A Raisin in the Sun (1961) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
74 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
An Underrated American Classic
snazel21 February 2002
Some stories leave you shattered. They speak to you on such a level and you identify with such intensity that by the end of the film, your nerves and emotion are raw.

Is Raisin in the Sun a play about racial prejudice? Yes indeed, an important one too. No story illustrates the ignorance of 'restricted neighborhoods' better. No film offers the ugliness of white arrogance and presumption, something that still lives and breathes in this country.

For me personally, this is also a movie about being a man.

This movie illustrates so well how men are composed. We honor the father, love the mother and protect the traditions that raised you. Mixed in with all of that and no less important, are our dreams and aspirations.

This movie teaches us, with immense power and clarity, that to be a man, to be a real man, you must never sell out your pride. Never. No matter how badly your dreams have been shattered, your pride and your manhood belong to no one. Simple, basic redemption lies within that truth.

It's an important lesson, a deep lesson, that men of today (including myself) need to remind themselves of from time to time. There is a pride within all men. It can be stubborn, it can be arrogant and it can be so full of dreams that it can lead to bitter heartbreak. But it is there, burning in all men and it's our most treasured asset.

I can't think of a contemporary play that illustrates more strongly, the struggle and rites of manhood in American culture today. How ironic and perhaps appropriate that the film is written by a woman. It is after all the women in this film who patiently wait for Walter to find himself. The love, faith and patience of the women in this film, illustrate the grace, power and importance women have in all our lives, regardless of our gender. A Raisin in the Sun, is a marvelous film and brilliant play. It is, from my perspective, an American classic and I believe one of the most underrated American plays of all time. I recommend it to any man that is struggling to find themselves or trying to recapture what is real and what is untouchable within our souls and within our dreams.
68 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amplified Tensions...
Xstal18 July 2020
An insurance payout amplifies the tensions in a small overcrowded apartment of a three generation family. The resulting misfortune and the prejudice suffered brings them closer. One of the best films ever made, one of the best stories ever told.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Incredible acting
HotToastyRag19 November 2017
When you rent A Raisin in the Sun, get ready for some seriously intense acting and a beautiful script. Usually, when a film is made of a play, one or two members of the Broadway cast are used, and the rest is filled with Hollywood names. In Daniel Petrie's adaptation of Lorraine Hansberry's play, almost everyone in the 1959 original Broadway cast reprised their roles on film. And, while Sidney Poitier and Claudia McNeil, as well as the direction and play itself, were nominated for Tonys, the film was universally ignored at the Oscars.

In a small apartment that doesn't even have a bathroom, there lives the widowed Claudia McNeil, her son Sidney Poitier, her daughter Diana Sands, and Sidney's wife Ruby Dee. They're all dissatisfied with their lives, but each family member deals with their disappointment and frustration in different ways. Sidney throws his heart into untrustworthy schemes, Diana is studying to become a doctor to better herself, Ruby keeps her head down as she tries to get through each day, and Claudia tries to continue mothering her grown children.

Unlike most plays, A Raisin in the Sun isn't overly wordy, and not a single moment is boring. It's terribly sad, but still a bit optimistic at times, and very thought-provoking. Perhaps my favorite element, besides the superbly heart-wrenching performances of Sidney and Claudia, is the character development in the script. Every single person in the story is three-dimensional, and no one is a villain or a saint. Audiences can understand their thought-processes and motivations, and it's nearly impossible to choose a favorite character. Depending on how well you handle sad stories, this might be a staple you add to your collection, or it might be a film you watch only once but remember forever.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must see movie
thowen198816 October 2006
"A Raisin in the Sun" is one of the finest American films ever made. This film discusses many vital issues, such as racism, abortion, trust, family values, greed, and even atheism.

My favorite character in this film is matriarch Lena Younger, impeccably performed by Claudia McNeil. Mrs. Younger is a wise, loving mother and grandmother to her family. While she may not always agree with her children's decisions, she never stops loving them.

Sidney Poitier is brilliant as the defeated Walter Lee Younger. Walter is frustrated with his job as a chauffeur, and believes he has more to offer the world.

Ruby Dee is great as Walter's supportive and level headed wife.

The dialogue and issues that are discussed reinstate the values upon which America was built. I strongly recommend this excellent film.
68 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Powerful performances
alicebonaise9 June 2001
"A Raisin in the Sun" presents powerful acting performances from Sidney Poitier, Ruby Dee, and Claudia MacNeil. I was deeply engaged throughout the film due to the fine presence of the characters and meaningful dialogue. The conversations between the members in the Younger family reveal not only their unique personalities and dreams, but also, the complex nature of their relationships and the deep personal issues within each of them. Someone once said, "pride is a dangerous thing" and this film beautifully illustrates the consequences of pride. In my opinion, this is one of Poitier's finest moments in film but, more importantly, I believe this story offers a lesson to all of us, regardless of race, about love and pride. It is truly a classic film.
27 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The cast was usually amazing, in this simple, but compelling story.
TOMNEL31 May 2008
The actors in this movie are great actors. That could be said for every one of them. They all knew exactly what to do with the script from their previous work on the stage play version. Unfortunately, when their face is blown up 10 times on the big screen, so are their actions, and some scenes, because of this, come off a little too over the top dramatic than they should be realistically. The story is a simple one, but actually pretty interesting, and most of the time this is entertaining to watch.

The Younger family has just lost a member. Lena "Momma" Younger's (Claudia McNeil) husband died, and because of this the government is giving the family 10,000 dollars. Momma wants to buy a house and move the family out of their tiny apartment into a nice white neighborhood. Walter (Sidney Potier) has the dream of taking the money to start a liquor store. Beneatha (Diana Sands) wants to go to college on this money. The family has problems, and though no real plot is apparent, the characters make the film.

The direction on this is great. The music only adds to it, and helps out greatly in scenes trying to be dramatic. The actors play the scenes off well usually, though as stated earlier, a few times they almost come off campy instead of serious and dramatic. Most of the time this wasn't the case though, and these actor's performances shouldn't be nitpicked like I'm doing, and most won't even notice the over the top goofiness. The writing is very good, and is straight out of the play. The entertainment value is high, though some scenes seem to drag, another better scene generally follows.

Overall, this is not a masterpiece. The play is good, the acting is great, the cheese level is fairly low, and Raisin has a true human touch to it that makes the audience feel for these poor characters, and it's a very hard trait to emulate.

My rating: *** out of ****. 120 mins. PG for violence.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very moving
Arcturus19808 July 2011
Sidney Poitier's A Raisin in the Sun exceeded my high hopes. Easily a 10/10 film, it is so very touching and uplifting with great characters and great performances. Humorous, too! This film delivers in a major way.

Ideally, a film should have something intelligent to say about life, about reality. A Raisin in the Sun is such a film and more. So, if the reality of human life in general interests you, consider yourself well-advised to watch this powerful film. I have little doubt that you will enjoy it.

It is, as of this posting, number 34 on my top 250.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best Black Cinema Ever
shadgurl7927 November 2005
My applause goes to director, Daniel Petrie, for a masterpiece movie that concentrated on one set of a black family's small apartment, in the projects of Chicago. This movie shows every hardship that black families went through in the fifties. A Raisin in the Sun movie is a remake of Lorraine Hansberry's classic stage play of how a black family tries to escape from their crowded apartment life to a house in an all white neighborhood. Sidney Politer delivered his usual outstanding performance in this film, which sends a message about the limited opportunities open to blacks in this time period. My favorite character was Mama, played by Claudia McNeil. She did an excellent job showing how the mother is always the backbone of black families through every trial and tribulation. I am not usually a fan of black and white movies, but this movie displayed a wonderful storyline for me to understand the struggle they went through. There was never a movie that I can think of that was this excellent with one set most of the movie and was in black and white. The part of the movie that meant a lot to me is how Mama took the money she received and did something with it that would benefit the whole family. Overall, each main character portrayed a strong black person. For example, Walter Lee realized that he is suppose to follow behind his father and be a strong black man and raise a family. Ruth always stood by her husband no matter his wrongs, Beneatha was a young black student going to college to be doctor and Mama was just their for any of her family member's and remain strong for everyone.
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great acting/actors, but....
dick_tater7 September 2018
...I found the acting to be somewhat "over-the-top". Also, the story could have been condensed a bit; it seems to go on too long for what was/is essentially a stage-play. The movie is over 2 hours in length. The story is quite good (but long) at telling what life was like in the 50's, for a well-educated black family, trying to make their life better.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A shining example of a good play turn into a great film.
ironhorse_iv16 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's rare to see a film version of a movie, be as good as the play version, but 1961's 'A Raisin in the Sun' does that. Based on the play made in 1959 by an African-American playwright and painter Lorraine Hansberry. Raisin in the Sun was the first drama written by a black woman to be produced on Broadway. Young Lorraine grew up in a Chicago's Woodlawn neighborhood and her own experiences lead to the play's story. She got the title of the play by finding it in a Langston Hughes's poem book 'Harlem' which is quotes in the poem 'A dream deferred'. The title, 'Raisin in the Sun' referred in the original poem about the hundreds of African American slaves that work in the hot sun in the cotton fields whom dream dry up like a raisin. In the play and the movie, its symbolism the frustration of blacks working trying to make a better life for themselves, but in the end, their dream are forgotten or put off due to the mixer of racism and classism. The movie story is about a working-class family called the Youngers. Living in a lousy apartment for decades, they want to and wish to leave the place behind. The central idea of the play is concerned with fighting off the myth of black contentment. It shows the stress of being in poverty when the large family is crammed into a small apartment. The plot get going when the family finds out that Lena AKA Mama (Claudia McNeil) got an insurance check for $10,000. Each members of the family find themselves having their own version of what to do with an insurance check. Walter Lee (Sidney Poitler) a poor chauffeur, dreams of making a fortune by investing the money in a liquor business against the wishes of both his wife and the mother. Sidney Poitler does a great job as Walter. It's one of his best roles in my opinion. You can see the want in his eyes. The pain, he goes through when it doesn't come his way. Powerful. Beneatha (Diana Sands), his flighty college student sister also wants the money so that she can be a doctor and live in Africa with one of her two boyfriends. One is a boy, George Murchison (Louis Gossett), a wealthy Negro concerned with appearances and material, while the second, Joseph Asagai (Ivan Dixon), is a native African that inspires her intellectually and spiritually. Great symbolism with Beneatha's hair in the film. When the movie begins, Beneatha has straightened hair. Midway through the play, after Asagai visits her and questions her hairstyle, she cuts her Caucasian-seeming hair for the new radical afro represents her embracing of her African heritage. Beneatha's cutting of her hair is a very powerful social statement in the 1960's, as she symbolically declares that natural black is beautiful and wouldn't conform to the style society dictates at the time. It's become a symbol of her anti-assimilationist beliefs. The film dealt with the talk about racism, not only with whites and blacks, but also black against black. One of the first major allusions to any sort of racism appears with the character of George Murchison. When the wealthy George enters the picture, the Younger family sees the differences in race and grouped him with snobbish white people. Mama dreams of buying a home in all-white neighborhood with her money, but fears that they would be faced with racist neighbors, and people trying to buy them out to prevent the neighborhood's integration. One such person trying to buy them out is Karl Aka Mark Linder (John Fielder) whom openly states the racism present in the neighborhood that Mama wants to live. While he at first sugarcoats his words, he tells the Youngers that they are not wanted in the neighborhood because they are Negroes. Mama's choice soon become troublesome, as one choice can lead them into deeply poverty or salvation. A Raisin in the Sun is essentially about dreams, as the main characters struggle to deal with the oppressive circumstances that rule their lives, both with happiness and depression. The movie follows a good amount of themes such as the need to fight racial discrimination in a powerfully demonstrates of the family strength. By having a strong family, it shows that the African American community, that the importance of family is key to success. One great thing about the movie is how little, they change from the play. Most of the movie takes place in the home. Was the bar scene really needed? Not really, the producers could had shown Walter's alcoholic nature, just with him coming home with a bottle, and we would get the same results. But by showing the audience how cramped the apartment is, we get how badly they are struggling. Plus, it's nice to see a movie with few cuts scenes. Director Daniel Petrie did a great job. I would had love to see more of Mama's plant. In the play, Mama's plant represents both Mama's care and her dream for her family. Still, the movie does a great job with dealing with other issues, such as abortion, greed, and the lack of religion. The movie follows the play very well. While, 2008's TV movie 'A Raisin in the Sun' does a good job as well. It's doesn't beat this movie by acting standards and scene delivery. While, one might label this as a 'black people' movie, I found its subject matter, universal. I think this film dealt with everything any common folk might have to deal with, and that's why I think the movie is so well-made.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Powerful and profound, but takes forever to make its point - overwrought and unnecessarily protracted
grantss18 November 2017
The Younger family are a working class black family with three generations, five people, living in a cramped apartment. However, it appears their fortunes are about to change as grandmother Younger is about to receive a large insurance payout. However, there is considerable disagreement within the household on how the money will be spent, resulting in friction within the Younger family.

Powerful and profound, but takes forever to make its point - overwrought and unnecessarily protracted. The ultimate theme is very admirable, and very necessary, especially in the 1960s. Well set up too, in getting to the punchline.

Too well set up. You have to wait for about 90 minutes for anything like a degree of focus or for a payoff for everything that came before. Until then the movie seemed to drift.

Worst of all, the dialogue is incredibly padded. The writer's reasoning seemed to be - why use 10 words when 100 will do? Every bit of dialogue is long-winded and feels like a speech, enough to make even Shakespeare seem succinct. So many times I caught myself thinking "Geez, just get to the point!".

Some brevity and this would have been a superb movie. Instead it is a bit of an ordeal, with a good payoff at the end.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Reaching into the deepest depths of one's soul to justify existing.
mark.waltz11 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard enough to make it in this world as a white man without money, let alone being a black man on the outside looking in. For the superb Sidney Poitier, he's imploding inside his insecurities of being a failure in the eyes of his family and be able to truthfully call himself a man. He's married to the hard working Ruby Dee who loves him with all her soul, but a distance she doesn't understand has grown between them. Poitiers's sister (the enigmatic Diana Sands) is also striving to better herself, attending medical school and trying to "express herself" with a variety of hobbies she dumps once bored with them. A slap across the face from family matriarch Claudia McNeil after taking the Lord's name in vain only briefly wakes her up. This is a black family in changing times losing their way, and it's up to the no-nonsense McNeil to bring them all back together.

Repeating her Broadway role and commanding every moment on screen, Claudia McNeil is award worthy as the heart and soul of her family. She loves her two children unconditionally but no longer understands them. That's why she has made Dee her confidante and training to take over as head of the family. A scene where she sentimentally talks about her dead husband reveals the truth inside the soul, admitting the man's imperfections, but loving him long after he's dead just the same.

The plot line surrounds the fight over an insurance check McNeil is waiting for, with Poitier spending somebody else's money even before they get it. Poitier wants to buy a liquor store, while McNeil wants to buy a house so the family (which includes Poitier and Dee's young son, Stephen Perry) can move out of the slums. But this creates many issues, not of which the least is the white neighbor's desperate attempts to prevent them f on moving in.

A timeless tale of how dreams exist in everybody's life, no matter the age, this has had two hit Broadway revivals since the beginning of the millennium, spawned an unofficial sequel ("Claybourne Park") and even been musicalized. It is a powerful character drama where a man is revealed to have not really grown up, the women who strive to help him even when it seems that he's beyond help. McNeil may not like what her children become, but her nurturing heart pulls the family together. A climactic breakdown in Poitiers's character may be the wake-up call he needs to become a real man, just like a wake-up call that sobers up a drunk. This is one of the all time classics and one that deserved more award attention in 1961 than it got.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Kinda like a rainbow after the rain..."
The_Movie_Cat17 April 2006
Yeah, there are some corny platitudes in this one, and it's a deliberately forced, theatrical melodrama. Not only that but you might be constantly distracted by Claudia McNeil's resemblance to the boxer James Toney.

However, the intentionally set-bound, stage-like work contains a mesmerising intensity throughout, an almost uncomfortable two hours of naked emotion on screen.

Cinematography and cast are both pretty much first-rate in a screenplay that seems to have one too many points to make, but manages to tie them all together by the film's end.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The $10000 Question
Lejink4 November 2022
I guess it's the fate of most cutting-edge social-commentary contemporary drama, be it in theatre or film, to become dated almost immediately after it appears. Although on rare occasions some can transcend their era, such as "To Kill A Mockingbird", they can often only be looked at today as snap-shots of society, the way it was or the way we were. The other things they can reflect are differences in style and representation. I have to say that for me, this in some ways admirable movie, fails both tests.

The story is simple - a poor black family comprising the almost stereotypical God-fearing matriarch, her ambitious, socially-aware young daughter and embittered 35-year-old son and his wearied wife and young son all live together in a cramped Chicago apartment. The father has just died and his life insurance cheque of $10000 is due to the mother the next day but what to do with it? She herself wants to buy a bigger house where they can all live, the son wants to go into business with two of his drinking pals and the younger daughter needs the money to go through medical school and qualify as a doctor.

As fate would have it, the son's wife has just learned she's pregnant and is considering having an abortion, while the daughter is being courted by two different black men, one a quiet, conventional college-type, the other an intellectual, self-aware Afro-American looking to convert her to radicalism. As they all in their own ways follow the money, disaster looms and just-under-the-surface family tensions are ignited raising the question as to whether the family will tear itself apart only for a bigger societal concern to make its ugly entrance and reunite the family at the movie's climax.

There's no question the film's heart is in the right place but quite apart from it never escaping its theatrical moorings, I didn't really connect with the issues of assimilation and identity as personified in the daughter figure and her choice between her very different suitors.

I also wasn't impressed by the boorishness and selfishness of the son, pleading and almost demanding his old mamma give up her new money to him while the figure of the censorious, Bible-punching old mother for me veered too close to Mammy-type caricature.

The plot skirts around other big subjects of family, birthright and abortion before arriving at the defining topic of discrimination which brings the family back together but on the whole I found the piece to be too driven by a series of unfortunate events and the conclusion rather pat and contrived.

As for the acting, I'm normally a fan of Sidney Poitier but found his work here to be too mannered, not to say physical. His conflict with Claudia McNeil whose sanctimonious bearing I found pretty wearing after a while, tended to dominate the action and both correspondingly act as if they're in competition with each other. This unfortunately doesn't leave much time or space for Ruby Dee as Poitier's rather downtrodden wife or Diana Sands as the impressionable daughter, to project their respective characters.

In the end I found the situations conveyed to be too artificially contrived, the dialogue too unnatural and the acting too overplayed to really move me the way great drama should.

And it's a pity that a work that turns into something of a crusade for racial equality should elsewhere resort to cheap, offensive and unnecessary homophobic name-calling directed at one of the minor characters.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the best films ever made
gtownes27 September 2003
I watch this film with my children, to show them that although there are no special effects, no explicit sex scences, and very little profane language this is a movie that GRABS you from beginning to end. It breaks beyond race and color, it is about HUMANITY. Sidney and Ruby are BRILLIANT in this film, but the accolades belong to the grandmother. She is the ROCK that holds everything together. I urge everyone to watch this movie. EVERYTIME I WATCH IT I CRY.
36 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Younger Family Of The South Side Of Chicago
bkoganbing25 July 2010
The tragically brief life of Lorraine Hansberry yielded a few literary gems among them A Raisin In The Sun, the first play on Broadway ever written by a black woman. Although Hansberry's childhood was a great deal more middle class than that of the Younger family who is the subject of the play, she captures the black urban experience of the civil rights era brilliantly. Some of the things written in A Raisin In The Sun were experienced by Hansberry personally, most particularly her own family's struggle to move into the white suburbs.

Columbia Pictures had the good sense to hire Lorraine Hansberry to write the screenplay and convert her play which all takes place in the Younger family apartment in the south side of Chicago for the screen. There are a few brief scenes added outside the apartment. But what really holds the interest is the dialog between the four main characters in the apartment. It's a lot like Eugene O'Neill's Long Day's Journey Into Night with souls laid bare. The apartment itself almost becomes a character, a home but also the symbol of a kind of prison the Youngers want to break out of.

The four main characters are Walter Younger, Jr., his wife Ruth, his sister Berneatha, and mother Lena, played by Sidney Poitier, Ruby Dee, Diana Sands, and Claudia McNeil respectively who all came over from Broadway. Through McNeil's performance particularly, but the others as well, the family patriarch Walter Younger also comes alive. What has happened is that he has recently died and the family is awaiting a $10,000.00 insurance check, courtesy of his years of service with the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, the first primarily black union to organize in the USA.

Poitier is working as a chauffeur, both Dee and McNeil work and have worked as domestics, Sands is a young college student with the ideas of her time, but she's also been spoiled a whole lot. Each has their own idea of what to do with the insurance money. The conflict and what eventually does happen divides and then unites the family in the end.

A Raisin In The Sun ran for 530 performances on Broadway during the 1959-60 season and earned a flock of Tony Award nominations including Best Actor for Poitier and Best Actress for McNeil. Coming out as it did during the Civil Rights era it was as timely a literary masterpiece as there ever was. When it concluded its Broadway run, film production with just about the entire cast from Broadway commenced.

A couple of other players who would make their marks later on were in A Raisin In The Sun. Lou Gossett, Jr. years before his Oscar plays a young and naive college kid who is interested in Sands. But she's far more interested in Ivan Dixon who is from Nigeria way before he joined the cast of Hogan's Heroes.

Though it is firmly set in the times it was written in, as drama A Raisin In The Sun is positively eternal. It's as flawless a transfer from stage to film as you'll ever see.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
well written and relevant to today...
MarieGabrielle18 August 2009
The American dream,and the loss of it, this film is relevant on many levels, dealing with financial strife,racism,dis-equity among working classes.It is more relevant even today, as people in America are seeing their houses devalued,loss of once stable jobs,and the struggle to endure.

Claudia McNair is simply superb as the grandmother, and glue which holds the family together. Sidney Poitier is Walter Lee, who is stocking all of his hopes in the 10,000.00 his mother is getting, from the deceased fathers life insurance policy.

Beneatha is the younger sister, attending premed in college with her own dreams and aspirations, which her mother and sister-in-law Ruth (superb performance by Ruby Dee), have difficulty understanding. A related scene when they burst out laughing as Beneatha takes up yet another hobby to express herself,the women's issues that were at the forefront during the 1950's and 1960's are evinced, as well as the racism issues,and unequal treatment.

An odious role with John Fiedler as a racist member of the Klyburn Park Homeowners Association,trying to pay off the family to not purchase a house in his neighborhood.

Overall excellent performance by Poitier as a young man trying to make his mark in a hostile society,this film is classic,must see.10/10.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb, Way ahead of its time
smakawhat22 May 2000
Brilliant performances all around. Amazing how far ahead this movie must have been in 1961. Watching it now it boggles my mind that these issues made it to cinema.

Poiter is GOD and has such a stage presence that it is no wonder he is such a gifted actor. Truly Brilliant film.

Rating 10 out of 10
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What happens to a dream deferred? Does it dry up, like a raisin in the sun?
JoeytheBrit31 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Lorraine Hansberry's screen adaptation of her own stage play is a powerful depiction of a black family's attempts to drag itself out of the ghetto with the aid of a $10,000 insurance pay-out following the death of the father. However, instead of providing the answer to their problems, it creates a new set that threatens to tear them apart.

Sidney Poitier got himself noticed with this flick, and it's not hard to see why. While it wasn't his breakthrough movie – he'd been around for years, and had co-starred with Curtis in The Defiant Ones a couple of years before – it was the film that led to him obtaining starring roles rather than supporting ones. He brings an exuberance to the screen here that few actors can match, and stalks the cramped set like a panther as he rages against his lot in life. His isn't a likable character, and yet it's a measure of Poitier's talent that, even though he tends to overact at times, he still manages to make the character a sympathetic one. Claudia McNeil, reprising her stage role, vies with Poitier for domination of the screen at times, but it is a contest that benefits the film rather than creating conflict, and both Ruby Dee as Poitier's long-suffering wife and the ill-fated Diana Sands as his feisty sister are overshadowed by the principle actors' performances.

Films like this require a level of compromise on the part of the viewer than doesn't come easy to me. While the film itself is undeniably powerful and the rare quality of the writing can't be faulted, the relentless emoting and dramatic expression of deceptively complex themes and ideas begin to wear one down after a while. By their very nature they can only fail to be representative of the people they depict because the ideas expressed are rarely more than passing observations to those who do not devote the deep thought to such matters that are necessary for the creation of such a literate piece of work. In fact, praise of the writing in a play/film like this is a double-edged sword when you think about it: the 'real' people represented by the Youngers may feel trapped in the same way as Hansberry's characters, but it's unlikely that they would be able to articulate their feelings in the way the Youngers do. In this sense then, such films are unrealistic, and too often the ultimate nobility of the characters – as witnessed in the concluding scenes in A Raisin In The Sun – fails to ring true. There are few people who would have not taken the white racist's money when faced with the hardship that the Youngers are about to endure, and it would be the easiest thing in the world for anyone to convincingly justify such an act. Perhaps that's simply a sign of the changing times, but something tells me otherwise, and for that reason, Walter's change of heart fails to convince. But then if he didn't have a change of heart, what kind of film – and message – would we be left with?
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great movie
marbleann5 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen this movie a bunch of times and every time I see it I pick up something new. This movie is really about the American Dream and how there are bumps in the road getting there. SOME SPOILERS AHEAD Sidney Portier is riveting as the neer do well son. Ruby Dee play his wife. One thing I did not notice before is that the son is 35 years old. I always thought he was younger. To me that changes his character and the way I look at him. He is way too old to act the way he did. And I believe his mother babied him too much and made excuses for him. I wonder if that is also a lesson to be had. He has a wife who works like a dog a young son and a kid on the way and he acts like a teenager. He and the mother made me angry this time around. Another thing is the Diana Sands character, she is delightful. I think she was right in being very angry with her brother, I wanted to kill him. I loved her independence. It is a shame Diana Sands died so young, what a great loss. It was very interesting to see the neighborhood welcoming idiot. I know this happens, but I feel it is less subtle in real life. The real estate companies do all the dirty work for the white neighbors by not even showing black people houses in the white neighborhoods. The revival of the Broadway play with P Diddy has John Fieldler in it too I believe. This is a great movie to be seen by all.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
important black cinema
SnoopyStyle17 May 2015
Walter Lee Younger (Sidney Poitier) is a chauffeur feeling under the thumb of the ladies in his life. His wife Ruth (Ruby Dee) is pregnant and considering an abortion. His mother and sister Beneatha are also living with them in their apartment in Chicago's south side. His father is recently deceased and his mama is expecting a large insurance cheque. Walter expects to use the money to buy a liquor store but his mother has other thoughts. His sister wants to pay for her education. She has a fight with mama over religion. She brings home Nigerian Asagai who introduces her to Nigerian culture. Her integrated boyfriend George Murchison (Louis Gossett Jr.) is dismissive of any old world culture. Mama buys a house in a white neighborhood to try to pull the family back together. Mark Lindner comes to offer to buy it back to avoid racial tension.

This is an important black play and an important black movie. There are a lot of family conflicts in this story. Some of it feels like piling on especially the abortion question. I would like a more simple argument about money. I am also not impressed with Sidney Poitier. He's being whiny. Maybe he is intended to be whiny but it would be better as frustrated anger. For me, the standout is Claudia McNeil playing the mother. She is both powerful and powerless over her children. She is playing on several different levels. The sister also feels whiny but she's younger and it fits more than her brother. There are some interesting work here and an important message in the end.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Rights of Dreams
higherall71 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
RAISIN IN THE SUN (1961), was like THE BEST YEARS OF OUR LIVES (1945) and CITIZEN KANE (1941). It was always on BILL KENNEDY AT THE MOVIES on Channel Nine here in Detroit. While my Father was putting down drop cloths and painting our rooms upstairs, I would skip downstairs in and out of the basement and catch snippets of it here and there between glasses of Kool-Aid and tuna fish sandwiches and playing Baseball. Of course it was considered a classic back then, and rightfully so. But being nothing but a kid back then, my idols were Jesse Owens and Willie Mays, and RAISIN IN THE SUN was too much Big Mama and indoorsy Drawing Room drama for somebody like me who simply wanted more Baseball.

As I grew older, I appreciated more what RAISIN IN THE SUN had to offer in illuminating the African American experience. Sort of in the same way I grew to appreciate MACBETH and HAMLET and JULIUS CEASAR, and stopped wondering why these dramas were on television so often. Forgive me if I still see RAISIN as essentially a woman's play, written masterfully by a woman with three of the strongest characters being women. Claudia McNeil as Lena Younger, is a paragon and archetype of feminine strength. She was a great actress, easily the equal of Ethel Barrymore or Margaret Rutherford, and her talent would have probably been more greatly appreciated in a wider diversity of roles. We knew Ruby Dee from her stint as Harriet Tubman on THE GREAT ADVENTURE; an American History Anthology TV series of the early 1960's, along with her husband Ossie Davis. She too was a great actress in films like NO WAY OUT (1950), where her husband Ossie Davis again starred with her alongside Sidney Poitier. I also remember her more vividly from THE JACKIE ROBINSON STORY, naturally because it was all about Baseball and a Black Man breaking into the Major Leagues. But hers was as distinguished a career as many actresses thanks to she and her husband's association with Spike Lee where they did some of their best work. I find it hard to imagine anyone playing Ruth Younger better than Ruby Dee. Finally, there is Diana Sands, who plays Beneatha Younger. She was an acclaimed Tony and Emmy nominated actress, noted for her work on stage and in film.

Now, I realize as I write this, we are talking about three Queens of Drama, as much as I was considering three Kings of Comedy when I did my review for HARLEM NIGHTS (1989). Naturally, posterity recognizes their work as the beleaguered women of the Younger Family. Claudia McNeil as Lena Younger, the matriarchal foundation of the family, upholding its time honored traditions and workable truths. Ruby Dee as Ruth Younger, feeling the walls closing in on her and simply wanting more room and sunlight than their cramped apartment on the south side of Chicago has to offer. Diana Sands as Beneatha Younger, an intelligent young woman determined to become a Doctor, who has her choice between two suitors, one whom she considers an imitation White Man and the other who fancies himself an African Prince destined to sweep her away across the ocean to the Motherland.

That's not to say that the men are any slouches in this drama. Sidney Poitier as Walter Lee Younger brings a catlike physical grace to the role that is a plus for this cinematic offspring of the play. This Chicago chauffeur with his dreams of running his own business has a visual dynamism that almost leaps out of the screen. Ivan Dixon as Joseph Asagi, is dignified and reserved as he offers his own oblique observations on how oppression and exploitation has arrested the development of this African American family. Louis Gossett Jr., as George Murchison plying also for the hand of Beneatha with Asagi, seems SHORT, and petty and mean, and you have to look close to see that he is actually taller than Sidney Poitier at 6 feet and four inches! Quite a feat for an actor. Joel Fluellen as Bobo also delivers as he poignantly conveys, along with Poitier, the anguish of Black Men attempting to make a mark for themselves in a world where all the rules are written by those who consider them nothing more than hired help.

I was fortunate enough to get a documentary record of RAISIN IN THE SUN when I was in my twenties. At that time, for the stage version that these records recorded, Ossie Davis played the lead role of Walter Lee Younger. I studied it the way you would study SPORTSMANLIKE DRIVING or the Bible. One thing I realized was that on the stage the human voice is the prime carrier wave of the emotional content of the drama, whereas in cinema it is physical motion. I can still hear Ossie Davis' voice thrilling and arousing the audience in that documentary record, just as I can vividly see Sidney Poitier spilling off the table in his living room, overcome with the intoxication of pride as he celebrates the greatest of the times.

Special notice should also go to John Fiedler as Mark Lindner, who bears the cross as the white token in a drama for once. Representing the Clybourne Park Improvement Association, he comes across convincingly as a nervous, frightened little man, who wants no trouble in his neighborhood, and timorously offers the Youngers a financial way out of his discomfort. You will remember him, perhaps, as just as effective and even brilliant in his turn as one of the jurors in TWELVE ANGRY MEN (1957).

There have been other film versions of this play, and you would probably do well to study them all for purposes of comparison and contrast. As for myself, I'll park this one as a keeper where Lorraine Hansberry has done the screenplay and provided the camera instructions for David Susskind. This is a worthy story of an African American Family making their Stride Toward Freedom and discovering what it means to be Young, Gifted and Black.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Powerhouse acting!
rat_20230 October 2017
I watched this today, and was so impressed I had to share my thoughts on it. Firstly, I love Poitier, and own many of his films from his incredible run of the 60's. He may have won the Oscar for Lilies of the Field, but I always thought he was better in quite a few other movies, and now this one joins them. In fact, I think in this film he was much, much better. And it's also interesting in that Walter Lee is a flawed character, in some ways. In some other movies Poitier's almost too perfect.

The supporting cast are incredible too. Claudia McNeil should have at least received a nomination for best supporting actress, And Ruby Dee... I can't get over how young and pretty she is, having only ever seen her playing mothers and grandmas up to now. Watching this, I kept thinking of another play turned movie, A Streetcar Named Desire. While Raisin is no Streetcar, it is a similarly powerful, moving piece of work and acting masterclass.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Way too slow
ThomasColquith8 February 2023
"A Raisin in the Sun" is the first Sidney Poitier film that I did not enjoy. All of the actors are unnatural and too melodramatic here. The dialogue feels too scripted and bombastic with conversations taking way too long to finish, I became frustrated and impatient by the end. The only sympathetic character is the mother. Everyone else is without moorings or scruples. A highly overrated film. I understand the playwright was trying to make bold and weighty points, but it just doesn't come across as real or vital as it should. It was a challenge to sit through it all, so I can only rate this film a 4/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed