Twenty Plus Two (1961) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
29 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Actors Make it Worth a Look
mackjay231 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
David Janssen was an actor who never seemed to be acting. He had a natural, guy-next-door style that works to make a viewer at ease with his characters. Thanks to Janssen's style, TWENTY PLUS TWO works pretty well. The plot of this near-noir is very convoluted, but the director keeps a steady pace and there is enough incidental interest to avoid confusion or boredom. When a Hollywood secretary is found murdered, Tom Alder (Janssen), a "finder of missing persons", is hired to investigate the murder, but quickly sees a link between the secretary and a the long-missing daughter of a wealthy family. Complications involve some colorful characters: Leroy Dane (Brad Dexter), a big movie star, Mrs Delaney (Agnes Moorehead) the missing girl's mother, Jacques Pleschette (Jacques Aubuchon) a shady figure who tries to hire Tom to find his missing brother. All these actors give top drawer performances, with Moorehead a standout for the way she takes complete control of her single scene with Janssen. Excellent too is Dina Merrill as Nikki (her Tokyo-set flashback with Janssen is quite impressive). Also fine in the cast are Jeanne Crain, Robert Strauss, and William Demarest, doing a convincing turn as a down-and-out drunken newspaper man.

The only real problem with this engaging film is Gerald Fried's score. It's basically good, and suited to the material, but the main theme, scored for big band, is too brassy and intrusive at too many points. Too much spoiler here must be avoided, but suffice it to say this film could almost be called a lesser VERTIGO, minus Hitchcock's touches of genius. It's unclear what the title refers to, but the story is engrossing enough. Watch this one for the main cast members.
32 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rather Like Being a Ghoul
davidcarniglia1 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Interesting late film noir, let down by some plot and casting flaws. David Janssen plays the quasi-detective character Tom Adler with an affected booziness; he's not imposing enough to make this Marlon Brando-mumbling-in-a-slick-suit thing work. I do like that his job is nebulous; he seems to have to explain himself repeatedly. It's as though, in true noir fashion, he's really not sure who or what he is.

As others have noted, Dina Merrill looks positively middle-aged when she's supposed to be just twenty in the Tokyo flashback. Thankfully, Agnes Moorehead, William Demarest, and Jacques Aubuchon inject Twenty Plus Two with enough life to sustain interest.

I like how the reviewer pierrotlunaire0 pointed out the plot holes. I can sort of see Tom falling for Linda all over again, especially as she keeps throwing herself at him. But it's just too convenient that she's also friends with Nikki, his other lost love. Since we never see the 'grown-up' picture that her mom shows him, we don't know that he then suspects that Nikki is Doris. At least that part of the mystery works well.

Then there's Brad Dexter's Leroy, who is the actual murderer, going free and easy because he framed Doris. The cabin-in-the-sticks denouement is stagey; but for all of its exposition, it still doesn't add up. How is it that Dane, of all people, doesn't recognize Doris/Nikki until she tells him who she is? Why did he have to kill his buddy anyway? Doris had fled, knowing she had shot Lane. She's still in hot water, and, given the mores of the times (in 1948, even in 1961), her pregnancy makes it worse for her.

Lane would have to fear repercussions from her wealthy family; but she'd probably be so relieved when she discovered that she hadn't killed anyone, that nothing more would happen. On the other hand, given that Dexter's character recreates himself as Lane, and became a celebrity, he should've at least been under suspicion as a rapist, if not a murderer.

Well, if we can squint our perception of the plot, there are those larger-than-life performances from the supporting cast to entertain us. The flashback sequence is masterfully set up by its ascending webs of smoke signalling Adler's reverie. Thanks to the black and white filming, we not so far from the smoky, boozy, hat-wearing late 40s noir golden age.

The editing is pretty good too; we're not allowed to get too comfortable before sweeping into another scene. The exceptions would be the interlude with Agnes Moorehead, which was so good it even made Jannsen look important, the cool 'interview' Tom has with the down-and-out bum in the bar, and the scene in the cabin, which dragged a bit. I'd have been happier with Doris and Tom's scene under the tree giving us a little more, and then letting the shoot-out happen quickly.

The music was irritating at times. Kind of like the nervous demeanor Janssen displays when he's not mumbling. Like others, I wonder what the title refers to. The better noir movies have abrupt, dangerous sounding titles that hint at what we're going to see. Other than a presumption that Doris is about twenty years old when she's in Tokyo, there's no twenty, or two, or twenty-two of anything here.

Still, a fun movie, with a good premise and some fine scenes. 7/10.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Worth a look, just to see Jeanne Crain in one of the tightest black dresses ever made
scsu197520 November 2022
Confusing but entertaining yarn with David Janssen trying to solve the case of a young girl who went missing years before.

Brad Dexter plays a movie star who, as usual, gives off enough vibes to make you suspect he's a rat. His secretary is bumped off, and since she seemed to have an interest in the missing person's case, enter Janssen. Jeanne Crain plays Janssen's old flame. Dina Merrill plays Crain's friend, who ultimately becomes an important part of the case. Everything gets wrapped up in the final ten minutes or so, but it's a bit of a mess getting to that point.

There is some good work by others, including William Demarest as a drunken former reporter who had written about the case, and Jacques Aubuchon, as a mysterious guy who wants Janssen to find his missing brother. It was a little odd seeing Aubuchon in a suit, since I was used to him walking around in native garb as Chief Urulu in "McHale's Navy." Silent screen star Gertrude Astor plays a dead body.

Worth a look, just to see Jeanne Crain in one of the tightest black dresses ever made.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Actors
drednm27 July 2017
This disjointed film noir is hobbled by a rambling narrative that spends too much time on a flashback and then devolves into a silly ending in North Dakota (with some hideous rear projection).

David Janssen stars as a finder of missing persons, especially heirs. He gets involved in a decade-old mystery in which a movie star vanished. Seems her rich daddy paid lots of hush money and she's long forgotten until her name comes up again after a woman is murdered.

Somehow, the case seems to involve a famous movie actor who seems to show up in odd places. Then there's an erudite fat man following him as well as an ex-wife who suddenly pops up.

Janssen gets hooked after visiting a a boozy ex-reporter who lets slips a few juicy details about the dead movie star. After a visit to her mother, he's on the trail that takes him, ultimately, to a shack in North Dakota.

The mystery isn't much and is given away in the flashback, after which the viewer just waits it out. But there are several excellent performances in this film. Janssen is solid. Jeanne Crain is wasted as the ex-wife. Dina Merrill is surprisingly good as Nikki. William Demarest is excellent as the boozy reporter as is Agnes Moorehead as the flinty mother. Jacques Aubuchon is also very good as the fat man, and Will Wright has a nice bit as the records keeper. Robert Strauss is good as Janssen's pal. That's TCM host Robert Osborne as the sailor with dance tickets. Brad Dexter is badly cast as the movie actor.

Certainy worth a look for some great acting and Gerald Fried's driving jazz score.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Nice Neat Job
bluerider52126 August 2013
A lawyer begins a search for a woman who went missing as a teen ten years before. He is also forced at gunpoint to take on a search for the missing brother of "the king of the confidence men." He interviews colorful characters, knocks on doors, has flashbacks to his own life, and it all comes together at the end.

The plot is intriguing. It is complicated enough to demand your full attention, but not so complicated to be hard to follow. The jazz score has been done many times before and since. It goes well with the movie, but it is inappropriately intrusive here and there.

All in all, a nice, neat job. My one complaint is that costar, Jeanne Crain, has little to do here. The costar should have been Dina Merril. I am not so much concerned about billing, I am just a devoted fan of Jeanne Crain
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
All in all it is a decent mystery/drama
Ed-Shullivan12 July 2018
This certainly should not be classified as a real "thriller" but, as a mystery film it was a decent watch. I was intrigued to hear the story behind special investigator Tom Adler's (David Janssen) American born geisha girl Nicki Kovacs (Dina Merrill). The story has flashback scenes to when Tom Adler was a lieutenant stationed in Japan when he meets Nicki Kovacs at a Japanese nightclub.. Nicki is one of the private dancers/geisha girls at the nightclub who provides the sombre looking Tom with an ear to listen to his woes, and a couch to sleep on overnight. By morning Tom has fallen in love with the mysterious Nicki but he loses touch with his war time crush and over the following decades he cannot get her beautiful mysterious face out of his dreams and thoughts.

Do not expect any James Bond or Mike Hammer physical action scenes as David Janssen is not your action Jackson type of detective. No, Tom Adler is more a wussy heartbroken type of detective who is good at his job at finding missing persons to which his firm gets a handsome reward for finding long lost loved ones. In this film, ironically enough Tom Adler is having a difficult time finding his own long lost love, his American born geisha girl Nicki Kovacs.

No spoiler here. Suffice to say that Twenty Plus Two is a decent mystery film with a decent ending to which I give the film a decent 6 out of 10 rating.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
has twists and turns, but also some plot holes...
ksf-23 December 2020
It's a mostly intriguing story... a young girl had gone missing years ago. now, when a woman is murdered, people start looking into the missing girl again, for various reasons. David Janssen (two years before his very successful series The Fugitive) is an investigator, and bits of his own past start coming out. some twists and surprises along the way. but also some pretty big plot holes that really should have been ironed out. pretty weak script. the acting is fine, but just some sloppy directing and creaky screenplay. some fun co-stars here.. Agnes Moorehead was so good in Dark Passage and the many projects with orson wells. Bill Demarest was in so many old films and My Three Sons... both actors getting up there by now. Demarest's character was so old, wrinkled, and ornery, I didn't recognize him when I saw him in the bar scene. Dina Merrill, who I knew from Desk Set. 20 + 2 directed by Joe Newman. never did anything too big. written by Frank Gruber; wrote lots of westerns and murder stories. and has an interesting quote that there are really only seven basic westerns. check it out on his imdb page. the film is very watchable, but has its flaws. Janssen died at 48... heart attack, according to wikipedia dot org. check it out... some huge names at his funeral. we should all be so lucky.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Call Overactors Anonymous !
montgomerysue15 December 2023
The producers were able to assemble a usually fine cast for this mystery movie, but the problem is, they all really ham it up so much that it almost becomes laughable. The worst hams are Jeanne Crain, Agnes Moorehead, and William Demarast, but Janssen does his share of chewing up the scenery, too. The mysterious plot is somewhat interesting but another problem is that the script just calls for these hams to stand, sit, or sometimes even lay around talking, talking, and talking even more. There is very little action here, just a bunch of verbalization that sometimes goes on and on. After seeing the scene when Janssen visits Moorehead, who is over the top with her hamminess, I concluded that the producers of TV's "Bewitched" must have seen it and said - oh yeah, we just found our outrageous Endora.

I still give this six stars, only because it is interesting to watch - and you really can't turn it off, waiting to see just which of these usually good actors it going to out ham the other ones !
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An epic mess
michaelg-784-60319412 July 2018
This is not the worst film I have seen, but it is among the most incoherent. My two stars are for splendid over-the-top cameos by the great William Demarest and the great Agnes Moorehead and a valiant try by Jacques Aubuchon. What are we supposed to make of an allegedly crack investigator who relies entirely on research by others and wildly improbable coincidences? What are we to make of the Jeanne Crain character whose only role is to look lovely, introduce the "hero" to another woman, reunite passionately with said "hero," and then vanish without trace? What above all are we to make of our hero's deep love for the Dina Merrill character when he fails to recognize her when sitting next to her and talking to her on a long plane flight? The story is ludicrous, the lovely Dina Merrill is seriously miscast, most of the male actors are stiffs, the denouement is absurd, and none of this farrago makes any sense at all.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid and suspenseful
xWRL4 December 2023
Not everyone liked this film as much as I did, and maybe some were better at second-guessing the ending than I was. I thought the plot was artfully constructed, with the realization of the ending dawning on us gradually, step by step. I didn't detect any false clues, just clues that became more and more revealing as the story went on.

David Janssen and Jeanne Crain put in fine performances, and most of the minor characters did well, too. Agnes Moorehead, who usually has enough presence to fill any role, was not convincing as a Park Avenue blueblood. Her lines didn't help, but it just seemed like she didn't have her heart in the role.

Overall, the writing was good, as was the staging. Unlike some reviewers who found that this seemed more like something written TV, I thought it was well put together.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Need to be a Weightlifter to Suspend your Disbelief over these plot holes
pierrotlunaire016 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Watching this movie was an easy way to spend a lazy afternoon, but the moment I thought about the plot, it fell apart.

Spoiler #1: David Janssen meets Dina Merrill, and apart from asking, "Haven't we met before?", accepts her word that they have never met. Until a good half hour deeper into the movie, and he suddenly remembers they had a passionate (albeit brief) affair years ago. Why doesn't he remember her? Well, back then she was a brunette, and now she's a blond. Oookay.

Spoiler #2: The con man character wants to hire David Janssen to find his long lost criminal brother. Dina Merrill was raped by the same criminal brother. Turns out that the criminal brother is now a top movie star. And nobody recognized him? Save your money, con man, and go to the movies once in a while. The criminal brother/now movie star is presented as a huge star, such that when he walks through a hotel lobby, excited teen fans mob him. Oookay.

Spoiler #3: Jeanne Crain is supposed to be the woman who broke David Janssen's heart, the woman who sent him a Dear John letter that sent him into a tailspin. They reconnect at the beginning of this movie, and in spite of the pain she caused him, David Janssen can't resist her. Except, once he finally recognizes Dina Merrill, it is as if Jeanne Crain never existed. Oookay.

Odd little movie, with the music score at times blaring as if it were having convulsions.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Complicated story with strong lead actor
MissClassicTV28 October 2015
"Twenty Plus Two" is a stylish, ambitious movie with a great look. It's a shame that it's filmed after the height of film noir, but it still has a few great scenes that are noir-ish, and plenty of night scenes in general. The movie starts off in Hollywood 1961 and follows Tom Alder (actor David Janssen) from coast to coast as he figures out a murder mystery and finds a missing person, all the while dealing with a LOT of different characters. I thought it was really well made.

The main problem with "Twenty Plus Two" is the casting of Dina Merrill as the female lead. Her character is about 30 years old at the time of the movie, and in flashback scenes, she's about 20. Merrill was 37 when she made this movie and she looked older. She was hardly believable as a 30-year-old woman, and definitely not as a young 20-year-old. She was badly miscast and it affected the movie.

Jeanne Crain fares better as a sort of "girl next door" but fifteen years down the line. She plays Linda, who was engaged to Tom before he was sent to Korea, but married someone else while he was away. Now, 11 years after they last saw one another, she wants him back, but he doesn't want her, and she spends half the movie chasing him. She and Janssen are kind of funny in their scenes together.

Agnes Moorehead as the missing girl's mother was superb in her scene with David Janssen. It's a long, pivotal scene. I give credit to both actors as their give-and-take was spot on. There's a lot of dialogue in this movie and these two could really deliver lines.

The most stylistic and atmospheric scene in the entire movie is a shot of Tom sitting alone in his hotel room, thinking about the past, smoking, and the camera follows the smoke as it rises to the ceiling. It is fantastic.

David Janssen is very, very good in this movie. He's cool, and the film's black and white visuals and jazzy score help to underline this. He should have become a major feature film star. As it was, he became a major TV star, and deservedly so.
28 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Waste of Time
helenekorbakis14 November 2020
This film is not what I expected, I sat through it, because I always liked Dina Merrill, but David Janssen comes across as too laid back in his role, as if he's just half-interested..and the story itself doesn't stir any great emotions in me, I honestly didn't care enough for the plot to like how it ends..
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
unreal
SnoopyStyle1 October 2020
In Hollywood, Julia Joliet is murdered. She's a small time secretary answering fan mail for a movie star. What catches the attention of private investigator Tom Alder is that she has collected clippings from the Doris Delaney case. Delaney was a missing heiress and her parents spared no expense to find her with no success. Alder decides to follow the clue.

I generally like the hard-boiled detective style and this has an intriguing start. I don't particularly like his meandering investigation. It seems a little slow and I'm never sure about his moves. Then it loses me in a flashback. The problem is that the flashback happens without much context since the audience isn't shown the old photographs. She's also a little older than I expect. The case is over a decade old but it may need to double that. It is also very coincidental. It's unlikely that he would be investigating the case without any pictures at the start. The whole thing is a house of cards built on a knife's edge.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why the film is called "Twenty Plus Two"
Cheyenne-Bodie12 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Frank Gruber wrote and produced "Twenty Plus Two", which was released in 1961.

Gruber also wrote a novel version of the film that was published the same year.

The novel was set in 1960.

The central mystery of the novel involved the disappearance of 16-year old Doris Delaney in 1938.

Wealthy young Doris vanished without a trace "twenty plus two" years ago.

If Doris is still alive she would be 38 years old in 1960.

Forty-one year old Tom Alder is an investigator who follows the case as sort of a hobby. Or is it an obsession?

Alder was an infantry captain who was severely wounded in World War II.

While Alder was recuperating from his injuries in Honolulu in 1944, he meets a prostitute who may be key to unraveling the Doris Delaney mystery.

David Janssen ("Richard Diamond") was cast as investigator Tom Alder.

Janssen was born in March 1931.

He would have been 29 in 1960. He wasn't old enough to have served in World War II.

Gruber changed the movie so that Alder was a veteran of Korea rather than WW II.

In the film Alder recuperated in Tokyo rather than Honolulu.

Doris now disappeared in 1947, not 1938. That would make Doris 29 in 1960, if she is alive.

The changes weren't really necessary.

Janssen was a mature looking guy who could have passed for older. In 1962 he convincingly played a troubled World War II veteran in an episode of "Route 66".

Jeanne Crain, Dina Merrill, Agnes Moorehead, and Brad Dexter were all close to the 1960 ages of their characters in the novel.

Frank Gruber was a veteran pulp fiction writer who wrote hundreds of western and detective stories. He even wrote for "Black Mask". At one time he was writing four novels a year. He is credited with 60 novels. Gruber was a creator of "Tales of Wells Fargo" with Dale Robertson, "Shotgun Slade" with Scott Brady, and "The Texan" with Rory Calhoun.

Maybe Dale Robertson would have made a better Tom Alder than Janssen. Robertson was 38 in 1960 and he was an officer during World War II who was wounded in action. Scott Brady or Rory Calhoun could have been intriguing as movie star Leroy Dane.

The last scene should have shown Alder reuniting Doris with her mother after 22 years. That would have given the film an ending with a real emotional punch. And you would have had to wonder whether Tom and the already married Doris stayed together.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ecruciatingly dull
mls41824 October 2020
By the time the convoluted plot is revealed, you just don't care. A waste of Janssen and Moorehead and an insult to Jeanne Crain. The only cast member to luck out was the talentless Dina Merrill who was 15 years too old for her part.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Incredibly complicated....but worth seeing.
planktonrules16 September 2021
"Twenty Plus Two" is an unusual film in that I re-started it about 20 minutes into the story. This is because although I was watching, I was distracted by other things....and this is NOT a film to watch when there are any distractions! It's complicated...and still worth seeing.

David Janssen plays Tom Alder, a man much like his TV character Richard Diamond, the detective. But Alder is not quite as smooth and isn't quite as irresistible to the ladies...though two women in the film clearly adore him.

Alder makes his living finding lost people. One old case that has been unsolved for well over a decade involved a rich young lady who just disappeared. The film shows the steps Alder takes to eventually find this woman and solve the mystery of her disappearance.

While I'd quickly admit that Janssen's acting is sometimes a bit wooden, I like him in his various shows and movies. He's quite good here and the story is good but almost needs a map to help you keep up with all the twists and turns. My only complaint, and it's minor, is that too many things seem coincidental...but this is a small matter. Well worth seeing.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
David Janssen and Agnes Moorehead
marthawilcox18313 July 2014
This poor excuse for a movie only has one line in the whole film that has any sparkle. It was when the woman says to David Janssen that he wouldn't make the first move. You can imply from this that he would fancy a woman, but not chat her up, especially if she is giving him any signals to offer friendship. Instead, he is quite prepared to spend $100 on a call girl just to talk to him. The one scene with Agnes Moorehead lifts the film in terms of performance, but it doesn't make it a good film. It comes nowhere near the quality of any Moorehead projects like 'Black Jack' or 'The Invaders' from season two of 'The Twilight Zone'. In short, stay away from this poorly made film because it's not a movie. I don't know what it is.
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A real deceit
searchanddestroy-14 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I must admit that I expected more from the Joseph Newman's last picture. I thought that it was an authentic film noir, not necessarily with plenty of action, but intriguing, breathless, well done; with a plot not tepid as the one in this feature.

The story of a private eye - Janssen - who investigates on a murder and meets a bunch of protagonists; as usual in this kind of production. An unbelievable tale, and complicated at the most. But the music score, jazzy, is adequate as the surroundings. I think it's the only positive point of view about this movie.

David Janssen is also rather good in his character, as Brad Dexter, Agnes Moorehead and Jeanne Crain.

In short, it's not a corny picture, but if you miss it, I think you'll be able to live without it.
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Twenty-Two Skadoo
ToryCorner18 October 2020
I always find David Janssen interesting to watch, even when he's delivering lines in an annoying hesitance only suited to his Richard Kimble on-the-run in The Fugitive (1963). But poor David can't save this mess. Granted, it predates made-for-TV movies but it has all the earmarks of one in its threadbare budget and trying to pass off the San Fernando Valley as one of the Dakotas!

Jacques Aubuchon is on hand to make sure this doesn't get elevated above television quality. Dina Merrill is lovely but too old for the part and lacking the real acting chops required for the role. Jeanne Crain has no chemistry with Janssen and she continues to cause wonderment as to why she ever had a career (like Joanne Dru, with whom she is interchangeable, her looks aren't quite movie-star enough and her acting talent is quite lacking).

As muddled as the story is, without a satisfactory denouement, the most puzzling thing is the movie's title. It's all based on producer/screenwriter Frank Gruber's novel of the same name (they even make sure to add that credit directly under the main title). But as has been explained in another review, because Janssen was younger than the novel's hero, the storyline shifted his background from a WWII vet to a Korean War vet. In doing so, it lost the relevance of the title, that referred to a crime which took place in 1938 and was resolved twenty-two years later in 1960. Why no production meeting was ever held to rename the movie while keeping the based on credit with the novel's title is totally incomprehensible.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The girl with everything to live for
kapelusznik183 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS**** Privite investigator Tom Adler, David Janssen,who specializes in finding dead person's family members is put to the test here when the secretary to action adventure actor Leroy Dane, Brad Dexter,Julia Joliet played by Gretrude Astor,is found murdered in his office with a scrap book filled with newspapers articles and clippings of Doris Delaney. Doris has gone missing 12 years ago after she found out that she's been put into the family way by a handsome tall & dark stranger who picked her up at the Brown Durby after treating her to a strawberry milkshake. Adler for some reason gets himself involved not in the murdered Julia Joliet's long lost relatives but in the missing and now pronounced dead-by the courts-Doris Delaney. As it soon becomes apparent Adler is or was somehow involved with Doris through his former girlfriend Linda Forster, Jeanne Crain,who he met at a bar a few days later.

With all the confusion about this strange as well as mysterious case were then brought back 10 year earlier in 1951 at a ten cents a dance in Tokyo Japan when Alder, just out of the hospital suffering from combat wounds,meets this hot American chick Nicki, Dina Merrill,that he takes for a spin and soon , within 24 hours, falls madly in love with her. What all this has to do with the story is later explained in that Nicki is somehow connected with the missing and presumed dead Doris Delaney!

****SPOILERS**** The film tries to tie all its loose ends together in Doris' disappearance and Alder discovering that he in fact had a close relationship with her without even knowing about it! But it's what turned out to be actor Leroy Dane brother Jacques Plechette, Jacques Aubuchon, who fills in all the info blanks or about this very bazaar and off the wall mystery. Far too long complicated and confusing to go into detail the the final outcome in all this has to do with who knocked up Doris back in 1948 when she was a teenager and set all this into motion. With Aubuchon while not too successful in trying to explain to both Alder and the audience what the heck is going on here he ends up shooting the man responsible for all this In self defense of course to finally put an end to all this craziness.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This thinly veiled drawn-from-current-events biographical picture . . .
oscaralbert14 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
. . . details the sordid Real Life back story of a then contemporary notable (and grossly over-rated) Tinsel Town blowhard, Marion Mitchell "Duke-the-family-mutt" Morrison. Mr. Dexter's spot-on performance nails the role of embodying this self-styled Duke (whose stage moniker here--"Dane"--rhymes with loser Morrison's screen alias surname), as a bloated buffoon who claims that he sometimes salutes himself since he specializes in pretending to be such a wide variety of bogus warriors from every conceivable branch of the military services on the Big Screen. Like the rest of Hollywood Village, the makers of TWENTY PLUS TWO knew this deviant Duke to be a notorious panderer in Real Life, making drunken forays into Mexico to marry street-walkers, riding Hogs up and down L.A.'s boulevards with henchman War Bonds clubbing out the teeth of any Gay-looking pedestrians and ratting out the fellow Socialist buddies, cronies and friends of his Youth to Witch Hunters to save his own skin. As ACTUAL war hero "Tom" growls to fake soldier Dane, "You've got a yellow streak down your back a foot wide!"
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Memory lapse
MikeMagi26 September 2013
Even in film noir...especially in film noir...the characters and their relationships have to make some sort of twisted sense. So what do you do when your hero, an investigator who searches for missing heirs, meets a beautiful woman and doesn't recall that they were lovers a few years before? Just because she changed her name and her hairdo. You figure it's about as logical as his investigation into the brutal murder of a fan club secretary for which no one seems to have hired him. There are some nice touches in the film -- William Demarest is terrific as a boozy newspaperman, Agenes Moorehead nails a salty old dowager and Jacques Aubachon makes an elegantly talkative con artist. On the other hand, Janet Leigh is mostly window dressing and David Janssen spends too much of the movie muttering moodily.
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
20 plus 2
mossgrymk25 October 2020
Wonder how many theatre goers in '61 had the same reaction I did while watching this overly scored, poorly written private eye flic? Namely, "Why would I pay to watch this when I can get it better for free by turning on 'Peter Gunn' or even ol twitchy himself on 'Richard Diamond'?" Give it a C.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Talky PI film
jameselliot-12 October 2021
By 1961, 77 Sunsey Strip and other cop shows were surpassing and muscling aside weak entries like this. Shot on cheap sets, Twenty Plus Two is not a neo-noir or a tough private eye tale. Even in the 40s and 50s, directors would shoot the main characters on crowded urban streets, for example Undertow with Scott Brady or DOA with king of noir Edmond O'Brien. These scenes are also great time capsules of street life in the past. Twenty Plus Two could have used material like this to liven up the dull story. Crain and Merrill look pretty sexy as some compensation even with their bitchy personalities. David Janssen is always good but plays his usual sullen, silent character he honed to perfection later as Richard Kimble.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed