Nuts and Volts (1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
automatizing things step by step
lee_eisenberg8 December 2007
As Sylvester's career was winding down, he starred in "Nuts and Volts", in which he uses a robot to try and catch Speedy Gonzales. The robot has no more luck than he has! Is this Sylvester's eternal doom?! One thing that I notice is that the robot looks a little bit like Rosie on "The Jetsons". I guess that in the early '60s, many American families dreamed about having technology do everything for us. Unfortunately, relying too much on machines distances us from the natural world (and there's always the risk that the machines could take over; or at least become more human than us, as happens in Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey").

I'm probably reading too far into this cartoon. It was probably intended as entertainment, and it entertains. I just like to analyze things as much as possible. Worth seeing.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you can imagine Sylvester and Speedy . . .
oscaralbert12 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
. . . respectively cast to play Wile E. Coyote and The Roadrunner in a Looney Tune, you'll have some idea of how bankrupt Warner Bros.' animation idea vault had become when the studio brass finally decided to take this shadow of its former self off life support. It's as if the Termites had riddled the Looney Tooners' Terrace like Swiss cheese, and Tweetie Bird had left the Coal Mine when it collapsed because all the support pillars had been removed. Sylvester spends most of NUTS AND VOLTS as a spectator, watching one of Mr. Coyote's Acme Corp. robot rejects misfiring while Mr. Cat sits in a chair, eyes glued to a viewing screen shaped like a 1960s-Era television display. As if this isn't boring enough, Warner's geriatric animators desperately grasp for a "groovy" vibe by assaulting our vision with an arty array of Hippy Dippy pastels not found in Nature. A cartoon such as NUTS AND VOLTS is even more cringe-inducing than seeing John Wayne waddling through his GREEN BERET movie set, since there's no physical excuse for NOT having Bugs, Elmer, Daffy, and Porky back as their old selves. Yet the worst of Looney Tunes--such as BUNNY AND CLAUDE--was still to come. To quote Col. Kurtz: "Oh, the Horror, the Horror!"
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Automation Sylvester
TheLittleSongbird6 February 2018
Love animation, it was a big part of my life as a child, particularly Disney, Looney Tunes and Tom and Jerry, and still love it whether it's film, television or cartoons.

Speedy Gonzales is not a favourite character of mine and his cartoons overall are very variable (the worst cartoons being the worst of his outings with Daffy Duck and 'Mexican Cat Dance'). Am a fan though of Sylvester, regardless of any character he was paired with he was always the funnier and more interesting while also being one to root for. Generally, their outings are better than Speedy's with Daffy though some are better than others, and their pairing makes much more sense and isn't too much of a mismatch. This is evident here.

Very like as was said for 'Pancho's Hideway', 'Nuts and Volts' is generally one of the better Looney Tunes cartoons to appear in a patchy decade and during a severe declining period that got worse 1965 onwards. There are serious issues still here in 'Nuts and Volts', though fewer than many of the cartoons from 1965 onwards (namely the worst of the Daffy/Speedy series and that for Roadrunner/Wile E. Coyote) certainly and all done far worse in those cartoons. There are also things that are done well.

Budget and time constraints, with the budget being lower, resources being fewer and time constraints tighter, show in the animation. This aspect is very limited, apart from some good flow in how the characters move, especially in the scrappy and incomplete-looking backgrounds. The story is basic and obvious, not an awful lot to it and the predictability factor is high.

Know that comparing Bill Lava unfavourably to Carl Stalling and Milt Franklyn is unfair, but it is difficult not to when the quality difference is so big. Lava did worse later, but the score is not an appealing one in sound, lacks energy and doesn't fit very well with the action.

However, Speedy is not too annoying thankfully and his chemistry with Sylvester is fun. Sylvester as was predicted is the funnier and more interesting character of the two by quite some way, he's cunning, provides the laughs more than naturally and is easy to root for. The robot adds a good deal too, and its inclusion does give the cartoon more of a freshness than is typically found and makes it stand out a little more.

The dialogue is not particularly fresh but it is quite sharp-witted and amusing and there is a crisp pace throughout. The gags are nothing innovative but raised still a number of smiles and laughs. The ending is a highlight.

Mel Blanc's vocals as expected are very exuberant and full of vigour, few actors have voiced multiple characters in one cartoon alone and give all of them a different identity with such conviction.

Overall, pretty good for past prime Looney Tunes. 7/10 Bethany Cox
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Speedy vs. Sylvester and a robot!
Tweekums3 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
After chasing Speedy till he is exhausted once again Sylvester looks ready to give up, and then an advert for ACME Automatons drops through the letter box... Sylvester quickly decides to get one; after all with a robot to do the work he won't get hurt all the time... at least that is what he thinks! The robot has as much luck as Sylvester; crashing into walls, crashing into Sylvester and finally being blown up when Sylvester decides to dynamite Speedy. Eventually he realises that the robot is no use so disposes of it and returns to his old techniques... only to discover that Speedy has a robot of his own!

This was a fun short shown mostly from the point of view of Sylvester rather than Speedy as was usually the case. The gags with the robot might have been expected but they were still pretty funny. The robot's very primitive appearance is in itself funny; especially when compared to the device Speedy uses at the end! On the downside it is just Speedy and Sylvester in the house; we don't see any of the other mice so there is nobody to tell us that 'Speedy Gonzales is the fastest mouse in Mexico' or that 'Speedy likes everybody's sister'!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nothing can catch the fastest mouse in all Mexico!
llltdesq17 August 2002
This is one of the better later shorts from the DePatie-Freleng years. Sylvester goes high tech in his attempts to catch Speedy with no more success than he had chasing Tweety for so many years. Sylvester's not a terribly skilled predator or so it appears here. Fun, entertaining short with mediocre musical score, but worth watching. Recommended.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"How do you like this? The pussycat got brains!"
slymusic17 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
"Nuts and Volts" is a very good Speedy Gonzales/Sylvester cartoon written by John Dunn and directed by Friz Freleng. Sly decides to construct a robot to do all the dirty work for him in capturing that pesky mouse. Great idea, Sly! It's the sixties! Why not?

Two highlights: First, when Speedy activates an electric eye, Sly springs out of a control hatch and crashes headfirst into a wall. And second, as Sly watches his control panel screen to check his robot's progress, Speedy runs into camera range and says hello to Sly, then quickly slips away as the robot charges toward the camera and CRASH!

I don't ever remember seeing "Nuts and Volts" as a kid, but I'm sure glad I've got it on disc! It's on the Looney Tunes Golden Collection Volume 4 Disc 3, with an all-too-casual audio commentary by animator Art Leonardi and cartoon historian Jerry Beck.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed