A Thousand Clowns (1965) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
82 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
I Tried to be Murray Burns, but I Did Snap Out of it!
givnaw10 October 2002
I first saw it years ago as an idealistic college student who did not want to become one of the great gray working millions, saddled with a job I didn't like, a huge mortgage, etc.. At that time, I fell in love with the movie and the characters. That's the problem. The movie cast a spell over me and sprinkled some weird kind of fairy dust over me. I wanted to be Murray Burns: a nonconformist, a smart ass, a non-contributor, a guy who ALWAYS did ONLY what HE ALONE wanted to do. And so, for a few years, that's what I did.

Those years, I must admit, were not very happy ones for me. Self-indulgence is a dead-end. I needed to be working hard, towards a goal, with a family, for me to feel truly fulfilled. And I think that is the case with most of us.

Murray Burns and his world are totally unrealistic AND unhealthy. Do not try to emulate him. It is a trap and a prison. It's like smoking dope all the time: you lose your drive and you increase your cynicism.

But perhaps I'm being too serious. Murray does have the kid, and he seems to fall in love at the end, so maybe there is hope for him. The movie has some great lines and funny characters. The black and white scenes of NYNY in the 1960's are wonderful, Martin Balsam as Murray's brother is one of our greatest actors, Barbara Harris is great, William Daniels is great, Barry Gordon as Rafael Sabattini, etc., is great.

See it and enjoy it but don't take it to heart like I did.

Alexander Hamilton imitations???
31 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A must see for those who don't like the "rat race".
HTFtoys25 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I love this film. I love the play which I have never seen but can imagine. I love the scenes of NYC in the wonderful 60's, and I love remembering the CBS Saturday Night Movie announcer "Don Rickles" (?, not the comedian, tho) who I remember assuring me "will be back in a moment" altho I was far too young to care and was not even watching the film. Why I so clearly remember him announcing that is up for grabs. I think that was 1969 or so. I didn't even know who the "Fabulous, Furry Freak Brothers" were. I didn't know anything.

Now, I KNOW I don't know much. Then, I thot I knew.

Oh, the movie;

There are many ways to look at the movie, and I have enjoyed reading the other comments on it here.

A young, impressionable, trying-to-fit-in Sandra Markowitz has earned her PhD and landed a job. Did she meet Albert there at work or knew him in college? Herb Garder took the answer to his grave. Anyway, she falls "instantly" in love with Murry and stands up to Albert. Seems pretty unstable to me, but she's cute.

I never thot Murry was a "slacker" OR a hero. He's (to me) as his brother paints him; someone to feel sorry for because he can see how stupid and pointless the human race is (as it is) and all the potential it is missing and how misguided it is. And yet, for many lowbrows, that's all they really can be. So Murry is smart, but intolerant. He needs a good dose of being around nice, but stupid people. Yet there he is with a "genius" nephew and a sharp brother. Maybe if he hung around "Perrucio" and his junk a while...

Murry should watch "Barney" or "Boohbah" on PBS if he thinks Chuckles the Chipmunk is stupid (and is). Then he'd be proud to write for Leo.

"You don't WANT a job is the whole thing!"

"Maybe if you say 'be happy Chuckles' it'll get un-stuck!"

"This robe fits fine.."

"Hey, Mur, I'll be up in a sec! Don't JUMP!"

Yeah, Gene Saks deserved the Best Supporting Actor award; I can think of three times more quotes his character said than those of Arnold Burns. Was it just the character being more interesting? But Balsam was a bigger star so, you know, like the most popular kid automatically becomes Quarterback no matter how good he is at it, he gets it.

"Hey, Murry. This paper is three days old." "So what? Is it starting to rot or something? Just read me from the paper." "Most of these jobs have probably been filled. I'll just go get another paper" "We don't need another paper! Besides, all the really good jobs stay around."

Murry's nephew unintentionally starts the investigation by writing an essay entitled "The Benefits of Unemployment Insurance". Nick probably wrote that his uncle and he were having a good ol' time seeing sites in NYC and he was getting paid to do NOTHING! I hope he did not also mention the times he has to stay at the ol' lady's apt. when Murry has his "late work" to do.

"Your work left her gloves."

Yes, as another commentator mentions; Albert Amundson was NOT a villain. The way Murry was going, he might have been a hero.

SPOILER comments; I enjoy one other commenter's point that the movie indicates a bittersweet ending; Murry DOES get a job and save the lad, BUT he looses his creativity.

"Neighbors? I really feel I should... Now I really want to tell you that... I'm sorry. I can't think - of anything to say."

This means that Chuckles the Clown is doomed. Murry will write the same schlocky stuff Chuckles already has going. Yet perhaps it was Murry that got him the fame he reached. Then Murry went to that bar and said "Gosh and Golly, yes!" to an olive in his martini, and left the show's staff. And yet, to Leo Herman, Murry will seem to be writing Great Stuff.

"Minnie Mouse! You called her Minnie Mouse! I swear; my life's work must be feeding you straight lines.!" Leo thinks that is so creative and funny and glib.

What the hell kind of furnishings was that?! "I've been attacked by the Ladies Home Journal." I don't know about Murry, but I would NOT like that apartment after Sandra got thru with it. "So it doesn't really fit with the overall design."

"We all got a little carried away, there. Just tussle around with the kid and he'll be fine."

Leo knows kids as good as humor; "a cloudy wonderland, as clear as the blue, blue sky."

"Goodbye, Charlie! Have a wonderful trip!"

"Hey, stick around, Dr. Markowitz! You know; anything can happen above an 'abandoned Chinese restaurant'!"

And so it did.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the best dramedies of all time
NoArrow14 July 2004
The hero of `A Thousand Clowns' is Murray Burns (Jason Robards), one of the most original, most complex characters in movie history, and also one of the hardest to decipher. That fact alone – that the protagonist is hard to understand – is probably the main reason that this fabulous film is reduced to only a 7.3 rating on the IMDb scale, a scale which often underrates some spectacular movies, but that's a whole nother topic.

The story follows Murray Burns through about two days of his life, as he goes through a tremendous change. Murray is unemployed and living in a junky apartment with his nephew Nick (Barry Gordon), who urges him again and again to get a job because children's aid workers are on their way. Murray shrugs it off, until two workers – Albert (William Daniels) and Sandra (Barbara Gordon) – show up at his door. Murray spends most of the interview making jokes and bugging Albert, and we sense that it is his defense mechanism. He doesn't want to face his problems, and when he needs to shape up the most he romances Sandra and takes her on a daylong date.

But Sandra happens to be more than a one-night stand, and the two fall in love, which proves to be another distraction that's averting Murray from working to keep Nick. It's only after Albert shows up once again and warns Murray that he fully realizes his situation, and after a long bout he decides to work for Nick, and he goes to get a job.

There's a problem, though, it's that Murray doesn't want a job, because he's afraid of becoming a regular, a dead person whose entire life is planned before it happens. Murray sees the rest of the world as a circus, where everyone is a clown with a routine. Murray is a hero to himself, thinking he's brave to avoid this.

Only its revolutionary script matches the revolutionary plot of `A Thousand Clowns'. It knows exactly the right moment to switch from comedy and drama, to show when Murray is frightened about losing Nick or joking to hide his fear. The scriptwriter knew everything he needed to know about his characters before he wrote the script (and probably the play) and his expertise shows. The movie is very funny, and also very touching, and at all the right moments.

The film is obviously told in Murray's point of view. Example: when Gene Saks' character first enters Murray's apartment the camera follows him as if it were someone's eyes, watching Saks, and since Robards is off screen for the majority of the shot, we can assume who's eyes the camera represents. And we are horrified by the warped Saks, just as Murray is, but compromise along with him as Murray enters the shot and reluctantly joins Saks. The cinematography is great in capturing all of this, and more.

Another great aspect about the movie is how barely anyone understands Murray. Saks doesn't, he just sees a good writer for his show and has no idea why Murray is so `odd', inspiring a long, anger-filled speech about the oddness of Murray's household. Nick doesn't even understand him; he likes his uncle because he is fun but doesn't know why he is fun, and why he must cease being fun in order to keep Nick. Sandra doesn't seem to see the cynical parts of Murray and spends the movie trying to touch on his more compassionate, regular side.

The character that understands Murray the most is his brother Arnold – played by brilliant character actor Martin Balsam. Murray and Arnold, who is also his agent, are locked in an intense verbal combat in an abandoned restaurant. For the first half Arnold is silent as Murray belittles him, as one of the `dead people', upset that Arnold never gets angry anymore, that he no longer is any fun. Murray is about to leave when Arnold screams, and then Arnold opens up, and explains how wrong Murray is, and how wonderful Arnold's life is. `I am the best possible Arnold Burns,' he says, and we see that he is right, and how happy he is.

You see; the whole point of the movie is that Murray is wrong. Well, not entirely, his description of people who've lost their souls to the system is spot-on for Saks' character, but his mistake is that he thinks everyone but himself and maybe Sandra fits into this category (though he's teaching Nick not to be). But he's wrong, and since the film is in his perspective we are as stubborn as he is in accepting that. But listen to all the other characters, like Daniels' line `A person like me will always look foolish when talking to someone as creative as yourself.' This is all summed up in Arnold's speech, about how you can still live a fulfilling life being a regular working man.

The acting in this movie is terrific. I'd like to single out Robards and Balsam (who won a very well deserved Oscar for this), who are wonderful, but really all the actors are great here. Harris is delightfully flighty as Sandra, Gordon is charming as Nick and Saks is strange and warped in his part. This is an ensemble piece, really, with every actor playing his or her part enough to leave a lasting impression while avoiding being a ham.

I love this movie, it's funny, and it's brilliant, 8.5/10.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Delightful and thought-provoking
deirdre-310 August 2003
I loved this movie passionately the first time I saw it, which was almost 30 years ago, and I love it every single time I watch it. Certainly aspects of it have gotten more meaningful as I've gotten older. The cast, full of people I had no idea of at the age of 10, turned out to be full of some of my all-time favorite actors (William Daniels, Barbara Harris, Jason Robards...how can you go wrong?)

I think some of the reviewers here (especially the ones giving it mixed reviews) are under the impression that the viewer is supposed to view Murray as a totally sympathetic character. He's not, and I don't think he's intended to be. Murray is really fun to be around for over half the movie; you're rooting for him all the way. As Sandy says, "No wonder Nick loves it here. I'd love to live here too if I were eleven years old!" When it's really time for Murray to settle down and do something to keep Nick, he can't bring himself to do it, and his free-spirited ways start looking, to the objective viewer, shallow and irresponsible. Murray needs to grow up, and do it fast, and growing up means compromising. That's the lesson; not that Murray was right all along, but that you can't be completely free if you do in fact have something left to lose, and Murray does. But life isn't a black and white choice between happiness and unhappiness, it's a continuum, and sometimes "doing the best you can" is enough.

I found it truly interesting that, throughout the movie, Nick was what Murray describes as "a middle-aged kid," seeming older than Murray himself. At the end, when Murray grows up, Nick seems to revert. He throws a full-scale tantrum, and that's the first time in the whole movie I remembered he was actually a child. I think that's a testament to Gordon's skill as an actor.

For anyone who read/saw the play: the director didn't seem to quite "get" the point of the play, and changed the end of the first and second (or is it second/third? I don't have it in front of me) to make the end of the movie more of a downer than the play. I never quite forgave him for that. The end of the play suggested that compromises have to be made, life goes on and it can even be good. The end of the movie seems to suggest that the last scene was unsubtly a "sell-out." I disagree. But I still loved the movie.

"Getting back to reality..." "I'll only go as a tourist!"
66 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My favorite movie, and it gets better with each viewing
lisalapp21 January 2006
"A Thousand Clowns" has been my favorite movie for 30 years -- not because it's the world's finest work of cinema (it's not; mainly it's a well-filmed play -- good, but not a masterpiece). What makes it my favorite is that the story is profoundly human, the script is unique and genuinely witty, the performances are delightful, and -- most importantly -- it's a movie that takes on new meaning as you mature.

When I first saw it I was in college and Murray was my hero; his crisis, to me, was all about selling out. Later, after I had started a family, Murray's story seemed less about selling out than about owning up to his devotion to his nephew. By the time I showed this movie to my teenage children, I had come to see Murray's brother -- the master compromiser -- as the hero. Now my children are grown, and I just watched it again -- and for the first time I saw that the buttoned-up male social worker (Mr. Amundson, played by William Daniels), shows great heart in the second act and is the only character who aims at all times to do what he knows is right. Amundson hasn't become my hero, but I saw him as a good man this time -- and I never as a young viewer imagined that he was anything but laughable. Also on this viewing, I came full circle to see that Murray really IS the hero in this story -- not because he's a charming nonconformist but because he does achieve redemption.

What keeps this movie so important for me is that, even after raising children, I still respect Murray's conflict and so I think his redemption really is heroic -- though no more heroic than any parent's true devotion. (If you don't respect Murray's conflict -- if conformity has never bothered you, or if you think he's just a bum, period -- then you might not enjoy this movie.)

This movie grows up with you, but some things remains constant with every viewing: the film's stunning wit, its passion for authenticity (Murray's speech on the fire escape is a deeply moving plea to wake up and live), and its charmed performances. If you like Jason Robards, you will love him in this film. And Gene Saks, as the TV star Chuckles the Chipmunk, does some of the best comedy work I've seen anywhere. (Notice his timing on the line, "She's done a wonderful job," and the ridiculous walk he came up with for the line, "You told me her name was Minnie Mouse!")

As a bonus, this movie gives you a sidewalk-level, free-wheeling view of Manhattan when it wasn't so overpopulated and Lincoln Center was just being built. It's enough to make you want to quit your job and start collecting eagles.
73 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie has become a part of my life!
Princess-183 March 1999
This movie, one of the best ever made, has become part of my life!

The setting is New York City in the 60s and the movie excellently portrays the feeling of the city at that time. It features incredibly witty and clever dialogue that my family and I unceasingly quote from. This movie deals with the topics of conformity vs. individuality. A movie that can be watched over and over and enjoyed all the more with each viewing! It will enrich your life to see it.
33 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thousand Clowns- Conventionalist Tale **1/2
edwagreen15 February 2008
Jason Robards is excellent as the free-spirit individual raising an illegitimate nephew in this very off-beat 1965 tale. The film was nominated for best picture but had little to no chance with with winner "The Sound of Music" or other nominee "Dr. Zhivago."

Robards just doesn't want to join that daily grind. William Daniels, who was quite good 2 years later in "The Graduate" and Barbara Harris, as Ms.Moskowitz, are terrific as the two social workers. The show 2 conflict in front of Robards and his nephew, a fabulous Barry Gordon. Harris soon becomes the lover of Robards and the two tour Manhattan.

With fine performances by Gordon and Daniels, how did Martin Balsam, as Robards conventional brother, get a supporting Oscar nomination here as well as winning the coveted award?

The film has one major flaw. By the end, to keep the child, Robards to has to be conventional and become a dashing Dan just like the rest of us. Why couldn't he defeat conventional wisdom here?
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
one of the great ones
Fred-369 September 1999
A choice movie, and an original. The writing is sharp, the characters well played. Highlight is Martin Balsam's defense of "getting along," climaxing in "I am the best possible Arnold Burns." Robards holds it all together, but the supporting cast, especially Daniels and Sax, deserve lots of credit. And of course young Barry Gordon was perfect. Movie makers everywhere take note: It's the script, stupid!
39 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Maybe Worked Better on Stage?
evanston_dad27 March 2018
Looking back over the years at films that have been nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award, there's always at least one each year that leaves someone today scratching their heads and wondering what anybody saw in it a the time to nominate it for Best Picture. "A Thousand Clowns" is that movie for 1965. Whenever that happens, I always chalk it up to hitting a cultural nerve that has since passed and that people living now don't totally get unless they were also living then. If nothing else, this movie feels like it has more to say about living in 1965 than its co-nominees "The Sound of Music," "Doctor Zhivago," or "Ship of Fools," all films that feel like they could have been made in a previous decade.

Jason Robards recreates his stage performance as a loafer caring for an abandoned nephew. Child services eventually comes calling in the guise of the adorable Barbara Harris and scene-stealing William Daniels, and when Harris and Robards falls for each other, he has to decide just how much he wants to resist Harris's efforts to domesticate him and turn him into a respectable member of society. The movie ends with somewhat of a compromise: Robards realizes he doesn't have to become an entirely different person just because he takes a steady job, and it's sometimes worth becoming a bit more conventional if it allows you to keep some of the things you love.

I like that message now, but I have a feeling I would have thought it came across as stodgy and dull at the time, with the youth counter culture growing in influence. In any case, it doesn't make for an especially gripping movie, and I wonder if the whole thing might have played better on stage.

Martin Balsam received his only Oscar nomination and win for playing Robards's brother, and whose performance mostly comes down to a single monologue in which he extolls the virtues of being ordinary.

"A Thousand Clowns" was also nominated for Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay (Herb Gardner adapted his own play), and Best Adapted Score, which consists of jarring renditions of marching band staples.

Grade: B-
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I bet you didn't know comedy could be so smart & thoughtful.
bjeffrey6618 February 2005
It's truly a shame that this film has escaped the attention of the last few generations of movie watchers -- not only have most people not seen this film, it's likely that only a small percentage of folks have ever even heard of it. I dare say that both the character Jason Robards portrays and this film as a whole are more relevant today than half of the comedies produced 5 or 10 years ago. The bottom line is this, if you're looking for great acting and smart dialogue, and are getting tired of the 'I've-just-wasted-the-last-couple-of-hours-of-my-life' feeling that comes over today's average TV viewer or cineplex visitor, then you simply must do yourself a favor and seek out this hidden gem.
42 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Murray needs some light comedy
SnoopyStyle19 July 2015
Twelve year old Nick Burns (Barry Gordon) lives with his eccentric unemployed uncle Murray (Jason Robards) in NYC. He was left behind years ago by Murray's free-living sister. They are visited by Child Welfare Sandra Markowitz (Barbara Harris) and her boyfriend superior Albert Amundson (William Daniels). Amundson threatens to take Nick away and Sandra breaks up with him. She falls for Murray completely. Murray's agent brother Arnold (Martin Balsam) pushes him to conform which would keep Nick. Murray goes back to his hated writing job for a children's TV show hosted by Leo (Gene Saks).

There are some terrific acting jobs. I would have preferred Murray to be much funnier. Jason Robards would find his philosophy go down a lot easier with some fun comedy. In the end, he's not a real comedian. The quirkiness is not gut busting funny. However I wouldn't eliminate any of the serious ideas in the movie. The conflict about conformity is still very compelling.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Best Film of 1965
ctrout23 January 2005
A Thousand Clowns is about a twelve-year-old Barry Gordon who lives with his Uncle, Jason Robards. A social worker played by Barbara Harris shows up and ends up falling in love with Robards. But the child welfare people try to force Robards to get a good job so that they won't have to take Gordon away from him. Gordon, who also fancies Harris, looks up to his Uncle as his role model and loves his lifestyle. But then Gordon sees that Robards is willing to give up that great lifestyle in order to keep his "family" together.

The film is an excellent portrayal of the "not a care in the world" way of life and should definitely be seen by anyone who loves comedy. It's one of only a few films that made me laugh out loud and I'm sure if you see it, you'll agree with me. It's only flaw is one scene in which Gordon sees what his uncle's life has been reduced to. But even that was necessary as it shows the way anyone would succumb to social workers.

The film was nominated for four Academy Awards including Picture, Supporting Actor (Martin Balsam as Robards' down to earth brother), Adapted Screenplay, and Score. Sadly, Best Supporting Actor was the only award that it was able to take home that night.
34 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Thousand Clowns (Fred Coe, 1965) **1/2
Bunuel19769 March 2014
This was yet another film I missed out on over the years on both local TV (back when they still showed movies regularly and not just recent titles!) and the MGM cable channel. However, I was not so enthused by the result this time out and, in retrospect, not only is Leonard Maltin's ***1/2 rating excessive but I cannot fathom how it ended up being Oscar-nominated for Best Picture – over such large-scale epics that repay repeated viewings as THE GREAT RACE or THOSE MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES! Incidentally, its other Academy Award nods were for Adapted Screenplay (understandable and, well, deserving) and Score Adaptation; with respect to either of these, however, my general apathy towards the film has made me forget both the titular reference and a popular song that is repeatedly sung throughout while being strummed on ukelele! On the other hand, Martin Balsam surprisingly emerged the winner of the Supporting Actor category – when he had even failed to make the shortlist at the Golden Globes (where the film did receive recognition for Musical/Comedy Actor and Actress for Jason Robards Jr. and Barbara Harris respectively); it is not that he had much in the way of competition, but it is also true that he only really shined in one sequence shot in semi-darkness to boot! For the record, Robards and Balsam – here playing brothers – would re-appear together in two real-life enactments i.e. TORA! TORA! TORA! (1970) and ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN (1976; which landed Robards the first of two consecutive Oscars).

Anyway, the plot deals with the writer of a TV kids' programme who quits and, since he is taking care of his 12 year-old nephew (abandoned by his mother, Robards' sister, and whose father is unknown), the Welfare commission turns up at his apartment to look into the sustainability of the situation. This already hardly augured well for comedy material, but much of the proceedings seem very unlikely, thus unconvincing (contrasting with the harsh cinematography of the New York locations – that said, the exteriors are often depicted via flashy montages which, again, dispels the intended realism and, set to loud ragtime music, prove that more irritating)! Despite the protagonist's backdrop, one cannot imagine the life of an out-of-work person with familial responsibilities to be as carefree as we see here; nor is it believable for Harris' social worker/psychologist – green though she may be – falling for him so easily (and for whom she even leaves patronizing colleague/boyfriend William Daniels)! Overstretched at nearly 2 hours, the film is at its most strident when Robards, youngster Barry Gordon and future director Gene Saks (as the child-hating star of the afore-mentioned TV show) give vent to their booming voices, and particularly in the climactic confrontation featuring all three. This is not to say that the movie is not worth watching, but it singularly lacks memorable incident and sympathetic characterization (THE KID {1921} it definitely is not!). In conclusion, producer/director Coe's only other effort for the big screen was ME, NATALIE (1969) which, while reuniting him with Balsam, is best-known today (albeit hard-to-find in serviceable quality) for being Al Pacino's debut!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unbearable
TooShortforThatGesture18 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this film mainly because "A Thousand Clowns" is one of those classic American plays that I had long heard about but never seen.

Now, it may well be a great play (though I have my doubts) but it is assuredly a terrible movie. So "stage-y" that I kept looking around for my Playbill. Its message feels dated and obvious (although to be fair, it may have had more emotional heft at the time it was made.) Jason Robards was a very good dramatic actor (and, yes, I know he played this part on Broadway to acclaim) but he's never had an particularly appealing affect and it seems to me here that one of the keys to trying to make this play work is that his character needs to be terribly charming. The best Robards can manage is a sort of grumpy kookiness. The kid, as played by Barry Gordon (and, to be fair, as overwritten by Gardner) comes across like an adolescent Woody Allen -- and I mean that in all the bad ways. Barbara Harris' character is a disgraceful and absurd portrayal of a modern women -- even given that the film is set in the early 1960's. (Apparently we are to assume that a women who recently earned her Ph.D. is ready to drop her nascent career to move into a one room apartment with some grizzled ne'er-do-well and his bastard nephew only 12 hours after meeting them).

All of the foregoing notwithstanding, what really makes this film painful to watch is the pseudo-"hip" filming and editing style where jump cuts occur without warning or purpose and where we go back and forth between a 1950's urban realism in one scene and a surreal "we're the only two people in Manhattan" empty city pastiche the next. Perhaps it felt interesting and experimental when it was made, but now it just comes across as odd and VERY over-mannered.

In retrospect, I would have been much better off just buying a copy of the play and reading it, rather than wasting 2 hours watching this. I find it hard to come up with any reason I would suggest someone watch the film.
19 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Thousand reasons to love this film!
jayrnj18 May 1999
Most of us have "favorite" films that we think no one else in the world has seen. You just want to tell everyone to go out and rent it, hoping that they too will say, "Wow, what a movie! I can't believe I've never seen it before!" "A Thousand Clowns" is just such a film. Rarely seen on television, this Oscar nominated (best picture) Oscar winning (best supporting actor/Martin Balsam) film is special in many ways. Superbly cast (child actor Barry Gordon is a must see!) and smartly written. The satire and tragedy blend so well you will be caught laughing and crying at the same time throughout the movie.1000 Thumbs up!
39 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ought to be seen much, much more often
rooster_davis3 August 2008
What does it say about the public when they will support about 200 TV showings a year of 'Sixteen Candles' but a film as great as this might appear once? This is an excellent, thoughtful, interesting movie. It's well-written and the acting performances are all flawless in my book.

Jason Robards, one of the all-time great actors, portrays an idealistic sort of guy who has taken in his sister's son whom she more or less abandoned. Such an idealist is he, that Robards can't bring himself to take employment at jobs that would require him to compromise his standards or work for people whom he doesn't respect. Unfortunately this puts him in danger of losing custody of his nephew, played by young Barry Gordon. A young social worker (played by Barbara Harris) unexpectedly finds herself falling in love with Robards and being taken with his nephew.

There are some really great surprises in this movie. Robards' ukulele performance of 'Yes Sir That's My Baby' is surprisingly pleasant, and much better than just 'on key'; in the part where Barry Gordon joins in, it's obvious he too had some musical talent as he does a fine job as well. In fact it is apparent that Robards was actually playing his uke and if Gordon wasn't also I couldn't tell it. (Used to be a time when performers could play some sort of musical instrument but I have seen more people blatantly fake playing a guitar or piano than I can stomach.) The views of downtown New York in the 60's will certainly be of interest especially to those who lived there then and can look for old (or new) landmarks in the background on the outdoors scenes.

Barry Gordon has to be one of the best juvenile actors ever. It makes me a little ill to think of the ones in the 80's and 90's who were paid ungodly amounts of money to mug for a camera; I bet Gordon was paid far less for a performance that was as fine as any adult's. There are so many good scenes in which he appears but to me the most powerful one is near the end of the film when he is afraid his uncle will take a lousy job just to appease the child welfare department. You can't miss it if you watch the film. Gordon shines in the whole film, and most brightly in that scene.

I don't know how else to say it; I "liked" Barbara Harris in her role, very much. Maybe the best way I can explain is that while I never saw the Broadway play version of this story, the same character in the play was portrayed by an actress who for some reason I just never liked. If someone was going to come into the relationship with Murray (Jason Robards) and Nick (Barry Gordon), she was ideal. I don't know why but if I don't like an actor or actress, I resent it a little when their character gets involved with other characters I care about.

It's amazing how great a movie can be made even if you don't budget latex rubber aliens oozing goo, or space battles, or massive slow-motion explosions or other disasters. This had to be a very low budget film - there are not many actors, the scenes and sets are rather simple one-room locations, the outdoor scenes were shot on location in NY. But when you have a great script with an interesting story and fine performers playing the roles, well it just shows that money alone does not (and can not) make a great film.

I decided to record 'A Thousand Clowns' and save it based on some of the other comments listed here and I am very glad I did. This movie would make an excellent intelligence / maturity test. "Which do you prefer to watch, 'Sixteen Candles' or 'A Thousand Clowns'?" Seldom anymore do I see a movie for the first time and realize that I had been missing something; this movie gave me that feeling. It has immediately entered my short list of favorite films, it's that good. All I can say is watch it and follow the story and you will see one great movie well worth your time.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My own private pig, my own private python
gort-82 January 2007
In most ways that matters, this is the perfect film. Yes, as an adapted stage-play it sometimes gets a little claustrophobic by modern standards that say movies are a collection of chase-scenes, fight-scenes, love-scenes and with the odd bit of dialog tossed in to grease the wheels. But in this age of special effects this film offers us two of the most spectacular effects there are - great writing and great performances.

I first saw this movie when I was 13 years old, in the spring of 1966, at the Paramount theater in Baltimore. When I walked into the theater, in my private universe, everyone had this thing in life that they were supposed to do, be it sinner or saint, business or baking. When I walked out that universe was closed forever. What if, I wondered, there is no fit? What if, like Murray Burns, life was made up of a series of trade-offs and compromises. As I write these words the Paramount has been dark for decades. Most of the movies that I saw have been digested and placed in their apportioned slots in my life. But not this one.

A THOUSAND CLOWNS is like a pig in a python for me. Its imprint is still fresh 41 years later.

Friends know that I'm "into" movies. I watch them. I sometimes write and lecture about them. Silent or sound, domestic or foreign, classics, b's, newly released - it doesn't matter. I'm fairly omnivorous. I'm often asked for my favorite movie. I never struggle for an answer or give out my top five. I simply smile and reply, "A THOUSAND CLOWNS." Some are puzzled by it. Most have never heard of it. None of them really seem to understand it.

My world changed in 1966 in ways that, even now, I'm still discovering. This is the movie that as present at the creation.

One last thing - if you want to put together an interesting double feature, watch this in tandem with King Vidor's 1928 masterwork, THE CROWD. The two films share some fascinating common themes.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
there's nonconformity, then there's this nut
BW Riviera4 January 2002
I was curious about this film for quite awhile. What a disappointment. Jason Robards was a great actor, but there's only so much sympathy even he could create for such an irresponsible bum. The idea that such a soul is above working, and encourages others not to work, is one of those "don't know whether to laugh or cry" concepts. I guess I like my movies to have a touch more realism. In a more realistic film, losing the kid would be the least of this guy's worries. He would be physically assaulted on a daily basis and probably institutionalized. So why did I give it a 6/10? When you have probably the wordiest script in film history for a 2 hour film, there have to be SOME good lines. And I'm such a lover of old New York that I kept watching for the scenery.

A special mention must be made of Gene Saks as the TV clown. Even allowing for the nature of the character, this is one of the most abrasive, scenery-chewing performances I have ever seen.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Conventionalism is the Adversary!!
dataconflossmoor-121 May 2009
At some point, everybody has to do a bunch of things they do not want to do, right!! Jason Robards plays a character who is plagued with the tedium of monotony and banal laboriousness!! As a result, he throws caution to the wind about accepting basic responsibilities. He and his ward, Nick, are completely capable of conveying messages to each other which involve an entirely different set of priorities than the mass public is accustomed to dealing with. The film "A Thousand Clowns" evokes a very flippant disposition about many ominous circumstances. Being perennially jobless, and living together in a New York City's makeshift definition of a cramped studio apartment, the New York Child Welfare Department does not feel that this is a suitable environment to raise an adolescent boy. The recurring song "Yes Sir,That's My Baby" throughout the entire movie, signifies an extremely nonchalant attitude that both Jason Robards and his ward (Barry Gordon / Nick) purvey in this film!! It's all about asking different questions, and wanting different answers!! Murray and Nick's ultimate desires are to pinpoint what exactly it is they want to do with their lives, and how they want to do it, without threat of fatal repercussions,, Suffice it to say, they are fighting a dreadfully losing battle while attempting such a dubious endeavor!! The movie "A Thousand Clowns" winds up being one big acrimonious jeremiad which denounces boredom and anonymity!! In addition to Jason Robards and Barry Gordon, there were many other terrific acting performances in this movie. Barbara Harris plays the perpetually misunderstood social worker who has her seriously low salary written all over her face. She develops an ideological crush on Murray (Jason Robards). Martin Balsam plays Murray's brother, he gives his brother a lending ear and is Murray's succor for empathy, yet, he realizes the urgency of the prevailing situation. Gene Saks is the total corporate man lock, stock, and barrel. He is painfully aware of the fact that he is not funny. Such a harsh reality can leave permanent scars on your fragile ego, as a result, this clown (literally) becomes Jason Robards' greatest nightmare!! Director, Herb Gardner, is sensational at instigating a catastrophically horrible occurrence, and making it utterly hilarious!! Such a scenario purports the real definition of comedy, especially a dark comedy!! What the film "A Thousand Clowns" ultimately makes provision for is the concept that a prerequisite to getting by in this world does not mean that you must engage in a total capitulation to the conventional!! More to the point, you have to sort of have a compromising relationship with conventionalism in order to feasibly survive!! Like most relationships, there is always give and take!! The film "A Thousand Clowns" takes on a very unique approach to what specific problems are afflicting Murray (Jason Robards), and how Murray's feelings about these dilemmas, affect everyone around him. Marching to a radically different drummer has created a rather fatal side effect of potentially catastrophic devastation regarding any definition of an harmonious family unit between Murray and Nick, or whatever the kid's name is this week!! The visceral reactions from all of the characters in this movie, give the movie audience a crystal clear indication that this film cannot afford the luxury of being ironic!! What was wonderful about this film is that human responses replaced stilted ones!! It is almost as if the title "A Thousand Clowns" translates to a thousand people with a thousand errors!! This domino effect disaster equals a million discrepancies, and so on, and so forth!! Excellent film!! Some off Broadway critics in New York have rated this play turned movie as perhaps the best movie ever written. I don't really agree with this assessment of the film, however, I do feel that "A Thousand Clowns" was superbly done!! A PERFECT TEN!!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great about 3/4 way.
marsh87627 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I've heard about this movie for many years, and finally got to see it after it came out on DVD. I'd heard it is one of the greatest movies. It was great, for about 3/4 of it. Up to the scene in the basement abandoned Chinese restaurant. Before this, it was funny, philosophical, witty, insightful, very creative.

But starting with the Chinese Restaurant scene, the movie became preachy, ponderous, wordy, and lecturing. And the scenes with the chipmunk clown were very unpleasant to watch. Does it take that much talent to create such a repellent character? Why did we have to be submitted to it? Was it only so the 11 year old (actually 17, ridiculous in it's own right) could tell him off so Murry could feel his education was complete, so he could now get a job? When Murry, 5 months earlier, decided to get out of the rat race, he wasn't thinking of the education of the kid.

Even though Murry's job status was central to the plot, no mention was made of how he was supporting himself and his nephew. Just on savings? Those run out eventually, so Murry would have had to face reality anyway, social workers or not.

In all it's hippy philosophy, including the sell-out end, there is presented the idea that work is bad. This is not a hippy idea, it's bedrock, mainstream Puritan work ethic. This "work is bad" idea is so pervasive, that when saying that work can be fun, someone said to me, "if it's fun, you should be paying them." They are paying me to make something they can sell for a profit. They don't give a fig how I feel about it. Actually, if I work with enthusiasm, my employer would like it, because I would be more productive.

Believe it or not, humanity, some people enjoy their jobs, and actually look forward to going to work. Now, since Murry didn't enjoy his work, it was his job to find a situation that he would enjoy. Instead, he runs down all working people as being inferior to him, and he runs down all work as bad, harmful to the worker. So, clinging to this falsehood, the movie bogged down in the last 1/4 with ponderous scenes serving to perpetuate the Puritan myth.

I think the movie is worth watching for the first 3/4, as long as the viewer realizes that the cop out at the end is not so much of Murry compromising, but of the playwright and director. They refused to tell a really revolutionary idea that work can be fun, but instead had the free spirit of Murry succumb to the repressive establishment and become one of the worker bees he so despised. (See Herbert Marcuse "Eros and Civilization".)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the few perfect movies
donjmiller15 March 2004
It's a shame that being in black & white is now a nearly fatal handicap; this is one of the few movies I consider perfect. From the enthralling, completely believable performances by everyone in the small cast, to creative details in the score, cinematography and editing, to dialogue with as many great lines as The Princess Bride or Monty Python & the Holy Grail, to the reality of its bittersweet message (given especially by Martin Balsam, in the abandoned restaurant), this is a level that film-makers very rarely achieve. If you get a chance to see this, get ready for a real treat. Like all perfect movies, it repays re-viewing with details and depths previously unnoticed.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The ending is Just Fine, thank you.
bernspen23 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
For my money, it's as fine a film as was ever made.

And I find the end consistent with the rest of the play, unlike a lot of the reviewers here.

In an early scene with the girl, Murray's literally up against a brick wall, and he tells her that he can't give in to the welfare people because the boy hasn't yet shown the backbone to stand up to the phonies in the world. He can't let Nick go, because he's not sure Nick's ready to face the world without him.

The scene toward the end - magnificent scene - in which Nick tells Leo Herman what a dip wad he (Leo) is, and how bad his potato chips are, is the boy coming of age, and standing up to the phoniness. At that point, it's fine for Murray to get a job and prevent the welfare people from taking Nick. Murray has accomplished what he wanted to do. Nick's come of age.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a movie of its times and our time.
lilllians28 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
As a child of parents who came of age during World War II, I suspect that Herb Gardner wrote this story from ethics and morals informed by his parents having lived through World War I, as my parents did. Having heard about the movie years ago from friends at college, I was uneasy finally seeing it today because its first impression on me was superficial. The age of Murray in 1965, when the movie was released, would have been known to most in the audience at that time as having been the age of the typical conscripted soldier in World War II. The fifties were a period of yearning for safety and normalcy for those who returned from the war, and many enjoyed the comforting effects of conformity and almost military routine in daily life, as depicted in the movie. It could not make soldiers forget the horrors of seeing their best friends blown to bits or of seeing skeletal prisoners, or buildings bombed to rubble like that of his neighborhood or stop the reminders of the fear that arises from the sound of guns firing --- and Murray may well not have had shell-shock, what we now call PTSD. But when he forgot what day it was on the train one day on his way to work, and stopped and focused on the exuberant unexpected and serendipity of human humor with Nick, he chose to stay with what would most easily keep him in the present and safe from the traumas of bad memory. His brother Arnold's being of a man with a wife and children and a job being the best he can be and proud enough of it to defend himself to Murray makes sense to me as commendable, because he has courage in living his ordinary life. It seems to me that Murray chose that, also.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Teeth-gnashingly 'kooky'
moonspinner5530 April 2006
Screen-adaptation of the Broadway hit grinds itself into the ground with a firm belief that kooky equals lovable, and vice-versa. It's tough to love anything here, particularly Jason Robards' performance as a life-loving eccentric (here we go) who is investigated by authorities to see if he's a proper guardian for his live-in nephew (played by Barry Gordon as a wizened little wiseass). A grueling piece of work. Martin Balsam won a Supporting Oscar playing Robards' brother; perhaps the Academy was just giving a fine actor his due. Had to be, because this brand of arms-flailing theatrics and sub-Neil Simon/jokey dialogue shows off no one to their best advantage. Helped a bit by the decent black-and-white cinematography, and by Barbara Harris' innate grace. *1/2 from ****
16 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of those rare gems you could see over and over again
Scoop-151 August 1999
Jason Robards, Jr. plays the lead role of the unique, quirky, firmly unemployed Murray Burns and effortlessly masters the clever dialogue the way it was meant to be performed. Writer, Herb Gardner, created a delightful character like those you yourself rarely meet who have an uncommon outlook on life.

This movie caught my attention and prompted me to check out the screenplay from the library so I could experience the dialogue again and again.

There are so many one-liners and passages to admire, and you'll enjoy the charming performance on ukuleles of "Yes, Sir, That's My Baby" by Robards and Barry Gordon which is played against the background of Murray and Sandra exploring New York.

The sad thing about discovering a gem like this play for the first time is knowing that you won't experience that same pique of excitement and discovery again the second time through it again. But you do continue to marvel at the mind that can create such a fresh screenplay.

Unfortunately, I could not find much more information about the author, Herb Gardner, than what was on the cover jacket of the screenplay: He was born in Brooklyn and worked as a teen-ager selling orange-juice and checking coats at the Cort and National Theatres. "He saw some plays as many as 140 times and reports that that's an excellent way to learn the craft of the dramatist." He was also married to actress Rita Gardner.

Some favorite quotes:

"If most things aren't funny, Arn, then they're only exactly what they are; then it's one long dental appointment interrupted occasionally by something exciting, like waiting or falling asleep. What's the point if I leave everything exactly the way I find it? Then I'm just adding to the noise, then I'm just taking up some more room on the subway."

". . . it could have been any day, Arnie. . . sitting in the train going through any day. . . in the dark through any year. ... Arnie, it scared the hell out of me. You got to know what day it is. You got to know what's the name of the game and what the rules are with nobody else telling you. You have to own your days and name them, each one of them, every one of them, or else the years go right by and none of them belong to you. . . And that aint' just for weekends, kiddo. . . ."
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed