Games (1967) Poster

(1967)

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Bullets and blanks...and red herrings
moonspinner5512 July 2008
Peculiar thriller begins quite promisingly, but takes a curious, dispiriting turn somewhere along the way and never recoups its glory. Upscale New York couple James Caan and Katharine Ross--who enjoy warped versions of penny-arcade games and mischievous pranks--invite fragile saleswoman Simone Signoret to stay with them, which culminates in a crime. Director Curtis Harrington, who was also involved with the script, sets up an initially delicious puzzle involving the decadent rich, but allows the intricacies of the character-development to unravel in the second act. Caan and Ross appear to be very much in love--and Ross herself seems to be a pretty smart cookie--rendering a plot-twist late in the proceedings unconvincing. William Fraker's cinematography is stylish, though the action rarely ventures outdoors and one becomes acutely aware of the low-budget underpinnings (the film also has a mysteriously European feel, causing the alleged New York location to seem irrelevant--and a mismatch with the material). Good acting only takes it so far. **1/2 from ****
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Really good
jrb195315 July 2018
It's a shame this is not easily available on DVD. It was a really cool thriller, well plotted, well acted.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Games people play
SnoopyStyle25 August 2013
A mindgames playing couple played by James Caan and Katharine Ross invites an intriguing older lady into their lives. Simone Signoret plays an aging cosmetics saleswoman invited to spice up their lives. The couple thought they were experienced, but could they be outplayed by her? The performances by all three are good. The tension is predicated on the likability of the couple Caan and Ross. That's questionable. They are written with too much callousness. They don't play nice normal people and I don't really care what happens to them. But it's a good exercise of whodunnit for the mind. At its core, it mattered very little the outcome. It makes the movie less than what it could have been.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Playing games on each other in the manner of "Sleuth"
manuel-pestalozzi11 March 2003
This film reminds me of "Sleuth", the movie based on a play by Anthony Shaffer released in 1972. Like in "Sleuth", people play games on each other and do not reveal their alliances, their true intentions or their true self. The story is acted like in a theatre play. The sets, representing a New York town house in a prosperous neighbourhood, are nicely done and give a vivid impression of the middle sixties' trends in fashion design and interior decorating - again you can compare it with the lavish set and the different costumes used by the protagonists in "Sleuth". For once, James Caan plays a slick urbanite, and he does it quite well. Don Stroud has a small part, a good actor whose screen presence and performance are always memorable. And then there is Simone Signoret ... as always she is absolutely riveting, and she puts a lot of charm in her rather pityful character. She uses her French accent very much to her advantage! "Games" is an elegant, suspenseful thriller for people who like to see a play now and then. Only right at the end you will know who has won!
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Games People Play
sol121822 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS*** Well to do yuppie, before that word became part of the English language, couple Paul & Jennifer Montgomery,James Caan & Katharine Ross, enjoy playing games on their friends and neighbors in their upper East Side Manhattan townhouse that has given the pair a reputation as neighborhood jesters. It's when Lisa Schindler, Simone Signoret, shows up at the townhouse unexpectedly selling cosmetics that the games that both Paul and Jenny have been playing go to a much higher level.

Lisa somehow gets Paul & Jenny to let her stay at their place until she, in being evicted from her apartment for being behind on her rent, finds a place to stay. Having dabbled in the occult in the past Lisa soon shows the pair what games of faith and chance really are. It's non other then the neighborhood deliver boy Norman Fields, Don Strod, who gets involved in Paul and Jenny's game of misdirection, That's when Norman is set up by the two as the "other man" in Jenny's life and ends up getting his brains blown out by an outraged Paul who caught the two in the act!

Thinking that his gun was loaded with blanks Paul in just trying to show the terrified Norman, after he got two harmless shots off at him, that it's all a joke lets go with the third shot that turned out to be the real deal! A .38 slug that bores into his brain through his right eye killing him instantly! Now with a murder or at the least homicide staring them in the face both Paul& Jenny are desperate to hide Norman's body and keep the police from finding it. While all this is happening Lisa who's totally in the dark to what happened to Norman starts to get suspicious of the couple in the very strange actions they do in preventing her from going in the house in her by chance finding evidence of Norman's death!

***SPOILERS*** It's later when everything seemed to be cleared up in what happened to Norman that he somehow comes back to life terrorizing Jenny while she's awake and Paul in his sleep. It's Jenny who really starts to get spooked in Norman's return from the dead that leads her to suffer from a number of paranoid episodes. They get more and more severe as Norman finally comes out of the shadows and is about to strangle Jenny. By then the poor and confused young woman loses it and in the process ends up losing her mind as well!

A lot like Simone Signoret's 1955 horror flick "Diabolique" the movie "Games" has the audience guessing if what their seeing is real or imagined just like both Paul & Jenny in the movie. The shocking ending is nowhere as good as that in "Diabolique" but still packs quite a punch in how we in the audience were manipulated into not seeing it coming a lot earlier in the film.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mortal games
echanove30 January 2021
Curtis Harrington, a director as interesting as he is unknown who did his first work on the B series, tackles here a project with more budget and more pretensions that lets you see and makes you hang out but that does not go much further and is too predictable .

Reminiscent of movies like Les Diaboliques (Henri-Georges Clouzot, 1955) or Gaslight (George Cukor, 1944), the great asset of this psychological thriller is the presence and great acting on of Simón Signoret (who was in 1955 film), in addition to the beautiful photography and the adequate recreation of a morbid and somewhat perverse atmosphere that as the plot film progresses is becoming more oppressive.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
games
mossgrymk26 January 2021
As a previous reviewer noted it's pretty damn slow for a thriller/horror pic. This central flaw is exhibited most clearly in that long and drawn out dead body disposal scene where director Curtis Harrington and scenarist Gene Kearney are too talky when they should be laconic (and suspenseful). Ironically, when the screenplay should be explanatory, as in providing a credible motivation for why Katherine Ross should invite an obviously dodgy Simone Signoret to live with her and hubby James Caan, Kearney goes all reticent on us and thus sacrifices what little credibility the story has. The result is your average scary movie which is not all that scary. Or disturbing. Or even interestingly deranged. C plus.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Old Hollywood
BandSAboutMovies20 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Paul Montgomery and his wife Jennifer (James Caan and Katharine Ross) are wealthy New Yorkers who amuse themselves by holding parties in their townhouse and playing sadistic games on their friends.

Then they meet Lisa Schindler, an older cosmetics saleswoman played by Simone Signoret. She faints as soon as she enters their home and spends the night. The woman may be psychic and definitely fits into the gameplaying nature of the couple, as she sets up some simulated situations for them to argue about, like a grocery deliveryman (Don Stroud) potentially having an affair with Jennifer, just to see how they'll react.

When the deliveryman comes back the next day, Paul threatens him with a gun after he sees the man make a pass at his wife. But it's all a joke on his part, as the gun fires blanks, until the second shot murders him and they have to hide his body. But when do the pranks stop? When they encase the man in plaster? Or when his ghost keeps walking through the house?

While the part of Lisa was originally intended for Marlene Dietrich, Simone Signoret makes sense, as the film she may be most famous for, Diabolique, has a similar tone. It's interesting that in 1967, as everyone was moving to the New Hollywood, Harrington had an eye to the glory days of the past.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Crafty, serpentine thriller
devalier13 May 1999
Crafty little thriller about a wealthy, bored young couple (James Caan and Katharine Ross) who resort to playing kinky games for kicks. The games turn deadly though when mysterious stranger Simone Signoret insinuates herself into their lives. After a rather slow start, Games soon segues into an exciting, serpentine mystery that seems way ahead of its time for 1967. Although modern audiences have become too adept at sniffing out clues and predicting twist-endings, this film is still very effective at keeping its audience guessing. Rarely shown on tv, but if you do have the opportunity to see it...do!
34 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weird family plot
happytrigger-64-39051719 January 2022
This movie makes me think of two masterpieces of suspense, "les Diaboliques" and "Sleuth". But "Games" isn't a masterpiece, because the three characters are not developed, I really don't understand their motivation. The main interest is to see a wonderful casting but sadly with no development. Simone Signoret is still brilliant as a mysterious lady, James Caan is so handsome and photogenic and Katherine Moss hypnotised me. The colorful settings and costumes are really pop arty and a feast for the eyes. It remains a fine entertainment.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Top Notch Mystery Thriller
irishcoffee63023 August 2003
Stylish photography, very well acted and very well written and directed thriller that will keep you guessing until the end. Katherine Ross and James Caan as the bored kinky NY couple are outstanding in one of their early roles. Made in 1967 this film was way ahead of it's time with it's themes. If you like offbeat mysteries "Games" is a game you will want to play! Hard to find on tape, not on DVD and rarely on TV. Too bad because this film is like one of those lost cinematic gems. Hopefully a DVD distributer will release in a (hopefully)widescreen. Recommend this one highly.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Thomas Wolfe was right...
theterror575 October 2010
You can't go home again. I remember seeing Games 35 years ago on the late-afternoon movie show, heavily cut. I treasured the memory of a suave, clever, scary film. I've been looking for this film for years; I wanted to share the fun with my friends. Unfortunately, I found it on DVD. While I understand why I loved it as a kid, it is one of those treasures that shouldn't be revisited. The direction is terrible, the script is worse, the cinematography and lighting are inept, same with the editing, and S Signoret appeared to be in her cups for most of the film(though she gave a good last scene). I'll give the other actors the benefit of the doubt...
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
See It - You'll Like It!
Joe-12818 September 1998
A clever, well-acted thriller with enough plot twists to leave you reeling, and an ending you will not believe. From a dull beginning to an exhaustingly clever ending, it will hold you spellbound, confused, engrossed and tense. Should be re-released, but not re-made.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A stylish, atmospheric and entertaining thriller.
ags12330 August 2006
"Games" has barely aged in over forty years. What looked avant-garde in the 1960s endures as quintessentially modern. The art-filled New York City brownstone house could be featured on today's HGTV. The cast is first-rate. Simone Signoret does a variation of her "Diabolique" character - a cold, calculating opportunist beneath the serene, matronly exterior. Katherine Ross couldn't be lovelier - whenever the story's logic becomes a bit shaky, you're too distracted by her exquisite beauty to notice. James Caan does a great job as a slick charmer living off his wife's money. It's all a fun-filled puzzle with lots of suspense. Attention Universal Studios: Put this film on DVD!

Update: Finally got my hands on the DVD from the Universal Vault series. I enjoy this film now as much as I did back in 1967. For me it holds up well to repeated viewings. Even knowing every twist and turn of the plot, I find the urbane treachery and artful setting endlessly absorbing. "Games" probably won't be a preferred choice of younger audiences, but remains my favorite guilty pleasure.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lame plot
filmklassik11 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Tedious thriller, in many ways a remake of Signoret's earlier DIABOLIQUE, with an ending Ray Charles could see coming a mile off. I'm surprised this movie has so many admirers. It shouldn't. It's derivative, far-fetched (the villain's scheme is ludicrous), and doesn't stand up to a moment's scrutiny.

Rule of thumb: If your scheme depends on fooling someone into thinking someone who's only *pretending* to be dead for several minutes is *really* dead, it's a bad scheme.

A lot can go wrong there. I take that back. *Everything* can go wrong there.

Rule of thumb: If your scheme depends on someone who thinks they're only going to be shot with blanks being shot with *real* bullets, and then not talking before they die (or even surviving the ordeal), it's a bad scheme.

This movie is about a very, very, very bad scheme.

Good actors, though. Hence my 4/10 rating.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A little seen horror masterwork you won't easily forget
bob_meg4 September 2011
It's hard if not impossible to believe the studios tossing around names like Marlene Dietrich and Simone Signoret when casting the the role of Lisa Schindler, the down-on-her-luck cosmetics saleswoman who wanders into the lives of bon vivants Paul and Jennifer Montgomery (deliciously cast James Caan and Katherine Ross). Such were the days when true Hollywood icons were available to lend gravitas to what could be standard horror fare.

The thing is, "Games" is hardly standard. It's wickedly evil, perverse, and calculating --- playing you like a piano, much the way Ross and Caan's characters typically play their party guests. The film takes place almost entirely in a fantastic set-piece brownstone owned by the couple, filled with off-putting expressionistic artwork and baroque/Gothic decorations. It's obvious neither Paul nor Jennifer work for a living, and placing a sophisticated cypher like Signoret among them, who oozes both charm and menace with equal ease, is a superb set-up.

All three of these characters enjoy playing "games" and suffice it to say, things take a turn for the worse rather quickly when Signoret gifts Jen and Paul a pair of antique dueling revolvers.

Curtis Harrington's direction really ignites this film: he plays with a lot of transposition and editing tricks that really heighten the suspense and paranoia. The last third of the film contains many moments that are downright terrifying, especially given the way they're set up and performed.

And of course, the script measures up to it, leading you down various false alleys and never giving you much clue as to what's going to happen next. When it's over, you can't believe you didn't see it coming, but that's part of the fun of "Games." It weaves a spell over you much like that mystical crystal ball of Madame Schindler's.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't Play these Games **
edwagreen29 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A pretty bad imitation of the older film "Diabolique."

An odd ball couple, James Caan and Katharine Ross, enjoy playing all sorts of tricks with their devised electrical equipment. Suddenly, Mrs. Schindler (Simone Signoret) shows up. While she isn't exactly Mrs. Robinson, she adds much to the mystery.

When a gun which is supposed to be filled with blanks goes off, a grocery delivery boy is killed and the couple try their best to hide the murder.

What follows is basically a diabolical scheme by Caan to get his wife's money. Mrs. Schindler is a cohort of the Caan character.

The picture tries to be scary, but it fails due to a lack of interest. Of course, Schindler turns the tables on Caan at the end, but you can't wait until all this is over.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Curtis Harrington's best feature, a tricky and artful suspense thriller
gortx13 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When Curtis Harrington passed away recently, it was difficult to convey to people just who he was, and why he was an important figure (he was an acquaintance of mine). Though his features were relatively few, he and his long-time producing partner George Edwards, produced a fine body of work. Unfortunately, Harrington was not only treated shabbily when he tried to get features financed (his last feature was 1985's MATA HARI), that negligence has continued on in home video with several of his films either out of print or on poor quality releases. GAMES is only available as an oop VHS tape.

GAMES probably represents the best-budgeted, most successful feature film in Harrington's career. It is full of colorful detail, flamboyant theatricality, art and artifice. Harrington had a great love for classic cinema and art/antiques and GAMES afforded him the opportunity to indulge them in this visually rich production.

GAMES has often been described as a Hitchcockian thriller (a filmmaker who Harrington doubtless had studied), but it pays an even greater homage to Clouzot's DIABLOLIQUE, even going so far as to cast its heroine, Simone Signoret. Signoret turns in a masterful performance utterly in keeping with the sly gamemanship on display. It is hard to describe the twists and turns in this tricky plot, but I wouldn't want to do so anyway so as not to ruin it for those who haven't seen it. Trust Harrington, Edwards and Gene Kearney's script, even if you can guess where its going, the ride is a witty one.

I'm afraid the deliberate pacing might be confuse those brought up in today's hyper action film environment with it being slow. The pace IS intentional and it adds to the intrigue. The payoffs are delicious and worth waiting for.

Just because Harrington had a love for the past (even the past as of the mid-60's) doesn't mean GAMES is just a nostalgia ride, he had the good sense to cast then up-and-comers James Caan and Katharine Ross, as well as mix in Lichtenstein like pop-art along with the antiquities in the set dressing. Harrington also included cameos from a couple of his actresses from his previous films: Florence Marley (QUEEN OF BLOOD) and Luana Anders (NIGHT TIDE).

The American Cinematheque held a screening of GAMES in tribute to Curtis Harrington and the print was in very good physical condition. The colors were strong and it was in widescreen. Though a bit soft and with some grain, it would make for a suitable DVD anamorphic transfer. Hint, hint Universal Studios!
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
frightening
americanidle-129 October 2006
i've been looking for this movie for years, it's impossible to find. i believe it was removed from public viewing because it's too scary to watch. i don't mean scary in the sense that there are ghosts in the closet, i mean scary in the sense that it portrays real life evil and possible scenarios that you could be in. yeah, you. if you do manage to find it, i defy anyone to watch it alone at midnight in a dark home, it can't be done. i tried it and blacked out from fear about half way through. you'll have to turn it off or you'll be checking the door locks and calling your friends. simone is the most under rated actress in history and you'll be cursing james caan and katherine ross for letting her in the door in the first place. find it and watch it but remember, don't you dare do it alone.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"Games": A Forgettable Misstep on the way to The Top for Caan and Ross
jtncsmistad4 August 2018
James Caan and Katherine Ross were each on the cusp of superstardom in 1967, he with a breakout performance in "The Godfather", she becoming a bonafide leading lady in "The Graduate". But before ascending into the rarified air of Hollywood Royalty, they made the clunker "Games" together.

Painfully slow and stunningly devoid of chills for an alleged "thriller", this one falls firmly into the category of "paying your dues".

Watching this legendary pair play Parcheesi would have been more stimulating.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Rarely shown on TV? This used to be on TV all the time.
bribabylk14 November 2012
When I was a kid living in southeast Missouri in the early '80s, this movie was frequently shown on television; there was a cable station out of St. Louis, I believe, that would show this. It would be shown as an afternoon movie from around 2-4 p.m., maybe, and then AGAIN in the evening, from 8-10. Captivated me the first couple of times I saw it, with its slick, stylish production values and quiet, slowly-escalating suspense, but I have to admit I got a little tired of seeing it. So I don't know what all this talk about it not being on TV is about. Well worth seeing if you never have, though, or if it's been awhile. All the performances are top notch, the story keeps you hooked and guessing--at least if you haven't seen a lot of these kinds of movies, I guess; to be honest, I think even as a kid I had a vague idea of how it would turn out. But getting there is fun.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
You win some, you lose some.
BA_Harrison21 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Simone Signoret (looking not unlike Eddie 'Suzy' Izzard), a young James Caan, and a pre-The Graduate Katherine Ross star in this late '60s murder thriller from director Curtis Harrington; unfortunately, however impressive the cast, the film doesn't deliver much in the way of genuine intrigue or surprises thanks to Harrington's pedestrian storytelling, his script nowhere near as clever as intended. The film unfolds exactly as expected, the twists easier to predict than the outcome of Wile E. Coyote painting a tunnel on the side of a mountain.

Caan and Ross play hip, married New York couple Paul and Jennifer Montgomery, who have inherited a fancy home from Jennifer's mother, as well as a small fortune that Paul likes to invest in his art collection. The couple also enjoy throwing bizarre parties and playing games, which includes mischievous pranks. Signoret is beauty product saleswoman Lisa Schindler, who wangles her way into the Montgomery household and becomes involved in the games, one of which has fatal consequences.

Like a poor man's Les Diaboliques (which also starred Signoret), the film involves a dead person who isn't really dead and a scheme by Paul and Lisa to claim all of Jennifer's money for themselves. It's one of those ridiculously elaborate plans that could easily go disastrously wrong, but which is somehow carried out as intended despite the occasional hiccup to add tension to proceedings. Harrington delivers one final twist at the end of the film that is just as predictable as all of the others.

4.5/10, rounded up to 5 for IMDb.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A mysterious woman interrupts the mindless game-playing of an idle young Manhattan couple, and introduces the duo to some more exciting and dangerous games that culminate in murder.
verna5514 September 2000
Stylish, offbeat American variation on the classic French thriller DIABOLIQUE, which also featured Simone Signoret in the lead. Signoret is equally effective here, and a young James Caan and Katharine Ross are also impressive as the bewildered young couple whose seemingly mindless game-playing takes a deadly turn for the worse when the mystical Signoret enters their lives. Director Curtis Harrington(who also had a hand in the script) has added some exciting and effective new touches to this first-rate suspense tale.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Want to play a game?
BumpyRide22 December 2004
I agree with others that this is a hard one to find, luckily I recorded it once years ago, but every now and then I dig it out and watch it. It's just a fun movie to watch with a great performance by Simone S. who dominates every scene she is in. This movie has atmosphere and an air of intimacy about it. The story may not be totally original but the originality of the characters overcomes any shortness of the script. Kooky Estelle Winwood is great as the "cat lady" who lives next door, who's always concerned about her savings coupons. The "Mod" decor of the 60's only enhances the funkiness to this movie. Scan the movie section and if you see it's going to be on by all means tune in and get turned on!
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Contains a terrific surprise ending.
montgomerysue9 August 2004
This movie about a young couple who engage in psychological games with a door-to-door saleslady who collapses in their home and becomes their houseguest is intriguing and almost fascinating to watch. Simone Signoret is wonderful as the saleslady, Lisa Schindler. After the film is over, you want to go back and watch her performance all over again. It's one of those types of stories. The sixties era in which the movie was filmed is captivating, too. Definitely for those who enjoyed such movies as "Night Watch" with Elizabeth Taylor, "The Usual Suspects", and "Diabolique", which also starred Simone Signoret. A very good thriller, with interesting twists, a cool sixties atmosphere, and Simone Signoret stealing every scene she is in from James Caan and Katharine Ross, who, at times, looks in awe of her co-star.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed