Wild in the Streets (1968) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
64 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
This Film is A Time Warp Back to the 1960's.
epl10 March 2006
This film is a time warp of Los Angeles and the Sunset Strip in the 1960's. At first sigthing on the FLIX Channel I thought the actor was James Dean. Uncanny resemblance.

Richard Pryor as the drummer in a rock band getting high on LSD with topless white chicks must of been mind blowing for teenagers then. I missed this film totally in 1968. My parents probably made sure of it.

To see Daily Variety columnist Army Archerd, and the greatest lawyer in the nation at that time, Melvin Belli, playing themselves in a film with a whacked out Shelly Winters was just amazing.

The real night time Sunset Strip cruising footage of 1968 was really "far-out man".
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not great, but a slice of the 60's-as-we-wish-they-were
Sperry2313 December 2005
Max Frost and his band want to run the country and with the help of their friends and some pharmacology, they take over the political structure of the USA. It's a reasonably well made cautionary tale of the late 60's. It briefly became a cult favorite and was said to have prompted then-mayor of Chicago, Richard Daily, to put guards around the city's water supply just prior to, and during the 1968 Democratic National Convention to prevent anarchists from "dosing" the water with psychedelics.

The storyline is fairly slick for the time; how do a bunch of don't-trust-anyone-over-30 kids take over the country? There's a little romance, a little angst, a little rock music, and a lot of scenery-chewing and overacting by the "Major Stars" including Shelly Winters and Ed Begley. Hal Holbrook was able to keep it toned down.

This was also one of the first major films the late Richard Prior appeared in. The other being Sid Cesar's "The Busy Body", released the same year.

The psychedelic aspects of "Wild in the Streets" make it a great film to pair with Peter Fonda's "The Trip" for a 60's double feature flashback fest. Enjoy and never trust anyone under 30. heh.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Satire or Prophecy? WHO CAN TELL???
Putzberger11 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The plot of this movie is absurd, Disney-on-acid: a rock star (who sounds a lot more like a 1965 Mitch Ryder wannabe than a 1968 Cream wannabe, i.e. this film was dated from the start) connives his way to the presidency. And certain elements of the flick are just as goofy as the plot: the early scenes of Max Frost's childhood, including Shelley Winters interrupting two necking preteens by screaming "DIRTY DIRTY BOY AND A DIRTY DIRTY GIRL!!" certainly seem satirical in intent, and I don't think we're supposed it take in seriously when Max Frost belts (Ryder-style again instead of adopting the fey, faux-British accent more popular in '68): "come on and vote for Sally LeRoy! She's old enough for the Congress, boy!!" But if you watch closely, there's some nasty stuff here: massacres, suicide and forced internment, none of it presented with a light touch. So are we supposed to identify with rebel Christopher Jones (jinkies, why did he disappear so quickly after this masterpiece?), or learn the bitter lessons of appeasement from the harsh fates of poor Shelley Winters (her last scene really is horrifying) and Hal Holbrook (a Kennedyesque [!] Senator betrayed by his more liberal allies [!!] - was this movie written before or after Bobby was shot?)? I think the movie is trying to have it both ways -- pandering to the youth market by supposedly extolling revolution while pandering to the "straights" by scaring the bejesus out of them with a bunch of ruthless, power-hungry hippies. Like a lot of trash, this movie makes for better sociology than art. But it's entertaining in an idiotic way (or maybe it's idiotic in an entertaining way) and there are tons of guilty pleasures here: beautiful Diane Varsi, captured halfway down her slide from "Peyton Place" stardom to oblivion; Richard Pryor, captured halfway up his climb from Bill Cosby-style polite token to foul-mouthed, confrontational genius; Congress on acid; and "Fourteen or Fight," the only protest song in history that sounds like it was inspired by the Mitch Miller show. Not a serious film, but somehow an important one.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
There's a new voice, rising up angry in the sky
sloopjohnb3721 March 2003
My high school buddies and I drove into Chicago to watch this the day it opened in 1968 and were not disappointed. On the way, WLS AM radio played "Jumpin' Jack Flash", which was the first time any of us had heard that tune. I think we may have inhaled some contraband, but I remember this day like it was yesterday. It was good to be "young, dumb and full of ***!" (-to quote Mr Busey, from Point Break.)

Some epic bits from this movie: 1) Richard Pryor spikes the DC water supply with LSD, resulting in a congress-full of hopelessly tripped-out Senators and Representatives. 2) Ed Begley and Shelley Winters wander about in flowing robes and caftans at the "Acid Concentration Camp" for people over 30. 3) Extremely young Billy Mumy confronting the great lout, Max Frost and declaring "We're putting everyone over 8 out of business!" 4)Diane Varsi cavorting nude in a fountain 4) Future Brady Buncher Barry Williams as the young terrorist Max.

See, this is one highly-lacking-in-credibility enterprise, but you have to love it. Watch and remark to yourself how this movie could only have been made in that halcyon year, 1968. Nothing this wonderfully over-the-top crazed and ridiculously sublime has been made since nor will ever grace the screen again.

For comparison (and companion) purposes, view this superb teen psychodrama in series with other 1968 befuddlements such as: "Planet of the Apes", "2001: A Space Oddysey", "Rosemary's Baby", "Putney Swope" and "The Savage Seven".

Christopher Jones only immortal role was the highly Hitleresque rocker, Max Frost.

Jeez, gimme the DVD already! This glorious cinematic potato is out of print!
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, but a little too cruel
preppy-33 October 2001
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS AHEAD**

Fantasy about a 24 year old multimillionaire Max (Christopher Jones) getting the voting age lowered to 14, becoming president and putting away anyone over the age of 30 in concentration camps and giving them daily doses of LSD. Believe it or not, this was taken seriously by some critics when it came out! C'mon!!! The plot is ridiculous!

I like it on a comedy level, but the movie has some very cruel moments. A little boy is hit and killed by a car (with long views of his bloody body); there's constant drug abuse treated as cute; older people are forced into taking drugs; a man hangs himself and the concentration camp plot is really repulsive. Also, almost all the characters are unlikable--especially the teenagers. That's kind of strange considering this is geared to a teen audience (who did like it).

I find it fun. The plot moves quickly, the songs are surprisingly good and there's some imaginative use of split screen. As for the acting--Shelley Winters is extremely annoying as Maxs' mother. She's not funny--just shrill. Diane Varsi is constantly drugged out as one of Max's girlfriends but she's very funny--her speech in front of Congress is hilarious. And Christopher Jones--he's very handsome and can sing really good, but has zero charisma and is a lousy actor. He comes across as a spoiled brat--I wanted to take him over my knee and spank him! Also he should not do shirtless scenes when his body is that out of shape.

Still, I enjoy it. As Leonard Maltin said, it's enjoyable on a non-think level. Recommended.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Psychedelic hash
jjnxn-110 May 2013
Hippie dippy ridiculousness is a true artifact of it's time. Starting off with the preposterous concept of lowering the retirement age to 30 and impounding all the retirees in militant psychedelic camps is silly enough. But then throw in all the groovy 60's speak, far out outfits and Shelley Winters abandoning any pretext of modulating her performance and what you end up with is not the happening experience the producers were surely hoping for but a sloppy mess that if nothing else is good for a few laughs. Several respected actors besides Shelley risk their reputations by appearing in this junk including Richard Pryor and Hal Holbrook fortunately they were able to go on and put a lot of distance between themselves and this cinematic white elephant. Peace out baby!!
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Many Things Age Poorly
Mike_Yike12 October 2012
I saw this movie in the theater a week or so after my junior year in high school. It was my first date where I was allowed to drive. The film received a lot of fanfare, aimed entirely at my generation. I went with high expectations and was of course disappointed. I think it was supposed to be some kind of Hollywood version of a social protest film, set in a slightly tongue-in-cheek spirit. It came off as just goofy. I thought it was goofy at the time, when I was 17 and almost anything designed especially for me I perceived as at least a little bit cool and hip. But not Wild In The Streets. Nope.

Some folks might think it has acquired some kind of cheeky flavor to it that makes it a good film, you know, like Plan 9 From Outer Space is supposedly a good movie too. But nope, Wild In the Street is simply a below par film, and for that matter, so is Plan 9.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
unintentionally funny and moronic social satire
planktonrules12 June 2005
When this movie came out in 1968, it made a bit of a stir. However, almost forty years later, it just looks incredibly dated and stupid BUT unintentionally funny as well! So for comedic value, you may want to give it a watch.

Max Frost is a very narcissistic rock star with a MASSIVE following among the youth. So popular, in fact, that he is able to mobilize the kids of America to go on strike until the voting age is lowered and they get a say in government (yeah, man--right on!). Unfortunately, his plan works too well and all the squares in Washington are sent packing and the good old US of A is now run by Frost and his hippie friends, man! So naturally, they use this power to send all the squares (aka, adults) to concentration camps and the kids run amok! Things are not that groovy, though, as the youngest members of society are left to fend for themselves and, within them, dissatisfaction begins to build and then the movie ends.

This is all meant to be some sort of allegory designed to warn us about "youth run wild". Instead of a serious message, though, it just seems overblown, ponderous and dopey,...as well as funny from time to time. These qualities make it an EXCELLENT film to show to your friends...sort of "Mystery Science Theater" style so you can all laugh at the unintentional hilarity of the movie.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Groovy Flashback...LSD not Required
mwbubelah2 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Since I was only in fifth grade at the time of this film's release in 1968, I did not have the unmitigated joy of seeing this on the big screen. In fact, I had only heard rumors of the film's existence until I caught it tonight on one of the Starz channels. (Thank the movie gods for them!) And despite the dated but still delicious grooviness of the then-teen flick, there are shades of relevance today.

The seemingly ridiculous premise: an unbelievably handsome 22-year-old millionaire singing idol (Christopher Jones)--who can make his own LSD!--helps a congressman (Hal Halbrook) become senator on the platform of lowering the voting age to 15, through sheer charisma gathers thousands of youths to rally in both L.A. and D.C., eventually wins the office of U.S. President as a Republican (!) and then forces anyone over 30 into a "paradise camp" to be forever happy on LSD so that they are incapable of causing any more trouble.

To many teens at the time (and even now, I suppose), this idea was not all that ridiculous. The "establishment" was greatly concerned over the growing influence of the babyboomers, who made up over half of the population at that time, and the young people knew it. This film's message of hope for peace and love by removing "old school" approaches to politics, while also offering a great song (which actually hit the charts), attractive actors in up-to-the-minute costumes and a higher-than-usual quality of filming, appealed to the rebellious nature of youth and their demands for a cool movie that they could relate to but that would simultaneously freak out their parents. It made a LOT of money for its day and genre.

The film opens with the rebel-protagonist quickly growing up with overbearing mom Shelley Winters, who chews up scenery like nobody's business. She has hilarious bits throughout the film, perhaps most notably after her acceptance of the "new order" as she extols the merits of LSD therapy! James Dean look-alike Jones intoxicates us with his gorgeous looks and charm, whether singing with his band in clubs or convincing us to go along with his outlandish hope for 14-year-olds to get the vote, since his own businessman/guitarist is 15!

Other highlights of the cast include Holbrook's full-on (dare we say it, mature?) dramatic acting, which contrasts greatly with the laid-back, free-spirit antics of the other young stars of the film, especially Richard Pryor, who assists in spiking the Washington D.C. water supply with LSD! Ed Begley has a couple memorable scenes as a stereotypically crabby and uncooperative senator who eventually finds drug-induced bliss at the over-30 camp, and Army Archie and Dick Clark (!) have cameos. Post-election ugliness and the ending scene with a future child star add ridiculous but poignant twists.

Today, many will see the film as over-the-top and rather campy, a weird period piece from the era of activism but also of often really bad movies. However, those old enough to have been around then will remember not just the drugs and far-out clothes but the counter-culture rumblings of the late 60s. True, this is not high art and certainly not cerebral. But far from being a throw-away film, "Wild In the Streets" remains a funny examination of a time when the demands for social change brought about extremes in actions. The posters on the message boards for this site who are searching for copies of this time capsule gem attest to its lasting appeal.
35 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Psychadelic paranoid fantasy goes nowhere slowly
herbqedi22 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
BEWARE -- SPOILERS (sort of)

The first thirty minutes of this psychadelic flower-child generation-gone wild paranoid fantasy percolates to its 60's beat. The set-up with Holbrook and Varsi as Jones' accomplices is close to ingenious. And Jones handles himself in a way that makes you believe his cohort accept him unflaggingly as their leader. But once he starts implementing his vision, things slide downhill all too fast. It is one-note, dumb, and predictable, as absolute power corrupts absolutely. But, it's a shame to tune out before the film's final scene, which is hysterical. The last line is just too good not to repeat as a classic, "We're going to put everybody over ten out of business!" And this was years before anybody could have predicted the Cambodian Khmer Rouge!

Overall, fun for film students, and fans of theatre d'absurd. People who want traditionally entertaining movies with characters whose actions actually make sense should look elsewhere.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Saw it on the Big Screen, just saw it again.
TR-2812 September 2006
When this came out in 1968 I was 17. It made a huge impression on me then. What a wild and strange movie. I was not really ready for this movie but I liked it just the same. When Max said 14 or fight, I believed him. Of course at 17 I couldn't vote but I was facing 18 and at that time the Vietnam draft. Scary times indeed. Just the other night it was on TMC and I recorded it. I don't think I've seen it anywhere since. It was fun to watch it again, Shelly Winters looked really young, Ed Begley was perfect as the stoned out old Senator and Christopher Jones, going from rock star to politician to President and then to "old guy" played the part to a tee. The only thing about this movie I didn't care for was that it type casted Jones and he really didn't do much after this movie.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Vidiot Reviews...
capone66610 July 2016
Wild in the Streets

The problem with teenagers voting is that they loiter around the ballot box afterwards.

However, the adolescents in this musical are more apt to through a dance party.

Subversive since infancy, Max Frost (Christopher Jones) now fronts a successful rock group of astute teens (Richard Pryor, Kevin Coughlin, Diane Varsi) that Senator Fergus (Hal Holbrook) would like to partner with.

But before he'll endorse the policymaker, Frost wants Fergus to lower the voting age to 14, or else Frost's fans will riot.

Eventually, Frost uses LSD to win the US presidency and send everyone over 35 to internment camps.

An outlandish cautionary tale about the social tensions affecting sixties youth, this cult classic may have some trippy ideas and seriously catching tunes, but its message of dissent is drowned out by all its bell-bottomed kitsch.

Regardless, what good is the vote at 14 if you can't go binge drink afterwards?

Yellow Light

vidiotreviews.blogspot.ca
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tries to Shock...
Space_Mafune16 March 2003
This film has the unlikely premise of a popular young musician using his charisma, youth and influence to win over the American public to a more youth-inclined culture, a one with no time or patience for adults. Basically this is out to shock and it succeeds in this respect..however there's really very little message or meaning here beyond that.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One wild, psychedelic ride
thomandybish16 February 2001
This film is a fascinating time capsule of late sixties fashions, music, and mindsets, as essential to an understanding to the culture of the times as BLOW-UP and BEDAZZLED. Like the decade itself, the film is funny, political, satiric, irreverent, colorful and groovy. No really. The movie involves Max Flatow, an angry teen who blows up his parent's car and runs away from his push-over father and clinging mother to become a rock star and multi-millionaire. Now flanked by a group of hangers-on/band members that include a washed-up child star-turned-druggie(Diane Varsi), a one-handed horn player(Larry Bishop), a gay business manager(Kevin Coughlin), a fourteen-year old Japanese typewriter heiress, and black militant drummer(Richard Pryor!), Max Frost, as he is now known, endorses a self-serving young senatorial candidate(Hal Holbrook, in a role that now undoubtably makes him cringe)hoping to court young voters. But Max has his own agenda, using the newly-elected senator to have Varsi elected to Congress and propose legislation that the voting age be lowered to 14!Max laces the Washington water supply with LSD, then he and his cronies enlist teenagers to escort the stoned Congressmen to the voting booths. With the voting age lowered, Max gets himself elected President and outlaws anyone over 30, sentencing them to concentration camps where they're kept perpetually stoned on LSD.

The whole premise belies the generational tensions that laid just below the surface of everyday life in the late sixties. What looks like far-fetched camp now was very much a concern to the older people who felt overwhelmed by the predominant youth culture of the time. Still, it is a fun romp. The musical sequences are eye-popping precursors to MTV, with psychedelic light displays and cutting edge(for 1968)graphics, and the camera angles and editing are top-drawer(the film was nominated for an Oscar for editing). Yet the film does have a good deal of camp, primarily in Shelley Winters, out of control as Max's overbearing mother. Winters was well into the insane/conniving/perverted mother stage of her career(starting with LOLITA and ending with WHO SLEW AUNTIE ROO)and she hits her stride here: she not only chomps the scenery but gobbles it down and goes for seconds! Everyone has a favorite scene: Winters commandeering the wheel of Max's Rolls and rolling the car, killing a small boy in the process; Winters in a long blonde wig and hippie get-up, extolling the virtures of LSD therapy; Winters(about five minutes after the last scene)in a pill box hat, suit, and finger waves haughtily telling a reporter about her recent appointment as U.S. Ambassador to England(?!); and my personal fave, with Winters, disheveled and whacked out on LSD, wearing a hospital gown and scaling a chain-link fence as she screams, "FEATHERS! I MUST HAVE FEATHERS!!" Whatthehell??

The movie was on video at one point, but may be out of print. AIP, that teen fare sausage factory, put this one out, and it supposedly got a bigger budget that their average flicks. It also made quite a bit of money. A true cult classic, and, did you know, the theme song, "Shapes Of Things To Come" was released as a single credited to Max Frost and the Troopers? It charted at #22 in 1968!
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
14 or fight!
Hey_Sweden5 July 2015
The prevailing youth culture of America in the 1960s certainly had tremendous impact, as noted in this interesting social / political satire courtesy of writer Robert Thom. Christopher Jones plays a young man who yearned to break free of his strict upbringing, and became a leading rock star and counterculture figure, rechristening himself "Max Frost". He becomes a voice for the kids of the nation, and youthful looking career politician Johnny Fergus (Hal Holbrook) figures to capitalize on this. Fergus reasons that any person old enough to be drafted into military service is at least old enough to deserve the right to vote. Their relationship bears some strange fruit, with Frost letting power completely go to his head.

While very much a film of its time, "Wild in the Streets" does capture a pivotal point in the pop culture evolution. It's an amusing and reasonably intelligent examination of the generation gap, which was even more pronounced in past decades than it is now. Kids didn't have a voice, anybody to speak for them, or individuals to relate to. And adults just assumed that they knew best; that experience was all that really mattered. The characters here are stereotypical, by and large, but that is entirely the point. When Frost and his followers - whom he calls his "troops" - get into power, things change to a radical degree, with official law enforcement organizations like the FBI and CIA seeming to become obsolete.

The music is, for the most part, quite catchy and groovy. The cast is impressive all the way down the line. Jones has some charisma going for him, and Richard Pryor is fun as his drummer, although the latter doesn't really get much opportunity to be funny. The young generation is extremely well supported by veterans such as Shelley Winters and Bert Freed (as Frosts' parents), and Ed Begley (as an angry senator). Co-star Millie Perkins, who plays Fergus's wife, was married to screenwriter Thom at the time.

"Wild in the Streets" may seem dated to some viewers now, but back in 1968 I can believe that a story of its kind would have great appeal to its audience.

Seven out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A "What If" Film That Falls Flat
atlasmb20 May 2016
"Wild in the Streets" is a film about the youth of American rising up to take political power via a reduction in the voting age. It was released in the 60s and reflects some of the issues of its time.

Today, the messages of the youthful upstarts might be seen as similar to the confused political fledglings referred to now as millennials. But the film is a parody of the counterculture--those who wanted more than change, they wanted revolution. In the 60s, many objected to the fact that 18-year-olds could be drafted but could not vote. Christopher Jones plays the role of Max Frost, a megalomaniacal rock star who energizes American youth--and some older members of the establishment who want to benefit from younger voters--to push for a younger voting age--somewhere between fourteen or eighteen.

The film imagines what might happen if such a movement took hold and gained power. It shows Frost as a near-dictator whose power corrupts him. He is without a conscience and he indulges his every whim. Frost also is immature (surprise!). And as a member of the counterculture, he endorses the use of hallucinatory drugs and the disbandment of all institutions of authority.

Though the film offers some moments of sharp insight, it mostly feels like it was written by a writer who himself was under the influence. And in the end, it is no more relevant regarding youth culture and politics than "Bye Bye Birdie".

The ending is anticlimactic and ham-handed--hoping to deliver a pithy insight that it undercuts by final scenes that are amateurish.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Silly but enjoyable 60's satirical teen psychedelic musical
Red-Barracuda18 January 2023
I am always a bit of a sucker for any late 60's American counter-culture offerings, so inevitably I picked up this effort from Roger Corman's AIP studios. Turns out it is a psychedelic political satire that doubles up as a teen movie. In it a young pop idol called Max Frost decides to run for president. He and his cohorts put LSD in the Washington D. C. water supply leading to zonked out members of congress voting in favour of his reforms, which include shipping people over 30 off to concentration camps where they will be given daily doses of hallucinogens and lowering the voting age to 14.

Its all pretty ludicrous of course but it works well nowadays as a time-capsule portrait of the west coast counterculture in exaggerated movie form. Needless to say, like many other films in the same bracket, its main strength is its far out late 60's vibes, which include colourful fashions and décor, of-its-time hip talk and psychedelic musical segments. The satire is pretty light-weight and the film overall is a pretty uneven experience but on the whole, it is another effort from the era which gets by primarily on its love generation vibes. My vote is seven lava lamps out of ten.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Possibly the worst film ever made
grahamsj37 November 2000
Warning: Spoilers
This film was doomed from the start. The ONLY thing it has going for it is the music. The film is about a rock star who wants to become the ruler of America. He gets all of Washington (pretty much!) high on LSD. The acting is abysmal and the story is even worse. The terrible acting is a surprise considering some of the names in the film. Hal Holbrook, Shelley Winters, Richard Pryor (before anyone had heard of him), Ed Begley and even Dick Clark are in this film. But the acting is still totally awful. The entire premise of the film is ridiculous, the story implausible and the directorship poor also. I gave this film a solid 1!!!!! If you ever have a chance to see this film, DON'T!!
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Sixties weren't ALL peace and love, baby
RodMorgan25 September 2002
Which came first, Robert Thom's Esquire novella or his screenplay? Doesn't matter - the premise of "the youth vote" (as if it were monolithic, a consistent mistake during the Sixties) working to overthrow the establishment and creating a fully functional dystopia was a winner from the first word. Immaculately filmed despite the shoestring budget and remarkably well-acted by an amazing cast, the New York Times referred to it as the only film that year to "get it" in terms of the impact of youth culture. Academy award nomination for editing, largely from clipping what appears to be Monterey Pop footage and overlaying our presidential candidate, Max Frost. A delight then, a delight now. Nothing can change the shape of things to come.
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nothing Can Change The Shape Of Things To Come
bkoganbing14 November 2012
A great cult film of the late Sixties, Wild In The Streets was a projection in fantasy of what the shape of the world would be if youth actually took over. Needless to say this was not the shape of things to come. For one thing the vote at age 18 was actually passed a couple of years after this film came and Congress did it without tripping on LSD. We responded in turn by re-electing Richard Nixon and in 1980 the youth vote went as a demographic majority for the oldest elected president we've ever had with Ronald Reagan.

Proving that we really do separate our politics from our entertainment. Not here however as charismatic Jim Morrison like rockstar Christopher Jones rallies the youth of America to assert their status and demand that the voting age be lowered to 14. A very ambitious Congressman played by Hal Holbrook who wants to be California's next Senator tries to ride this particular tiger and gets consumed in the process.

Shelley Winters and Bert Freed play Jones's parents and Winters looks like she's having a ball in a part that calls for her bravura style of overacting. Ed Begley also in one his last films first playing one of pillars of Congress as the senior Senator from California and later on as a caricature of an old Testament prophet which is what mandatory LSD has turned him into.

Young people today can't quite grasp what Wild In The Streets was all about back then which is why it's an anachronism today. We had the draft back in those days so when older people over 30 in the government sent you to the Army and to some war you didn't quite understand what the issues were there, a slogan like 'Don't Trust Anyone Over 30' had real meaning and it wasn't just a matter of tastes. That's the mentality that Jones in his character of Max Frost is playing into. He calls his followers 'troops' and in a real sense they are.

But today in America young folks played a major role in re-electing Barack Obama. If Max Frost was a candidate for president today we might be electing a Jonas Brother. And I only exclude Justin Bieber because he's Canadian.

Still this film is quite a view of the Sixties be it a jaundiced view.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Die Hippie, Die!
twhiteson20 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Where's Eric Cartman, a giant mechanized drilling machine, and a Slayer CD when you really need them?

"Wild in the Streets" is a laughably dated curiosity piece from the late 60's that really has to be seen to be believed.

The plot: We're introduced to the life of one "Max Jacob Flatow, Jr." aka "Max Frost" (Christopher Jones) from his unwanted conception to his dysfunctional childhood due to his mother (Shelley Winters) being a frigid harpy to his running away from home as a teen. We later meet Max as a 22 yr old lead singer of a successful pop group. Although he's an acid-dropping, dope-smoking layabout with several illegitimate children and is surrounded by ne'er-do-well hippies (yes, a redundancy), Max has become one of the richest men in the country. (Hippies have money?) With his wealth and massive youth following, Max's support is sought by politicians.

Enter ambitious "Johnny Fergus" (Hal Holbrook), a 37 yr old family man, who wants to be a senator. He's a supporter of lowering the voting age to 18, and believes that Max can further help him wrap-up the youth vote. However, Max knowing that the young outnumber the "Old Tigers" (anyone over 30) demands that Fergus help him lower the voting age to 15 in exchange for his support. Fergus agrees and wins his coveted senate seat. Yet, Max isn't through. With voting age lowered, he's able to get his acid-head girlfriend (Diane Varsi) elected to congress from which she pushes for an amendment to lower the age restrictions to 14 for all political offices including the presidency. The amendments pass with the assistance of spiking the water supply with LSD.

Max then becomes president and disbands the military, FBI, CIA, and secret service; ends all foreign entanglements; feeds all the hungry nations; and imprisons anyone over 35 in concentration camps where they're force-fed LSD including his nutty mother and Senator Fergus who woke-up too late to the monster he helped create.

This is one seriously whacked-out film. It goes to show how desperate Hollywood was in the late 60's to reach the youth audience, and it really thought this LSD-inspired mess would do the trick. It's supposed to be a satire, but it panders to many of the nuttiest excesses of the late 60's counterculture. Yet, at the same time, it also portrays the hippies as power-mad fascists. It's so ham-handed that it comes across as a bad acid trip. Overall, it's just so ridiculously stupid that it can't be viewed as either satire, parody, or broad comedy. There is absolutely nothing clever or witty about this film.

As for the cast, no one comes-off well here. Ed Begley and Shelley Winters ham it up to an extreme extent. Christopher Jones was briefly a hot commodity, but quickly disappeared from the film scene. Richard Pryor has a small role as "Token Black" who plays drums rather than bass in Max's cheesy band. The only other "notable" is Barry Williams (aka "Greg Brady") in a brief scene as adolescent Max.

Like the now unintentionally funny Billy Jack films, "Zabriskie Point, "The Strawberry Statement," and other awful counter-culture films of the late 60's and early 70's, "Wild in the Streets" is an absurd time capsule that really makes one wonder how did the CIA or the Commies manage to spike America's water supply?
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
is it wrong to read this (if only in retrospect) as a jaded satire on youth culture and politics?
Quinoa198429 March 2009
I was curious to read some reviews of Wild in the Streets from when it was released (i.e. Ebert's) to get an idea of what the movie was thought of at the time. There was a good line that nails what is probably at the core of the film, which is "the fascist potential of pop music," but it can be taken a step further to what the fascistic potential is of anyone who appeals to a section of the culture that can be galvanized. The movie wasn't well received- it was, granted, an AIP picture dumped on the masses as a hippie exploitation flick along the likes of Psych-Out- but now in looking back I wonder if the writer, Robert Thom (also responsible for the cult classic Death Race 2000) and director Barry Shear (mostly a TV director) were much ahead of their own audience. It skewers the old and politicians, yes, but it also skewers pop music and LSD and hedonism and even communism to a certain extent. It's a fun, absurdist nightmare 'trip' on what would happen if the "kids" took over, which leads eventually to the question: what happens when they're too old.

Four sentence summary: Christopher Jones plays Max Frost, a pop star who had one of those shaky childhoods that led to a lot of acid and blowing up his parent's car. His band, a bunch of Monkeeys rip-offs (yes, that's right), are filled with a bunch of who's whos, like a 15 year old super-genius account and a black anthropologist played by Richard Pryor. At a political rally for a "youth" senator (Hal Holbrook) who wants the voting age lowered to 18, he comes up off the bat with a rallying song, "14 or fight" to lower the voting age to 14! And then everything soon spirals into a youth-controlled congress and presidency (think Mr. Smith Goes to Washington with over-ecstatic flower children), with all the "old" pulled into camps where they're doped on acid and given frocks to wear.

Trippy, man, trippy. Contrary to what some have said, and perhaps I read more into it than was necessary or warranted, Wild in the Streets takes a hold of its principal subjects as something that is meant to be mocked mercilessly. While nowhere near the brilliance of Network, it does have the same kind of super jaded view of humanity below the surface. Everything becomes so exaggerated that the only conceivable way to take it is as a satire; if it is meant as a "serious" look at politics and the youth culture then only a few moments stand out (actually the "Shape of Things" song is ironically powerful in the context of where it comes which is right after a few students are shot at a rally - a foreshadowing to Kent State?), but on its terms of it being a nutty but oddly lucid spoof on the political scene then it works really well.

If for nothing else the cast is a hoot: Shelley Winters hams it up as the star's mother who in one scene literally crashes through security gates to get to her son who really doesn't want anything to do with her, especially after she basically kills a kid with a car! Also big props to Hal Holbrook who takes the quasi William Holdon in Network role (the one "serious" guy amid the chaos) and Ed Begley as a crusty old politico who quickly gets run out to the old-folk farm singing in circles. Along with Pryor look out for Larry Bishop and Millie Perkins. It's not high art, but Wild in the Streets has some scenes that are excruciatingly funny (I was dying during the 25 year old "chick" speaking to congress about lowering all ages to run for office to 14), and there's even some good pointers made about the state of the nation. It's exploi-satire, baby!
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The day it all happened...baby
moonspinner551 September 2007
Naïve political rabble-rouser from American International Pictures casts Christopher Jones as a sexy pop star who is elected President of the United States after the voting age is lowered to 14. Screenwriter Robert Thom, working from his short story "The Day it All Happened, Baby", addresses heady issues but in a campy manner, skimping on anything too harrowing for the sake of his target audience (presumably around 14 or so themselves). Thom also leaves out a major part of the story--the voting process--in favor of an 'ironic' subplot which parallels a chapter of World War II! The picture does look good and sound good, and it has fine acting from Jones, Shelley Winters as his mother, Diane Varsi, Millie Perkins and, in a bit, Richard Pryor. One Oscar nomination: Best Editing (Fred R. Feitshans Jr., Eve Newman). **1/2 from ****
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
the future belongs to the young
lee_eisenberg26 November 2021
It was inevitable that the '60s would produce a movie like Barry Shear's Academy Award-nominated "Wild in the Streets". This musing on the hypothetical result of letting the younger generation take over the country has to be seen to be believed. I should note that it doesn't depict the youth as heroes; it basically depicts their idealism as the result of LSD. It's easy to see why the younger generation didn't want to trust anyone over thirty.

Aside from that, it's certainly a funny movie. The last scene makes clear what the protagonist has wrought.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed