Wake in Fright (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
121 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A Bloody, Brutal Masterpiece
John Grant is a schoolteacher in a remote town deep in the Australian outback. It's the Christmas holidays, and he plans to go to Sydney to meet his girlfriend. However, the train only takes him as far as Bundanyabba- The Yabba to those who know it- where John promptly loses his money at a gambling hall. Stranded in The Yabba, John is introduced to some locals- the sinister yet charming Doc Tydon among them- and falls ever deeper into a drunken, violent haze from which he may never be able to escape.

Based on Kenneth Cook's novel of the same name, 'Wake In Fright' is a powerful psychological thriller that is frighteningly visceral and brutally realistic. Subtly directed by Ted Kotcheff, the film is a trip to the dark side of the human condition that pulls no punches. Kotcheff made some great films- 'The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz', 'Fun With Dick And Jane' among them- but this is arguably the most enduring and affecting work he ever did.

Evan Jones' adaptation of Cook's novel has resulted in a masterful screenplay that is unpredictable and terrifying. The story is riveting and realistic, never melodramatic and always entertaining. A seedy undercurrent and threat of violence runs throughout the film that will leave any viewer utterly spellbound. The brutality borne of the boredom the men in the film experience day in and day out is startlingly authentic and powerfully captured on film.

On the point of authenticity, viewers will no doubt be put off by the infamous and distressing kangaroo hunt sequence. While it is stomach-churning, it undeniably heightens both the reality and frightening nature of the film. Also- and this point is important- the hunt would have happened, had the cameras been rolling or not. Drunken idiots with weapons and too much time on their hands do savage and disgusting things; that is not up for debate: that's truth. Arguably, Kotcheff's inclusion of the sequence merely adds to the narrative power.

Brian West's naturalistic cinematography captures the outback like no other: the heat, the vast expanse, the sweat; the endlessness of it all. His camera work is fluid and artistic, his composition and framing undeniably beautiful. It is work reminiscent of the best of Bert Glennon or Freddie Young: epic photography that is truly unforgettable.

Anthony Buckley's editing is tight, his cuts adding additional subtlety and power to the film. John Scott's score is atmospheric and eerie, contributing to the sinister tone of the film, but never becoming over the top or melodramatic. The production design and set decoration is realistic and grubby, every location in the film looks genuine. The same can be said for Ron Williams' costume design- it looks like the costumes were stolen from locals' washing-lines in the night (before they were washed, one might add).

The intense realism of the picture extends to the actors' performances. Gary Bond- as Grant- is masterfully understated. The audience is totally on his side as he undergoes tortures of a psychological kind while stuck in The Yabba. Bond was often compared to Peter O'Toole throughout his career, but his is a far less theatrical presence on screen, and his performance in 'Wake In Fright' is fantastically natural.

Donald Pleasence was a terrific, powerful actor, but could occasionally lessen a film's impact with his overacting; particularly in villainous roles (see him hamming it up in 'Will Penny' for proof of this notion). However, as Doc Tydon, he is electric, magnetic and simply incredible. It is a performance of no vanity, a towering piece of acting both entertaining and petrifying to behold. That he wasn't nominated for an Academy Award for his work in the film is a testament to the fact that the Academy usually get it wrong; and always have.

In addition to Bond and Pleasence, Chips Rafferty does a scene stealing turn as the local hard-drinking policeman, Jock Crawford. Every time he's on screen your eyes are drawn to him immediately; and his performance is fantastically unaffected. Sylvia Kaye also does admirable work as a depressed sheila in whom Grant finds some kinship, and Jack Thompson makes his film debut as Dick; one of Tydon's alcoholic and violent cronies.

'Wake In Fright' is a psychological thriller full of emotional power and unpretentious depth. Featuring career-best performances from many in the cast, the film is a roller-coaster ride through a hellish outback populated by drunkards, brutes and the occasional kangaroo. There are many violent moments in the film, and some genuinely disturbing scenes that aren't for the faint of heart. It is always realistic though, and never histrionic. Most of all, it is a powerful critique of human nature, of the fallibility and violence inherent in man; especially when boredom and alcohol is involved. 'Wake In Fright' is- simply put- a masterpiece, a bloody, brutal masterpiece.
33 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Stunning new print seen at TIFF
targosfan127 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I had the great good fortune to obtain a ticket for a one-time-only screening of Wake In Fright (aka Outback) at the 2009 edition of the Toronto International Film Festival. I had heard of the film and read reviews of it, but it had receded from my memory before I noticed it in the festival program. Ted Kotcheff was known to me as the talented Canadian director of such artful Canadian films as The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz (1974) and subversive Hollywood offerings like North Dallas Forty (1979) but I had not connected him to WIF.

The screening was part of TIFF's Discussions series, which features an extended, moderated Q&A after the film. I believe this one ran at least one hour, and was very informative and interesting. But first the film.

Briefly, school teacher John Grant (Gary Bond) is contracted by the government to teach in a one-room schoolhouse in Australia's primitive Outback. The school year ends and Grant thankfully boards the train for a six week summer vacation. But he loses all his money when drawn into a stupid gambling contest in the first settlement the train reaches. He is thus just as helpless and alone as any civilized man among dangerous savages (think The Naked Prey with drunk, horny rednecks chasing the titular hero.) Grant first meets the local lawman Jock Crawford (Chips Rafferty) who appears unconcerned with the pervasive drunkenness in his community. He insists they get sloshed together, and unwittingly leads him to the gamblers, who play a simple-minded game of heads or tails with two coins. Grant wins at first, but then loses it all. Destitute, he has no choice but to accept the sodden hospitality of the locals. We get the idea (via excellent acting by Mr. Bond) that the educated young man is not happy being at the mercy of these lower-class savages. But their brutish acting-out is partially accounted for (but NOT excused) by the scarcity of sex -- whatever each of these man-children desires, men or women, they just aren't getting enough! An excellent sequence in the film is the attempted seduction of Grant by Janette Hynes (Sylvia Kay), daughter of one of Grant's erstwhile "mates." Loneliness, desperation and sexual frustration are etched in her face, and she leads Grant out of a drunken party for a walk, intending to do the dirty literally in the dirt, but her intended vomits up one of the 1,000 or so beers he downs in the film. Her wretchedness as she flees sobbing back to her father's house is just devastating.

The most controversial scenes in the film were shot during actual kangaroo hunts, conducted at the time with no decent regulation, for the benefit of foreign pet food companies. Drunk as lords, the Aussie crew speed through the desert in a "Mad Max" hunting truck, shooting every poor 'roo they can find. In the grisly climax, Grant agrees to kill an animal with a knife and his bare hands.

Later, seriously alcoholic 'Doc' Tydon (the great Donald Pleasence, at the peak of his brilliance) sexually assaults the (finally) unconscious Grant in his filthy hovel. Grant "wakes in fright" to find the good Doc asleep on the floor, naked except for a woman's baby doll nightie. "Gay panic" ensues, and after an unsuccessful attempt to hitchhike out of the town, he returns to the cabin with his kangaroo rifle and confused intentions. (SPOILER) 'Doc' returns, but Grant turns the rifle on himself and fires. He awakes in a hospital bed, and signs a statement saying the shooting was an accident. He is discharged just in time to return to his school house.

At the Q&A we learned some interesting facts: The film was shot on location in a small Aussie town, and the bar, gambling hall, the Hynes ranch, the schoolhouse, etc. are real, and together with the stark cinematography impart a sense of one of those faintly recalled nightmares that seem like a true occurrence. Mr. Kotcheff told us he was aiming to create claustrophobia in wide-open spaces, and in my humble opinion he succeeded.

The 'roo hunt was filmed documentary-style at a real hunt. The filmmakers consulted with Australian anti-hunt groups who told them to go ahead, so that the Australian public could see the cruel slaughter for themselves. It's quite sickening -- the hunters amuse themselves by shooting to wound, then watching the bleeding animals jumping about in pain. The killings by knife were simulated, shot in a black-out tent to match the night-time of the documented hunt.

The film was well received by critics at Cannes (and the restored film was re-screened there this year), and the director remembers being told by his hosts that it was an important film for Australians, and that it could only have been made by an unbiased outsider. Its North American release (as Outback) was botched -- perhaps deliberately, since (I suppose) unfettered alcoholism + gay rape + graphic animal slaughter wasn't expected to sell well, even in the cinema's post-60's creative ferment.

Eventually, the film was forgotten and the master negatives misplaced. The film's editor spent two years on his own time and dime tracking it down. He found the reels in a Pittsburgh, PA warehouse, in containers marked for destruction. Restored, remastered and revived, it has met with accolades in Australia, at Cannes, and of course here at TIFF.

Needless to say, I am anxiously awaiting the DVD release!
42 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Under the weather down under
Philby-314 July 2009
Kenneth Cook was posted as a young man by the Australian Broadcasting Commission (our state-owned broadcaster) to the NSW outback mining town of Broken Hill in the early 1950s. This experience provided the basis for his scarifying first novel, "Wake in Fright", published in 1960. In the novel, Gary, a young schoolteacher bonded to the State Education Department to teach in a desolate desert whistle stop, visits "Bundayabba" (Broken Hill) on his way back to Sydney, surf and girlfriend for the vacation, loses all his money in a two-up game in a desperate attempt to pay off his bond and descends into drunkenness and depravity with the friendly locals, who all appear to be carrying on as they normally do.

This film was made from the novel in 1970 by a production company hitherto associated with light TV entertainment. The then fairly young Canadian director, Ted Kotchoff, with a couple of foreign leads, Donald Pleasance and Gary Bond, was quite happy to accept Cook's ugly Australians as his local characters and his parody of "mateship" as the social cement binding them together. The dialogue may be spare but the editing (by Tony Buckley) is great, and we are right inside Gary's head as he loses it.

I saw this movie when it first came out in New Zealand, where it passed almost without comment. Australian audiences did not flock to see it, and the general critical reaction was that it was too confronting. Nearly 40 years later, restored by the Australian Film Archive, it is a well-made classic which still has plenty of punch. Gary Bond as the hapless schoolteacher is very convincing. Chips Rafferty as the local policeman with a pragmatic approach to enforcing the law exudes a low-level air of menace. Donald Pleasance as "Doc" the alcoholic ex-doctor who leads Gary astray is not so much menacing as over the top, but very amusing all the same. The rest of the cast are suitably ocker.

Much has changed in the outback since the 1950s. Most of the people you rub up against in the bars of mining towns are likely to be from somewhere else, and you'd be lucky to hear those harsh bush accents. Broken Hill has shrunk a bit and is now a pretty quiet place. The Education Department no longer goes in for bush slavery - this is no more than an historical portrait. Yet many city dwellers still see the outback as Gary sees it – a place full of drunken homoerotic dickheads who abuse their environment, treat women like public conveniences and whose idea of mateship is to keep their mates drunk. "Wake in Fright" is best seen as very vivid fiction, a horror movie in fact. I don't think Kenneth Cook set out to write non-fiction. Neither was Ted Kotchoff trying to make a documentary. But, with the aid of several good actors and a host of authentic extras he created such a realistic atmosphere that many viewers were misled.

The film, which launched the career of Jack Thomson for one, is said to have given the Australian film industry a boost, even though few saw it. Certainly some fine films followed ; "Picnic at Hanging Rock", "The Getting of Wisdom", "The Devil's Playground", "The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith" for example. But history prevailed – modern Australia was not yet ready to film.
50 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Quite Possibly The Most Realistic Film I've Ever Seen
Sturgeon5421 August 2005
The first time I watched this, I really didn't know what to make of it; it was so different from any other film I had ever seen. It seemed as if it was filmed with virtually no budget, the sets and atmosphere were completely dingy, the setting and much of the language was foreign to me, and it felt like a kind of homemade independent film. However, upon a second viewing, I see it for the richly-textured masterpiece that it is, and for the awesome attention to detail that must have gone into it which I had taken for granted the first time.

There have been other films with similar subject matter in alternate settings of cultured men reduced to a kind of forgotten primitivity, but I think the thing that sets this movie apart is the fact that director Ted Kotcheff remains completely neutral toward all of the characters - both the cultured schoolteacher as well as the locals. By the end of the film, no character remains unscathed, and yet no character is completely without sympathy, either. It must be quite difficult for a director to remain impartial, especially when most stories require audience sympathy for a protagonist versus an antagonist for story momentum. This impartiality establishes an incredible realism in the film which is difficult to shake off. Here, as in life, things just happen to the main character organically - whether there is any rhyme, reason, or moral to any of it is the complete burden of the audience to figure out.

Another key aspect to the film is its universality. Most people would like to believe that in the modern world, and especially a modern country such as Australia or the U.S, that such ugly colloquial primitivity has been largely purged from polite society, but they would be quite wrong. I can equate some of my own personal experiences with those of the main character in this film, and so felt an uncomfortable recognition as I was watching this. Moroever, virtually every scene in the film I could envision actually occurring - something I cannot say about any other I can think of. Sam Peckinpah's filmic explorations of perverse masculinity, some of Samuel Fuller's work, and "Deliverance" are the only movies that achieve something close to the kind of effect this movie has, and even Peckinpah felt the need to resort to flashy cinematic stylistics to get his points across.

This movie has not aged one bit, and probably never will. It is a tragedy that it has all but disappeared even in its own country of Australia. Director Kotcheff displayed an amazing early talent; it is too bad that his career never reached another peak like this - even in "First Blood" and "Uncommon Valor" - two of his other films with similar themes. And that the same man ended up directing "Weekend at Bernie's" and episodes of "Zalman King's Red Shoe Diaries"!!! The world is a crazy place, and one need only watch this film to realize this fact.
160 out of 190 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"You See, We're So Isolated, There's No Place To Go!"...
azathothpwiggins18 June 2019
School is out for the Christmas holiday, and teacher, John Grant (Gary Bond) has six weeks before the next term. So, he leaves his rented room in Tiboonda, Australia, hops a train, and heads for Sydney. Along the way, Grant stops off in the town of Bundayabba for a night. Here, he discovers what just might be the answer to his secret prayers.

Since he's not really fond of teaching anyway, Grant believes he's found an easy way to pay off his government debt, thereby escaping his job. It all comes down to the toss of two coins, which appears to be the biggest excitement in town. That, and consuming incredible amounts of alcohol.

Unfortunately, Grant finds himself skint, and constantly delayed and drawn in by the "hospitality" of the inebriated, crackpot locals. Not surprisingly, this includes his consuming oceans of beer. The longer he stays in the Yabba, the deeper he falls into stupor and depravity.

WAKE IN FRIGHT is an increasingly frenzied spin into drunken madness. Disturbing, nightmarish, and fascinating, this movie takes the viewer on Grant's dark journey to near oblivion. The opening and closing shots establish the desolation between them, showing the utterly barren landscape that seems to stretch on forever. By the end, Grant has gone through torment and desperation, and makes one wonder what will become of him.

Co-stars the vastly underrated Donald Pleasence as the unassumingly low-key, Doc Tydon, and Sylvia Kay as the palpably bitter, Janette Hynes. Chips Rafferty also puts in a great performance as the gleefully corrupt cop, Jock Crawford.

ANIMAL LOVERS BEWARE: The infamous kangaroo hunt is truly terrible, as well as lengthy. Although it is explained in the disclaimer, it's still difficult to watch...
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
too true, too true.
ptb-86 February 2005
WAKE IN FRIGHT is also known Internationally as OUTBACK. Released to quite a furore in Oz in 1972, I saw it as a teenager and was not unshaken believing that it was all too true. The absolutely brutal sunbaked world of the inland 'scrub' is unflinchingly shown for every part of it's harsh reality. The bozo behavior of local men lubricated with endless alcohol and cruel boredom gets a mighty serve as well. A lot of media and tourist execs of the time were suitably outraged as were the conservative older establishment, and there were opposing films made to soften the blow (SUNSTRUCK, for example). However, WAKE IN FRIGHT is a major achievement as is Roeg's equally devastating WALKABOUT made around the same time. Recently THE TRACKER and RABBIT PROOF FENCE go into the same cinematic territory and deliver equally pungent views. WAKE IN FRIGHT will soon stand among the greats of Australian international cinema and rightfully so. A DVD release and a cinema reissue apparently is keenly awaited.
51 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brutal...
Xstal21 April 2020
Depicting a society and culture in Australia circa 1970 that isn't too far from how some live their lives today; albeit with an increasing amount of pharmaceuticals (legal or otherwise) to complement the alcohol. If you take some time to reflect on how cultures around the world behave and are able to exhibit such diversity, you will invariably happen upon a range of reasons for such variance in the way people live their lives - the cause and effect. Arrive at your own conclusions but there are some common denominators originating from white western European cultures that uniquely deliver you to the fright you could easily wake up to, if you stop being you, and go with the flow.

Surprised how well received this film is considering the genuine animal slaughter that takes place. An eye opener and a sharpener, should you need one, nonetheless
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Raw introduction to Australian outback life
robertemerald6 June 2019
You can't help admiring many aspects of this confronting movie. The use of light is inspired. Fantastic colour too. Some brilliant camera angles, and some advanced editing techniques. It conveys the heat of the outback, the dust of the towns, the sweat of everybody. Great actors, truly, really great. The story itself is fairly straightforward. It's the odd touches that are memorable. A receptionist dousing herself with water. A drunk man registering that some food in his pocket needs to be in the fridge, so he just stuffs the entire jacket into the freezer. The occasional flashback of a girlfriend, miles away in a seemingly enchanted world, coming out of the surf at Bondi. A slow pan of a lonely outback railway stop. A rabbit turned into lunch. I listened to an interview with the Director, whom claimed this movie is about the human condition that we are all capable of being our worst imagined selves, as well as our best, and as such the movie was not commentary on Australian males of that time, but more about a stranger in a strange land. That's probably true. In my experience (I've stayed in country towns), the film was a fairly accurate description of country blokes' obsession with beer on the weekends, and I was impressed with how the movie shows how truly vulnerable a single guy from the city can be in such an insistent culture. I also liked the way in which Wake In Fright never quite passes judgement by making anyone evil or aloof in any way. The protagonist does try to be civil, and he is honest, so he's not really to blame for the adventures that follow. Similarly the guys he encounters are not out to corrupt or have fun at his expense. They are all genuinely just out to enjoy the weekend, and, in their own peculiar fashion, they are all being generous. The soundtrack is impressive too. I'll concede that it sounds a little old-fashioned and 1960s, similar to the horror movies of that time, but the sounds are nevertheless a very fine example of that vogue. Indeed, Wake In Fright is a very fine example of gritty outback drama. I don't remember seeing it in its day, I only saw it today. Wake In Fright certainly has power. I'm looking forward to checking out the TV series. Cheers!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It all started with a drink.
Marwan-Bob10 December 2019
This film is beautifully shot and captures a time and a mood that conjures up grainy family photographs of the late 60s and early 70s. WAKE IN FRIGHT is a disturbing but must-see piece of filmmaking.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sweet Home Bundanyabba, where the skies are grim.
Coventry19 January 2008
"Outback" is unlike any other film ever made and quite impossible to categorize. If the movie taught me anything at all, it's that the Aussies can drink seriously hard and loads of it. They even drink till they pass out and then immediately open another can when they come to their senses again. I thought only Belgians did that. You cannot possibly count the amount of beer cans and bottles that are consumed in this film and the most repeated line of text/monologue is without a doubt: "C'mon mate, let's have a drink then". Based on the novel by Kenneth Cook, "Outback" tells the story of a young school teacher visiting the little outback community of Bundanyabba, where the local population is so hospitable and acts so familiar it becomes truly disturbing. They fill their days with drinking, gambling, getting involved in bar fights, drinking again, kangaroo hunting and drinking some more. John initially disapproves their savage habits and looks somewhat down upon the villagers, but slowly and gradually he becomes one of them as he wastes his entire year salary on booze and primitive roulette games. "Outback" is very slow-paced and moody. Sometimes you can literally taste the copious amounts of liquor and experience the heat of the Aussie summer. The noticeable heat, together with the feeling pure geographical isolation truly makes the film disturbing and uncomfortable as hell. "Outback" works effectively as psychological drama but even more as the non-fictional portrait about a society that is largely unknown and unspoken of. The footage of the kangaroo hunting trip is haunting and very, very depressing. I was really relieved when, during the end credits, a message appeared on the screen to state that no real kangaroos were harmed during the production. The film mostly benefices from astonishingly mesmerizing photography, superb music and Ted Kotcheff's solid direction. The versatile and brilliant actor Donald Pleasance is even convincing as an Aussie drunkard and the rest of the relatively unknown cast delivers great performances as well. This is one of them unique movies you only encounter a couple of times in a lifetime, but it's incredibly obscure so if you find a copy treasure it. So mate … shall we have a beer then?
66 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
New to the Yabba? Have a drink! But prepare to be disturbed Mate
mwilson19766 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Initially release as Outback outside of Australia, Canadian filmmaker Ted Kotcheff's brutal psychological horror movie about a young school teacher (Gary Bond) who gets stranded in a remote Australian mining town and plunges headlong toward his own destruction, is one of the most harrowing portrayals of outback life you will ever see. Prepare to be disturbed as he is taken under the wing of alcoholic doctor and resident deviant-philosopher-madman Doc Tydon (Donald Pleasance), and a rag tag gang of local degenerates. He goes on a kangaroo hunt (apparently no kangaroos were expressly killed for this motion picture, but that doesn't make it any the less comforting, you will flinch in horror at the brutality of the slaughter), and knocks back staggering quantities of the local grog. Alongside two other Australian movies, Walkabout and Picnic At Hanging Rock, Wake In Fright was nominated for the grand prize at the 24th Cannes Film Festival, but bombed at the Box Office in it's native land. Considered lost after its original negative went missing, it was eventually rediscovered and restored for release in 2009. The movie is also notable for featuring the last onscreen appearance by veteran character actor Chips Rafferty (he died of a heart attack prior to the movies release), and for being the first film with future Australian cinema star Jack Thompson.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Have a drink, mate !!!
avik-basu188931 May 2017
'Wake in Fright' is a film that explores a nightmarish descent into madness in the most disturbing, terrifying, yet perfect manner possible. The very first shot of the film(an overhead wide angle shot) establishes the desolate, isolated nature of the setting. The protagonist Gary Bond, a British school teacher in Tiboonda, a remote township in the Australian Outback, is clearly trapped in the middle of nowhere and Bond is all too aware of this fact. We see him verbalise his contempt towards the educational system for tying him down with a financial bond and making him their slave. When the Christmas vacation starts, Bond with the intention of going to Sydney to visit his girlfriend, first makes his way to a nearby town named Bundanyabba which the locals call 'Yabba'. Once in Yabba, Bond comes into contact with the locals who seem over-exuberant to make his acquaintance and offer him their booze. Once the booze starts to get gulped, everything goes crazy.

The reckless drinking in Yabba pretty much takes Bond on a journey into the deep dark abyss of the reckless and toxic side of masculinity. The men who Bond comes across in Yabba have nothing to do except drink and indulge in highly disturbing activities which they consider to be an exercise in bonding. This desperation to one- up each other and engage in violence and uncontrolled machismo has its roots in the fact that these people have very little to do in their lives. The loneliness and pointlessness of the life of a man in the Australian Outbacks fuel their need to play with danger and grapple with their deranged conception of 'manliness' among each other. Although the alcohol is the primary reason behind the deplorable experiences that Bond goes through in Yabba, but the director Ted Kotcheff and screenwriter Evan Jones subtly imply that Bond isn't completely faultless either. His repressed frustration for being tied down to Tiboonda actually makes him feel a bit liberated once he reaches the far more populated town of Yabba. To some extent he allows himself to be taken advantage of because of his own desire to let go. Unfortunately, his quest to liberate himself from the cage of his mundane life in Tiboonda leads him to a bigger cage of alcohol and violence in Yabba.

The setting of the Australian outback instantly offers a unique visual texture to the film. The setting is essential in the thematic context too and adds to the bleakness of the tone. Ted Kotcheff and his cinematographer have to be admired for expertly capturing the Outbacks which look very post-apocalyptic(reminded me of Mad Max) and they manage to make the Outbacks look almost beautifully hideous. Tone wise Kotcheff finds the perfect balance between gritty realism and almost a Nicolas Roeg-esque transgressive surrealism. The editing goes a long way in accentuating the sequences of Bond getting drowned in booze. The frantic nature with which Kotcheff and his editor cut the film complements the frantic nature of the violence and debauchery on screen. 'Wake in Fright's grainy visual texture and its cynical view of humanity leaves a bit of an air of hopelessness in the mind of the viewer and the uninhibited nature of its dedication to capture this cynicism can be equated with the original 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre'. I have read that Scorsese was hugely influenced by 'Wake in Fright' and that makes me want to make another analogy. The descent into nightmarish madness that Gary Bond embarks upon in this film is somewhat similar to the colourful and idiosyncratic night that Paul Hackett goes through in Scorsese's 'After Hours'. Although 'After Hours' is a black comedy and is nowhere near as disturbing as 'Wake in Fright', but the fish out of water element in both the films is certainly comparable.

John Grant is wonderful as Gary Bond. The transitions that he goes through in the course of the film are well executed and he does well to portray the inner struggles, the dilemma and heartbreak which add depth to the character. Donald Pleasence is brilliantly disturbing as the odd ball Doc Tydon. His character remains a bit of an anomaly throughout, but his presence and peculiar mannerisms help to add an unsettling element in various scenes.

'Wake in Fright' is to alcoholism, what 'Requiem for a Dream' is to drug use. But having said that, it will be unfair to describe 'Wake in Fright' as nothing but a cautionary tale about reckless drinking. It is deeper than that. This film has things to say about the toxic masculinity of the 1970s in the Australian Outbacks, the reasons for which are rooted in plain boredom. It explores the perils of loneliness and throws light on how one can lose control of his/her senses when living a life of utter discontentment. 'Wake in Fright' is not for everyone, but for me, it is a dark, unsettling and surreal masterpiece.
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Never seen THAT before
SnoopyStyle3 November 2013
John Grant (Gary Bond) is a disenfranchised teacher who is leaving town for Christmas break. An overnight stay in a rough outback town Bundanyabba turn into a crazy alcohol induced dreamscape. I can safely say there are things in here that I have never seen before.

I have never seen a more excited crowd betting on coin flips. I have never seen hand to hand fights with kangaroos. This is a haze of aggression that would put Fight Club to shame. It has the free flowing, random, meandering feel that is indicative of the 70s movie era.

John Grant is not a likable character. He couldn't care less about his teaching job. He's waiting for the final seconds to tick off until his Christmas vacation just as desperately as his little kids. He is greedy, petty, and suspicious. He is not a likable guy.

This is an art picture in the lowest order. This along with 'Mad Max' and 'Walkabout' form the base of modern Australian movies. You can see the ugliness infecting many of the present day Australian horror movies.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Puzzingly over-praised
MrsHenry10 August 2014
I am utterly perplexed by the high praise lavished on the re-issue of this film in 2014. The cinematography is not bad at times - the bar scenes, the gambling and the kangaroo hunt are all quite well done; and the music is effective. Otherwise this film is marred by bad acting, unconvincing episodes, overlong and repetitive scenes and, above all, the lack of interesting or engaging characters. Do we really care what happens to John Grant? Are we allowed any insights into his character, or any of the other stereotypes he meets? Most puzzling is the lack of tension or threat. Wake in fright? - fright of what? At no time is John Grant in any real jeopardy. In sum: of interest as a portrayal of boorish and drunken male culture in 1970s Australia, but of very little value otherwise.
22 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kotcheff's walkabout
ma_teng28 April 2002
It's been said: "The best film ever made about Australia was directed by a Canadian." Possibly true. "Outback/Wake in Fright" is one of those films which gets a little too close for comfort. Unlike most Australians, those of us who grew up in the country will recognise a lot in this film, not always with displeasure.

What a strange, malleable career Ted Kotcheff has had. Of late he has retired to the relative comfort of making TV movies and even contributed to "Law and Order SVU". Yet like Nicolas Roeg ("Walkabout"), Kotcheff's brief spot of work in Australia was a wake-up call to a blinkered urban population (or those that went to the movies at any rate) to the complexity of the outback, in all its bloody glory, dispensing with the romantic pills we were used to swallowing. Kenneth Cook's novel should be held in equal regard, but his writing doesn't get much press these days, which is a shame.

Television prints of this film - rarely shown these days - heavily censor the kangaroo kills, which says a lot about the hypocrisy of the city. Uncut version is essential viewing.
49 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An absolute powerhouse
Woodyanders12 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Smug and uptight British school teacher John Grant (a fine portrayal by Gary Bond) finds himself stranded in a hellish small town in the Australian outback that's populated by fiercely "friendly" drunken hooligans who eventually push Grant over the edge into madness, despair, and unhindered barbarism.

Director Ted Kotcheff evokes a potently unsettling feeling of isolation and vulnerability from the remote rural region setting, maintains an unsparingly bleak tone throughout, and reveals the darker and more disturbing aspects of the rough'n'ready Aussie male character with jolting starkness and a masterful crafting of a gritty, yet surreal and nightmarish mood. The sharp and observant script by Evan Jones offers a bold and unflinching exploration of the dangers of "aggressive hospitality" and the startling extreme lengths hyper-masculine guys will go to in order to prove and assert a sense of virile potency over everything, with a chilling nocturnal kangaroo hunt rating as the definite shocking highlight. Donald Pleasance gives one of his best and most fearless performances as the educated, but slimy and depraved Doc Tyson, who assumes the role as a kind of insane fallen intellectual mentor to Grant as he descends right into the heart of human darkness. Moreover, there are bang-up contributions from Chips Rafferty as amiable constable Jock Crawford, Sylvia Kay as the forlorn and frustrated Janette Hynes, Jack Thompson as the rowdy Dick, Peter Whittle as the loutish Joe, Al Thomas as the jolly Tim, and John Meillon as affable bartender Charlie. Brian West's crisp picturesque cinematography vividly captures both the severe oppressive heat and suffocating backwoods hamlet atmosphere. A riveting and provocative stunner.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brutal
gbill-7487716 July 2022
"Come and have a drink, mate."

I definitely could have done without the footage of the kangaroos being brutally slaughtered even with the disclaimer (seriously, beware folks), but director Ted Kotcheff creates a quite an existential nightmare with this teacher finding himself trapped in a rural town, and also ruthlessly satirizes Australian bro culture. The moronic gambling, excessive drinking, and gleeful violence are all served up extra dark, and between that and the oppressive sense of heat and dirt, you may feel like you need a shower afterwards. Loved the cinematography, soundtrack, and foreboding feeling this one gave me - like we're all trapped in a little town populated by macho lunatics, no matter how much more "civilized" we think we may be. Maybe that's summarized best by this line from Donald Pleasance, spoken while two of his friends beat the hell out of each other for fun in the background, destroying the roadside bar in the process:

"The aim of what you call civilization is a man in a smoking jacket, whiskey and soda, pressing a bottom... button, to destroy a planet a billion miles away, and kill a billion people he's never seen."
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Descent into Madness
snakeyplissken23 July 2022
There was zero hesitation to give this 5/5 stars. One of the best movies I've ever seen. There is often reticence to give such powerfully strong praise to a film but this was a no-brainer, and deservedly earns its place of honor in both Australian cinematic history and cultural heritage.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
'Ave a beer
edgeofreality24 September 2020
Lord of the fleas down under where men are boys and women scarcer than kangaroos. Horror of self-discovery for British lost soul working as teacher (a God-forsaken job in any place) in woop-woop, where the students are so bored that at least they lack the energy to misbehave.. No escaping his lot he plunges deep into ockerism and comes out clean of his snobbery and finally dead content in the classroom. In my view he did it on purpose to escape the clutches of his girl in Sydney ... But what a middle age he has to look forward to. An unforgettable film with image, music and performances coming together brilliantly.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wake in Fright
henry8-38 January 2022
A disillusioned teacher in the middle of nowhere Australia goes on his annual holiday starting in The Yabba, a town seemingly full of drunken gamblers. He loses all his money in a bet and goes to stay with a local man and then gets involved with semi mad doctor and alcoholic Donald Pleasence and his charmless, asinine mates.

This is quite a hard watch, but a well put together drama looking at life in a particular part of the world which remains uncomfortable, intimidating and threatening without any real violence* taking place and where lead Gary Bond is slowly dragged into the mire resulting in inevitable tragedy. Pleasence, who can do unpleasant and intimidating in his sleep is particularly impressive, as is Chips Rafferty as the only level headed member of the population - note his amazing capacity for downing beers.

*there is a deeply unpleasant scene where the new drunken friends of Bond go hunting kangaroos for lols - it is an important scene as it hammers home the thinking of the people here, but it is not very nice to watch.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the great movies of all time
Zane-141 July 1999
This is one of my favourite films of all time and I'm not surprised when I hear of others who also see it as one of their favourites (including singer Nick Cave and Robert Mitchum). Detailing the life of a city school teacher stuck in an Australian outback town, this movie shows in great detail the ugly side of Australian country life that the Australian tourist authorities attempt to hide. Excellent performances by all the actors, including Donald Pleasance, Jack Thompson, John Mellion and the legendary Australian character actor Chips Rafferty (in his final film) help give the film a very gritty "real" texture.

Known as "Wake in Fright" in Australia, the film is still powerful nearly thirty years after it was made, although viewers unaccustomed to the Australian lingo may need an Australian strine dictionary to get them through some scenes. I saw this film with a Polish friend who was so overawed by the film and wanted to get a copy of the movie to take back to Poland and show it commercially there.

As an interesting side note, at the end of the film, in the spot usually reserved for the caption "No animals were harmed in the filming of this movie" is instead a note stating that the kangaroos killed during the making of the movie were killed as part of an official kangaroo culling programme.

See this movie if you can.
24 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting, partially successful atmospheric ramble
S_Craig_Zahler8 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I saw the restored print at Film Forum.

The main reason this is a partial success is because Bond is not a compelling or likable or interesting character. He's bland and it is his ordeal and his change during the ordeal that engaged me in the picture, but most of movie prior to his invitation to a drinking buddy's home is dramatically flat. One could argue that that is the point-- that not much is there, but the sequence in which Bond maniacally talks himself into betting (some of which seems like ADR added after the fact) is clumsy and tells me that I was supposed to have some emotional investment in whether he won or lost his freedom from the school system purgatory in which he was trapped.

The piece really takes off the moment the two big, menacing fellows step into the house and works very well once Bond is relegated to a witness of Donald Pleasance, who has never been better than he is here, maybe not even comparably good.

The hunting scenes are difficult to watch, but it is the wild abandon of the riders after the hunt, the berserk and forced "enjoyment" of their sadism, that is the high point of the movie and quite excellent. The filth and squalor of this presages things like Gummo and the overall tone reminds me of Walkabout, with a dash of Cannibal Holocaust.

It's sort of strange that the film is quite comfortable graphically showing animal death but shies away from depicting any of the implied drunken homosexuality.

Overall, this movie has about 40 really engaging and disturbing minutes, but lacks a compelling lead and ends a little to quaintly to be truly substantial.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Disturbing and Magnificent
SolidChris19 July 2005
It is this film which tells me more about Australia than any other.

Shown this film by Australian film scholar Cath Ellis i was captivated from start to finish. It is this film which does not flinch from the heart of Australian masculinity. There is no romanticism as with that found in Gallipoli or Newsfront.

We are slowly drawn into the disintegrating world of a hapless teacher who is trapped in the Australian interior. This isn't the Australian dream of the new frontier, this is a vision of Hell.

By the finale you will be swearing (as many Australian students apparently do when confronted with this film) that it cannot be that bad, the rampant hyper masculinity on display is too much and too wantonly violent. Hmmm.

The film is notorious for scenes of a Kangaroo being brutally murdered by a pack of drunken men engaging in an uncontrollably escalating series of dares. It is one of the most damning scenes about the pillage of Australia you could ever see. But like a train wreck you cannot avert your eyes.

On a cheekily upbeat note, look out for Donald Pleasance who seems to be enjoying the whole thing far too much. It looks like they were paying him in beer...
21 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wake in Fright
jboothmillard6 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This film had apparently been lost for over 30 years before it was found again, it was added into the book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, I had to see if it was all worth it, directed by Ted Kotcheff (Fun with Dick and Jane, First Blood). Basically in Australia, John Grant (Gary Bond) is a middle-class teacher from the big city who arrives in the rough outback mining town of Bundanyabba, known as "The Yabba". John plans to stay overnight before catching the plane to Sydney, he has accepted a position at the tiny school in Tiboonda, but John's one night is stretched to five by his own methods. It is through encountering many discomfiting characters, such as medical practitioner "Doc" Tydon (Donald Pleasence) and policeman Jock Crawford (Chips Rafferty), and a series of alcoholic fuelled nights out, that John causes his own self-destruction. When the alcohol effects fade away there is little left of the original man, John becomes self-loathing trapped in a desolate wasteland, and he contemplates suicide with the one bullet he has left in his rifle, will he get out of it and get back to a sane civilisation? Also starring Sylvia Kay as Janette Hynes, Jack Thompson as Dick, Peter Whittle as Joe, Al Thomas as Tim Hynes and John Meillon as Charlie. Bond as the frustrated teacher going downhill during his time in the small town is good, and Pleasence proves himself a good character actor, this film has been called the "Australian Deliverance", I can see what similarities with the format, the film makes you feel uncomfortable with its disturbing imagery, and you hope desperately the leading character will get out of the downward spiral, a weird but worthwhile thriller. Very good!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ugly Behaviour with no point or story
ironman81720 May 2013
I cannot believe people see any value at all in this film. Men behaving badly is the formula for a lot of films, especially comedies and here it is a drama. I found myself watching a collection of lazy good for nothings drink, gamble, fight and murder animals. By the end I was hoping that all the characters would not produce progeny. I felt like I needed a shower to wash off their stench. Where is the story? What is it about? Is there a moment I will cherish, a great idea, a great line of dialogue? Give me something, but it does not. People may think it has something to do with the corruption of intellectuals by their exposure to primitive men, but the lead character for all his learning is a bit of drunk and a failure and he only needs a shove to fall into the pit. Somehow I suspect he will return to this group of frat boys. His willingness to slaughter defenseless animals for the joy of killing is proof that he harbors inner demons and is as disturbed as his vile comrades. Men like this eventually murder. The gang in Reservoir Dogs was more appealing than this bunch.
28 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed