I Want What I Want (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
She Got What He Wanted
richardchatten27 August 2017
The British cinema's response to 'The Christine Jorgensen Story' (1970). Five years after casting his wife Anne Heywood as a butch lesbian in 'The Fox' (1967), producer Raymond Stross showcased her as a troubled young male transsexual in this film of Geoff Brown's 1966 novel which bites off considerably more than it can chew.

Ms Heywood is sympathetic in the lead as conflicted young Roy - who would already have enough hang ups without his macho, ex-army father Harry Andrews - but receives little help from her makeup and costumes which make her look like a marionette from 'Joe 90' as 'Roy'. (Christine Jorgensen herself thought John Hansen made a more convincing girl in the former than Heywood did a boy). As 'Wendy' both his father and sister tell him he looks ridiculous in drag; but to me Heywood looks absolutely fab, and only too convincing as the seriously hot 40 year-old woman she actually was at the time. (As 'Roy' she looks more like a schoolboy than a grown man; a common side effect of female-to-male cross-dressing. I believe it's known as the 'Peter Pan Effect'.) Today's feminists would also rightly take issue with the notion that only a woman would manifest Roy's preference to discussing shoes and fabrics to politics.

The film abandons 'Roy' surprisingly early on to concentrate for most of the running time on his efforts to pass as 'Wendy', and ends very abruptly. But it certainly makes you think about 'her' loneliness, her efforts to find work and build a new life without references from her former employer or a birth certificate; and the daily balancing act 'she' has to perform to pass as a woman without men getting too interested in 'her'.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Simplistic yet thought provoking
melinda200117 June 2001
This is the story of a young man's slow transition into the woman he always knew he was meant to be. Roy/Wendy played by Anne Heywood takes the plunge, leaving her abusive father's house and starting life anew as a woman. Through trial and error she learns the skills and consequences of being a woman as well as the terrible problems involved in not being considered fully female.

The look of the film is total 70's complete with bellbottoms and sappy soundtrack. The story is also somewhat unrealistic. For example, Wendy is able to become fully passable with only a short time of practicing in private. The film goes on to explore many interesting consequences of a life "under cover" when all she wants is a simple life as a normal woman. With all it's obvious faults, "I Want What I Want" contains some surprisingly touching and sensitive moments. And although it appears to have been a very cheap production, the filmmakers manage to do quite a lot with their limited resources. For example, background sounds of cars and dogs during some of Wendy's terrifying moments in public give an eerily realistic feel.

I always find it disappointing when a woman is cast for the part of a man pretending to be a woman. "Victor Victoria" is a fine film using the same gimmick but I find it very difficult to see Julie Andrews as a man even though she gives about the best performance she was capable of. The same goes for this film. Contrast that with "The Crying Game" where the illusion is perfect due to exceptional casting.

Probably controversial in it's time, "I Want What I Want" is a clearly a small film but one worth watching by anyone interested transgender issues.
32 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I Want What I Want
a_baron28 September 2022
Based on the 1966 novel of the same name, the lead is played unconvincingly by Anne Heywood, unconvincingly because she starts out as Roy, a young dude who wants to become a woman.

Roy was said to be in his early twenties; Heywood was over forty when this film was released, although you wouldn't think so. (Some women really do age like fine wine).

This was a controversial subject and is even more controversial today, albeit that the current controversy is of the entirely manufactured kind. Far more taboo today than then would be a doctor offering a patient a cigarette. Best not to mention the children's golliwog toy.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
At least it's not Glen or Glenda.
mark.waltz19 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
They do attempt to create a sensitive story involving a transgendered character played by British actress and Heywood, in the first half an hour as a young man named Roy fighting against how he was born. After a fight with his father, Harry Andrews, Roy decides to begin a new life as Wendy, moving into a boarding house and slowly makes the transformation. But as a woman, she must learn to deal with unwanted advances from men (Roy claims that he is not gay in the argument with his father), and of course the daily issues that women go through in their struggles in society, at least from the early 1970's point of view.

Giving this role her all, Heywood in her male guize looks like a young Asian boy, and the makeup when Wendy appears makes her appear to be much more masculine even though she is very feminine. The film's best scene shows Wendy walking down the Streets of London, paranoid that the secret that she carries will be revealed. Every look that she gets gives her a sense of fear that someone suspect something, and when she is confronted by two measures outside a public restroom on the street, must make the important choice of which bathroom to walk into. Her fear when a police officer asks her if she is okay is also very convincing.

So this is an issue film way ahead of its time that does not play for camp but Heywood isn't consistently convincing. The film is also a product of its time so the early seventies sensibilities in fashion and attitudes are very dated. Jill Bennett has a key role as her neighbor in the boarding house. I never got a key sense of confidence in the performance Heywood didn't know who either Roy or Wendy were, yet it still a brave step to take in an acting career. Something tells me that this film didn't garner much attention in the first place and probably didn't play in more conservative cities. You know that this is going to have possible tragic consequences, and at least the filmmakers didn't go down the road a bad taste and turn it into a John Waters movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed