The Salzburg Connection (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
kind of a yawn
blanche-23 August 2012
Had it not been for some strong language, I would have tapped "The Salzburg Connection" as a TV movie, but apparently, it had a theatrical release. Based on the book by Helen MacInnes, the film stars Barry Newman, Anna Karina, Klaus Maria Brandauer, Karen Jensen, and Whit Bissell.

Newman plays attorney Bill Mathison, who goes to Salzburg to investigate a publishing contract for Richard Brandt, a man photographing Austrian lakes. When he arrives at the man's photo shop, he meets the Brandt's wife (Karina) and her brother Johann (Brandauer).

Shortly thereafter, he learns Brandt is dead as is one of Mathison's European contacts. Apparently agents are searching for a chest buried by the Nazis and believed to be in Brandt's possession. It contains the names of Nazi collaborators who can be called upon for neo-Nazi activities. All the countries want it for one reason or another -- the Americans want to know if any of these people have important jobs in the U.S.

I remember reading this book and liking it, but I am unclear if I saw this film. The Austrian scenery is glorious, but since this is a Twentieth Century Fox film, I can't believe they filmed in Salzburg without any visual references to Salzburg's major tourist attraction - The Sound of Music tour. Not to mention The Sound of Music postcards and other paraphernalia.

The film version is slow and boring, and I couldn't get attached to the characters or their plight.

Barry Newman made his name at just the right time, when the antihero types like Pacino were coming to fame, but his career never took off. He always had an air of overconfident playboy about him, but he was certainly popular, and he is still working. He's okay in this. Everyone is okay.

I'd say the scenery is the star.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Convoluted espionage thriller with little to make it stick in the memory.
barnabyrudge7 April 2005
The Salzburg Connection is based on a novel by Helen MacInnes, and is a rather unoriginal spy thriller with the usual ingredients that characterise practically all early '70s movies within the genre: a convoluted plot, double-crosses, triple-crosses, characters with secrets, and attractive European settings. Barry Newman is actually rather good in the leading role, and is nicely supported by Anna Karina.

American lawyer William Mathison (Barry Newman) is vacationing in Switzerland when he is asked by an American publishing firm to go to Salzburg, Austria, to contact a photographer who has written a book about Austrian lakes. Mathison immediately realises that something is amiss when he reaches the photographer's small Salzburg shop and finds the photographer missing, and his anxious wife Anna Bryant (Anna Karina) being protected with near-claustrophobic zeal by her brother Johann (Klaus Maria Brandeur). Johann initially suspects that Mathison is a secret agent and refuses to give him any information. Gradually, though, Mathison realises that Anna's husband has been murdered, having found a chest in an Austrian lake containing a list of Nazi collaborators from WWII. Agents from all over the world, including Russia, Israel, Germany, Austria and America, want to get hold of the chest. Mathison finds himself playing a delicate game of cat-and-mouse, in which he can trust virtually no-one, such as KGB sex-pot Elisa Lang (Karen Jensen) who attempts to seduce him by posing as a free-wheeling American tourist, and elderly Austrian Felix Zauner (Wolfgang Preiss), whose name is on the list because he collaborated with the Nazis during the war in order to save the life of his wife.

The film could've been pretty good, but it misses rather too many opportunities. Newman and Karina, as I've already said, are quite good, and Jensen as the KGB lady-spy also registers well. Furthermore, the locations are pleasing to the eye. But other than these scant positives, the film is a somewhat poor affair. Lee H. Katzin directs sloppily, far too frequently punctuating his movie with gimmicky editing techniques such as meaningless freeze-frames and unnecessary slow motion sequences. Katzin also ruins several key scenes by failing to make it clear quite what's going on (e.g. the finale, in which Newman and Preiss approach an abandoned gunnery post on a mountainside, is terribly rushed and seems to make little sense). At a mere 93 minutes, the film tries to cram in a heck of a lot of plotting and counter-plotting, yet too many of the characters are so hurriedly introduced that it's hard to remember who they are or what agency they work for. One scene that I DID like, however, involved Karina being kidnapped by spies and whisked away in their car. Newman - a veteran of earlier car chase movies - takes a shortcut in his own car and manages to get in front of the baddies. In a clever twist on the traditional concept of a car chase, he slows down their getaway by driving so SLOWLY that the police eventually turn up to find out who's holding up the traffic! A rare ingenious moment in an otherwise dull potboiler.
36 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Box Lunch
kapelusznik187 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS*** Barry Newman as American lawyer William Mathison gets involved with a Nazi ring in Salzburg Austria who's job it is to keep the identities of Nazi war criminals from being made public;and thus subject to being made to play for their crimes. This all stems from a medal box dredged up by Richard Bryant, Patrick Jordan,from the bottom of Lake Fintersee that's been dumped there by the fleeing Nazis at the end of WWII. Before he can open the box Bryant is murdered by two ex-Nazis who've been on his tail form the start. That alerts the local police as well as the CIA KGB MOSSAD and German and Polish intelligence agencies to scramble for the box in that now all their leads to capture the fugitive Nazi war criminals have gone up in smoke.

Like most movies of this type, spy films, the plot twists and turns resulting in Mathison, an innocent bystander at first,getting caught up with the action in him trying to locate the missing box. That in him getting involved with Bryant's sister Anna, Anna Karina, who's targeted by the ex or on the lamb Nazis who feels she has knowledge about the contents in the box in who the Nazi war criminals, with their new identities, really are. We have a number of assassinations car chases and shoot-outs while at the same time enjoying the scenery of picturesque Austria until we finally get to see who's behind all this action. Who just happens to be a victim of the very Nazis themselves that he seems to be, in order to save his own behind, covering up for.

****SPOILERS**** In the end Mathison save's Anna's brother Johann, Klaus-Maria Brandauer, from the Nazis holding him hostage until he reveals where the box, that has since gone missing by him both stealing as well as burying it, is hidden. The person who set this whole crazy plan up, who shall remain nameless, ended up getting rubbed out by the very Nazis that he was protecting! And as for the box itself it ended up unsealed were it was all these years at the bottom of Lake Fintersee with all its contents, the secret list of fugitive Nazis, too soggy and totally destroyed due to water damage to make any sense of them.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A disservice to Helen MacInnes
JohnHowardReid31 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Although filmed entirely in and around Salzburg, this is a disappointing adaptation of the novel by Helen MacInnes which I read and thoroughly enjoyed around the time the movie went into production. Yes, I am aware of the conventional wisdom to the effect that a movie should NOT be compared to the book on which it is based. They are two different art forms and it's therefore considered that a movie should not necessarily be a faithful transcription of the book. But that is precisely what is wrong with this adaptation. It is indeed a mirror of the book and as a result is less suspenseful, less intriguing, and far less entertaining.

Director Katzin is seemingly unaware of this problem and does absolutely nothing to improve the movie's pace. Instead, he directs the action highlights in a slow-motion, stop-frame manner that admittedly makes then run longer – but with far less impact.

However, the ineffective way Katzin handles what should have been the action highlights, is nothing compared to the downright incompetent way he attempts to ram the dialogue scenes down our throats. Mr Katzin is obviously a recruit from TV who knows nothing – but absolutely nothing! – about film-making,

I don't know why the producer wasted his money hiring Lambert Hofer to design Karina and Jensen's wardrobe. We never see it. Any shots below shoulder level are rare – and this applies to the whole cast, not just Anna Karina and Karen Jensen.

The movie also cries out for reverse shots to relieve the monotonous cutting, but the cutter, John Woodcock, evidently had no choice. Katzin apparently didn't shoot any reverse angles at all.

The end result of Katzin's incompetence is a totally boring movie that, whilst certainly faithful to the book, is a real turn-off. Although Helen MacInnes can't be blamed for this unwise adaptation, I've never read any of her novels since.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"My husband was always haunted by a sense of failure"
hwg1957-102-2657049 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A lot of people are after a box. I think that was the plot as the film is very confusing and by the end I didn't really know who was who, who they worked for or what were their motives. Perhaps the Helen MacInnes novel on which this is based makes things clearer. Barry Newman plays William Mathison, a lawyer caught up in the plot who becomes more James Bond (shooting, car chases, lovely women) as the film goes on, not a role suited to Mr Newman. The cast are generally OK, the most compelling character being Klaus Maria Brandauer in his American film debut as Johann. The film gets better when he is onscreen. Salzburg looks attractive so there is that visual treat to enjoy while the story winds itself around itself until all the suspense is spent.

The chair lift scene was well filmed but even so it wasn't exciting because one didn't know who some of the characters were, particularly the man who was killed. Who did he work for? Was he important? Was his moustache false? Dunno.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
mediocre spy movie
myriamlenys27 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Up to a certain extent, an espionage movie (especially of the more intricate kind) can be compared to an erotic dance in the "Seven veils" tradition. Near the end, the intrigue should be visible in all its stunning glory, but this ending should be preceded by an artful game of covering and showing, baring and fleeing, promising and denying. Judged according to this criterion, "The Salzburg Connection" is not the most nimble or mesmerizing of dancers. Part of the movie is deeply confusing ; another part is taken up by heavy-duty explanations along the lines of "Now that A is working for the CIA, B will have left the CIA so that C can continue as a double agent for the Mossad, not that this will stop D from working for A, as long as E is still a Neonazi".

I've got to admit that I stopped paying attention by the end of the movie. For all I knew or cared, the various characters could have been after the secrets of the Nazis, after the plans for a new wind turbine or after the educational tips of Bulgarian homemakers.

Being a cynical creature, I laughed merrily when one of the characters stepped into a store and said that he was a lawyer working for free, during his holiday. "I'm a cannibal and I want to promote vegan cuisine" would have sounded more credible.

Still, the scenery is ravishing - Salzburg looks good enough to eat - and there are moments of wit or invention, such as a playful take on the "Follow that car !" cliché.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A routine action thriller with attractive locations...
Nazi_Fighter_David31 August 2001
Warning: Spoilers
After 'Vanishing Point' and 'Fear Is the Key,' Barry Newman is involved in another auto-chase, but this time with a distinct difference... The baddies, not strictly gangsters but hoodlums with Nazi connections, have kidnapped Anna Karina for some dirty purpose and are driving away with her through busy city streets...

Newman, an American lawyer on holiday in Salzburg, finds himself suspected by spies of both sides... He chases the kidnap-car by continually managing to get in front of it (the high speed scenes), then slowing down to cause a traffic jam and attract the attention of the police...

Klaus Maria Brandauer makes his film debut here, before his appearance in 'Mephisto,' Oscar Winner for Best Foreign Film in 1981...
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
*1 1/2*
edwagreen21 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Very confusing film.

If it weren't for the fact that the film takes place after the war, you would recognize the scenery of the buildings in Austria just before the Anschluss of 1938 shown in the wonderful "The Sound of Music."

Everyone is after a box filled with names of Nazi collaborators during the war, many of whom could resurface should Nazism ever attempt to take hold once again.

The problem with the film is that there are so many sides that you begin to lose track of which side the individuals are.

You know you're in for a bumpy ride when both the photographer and the one who allegedly paid him money for the photographs both wind up dead within the first 10 minutes of the film. The bodies invariably begin to pile up.

You just don't know or understand where Klaus Maria Brandauer is coming from.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very bad!
RodrigAndrisan3 November 2019
I had very high expectations from this production. The presence of the super beautiful Anna Karina, of the charming Barry Newman from the spectacular "Vanishing Point" and "Fear Is the Key", then Wolfgang Preiss from the exceptional Mabuse series, the presence of Miss California Karen Jensen, Nazi mysteries and Salzburg as the place of action... But, everything was revealed from the first minutes and continued until the end: a total failure! A story no one believes in. If the Nazis had made a list of those who collaborated with them, they certainly would not have been in a metal box at the bottom of a mountain lake in a tourist area of Austria. And Klaus Maria Brandauer is false and the same in all his films.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
interesting enough story
ksf-229 June 2021
When they can't locate a photographer who was documenting lake scenes in austria, his sister, the brother in law, and a lawyer sent to speak with him start to be concerned. And why are there people following the lawyer (Barry Newman)? And how are the photographer's sister and brother in law involved in what's going on ? And is the lawyer really a lawyer? We're forty minutes in, and all we know is the photographer is dead. The brother has found a box with "something" in it, and "someone" is willing to pay a lot for the contents. And others may pay even more. Some fun foreign filming locations - were they really filmed in salzburg and vienna? This one is either a bit dated, or maybe too far from the subject matter for us to care..? It goes so slowly, and we don't really care about the characters. The story is solid enough, but not exciting. Directed by Lee Katzin. Had a couple big movies, and whole lot of television. Novel by Helen McInnes. Her biggest novel/film was probably Above Suspicion, with Joan Crawford and Fred MacMurray.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not What I Expected
DKosty12331 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
What I thought I'd see was a tight spy thriller. What I got was something like a step barely above a Barry Newman TV show. It is all shot in Salzberg, Austria and the scenery is perhaps this films most impressive asset. The script and story are slow and plodding.

Anna Karina is here a lot, but the script gives her little to make an impression. Of course, Newman does not get a lot from it either. Karen Jensen does not get a lot of script, but the camera makes her figure look like it was ready for prime time in 1972. Amazingly this beauty did not get a lot of exposure.

The plot is a box of Nazi papers naming people responsible for some of the horrible things Nazis did during the war. The information is not easy to get, and there are a lot of curves and people after this box. Not a great film, very dull, and it should have been done better.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Should've been better
neil-douglas20101 October 2022
A film set in Austria about Nazi's starring Barry Newman (Petrocelli) as a lawyer and the beautiful Anna Karina whose husband has been murdered, this should have been a winner. Alas not quite, not awful by any means, it just lacks that vital spark.

Salzburg looks lovely as well, Newman is excellent as Mathison, as is Karen Jensen as Elissa Lang who is keeping an eye on Mathisons comings and goings. Espionage at its most convuleted as a lot of the characters we don't know where there allegiances lie, even the Americans.. Hopefully at the end when we see Mathison and Anna drive into the distance they have a happy life.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Secret Agents in Search of a Valuable Chest
Uriah4322 August 2021
This film begins with a diver by the name of "Richard Bryant" (Patrick Jordan) finding a metal box at the bottom of a lake in a remote part of Austria which contains a list of former Nazi agents and informants which several countries realize could be of great value to them. To that extent, an American lawyer named "William Mathison" (Barry Newman) just happens to be on vacation near there and is told to investigate the details of a contract Richard Bryant had recently signed. However, it soon becomes clear to him that something isn't quite right and his suspicions are proven correct when he learns that Richard-and several people somehow involved with him-have recently been murdered. Not only that but it appears that Richard's wife "Anna Bryant" (Anna Karina) and her brother "Johann Kronsteiner" (Klaus Maria Brandauer) are also in danger as well. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was an okay spy-drama which definitely benefited from the European scenery as it provided a good Cold War atmosphere. Likewise, having two attractive actresses like "Karen Jensen" (as Elissa Lang) and the aforementioned Anna Karina certainly didn't hurt in that regard either. One slight drawback, however, involved the "made-for-television" format which typically limits certain aspects of a film-and this picture was no exception. Be that as it may, I still found it to be worth the time spent to watch and I have rated it accordingly. Average.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
High on a hill was a boring movie...
mark.waltz15 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Once you get the first ten views of the mountains and sumptuous lakes and surrounding sights near Salzburg, you realize that you're stuck in a movie with no plot, just an idea that really goes nowhere. The story (what there is) deals with research surrounding the existence regarding a book of photographs of Austrian mountain lakes and the disappearance of a bookshop owner. American tourist Barry Newman is secretly on assignment to find out what happened to him, encountering his wife (Anna Karina) and her brother (Klaus Maria Brandauer), and threatened by several sinister looking men obviously determined to scare him away.

Best known for TV's "Petrocelli", Newman doesn't have any big screen magnetism, and certainly isn't aided by this messy story with a ridiculously convoluted structure that a straight path through the Alps couldn't fix. Shoddy camera work makes scenes focusing on all of this local beauty seem pointless, and the overbearing music doesn't help either. The film never successfully develops any of the major characters, and like most cold war dramas, tries to fool the audience into thinking that this is intelligent which only expresses the pretentiousness of its script and direction. Far too many minor roles adds far too many extra ingredients into the generic stew and leads the viewer to have a metaphorical stomach ache as that stew turns into an inedible goulash.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Terrible movie, terrific Karen Jensen
gridoon202424 May 2022
Tedious, completely incomprehensible spy mishmash gives the strong impression that it was made up on the spot simply to utilize some Salzburg locations that cast & crew had access to. Anna Karina is totally wasted in a drab role; the blonde knockout Karen Jensen fares considerably better - in fact, she is the ONLY virtue of this movie. Oh wait, there is also a good (if brief) car chase. *1/2 out of 4.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fun to look at! don't try to follow
sabor4323 April 2023
You can jump in and out and see what someone thinks a spy movie should look like. TV movie score for sure. I almost anticipated commercials. Don't try to follow any story line; just enjoy how the actors do what they are told to do. You can hear the director coaching, while looking at his watch. Can only imagine what went on in editing.

But it is fun to look at!

Just what vacation was Barry on anyway? He must be some lawyer back home - a Bond/Flint type practicing law?

Lawyer picks up college grad and immediately invite her to his room; poor innocent American! He's in for a surprise for sure.

Anna Bryant is a joy, as she tries hard to carry the role. Barry keeps up, and along with Karen Jensen make it viewable.

One last thought: is not Walt Bissell always great?!!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Book Good, Movie Bad
mws-8271716 November 2019
I read the book over the Christmas holiday 1971. I have to say that I did not like the movie when it came out. Characters and story items were changed and just made things confusing. I had to go back and read the book to see if it was the same. If you have a couple of hours read the book, if you can watch the movie. Just don't bother with both.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Incompetent, incoherent clustercopulation!
BreeInAZ14 April 2021
Barry Newman should have his name removed from the credits while still alive. Low budget full-frame TV-movie vibe with a script that made little go no sense. Even the ending leaves you asking "WTF!? " Utter complete waste of talent and your time viewing this mess. I wish I'd taken advice in previous reviews here, but I like Barry and he had such little movie work for some odd reason. This is no Vanishing Point or Petrocelli. It's a 2nd grader effort at a Botticelli. Terribly awful film. 3.5 stars for Barry, Klaus, a few stunts and 'some' scenery. A total stinker.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Salzburg Connection
CinemaSerf28 May 2023
Barry Newman is "Bill", a lawyer for a publishing company who travels to Salzburg to talk to a photographer who is working on a book about the local lakes. When he stops by the man's studio, he discovers from his wife "Anna" (Anna Karina) that the man has recently died - and that she and "Johann" (Klaus Maria Brandauer) suspect foul play. When Brandauer discovers a metal box in the water, he secretes it away in a remote house; hopefully safe from those who will stop at nothing to obtain it's contents. What now follows is a series of perilous escapades as Newman tries to stay alive long enough to get to the bottom of this mystery. This film might have been better had the star had a bit more of a presence, but as it is he is little better than a jobbing television actor who brings little gravitas or style to the role. Brandauer isn't much better, with a supporting cast of mediocre acting talent that rather drags this post-war thriller into the doldrums and leaves it there.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed