To Kill a Clown (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
See it for Alda at least
udar5520 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Adapted from Algis Budrys excellent short story "The Master of the Hounds," TO KILL A CLOWN is an oddity of revenge cinema from the early 70s. While it serviceably handles the man vs. man with dogs scenario, it unfortunately never achieves full audience involvement due to unsympathetic leads.

Despite being based on a short story, the material here is still painfully underdeveloped with major dramatic portions of the story left untouched. Director George Bloomfield has altered Budrys' source story by making Alda's character a Vietnam vet (in the short story he was a WWII POW) and the young couple hippies. This dynamic of the war monger vs. the peaceniks should have offered some interesting social commentary but Bloomfield does nothing with it. It also doesn't help that our hero Timothy (Lamberts) is a really annoying hippie prone to acting like a immature child and talking about his career path as a clown (another variation from the story and source for the odd title).

Bloomfield was also obviously inspired by the previous year's STRAW DOGS and more interested in making a film like that. Not only is his lead Lamberts a dead ringer for Dustin Hoffman from that film, but Bloomfield changes the end of the story (where the crippled Major and his dogs invade the couple's house via underground tunnels) to outside assault that segues into a fistfight where the peaceful become the punishers. But Bloomfield is no Peckinpah and the end result is not as powerful as it could be.

If CLOWN does have any merit, it is for the pre-M*A*S*H performance of Alan Alda as the deranged Vietnam vet. At first he is subtilely creepy with his awkward questions and affable laugh but as the film progresses he becomes more unhinged. The scenes where orders Timothy around like a soldier are very creepy and by the end he is just a notch below raving lunatic (his speech about how buttons are the foundation of America is a keeper). In fact, all of the acting in this is good with fine turns by Danner (who looks so much like her daughter that it is creepy) and Lamberts despite the bad characters they are saddled with. The two Doberman Pinschers are also quite good and deliver all of their lines perfectly.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Boring, but Watchable
lthseldy123 May 2000
This movie is strange. First of all, Alan Alda is TOTALLY different from his noticeable character from M*A*S*H. This story tells about a couple that rents a house on the beach from Alda who plays a veteran and is now handicapped from the knees down. As the couple starts settling down, Aldo starts snooping around the house offering friendly gestures such as wine and beer. He likes the wife who can do without the raspy, whiney voice and all she talks about her immature husband. Then he discovers that the husband is all she is into and Alda looses interest and just likes her as a friend. Alda ownes two vicious Dobbermans that attack and guard on command and scare them half to death. As the story continues, Alda decides to party with the couple and invites the husband to come out with him at sunset. Nothing is mentioned of what he is to do, but the next morning, Alda is angrily waiting the husband to come out and he finally does. Then Alda starts action crazy like he is a drill sargent and treating the husband like a recruit giving out commands and ordering them to be carried out. The husband acts as if this is silly, but finally obeys. After all of this, the couple is held hostage in their own house guarded by the ferocious dogs. They find a way to get out and Alda has made it so that they wouldn't. The couple and Alda fight it out and something happens, but it should have been the other way around. Alda was good as the crazy Mr. Richie but his character could have been pepped up a bit to make him more crazier. The people that played the couple were foolish. I give it a 5.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Where's the unedited version?
kamikaze-424 December 2023
This movie would frequently appear on late-night TV in the late 1970s. Years later, in the home video rental days, this movie would appear on the video rental shelves waiting for a rental.

The one thing I remembered about this film was that the film was edited with a chainsaw. It seemed that big chunks of the film were left on the cutting room floor, making the movie almost senseless.

I found a used copy of the video at a thrift store. I immediately snapped it up. I put the video in my trusty VCR player, and it was the same version I remembered when I would watch this on late-night TV. This version may be the late-night TV print that played back in the days of the Movies-'til-dawn programs of yesteryear.

I did some research on the film's background. The film was over 100 minutes, not eighty-two minutes as stated on the Media VHS tape. The TV prints seemed to be edited to fit ninety-minute time slots.

If this is true, what is missing?

I got a kick out of Alan Alda playing a deranged Vietnam vet terrorizing a Bohemian couple on his island, played by Blythe Danner and Heath Lamberts.

I would like to see the unedited version so I can see what is missing, and would the original edit make a difference?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strange but not really compelling
Wizard-815 February 2016
"To Kill a Clown" is a really strange movie, one that could have only come out of the 1970s. For starters, it doesn't seem to know what kind of movie it wants to be. It starts off being really goofy (even the opening credits are comic), but the movie ends with a climatic sequence that seems to have been inspired by the previous year's "Straw Dogs". Throughout there are bizarre touches like the many freeze frames the movie uses when moving from one scene to another. And there is the atypical casting of Alan Alda as someone who is mentally disturbed. All this may make the movie sound like it's a gold mine for people who are into bizarre cinema, but it isn't that much entertaining. It starts off slow and soon gets to be pretty boring; you have to wait until an hour has passed before some juice starts to flow. And even when that happens, what follows is not really worth the wait. Ultimately, there seems to be no point to the movie; what writer/director George Bloomfield was trying to say or accomplish, I'm not sure. It's no wonder why this movie hasn't been given a DVD release. By the way, while the movie was slapped with an "R" rating, what's displayed barely gets to "PG" status by the standards of today (or even back in 1972.)
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Please, kill the clown... And the rest as well
Coventry20 November 2022
It's not a very nice or friendly way to begin a user-comment, I know, but ... what a boring movie! Personally, I never liked Alan Alda (can't stand his voice), but he's still the only reasonably qualitative factor here. I usually adore Blythe Danner, but her character is one of the most lamentable ones of the entire 70s decade. And, finally, I never heard Heath Lamberts before, but he's a poor actor and gives a weak imitation of Dustin Hoffman in the previous year's hit "Straw Dogs".

Please don't ask me to describe "To Kill a Clown" too much in detail. I constantly got distracted because the film is SO boring and SO incredibly uneventful. Lamberts is an untalented painter who occasionally paints his own face. He and his wife Danner struggle with marital issues and rent a cabin next to the sea, hoping to resolve them. Their neighbor and landlord, Alda, is a weirdly eccentric Vietnam veteran with two frisky Dobermans. What happens next, plain and simple, is that these three people attempt to talk each other to death. Talk, talk, talk, ... dull, dull, dull. And with a horrendous ending.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The only terror that will ensue is your own...
flyingdutchman22 November 2002
Okay. I have very little to say about this "movie" since I understand very little of what went on. But I will say, if you see this piece of crap on the shelf at your local video retailer, put it back and rent Strawdogs. This movie had a nonsense plot, a horrible script, bad acting, and the worst tanline this side of the pacific. Blythe Danner can act, but she must have been dealing with some personal issues during this movie (probably working on her clone, the one we now call Gwenyth). Alan Alda as a sadistic, cripple Vietnam Vet. Sorry, I just don't buy it. And you won't either. Please, do me one favor, don't subject yourself to this "psychological thriller". You'll just end up playing Scrabble anyway.
5 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hard to classify suspense film (in spite of some of my comments)
Skragg11 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Partial spoilers. It's very "arty" (largely in the self-conscious sense, I guess), it's in some ways a stereotypical early ' 70s film, it has maybe a third as much suspense most people demand in a suspense film, and in spite of the first and third things, I'm hugely attached to it. (I don't apologize for the second thing.) Alan Alda is completely believable as "Evelyn" (a strange name for a character from the kind of background you presume he has), and he's just the opposite of the Hawkeye character, who came along only about a year later (or the character in "Jenny", for that matter). Even his trademark laugh is replaced by a deep-sounding one, just what you'd expect from such a character. I don't know why it isn't even mentioned casually (as far as I know) in interviews with him, or even in an entire book about him that I looked through. Blythe Danner is just as good as "Lily", especially in the scene where she tries to seduce him, and he starts reliving the accidental prank with the "Kick Me" sign, which had one of the best lines - "You put a sign on yourself!" Followed by the "Buttons" scene, which is almost funny in a sad way. And Heath Lamberts (whom I know from very few things) is very good as "Timothy", whom you almost think of as no match for Evelyn (in spite of his handicaps), but who almost manages to be. The theme song seems to have nothing to do with the story (except maybe the line "I hurt my friend instead" connecting with the accidental prank ; I don't know), but that's another thing that never seems to bother me. Even though it uses two big clichés of early (and later) ' 70s suspense films - Vietnam vets and Dobermans - and in spite of the downbeat ending, I think it's very original, and that it mainly works.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lonely and Strange Film
carey656721 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
To Kill a Clown is one of the strangest Films I've Ever Watched. Its an Odd mix of Psychology and Social Commentary on The United States and Its Post Vietnam War Hangover. The story concerns mainly 3 people living on an isolated island off the coast of New England. A hippie couple who have recently bought a holiday home to try and work on their marriage and a lonely , crippled , sad Vietnem veteran named Major Evelyn Ritchie played by Alan Alda in the most odd film role of his career. The film hints that Ritchie has lived on the island for most of his life , even as a young child through to his adult years and that his parents are now dead. He's proudly fought for his country in Vietnam and has paid the price by stepping on a land mine and being reduced to walking on crutches. His only company on the island is his 2 pet Dobermans and a Strange old man that joins him for a beer or two occasionally from time to time. The Film fails to define the old man's character and this remains a mystery. Ritchie in one scene sits with old man drinking beer and jokes at how he and his army buddies tortured Gooks and how funny and satisfying it was for him to have these experiences in Vietnam.

The Hippie Couple are just run of the mill folk who really know nothing about fighting in a war or demeaning military discipline. They are peace loving people. The Husband Timothy has a personality completely opposite to Major Ritchie and this is where the Conflict Occurs. Timothy's personality is that of a Clown , a Hippie , a laid back dude that doesn't take much in his life too seriously.

Ritchie at first is friendly to the newly arrived couple , he visits there beach house a number of times and comes across as a nice, warm friendly man. The couple feel sorry for him, particularly the wife Lily. She then decides to invite Ritchie to have dinner at her house with her and her husband Timothy one night. The evening rolls on but as Timothy gets more and more drunk , the more he gets silly and it seems to change Ritchie. Particularly when Ritchie talks of his time in the army and the strict discipline required and being a POW.

Timothy on the other hand finds Ritchie's experiences Alien to himself and talks more about being a clown. He decides to show Ritchie his clown impersonations and its makes Ritchie somewhat disgusted , annoyed. Ritchie's Fake affable laugh also makes him creepy with his interactions with the couple when he's trying to come across as friendly. Ritchie then challenges Timothy to a contest to see if he could put up with a Military way of life.

The next day Ritchie stands outside the couple's house with his 2 vicious Dobermans. He flips out and begins acting like a drill Sargent making Timothy participate in monotonous tasks and treats him like a soldier. Ritchie uses his dogs to make sure that Timothy obeys his orders. He makes Timothy move rocks all day in the scorching sun , salute like a soldier and screams at him to stand to attention. He lectures Timothy on Discipline and comes off very deranged. The couple become Hostages to Ritchie and he gets a kick out of frightening them with his Dogs and playing mind games with his hostages.

The most powerful and curious scene in the film is when Lily goes to Ritchie's House while her husband is on the beach under the guard of the Dobermans. She walks into Ritchie's bedroom finding him sitting alone on his bed. An American flag on his wall. She attempts to seduce him by taking her clothes off and sitting naked in front of him. Ritchie has this broken , sombre and lonely look in his face and begins to talk about being a Teenager and falling in love with a beautiful girl that lived near his house on the island. He tried to watch her as much as he could secretly. He mentions his cruel, strict Father and how he felt it was wrong to show emotion for the girl due to the upbringing of his Father. In fact he makes it clear that he never had the opportunity to have a relationship with her as she ended up moving away and leaving the island and he felt alone again. In his moment of storytelling you get a perception that from that point in his past he never knew how to love anything anymore and probably never had that opportunity to feel drawn to a woman ever again. The perception is that he joined the army and became devoted by mind , body and soul to be a cold Killer and he never had emotion or love for something again. The scene in the bedroom ends when Lily tries to kiss him and he slaps her in the face. Telling her to get out. He rejects her. I feel he did this due to his lack of understanding to love or that he is impotent from his land mine accident and can't sleep with a woman. Alda pulls of the scene very well and it makes you feel sorry in some ways for His character as he looks like such a twisted broken soul. Loneliness is painful , you can see his pain all over his face.

I won't give away the rest of the film but it basically is a struggle for survival. The couple tries to find a way to kill Ritchie and his dogs and get off the island. Not many people have seen this film and it is rare but its an offbeat film that is enjoyable to watch for its strange storyline and Alan Alda's deranged performance.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What is this movie about?
louisgauthier28 October 2002
This movie contains some of the worse dialogue and direction I've seen in years. No one seems to know what the hell is going on. What's the point? The dialogue and acting is uncertain and the little photographic tricks like freezing the frame at the end of every scene is ridiculous. Who is Alan Alda's character suppose to represent and why is he torturing these people? Although his character has presence and conviction, his inane dialogue betrays him every step of the way. What are his motives? Anyone?? The movie starts out like a 1960's hippie comedy(check out the opening credits and music) but then goes straight downhill. It looks like it might have been an interesting story(great location- a nearly deserted beach) but someone forgot to write a coherent story. Too bad. What a terrible waste of a young, cute Blythe Danner(in a bikini for the most part) and a young Alan Alda just before MASH. The movie feels like it's trying to make a point. Wish I knew what it was.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed