Who Killed Lamb? (TV Movie 1974) Poster

(1974 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not "Thriller" but still worthwhile
alanbnew3 July 2005
At the time of its broadcast in 1974 this one-off drama was erroneously billed as an episode of the excellent Thriller anthology that had just finished its second series. That association has stuck but this is a quite different production, made by the then Yorkshire Television.

Although this show had the same unusual 65 minute time span (designed to aid US sales) and was shot on video-tape it is very different in style to the suspense and fear of Thriller. This is essentially a detective-drama, not unlike more recent productions like Morse. Indeed like the latter it is set in Oxford. The detective in question here is the commanding Inspector Jamieson. He has been sent from New Scotland Yard to investigate the murder of local businessman Octavius Lamb. Lamb's murder seems inexplicable, as everyone seems to speak so fondly of him. However as Jamieson searches he finds that maybe Lamb was not such a benevolent figure - but who exactly would want to target him?

Like most detective dramas this is a whodunit. Such dramas are often star vehicles and this is certainly no exception with renowned film actor Stanley Baker making a rare and very strong appearance on TV. His character is an interesting one, efficient and forceful without being notably intellectual or eccentric like many other TV 'tecs. It might have been interesting to see how the character would have developed within a series but Baker would probably not have been available for a longer-running production. His presence will certainly be the chief focus for most viewers even if it had been considered. The cast generally is very strong, additionally featuring Peter Sallis, David Swift and John Challis alongside other familiar TV faces.

Flashbacks help to flesh out this story. There is some neat humour but this is fairly conventional entertainment, without any great highs and lows, although on the whole interesting enough. It has now emerged on DVD as an extra on the release of "Thriller" and is worth seeing as comparison with the series "proper" as well as on its own merits.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A supplementary course of lamb that is worth a bite
analoguebubblebath31 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
'Who Killed Lamb?' is a one off play from Yorkshire TV which has no connection with Thriller but was transmitted immediately after 'Sign It Death' in the second series schedule and was billed and fully networked as an episode of the classic ATV series. While it bears a similar running time [65 minutes], it uses a standalone title scene and theme music.

The premise is a straightforward detective story. The ostensibly affable Octavius Lamb has been murdered in his home and Stanley Baker, playing the part of Detective Chief Superintendent Jamieson, is determined to ascertain the killer's identity. As the narrative unfolds we learn that Lamb is not the saint as originally portrayed and in fact, had many enemies due to his 'second job' as a blackmailer.

There are many flashbacks in the story which add clarity to some scenes and the characters are well developed with some excellent performances - namely John Challis as a blackmailed biker and the mouth-wateringly tantalising Barbara Leigh-Hunt as Mrs Lamb.

The conclusion is reasonably satisfying and while 'Who Killed Lamb?' does not hit the highs as much as Thriller did, it remains an interesting curio, and a welcome addition to the complete series' box set.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A pity Lamb didn't turn into a sheep!
Sleepin_Dragon21 January 2018
Having worked my way through the Thriller box set this one felt a little unusual to begin with, but equally as enjoyable as the Thriller episodes. It looks and feels very different, more straight laced then you get with thriller. but an intriguing drama nonetheless. I wonder if they'd tested the water as it were to see if a series was viable from this one episode, a shame it wasn't developed, more mileage could have come from its main characters. The crime is engaging enough, good suspects, a good set of characters, but it's the charisma of Stanley Baker that makes it such a great watch for me, he is so commanding on screen, a hugely talented actor, 'don't call me Sir!' Derek Francis was good, a prolific actor right up until his death, Dennis Lill was good. Barbara Leigh-Hunt I thought was excellent. Wonderful fashions and decor throughout, a time when people wore dinner jackets and donned cravats. A good watch.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
WHO KILLED LAMB? (TV) (David Cunliffe, 1974) ***
Bunuel197624 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Typically proficient murder mystery (associated with but not actually forming part of the popular 1970s "Thriller" series) from the golden age of British TV: reasonably compelling and twist-laden, it is further elevated by the presence of Stanley Baker as the gruff yet unperturbed Police Superintendent on the case and the bouncy music played over the opening, intermissions and end credits. The plot deals with the killing of a family-and-business man who, by all accounts, is a symbol of respectability; however, the probing by Baker and his team (including the requisite bumbling and perennially hungry subordinate) unearths the proverbial can of worms. The murdered party – Derek Francis – is actually a blackmailer (living out his double life under a fictitious identity, using a modest and remote post-office as his checkpoint), but whose underhanded activities obviously aren't condoned by his immediate family. On the fateful night, his wife and son are out: she with her lover, having been denied a divorce by Francis, and he ostensibly at a cinema. Having been directed to the blackmailer's home via an anonymous note, the latter receives unexpected visits from two of his 'victims' involved in illicit relationships (incidentally, another is Francis' own manager at work who, unable to take the strain, slashes his wrists in the office restroom); while one of these crashes his bike on leaving, the other – a lady – eventually goes to the Police of her own accord. Though necessarily tortuous (where virtually nothing is what it seems), the various plot strands are nicely tied up by the end; alleviating the dour proceedings somewhat, however, is a healthy vein of dry British humor that runs through the whole show.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This isn't from the "Thriller" series but intriguing all the same.
alexanderdavies-9938214 April 2017
"Who Killed Lamb?" features one of Britain's most popular actors of his time - Stanley Baker.

Once in demand and now on television and lot, he is a strong and hard-nosed police officer on the case of a murdered local businessman who didn't seem to be what he appeared to be after Baker is investigating the victim's background.

The episode features a lot of intrigue and contains a neat twist to the tale.

Very well made on all fronts.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Don't Call Me Sir"!!!
kidboots7 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Apart from being included in the Brian Clemen's "Thriller" DVD set and being roughly 65-70 minutes in length, there is nothing to connect this terrific whodunit with the equally excellent "Thriller" series except Derek Francis who got another chance to essay a villain par excellence (he was also the slimy hotel manager in the murderous "Murder Motel" from "Thrillers" season 5). In this one he plays jovial Octavious Lamb for whom no one has an unkind word - as his secretary says "why poor Mr. Lamb, why him"??? Why him indeed!! Inspector "don't call me sir"!! Jamieson has been called to Oxford to investigate the case and soon finds people 'a plenty with an axe to grind - starting with Mr. Humber from accounts who is determined to pick up the rest of his "papers" and won't let a minor thing such as a corpse stand in his way!!

Turns out that "our Mr. Lamb" has been leading a double life as a blackmailer who even goes out of his way to a little country post office to pick up his grubby money - all under an assumed name of course!!! There's a leather clad biker who is paying dearly for some "shocking" (by 1974 standards) pictures - as the nurse says "even his underwear was leather" (shock, horror!!) There is a school principal who has been paying for years for an indiscretion with his best friend's wife and Mary (Ingrid Hafner who was the distraught wife in "Dilemma" (1963)), the best friend's wife - Lamb has been bleeding her dry as well!! But it is all coming unstuck as two of the victims descend on his house to have it out with him - courtesy of a letter written by a "well wisher"!!

Lamb does have a family and they are pretty fed up with him: wife Madeline is having an affair with an old professor friend. There is even a bit of snobbery as when Jamieson asks Madeline if her husband went to Oxford she witheringly gives the impression of not being very impressed with the scholastic achievements of her self made husband. Superb Stanley Baker walks away with the show as the taciturn Detective Inspector who in his quiet way wraps up the case with no histrionics but he is almost matched by the very gorgeous Barbara Leigh Hunt (Jon Finch's unfortunate wife in "Frenzy") who is just class personified as the poor beleaguered Mrs. Lamb.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great mystery movie
matdrummo16 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Who Killed Lamb? Is an underrated mystery movie. The story of Who Killed Lamb? Is about a detective named Jamieson who is trying to find out who killed Octavius Lamb since he got shot in the belly and in the back and so it's up to Jamieson to solve the case and arrest whoever killed him. He goes around asking people who know a lot about Mr. Lamb?. The story of this movie is very predictable and very simple but overall works very well as a mystery movie. I like how the movie sets up all that happens on the night Mr. Lamb died by throwing in lots of events such as Lloyd being the basement, Mr. Humber being at Mr. Lamb's place long before Casson arrived with a gun and then by the end of the movie when Jamieson finds out who killed Mr. Lamb it's turned out to be Mr. Lamb's wife Madeleine who grabbed the gun that Casson had left there. All these little sets ups in the movie all work together and help the audience keep on guessing on who killed Mr. Lamb. The twist is this movie with it being that Madeline killed Lamb was something I did not see coming at all. The story doesn't do anything much different compared to other mystery movie stories that revolve around a detective solving the case. The characters are great is this movie. Jamieson is very serious about trying to solve the case by peacing everything together on who could of killed Mr. Lamb?. The side plot with Mr. Humber wanting Mr. Lambs paper work for his business leads to Jamieson going to find out what Mr. Lamb gets delivered to him. The side plot with Madalaine wanting to go and be with Professor Friedland sets up the plot about Steven messing around with Mr. Lamb's other business he owns. The side plot with Casson sets up how the gun got there in the first place and what Madeline used to kill Mr. Lamb with. These sub plots really do help at showing the audience what the characters where doing the night of Mr. Lamb's death. The sets for this film are great especially for a TV movie. The music in this movie is really nice as well. The main music in this movie is the opening and closing credits for this movie is pretty good. The best music in this movie is music when Mr. Lamb starts betting up Steven. 8/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed