Triple Irons (1971) Poster

(1971)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A Nutshell Review: (DVD) The New One-Armed Swordsman (1971)
DICK STEEL11 June 2006
I can't remember the details behind the reason why Wang Yu left the franchise, but Chang Cheh replaced him with David Chiang in the titular role, and of course it's a totally new character, having his own motivations and background, as compared to Yu's Fang Gang.

Written by Ni Kuang (author of HK's popular Wesley science fiction series), the new one- armed swordsman is now Lei Li (Chiang), an arrogant young swordsman whose specialty is his "yuan-yang" double swords. A hotheaded, up and coming hero, a diabolical plot was hatched by Lung I Ching, a veteran swordsman in the martial arts world, to keep these young upstarts at bay. With his three-joint-poles, which always seem to defy gravity, he schemes and manages to duel with Lei Li, defeating him and caused Li's arm to be chopped off.

Herein lies the difference between this One Armed Swordsman, and the original Fang Gang. Fang Gang had lost his arm because someone else hacked it off in a fit of rage. Here, Lei Li actually gambled with his arm - the loser of the duel would have to remove it, and retire from "society". While Fang Gang had to learn his martial arts all over again, Lei Li was already skilled with his left hand, because he was originally ambidextrous. Also, Fang Gang's weapon of choice is his father's iconic broken sword, Lei Li doesn't seem to have any preference, and could fight with any.

While there is a token romance with the daughter of a village blacksmith, the introduction of a special sword didn't seem to auger well, and it didn't last - it lacked something special, be it emotions or prowess, and seemed too generic. Anyway, I can't help but to chuckle at Ti Lung's character Feng Chun-Chieh, also a young upcoming swordsman who uses two swords. Chun-Chieh and Lei Li formed a sense of brotherhood when the former protected the latter from bullies, only because the latter doesn't wish to use his martial arts skills anymore. They become fast friends, but from the way their scenes were shot - the numerous hugs, back-slapping, arm holding, eyes longing, you might be expecting one of them to say that if only he knew how to quit the other.

That aside, you'd come to expect the usual ketchup blood laden violence which have become the hallmarks of Chang Cheh's swordfighting movies. Here, it doesn't get any less bloody, and scenes can be quite graphic with the numerous decapitations of limbs, and one really interesting decapitation of half a human body, across the waist.

There are plenty of set action pieces, like that iconic fight on the bridge with many footsoldiers simultaneously. Scenes like these are what Tarantino adopted in his homage Kill Bill double feature, where the hero goes on an unstoppable roaring rampage. Though I must admit the introductory fights don't contribute much to the plot - just there for the sake of showing off what Lei Li can achieve.

All in all, it's great fun, just to watch what our parents were watching as they grew up, and comparing these films to the standards of today. While cheesy, the good old classics stand out for their groundbreaking effort in those days, to bring us what has evolved till now.

Code 3 DVD contains minimal extras, just one trailer, a photo gallery, the original poster, one general paragraph passing off as production notes, a biography and selected filmography of the cast and crew.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of Chang Chehs finest films
t_atzmueller25 January 2014
Chang Cheh had already directed an iconic "One-Armed Swordsman" (Jimmy Wang Yu) a few years earlier but for reasons unknown to me decided to 'reboot' with "The New One-Armed Swordsman", featuring David Chiang as the protagonist. Unlike stern and stoned-faced Wang Yu, Chiang plays the ever-jolly, jovial Lei Li, a very skilled traveling swordsman who is forced to cut his own right arm off after loosing a fight with villainous mastermind Lung I-Chih (Feng Ku), leader of the "Tiger Gang". Li retires from being a fighter and resigns himself to becoming an aid at a local restaurant, constantly subjected to the mockery of the patrons. When fellow traveling swordsman Feng Chun-Chieh (Lung Ti) rides into town, he and Li bond almost immediately but Feng likewise looses a battle with I-Chih and is killed in the process. Li swear vengeance and goes up against I-Chih, his supposedly unbeatable weapon, an interlinked, triple-iron staff (a weapon that "can only be bested by three swords") and his army of goons.

"The New One-Armed Swordsman" was one of the first Hong Kong films to become a hit in (West)-Germany (under the title "Das Schwert des gelben Tigers" or "The Sword of the yellow Tiger"), sparking a wave similar-minded films to flood the market. Indeed, during the early 1980s you'd have been hard-pressed to pass a cinema that was not showing at least one Kung Fu flick or a video store that wasn't stacked.

Especially David Chiang does an amazing job, being very charismatic, at the same time makes the viewer believe that he could pull it off and decimate a legion of fighters with only one arm. Like in many other movies that feature this duo, Chiang and Lung Ti have a very good chemistry, something like the Dean Martin & Jerry Lewis of martial arts movie. Perhaps even too good a chemistry: As some may have pointed out, the constant gazing at each other and assuring themselves of their friendship, at times reminds one of "Brokeback Mountain" (and relegates the supposed love-interest, the cute-as-a-button Ching Lee to a mere sister-figure). Feng Ku is a reliable baddie and is well versed in changing from an almost fatherly figure to a menacing fighting machine within an instant.

The special-effects are bloody but may seem a little dated, especially in times where most martial-arts-movies are saturated with CGI and actors flying around on wires. But for those interested in honest, hard-working Kung Fu and sword fights, there can be few better recommendations than "The New One-Armed Swordsman".

8/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A one-armed swordsman movie, not THE one-armed swordsman.
planktonrules22 August 2016
It's very confusing. Director Che Chang made a series of five films which starred Yu Wang as the One-Armed Swordsman. However, Chang ALSO made some other films with the phrase 'One-Armed Swordsman' in the title...but not the same guy! In this case, the great martial arts actor David Chiang stars as Lei Li...A One-Armed Swordsman! Confused? I sure know I was! It is possible that the titles I am talking about are only the English language titles...but they do involve a hero who is missing an arm. My assumption is that the franchise was so successful that Chang decided to put out as many one-armed films as possible! Oddly, however, this is the only one- armed film with Lei Li.

By the way, the version of this I was was the American dubbed one. Because of this, it might have been edited heavily...I have no idea but this often is the case with martial arts films. It is a Shaw Brothers film...which generally is a VERY good thing, as they tended to make some of the best martial arts film of the era.

When this film begins, we can see that Lei Li is kind of stupid...at least when it comes to losing his arm. He's attacked by some jerks and he defeats them. When their master comes along and confronts Lei Li for this, Lei Li challenges him to a duel--and the loser promises to give up an arm!!! Naturally the master wins and he's decent about it...telling Lei Li to forget about the bet. But Lei Li is an idiot and soon lops off his arm in a memorable (and silly) scene! This is how this one-armed dude came to be in this film. Unfortunately, after this, Lei Li is pretty defenseless....or so he thinks. Jerks come to town and bully the crap out of him...simply because everyone sees him as a useless one-armed guy...and he is during much of the film. What happens next to make him go from a one-armed loser to a one-armed hero? See the film and find out for yourself.

This is clearly a better than average martial arts film. Even with the celery-crunching sound effects and silly dubbing (typical of most films in the genre), the fighting scenes are better than usual and the story a bit different from other one-armed films. Oddly, however, they did no follow-up films with Lei Li...and I would have enjoyed this.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
David Chiang takes over in lavish Shaw Bros. follow-up
BrianDanaCamp9 September 2001
THE NEW ONE-ARMED SWORDSMAN (aka TRIPLE IRONS, 1971) follows director Chang Cheh's earlier one-armed swordsman films (ONE-ARMED SWORDSMAN, RETURN OF THE ONE-ARMED SWORDSMAN) but replaces departing star Jimmy Wang Yu with the director's newer find, David Chiang, who is joined by frequent co-star Ti Lung. It's a colorful, occasionally moody historical adventure shot on Shaw Bros.' sprawling Hong Kong backlot and features a climactic battle in which the titular hero takes on an army of bad guys single-handed.

David plays a swordsman tricked into a duel to defend his honor with a corrupt swordfighting teacher (Ku Feng) who causes him to cut off his own arm. He leaves the `gallant fraternity' and broods in isolation, making a living as a waiter at a roadside tavern. When a wandering swordsman, played by Ti Lung, learns who he is and gives him a pep talk, David is stirred, but refuses to take action. When Ti is killed by the same corrupt teacher, who uses a lethal three-section staff, David is finally spurred to action and, armed with a dead warrior's sword given to him by the tavern owner's sympathetic daughter (Li Ching), he goes after the offending gang of fighters and figures out a 3-sword move designed to beat the 3-section staff. Before he's through, he leaves a trail of corpses littering a massive bridge leading to the gang's fortress.

David Chiang may not have been the best martial artist, but he had a wiry, energetic quality that served him well in this type of slashing and swirling fighting style. He also exuded a brooding intensity that came in handy in his portrayal of the onetime swordsman, who is crippled both physically and psychologically and has turned his back on his calling. Chiang and Ti Lung worked well together in violent tales of male bonding in turbulent eras. The villains here, Ku Feng and Chen Sing, both excelled at playing devious and crafty characters capable of unctuous charm one minute and great cruelty the next.

Famed martial arts director Lau Kar Leung worked on the fight scenes, in which kung fu takes a back seat to swashbuckler-style sword- and weapons play. (Lau was an expert in both styles of fighting.) This was one of a group of costume epics made by Chang Cheh prior to his series of Shaolin-themed martial arts films, dating from 1973-76, which put kung fu in the foreground and were made initially in collaboration with Lau, who broke off in 1975 to direct his own films.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A reboot from the one armed swordsman
Genkinchan7 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It's actually have a very good plot better than the original I would say on how the character get chop off his arms... everything went mediocre from there onwards it's David Chiang is no Jimmy Wang yu... the character less a soul in it ... the lonely soul just kind of lack in the character... Ti Lung character is a waste of good talent making him a supporting cast so that it can garner some audiences and finally ku feng as the main antagonist is not that thrilling after all... the shaw brothers should went with lo lien instead.. the only appearance of all the three swordsman was Cheng lei who appears as the wounded swordsman that is something to mention other than that this movie is rather dull and overrated... the first two is actually very entertaining the reboot ain't so.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Great Fantasy Martial Arts Film
seductrix6 July 2007
I usually like more realistic action films like Bruce Lee. Not the latest Die Hard where they break the laws of physics every ten minutes. And I don't like the current stuff with too much CG and wire-work.

That said, I love this film. Especially in the original Mandarin. Fine production values, two heroes Chiang and Jimmy Wang Yu and a great villain "Hero Lung." A classic movie baddie.

The only possible improvement would be if Bruce Lee had starred. Still, I'll have to say Chian is perfect as a young master swordsman who would rather cut off his own arm than live with dishonor.

I've heard that Jimmy Wang Yu was not a trained martial artist, but a pretty tough guy in real life. Too cute guys.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid
Jeremy_Urquhart11 February 2023
Compared to the other movies in the One-Armed Swordsman series, this isn't quite as good as the first, but I feel like it's an improvement on the second. It features a new actor playing the titular role: David Chiang, who I feel is one of the best leading actors who frequently headlines these old Shaw Brothers movies (it's either him or Gordon Liu - I honestly can't pick a favourite between those two).

This delivers everything you'd want from an old-school martial arts movie without truly excelling at everything. It's like the movie equivalent of a classy - but not super fancy - burger place: a step above mass-produced, fast food slop, but not exactly gourmet. Still, the action is good, the story is competent, and the ending features the main character taking on a small army worth of henchmen, and I'm always a sucker for seeing that kind of fight scene play out on screen.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best movies I have seen so far
S1lv3rSp33r7 September 2002
This is 1 of the best movies I have seen so far!

Its always nice to see david chiang and ti lung playing togheter with eachother !

Like some guy explained before , you can learn from this movie , because although you have a handicap you can still be improving your skillz.

This story is well made , like mentioned before a guy Lei Li losing his arm to a corrupt "held" Lung. After being retired for a year a brother Feng come to his place where he acts like a bartender. While he was demolished by some people from the Tiger Fort , Feng teached Lei Li to appreciate himself again. Then one day Feng is losing his battle in the Tiger Fort against Lung , Lung used the same trick he used to do to Lei Li to with his sticks. After that Lei Li sworn revenge and the ending is amazing ! He defeats a whole squad of fighters from the Tiger Fort! And once again he meets Lung , the man that made him retire for a year. A very nice battle at the end !

Anyway just watch the movie then you know what I mean ! :-)

Greetz!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Shaw Brothers at their masterful best
Leofwine_draca20 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
THE NEW ONE-ARMED SWORDSMAN has the honour of being one of the finest Shaw Brothers movies I've watched and that's saying something when I enjoy the studio's films in general and have yet to find a film from them which I've really disliked. For me, their best work seems to be that made in the early 1970s, in which the plots were still delightfully old-fashioned but the action was harder-hitting than ever. This film happens to be extraordinarily gory, the goriest I've seen from Shaw outside of FIVE ELEMENT NINJAS.

The plot is a reprisal of the films that made Jimmy Wang Yu a star, i.e. THE ONE-ARMED SWORDSMAN and its sequel. David Chiang is the hero who loses his arm in a duel and becomes a reclusive waiter until Ti Lung shows up and galvanises him into action once more. Chang Cheh was an excellent director and he's at the top of his game here; not only are the widespread action sequences impressively skilled and visually masterful, but the rest of the movie looks fantastic too, especially the framing shots. The incredible bloodshed is really ghoulish here and really goes over the edge at times. Chiang has never been better as the brooding hero - don't expect any of his trademark humour here - and Ti Lung excels in a star-making turn. Add in Ku Feng's truly malevolent bad guy and you have a classic of Shaw cinema.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Impressive, enjoyable and a must see for the genre Warning: Spoilers
We remain fascinated by this masterpiece of Chang Cheh. Its graphic violence serves this story of honor and friendship where a swordsman knight (David Chiang, inhabited and mutinous pout) cuts his arm following his loss of a fight against a treacherous knight (Master Long played by Ku Feng) and calculating (he uses a three-pronged flail rigged, and smiles a lot). He retires from the sword arts and becomes a waiter in an inn, but also the laughing stock of everyone. Only the delicious Li Ching believes in him and tries to make him come back to the sword despite a missing arm. But nothing works. Then comes a new knight (Ti Lung, flamboyant), who becomes his friend, but who decides to fight Ku Feng to denounce his perfidy. But he loses his fight, and as he refuses to mutilate himself (cutting an arm), he is cut in two. David Chiang, mad with rage, takes back the sword and kills them all (by the way, this story was made several times by Chang Cheh).

This simple and pretextual dramatic framework is supported by very stylized studio sets (not to say cardboard) but also by a staging based on a lot of travelings and panoramas, of which even some fields against fields are treated in traveling.

All in all, everything is schematic, with the masochistic hero, with the sneering villain, with the fake soundtrack and the exaggerated sounds (the slightest movement of the sword splits the air or produces a clatter, the slightest shock gives a noise of punch on meat), the music so 60's, the fights unrealistic as possible, but this produces a referential film which keeps its impact and its power.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Most realistic sword fights
Mick-L15 May 1999
As a beginning martial artist at the time I saw this film,I was amazed at how realistic the fight scenes were.This man could handle a sword and to this day I wonder how they made it look so real.
0 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great story, well made movie
street16 October 1998
There are many metaphors in this movie, but the one, I think, is the most important is that; Once you have accepted your lot in life you can improve yourself beyond your own expectations. The story is straight forward, good guys versus bad guys, and some of the stunts are really unbelievable. But, overall I recommend this movie just because it is a great story.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed