Dark Places (1974) Poster

(1974)

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Not too bad but not memorable enough
adriangr16 August 2007
"Dark Places" tells of a man who inherits a house that is reputed to contain a stash of money hidden somewhere by the original owner. The new owner moves in, despite warnings from local people that the house is cursed, and enthusiastically begins hunting for the loot. Unfortunately for him, there are other people trying to get to the cash before he does, but worse still, the house really is haunted.

"Dark Places" is a moderately successful film that does a good job of weaving a mystery with it's storyline. The acting is also all pretty good, and with such star names as Christopher Lee and Joan Collins, it's amazing that this isn't one of the major British horror films of the 1970's, but once it gets going you'll soon realise that, as with a lot of other UK horror films of this period, the chances of something significantly exciting happening are pretty slim.

What doesn't help is having the lead character played by Robert Hardy, who, while being an excellent actor and playing the character well, just does not have the "leading man" quality required to carry the entire focus of the film. Joan Collinsd and Christopher Lee look great in their supporting roles, but then again, they always do. What does work well is the way the film starts to move between present day and flashback as Hardy starts to uncover more of the truth about what went on in the house before it's original owner died, and what the truth is behind all the stories of murder. The flashback scenes are great, and they reminded me the great things some 1970's films from the UK could do with a period setting. Look out for a fantastic cameo from Jean Marsh as the wife in the flashbacks, although many men may be more entranced by the young Jane Birkin as the governess, even though she doesn't do very much.

Sadly there's no real meat on this bony story, but it does have a couple of mildly grisly scenes and a kind of surprise ending, so it's fairly enjoyable.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very decent little thriller!
The_Void23 September 2007
Dark Places is not a very well known seventies British horror movie; probably owing to the fact that it's not a Hammer movie, but it features an interesting story and a great cast, and overall this is certainly a very decent little thriller! The story has some fairly strong horror themes running throughout, but personally I wouldn't say this is a horror flick; Dark Places is a thriller, and the main focus is on the thing that makes the world go round - money, and a huge stash of it. At the centre of the film is a spooky old house, once owned by a mental patient who died. The house has now being taken over by the Asylum administrator who inherited the house. This is bad news for a few different people in the village - mostly notably scheming couple Dr Mandevile and Sarah. The reason being that before he died, the owner of the house hid a huge sum of money somewhere within the walls and the pair have been on the trail of it ever since. Not wanting to risk losing their cash, Sarah and the doctor hatch a plan to turn the situation to their advantage...

The key thing about this film is the old house at the centre, and therefore the chilling atmosphere stemming from it. Director Don Sharp has a history in horror, with a handful of films made for Hammer, as well as the excellent cult trash classic 'Psychomania' to his name, so it's quite unsurprising that this film has a horror atmosphere. The plot is well done also, with many different characters having a stake in the money at the centre of the story, and thus ensuring that the film remains interesting and varied. Dark Places features a very good cast, which makes it even more surprising that this film isn't better known. The great Christopher Lee is the biggest standout in his role as the doctor with an ulterior motive, while Joan Collins gives good support and provides some nice eye candy as his accomplice. The film also features performances from fellow British stars Robert Hardy and Herbert Lom, who also do well. Overall, this might not be a masterpiece; but it's certainly a good film and comes recommended to fans of British horror!
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
DARK PLACES (Don Sharp, 1974) **1/2
Bunuel19769 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This 'haunted house' movie is not very well-known (and, whenever mentioned, it is generally dismissed) despite the star cast and name director it attracted: both of these have ties to Hammer Horror (Don Sharp having helmed, among others, KISS OF THE VAMPIRE {1963}, and the former including Christopher Lee, Joan Collins, Herbert Lom and Robert Hardy) but the style is not necessarily reminiscent of their output (especially since the company never actually dabbled in this particular subgenre).

Anyway, I quite liked the film if ultimately emerging as nothing special: that said, the plot does provide some novelty to the formula of ghosts haunting the current owner of some old mansion in order to expose some long-ago crime. In fact, here we not only have the protagonist (played by Hardy, from Hammer's DEMONS OF THE MIND {1972}) being a dead-ringer for the man who previously lived there (though the probability of both being, concurrently, in the same mental asylum is very unlikely) and who gradually has his personality overtaken by him, but his actual goal in possessing the property concerned is to find the old man's fortune hidden behind one of the walls! The handful of people who make it a point to befriend him (doctor Lee, his sister{!} Collins and solicitor Lom) all know about the money and are understandably miffed that the house was ultimately bequeathed by the dying former occupant (not played by Hardy in this guise!) to a casual acquaintance. Collins, typically playing a man-eater, actually decides to seduce the stout Hardy (by first volunteering to clean up the place for him) in order to 'follow' the search for the loot first-hand – which displeases Lee, who constantly berates his sister for her loose morals (incidentally, he and Collins do not look favorably upon Lom either, whose interest in the 'financial' matter is more subtly deployed).

Eventually, as already intimated, Hardy starts to re-live his predecessor's experiences within the household: it transpires that he was unhappily married, with a couple of apparently fiendish children in tow, but he finds solace in the arms of the latter's much-younger nanny (Jane Birkin). However, when he decides to leave with her, the wife throws a fit and the kids, who never liked their governess anyway, murder her! This, of course, sends the poor man off the deep end and he takes to his family with a pick-axe, though none of the bodies were actually found. Towards the end, as the modern-day Hardy identifies more and more with his 'doppelganger', he begins to see the obstacles to his contentedness everywhere so that, during a country stroll with Lee and Lom, he physically assaults (leaving his companions perplexed) a couple of children he takes for the ones tormenting his love Birkin! Later still, when Collins turns up ostensibly to comfort him, he sees her in the image of the wife the previous owner loathed and strangles her to death – just then, Lee himself happens along and, rather bloodlessly, ends up on the wrong end of Hardy's pick-axe!

When Lom turns up there too and is about to meet the same fate, a couple of cops he had called arrive just in time to take the deranged Hardy away. The double twist here involves Hardy being not an employer of the asylum as he had let on but really a patient, and that his attempts to unearth the cache' of money by tearing down the walls also reveals the resting-place of the former murdered victims. Lom being responsible for the house offers to take charge of a couple of bags the cops come upon, conscious of course as to their actual contents, but the latter insist they be checked first and, once they are, these are naturally confiscated…so that, predictably, nobody gets anything after all!

As I said, the approach is not really inspired but the performances by all concerned (but, needless to say, Hardy in particular) are committed enough to keep one watching. For the record, this is the third and last film genre icons Lee and Lom appeared in together after the ludicrous 'female Tarzan' adventure THE FACE OF EVE (1968) and Jess Franco's interesting but unsatisfactory COUNT Dracula (1969).
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Should have been a better spook story...
BugEye5 July 2000
Warning: Spoilers
This film has a plot which, if handled competently, should have made a very shivery film. A man searches for a hidden fortune in the house of a deceased maniac. As he does so, images from the house's past begin to haunt him, and his own personality is slowly overshadowed by that of the former, homicidal occupant. It is to the credit of Robert Hardy that he carries off the central role well (and, indeed, holds the film together) but indifferent direction ensures that the rest of a talented cast is largely wasted. Still, worth seeing for the original story line.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Short budgeted terror movie filled with chills , tension , intrigue and horrible crimes
ma-cortes28 August 2013
Plot Summary : A former mental patient inherits the old house of a man who had killed his wife (Jean Marsh) and children and died nut . As he (Robert Hardy) lives in the mansion , but the insane spirit (also Robert Hardy playing a double role) of its previous owner seems to overcome him with a need to repeat the murders . Meanwhile, a scheming couple of brothers (Joan Collins , Christopher Lee) and the manor administrator (Herbert Lom) plot to rob a hidden cache of stolen money from its rightful owner . The only problem is that the house they plan to hide it in is haunted . There is more than death waiting for you in Dark Places.

This is a thrilling film including horror elements taken from Edgar Allan Poe and with plenty of chills , familiar drama , suspense and grisly killings . Filmed in low-budget though starred by an all-star-cast ; it's acceptable but no memorable picture and generally chilly clutch . Director Don Sharp has got other horror films for which has achieved a certain cult following . Good acting by Robert Hardy as a man who masquerading as a hospital administrator inherits a ruined mansion and nice support cast , such as Joan Collins as intriguing as well as seductive woman , Christopher Lee as astute brother ,he worked six times for director Don Sharp , Herbert Lom as a mean business attendant , Jane Marsh as wife and Jane Birkin as a young lover . Average cinematography , being necessary a right remastering because of the film copy is worn-out . Atmospheric and frightening musical score .

The motion picture was professionally adapted and directed by Don Sharp , though with no originality . He was born on the island of Tasmania off of Australia, and began his show-business career there as an actor. After World War II he traveled to England and continued his acting carer . He became a filmmaker in the mid-1950s and turned out some low- and medium-budget musicals, such as the Tommy Steele vehicle ¨It's All Happening¨ (1963). In the mid-1960s he was hired by horror specialist Hammer Films and turned out some well-received thrillers, including ¨Kiss of the vampire¨ (1963), his first for Hammer , this one along with ¨Witchcraft¨ and ¨Psychomania¨ are the best-regarded . He worked on a few films as second-unit director, most notably ¨The Fast Lady¨(1962) and ¨Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines or How I Flew from London to Paris¨ (1965), before returning to directing again, and turned out a string of thrillers such as ¨Callan¨, ¨Hennessy¨, and his version of ¨The thirty nine steps¨ , although much inferior to Hitchcock ; in addition , horror films and comedies . Towards the end of his career he worked in television on mini-series .
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Engaging British Horror
ladymidath11 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit I have a fondness for old British horror film, Hammer, Amicus, I am there for them. This is a pretty good one. While it is not one of the standout horror movies of the time it has a great cast and an interesting story. Haunted house, hidden cash, scheming couple wanting the said money for themselves.

The scenery is beautiful and the flashbacks between past and present are well done and doesn't slow the story down. By today's standards, it's not that scary, but it has enough to keep viewers interested. I enjoyed it and I think that fans of old British horror movies will as well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable but rather uninspired psychological thriller
TheWelshRagingBull28 June 2009
This 1973 UK thriller sees Robert Hardy (who had previously starred in Hammer's "Demons of the Mind") play Edward Foster, the former Head of an Asylum who gets called to a patient's - Andrew Marr's - death bed, and ends up inheriting his house where a significant amount of money is hidden. This prompts certain interested parties to become part of Foster's life, namely a scheming brother and sister and the estate's solicitor; however, the house's murderous past comes back to haunt them all....

Despite some clichéd elements to the script (cynical townsfolk; noises reverberating around the house etc.) this is a film which clearly had a lot of potential on paper but it really doesn't get out of first gear until the last half hour when the central themes of the plot become clearer. The interweaving of past and present with Hardy interchanging between both Foster (present) and Marr (from the past) in certain sequences is hardly seamless and is patchily handled.

On reflection, the supporting cast don't really get that much to do considering that the 3 of them (played by Christopher Lee, Joan Collins and Herbert Lom) are all hell-bent on finding the money. Lee in particular seems to be more of peripheral figure than you would have expected.

Perhaps another thing to undermine it's psychologically thrilling aspirations is the script-writers' under-appreciation and under-usage of the story's more substantial "horror" or "thriller" elements occurring at night. It clearly dilutes the central thrills of the film.

Hardy does a decent job of portraying the gradual decline in sanity of his characterisation; and due to its little-known status this film might well be worth a look at, but to my mind, it could have been handled and executed a lot better.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Careful with that pick-axe, Edward.
BA_Harrison30 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Psychological thriller/haunted house movie Dark Places has got quite the horror pedigree: it stars Robert Hardy (Demons of the Mind, Psychomania), Hammer icon Christopher Lee, Joan Collins (Tales from the Crypt, Tales That Witness Madness), Herbert Lom (The Phantom of the Opera, Asylum) and Jane Birkin (Seven Deaths in the Cats Eyes) and was directed by Don Sharp (Rasputin: The Mad Monk, The Kiss of the Vampire). The plot might not do anything revolutionary, but with talent like that, a good time is virtually guaranteed.

Hardy plays Edward Foster, who inherits Marr's Grove, the run-down, purportedly haunted home of Andrew Marr, who spent his last years at St. Columba's Mental Institution. According to Marr's dying words, there is a fortune hidden behind one of the walls, and Foster intends to find it. However, he is not the only one hoping to get his hands on the cash: Marr's physician Dr. Ian Mandeville (Lee) and his sister Sarah (Collins) also know about the money, as does Marr's attorney Prescott (Lom). Foster also has to contend with the issue of ghosts, the spirits of Marr's murdered wife, children and mistress Alta (Birkin) haunting the decrepit property.

The standard haunted house shenanigans ensue - lights go on and off by themselves, objects smash, spooky voices echo through the corridors - and Foster slowly find himself possessed by Marr's spirit, causing him to experience visions from long ago. This enables Sharp to deftly weave together the present and the past, ultimately revealing the secret behind the mysterious deaths of Marr's nearest and dearest, and the location of the missing money. After lots of subtle spookiness, the film goes all out with the horror in the final act, Foster throttling Sarah and pick-axing Ian in the chest; he also has a flashback to Marr killing his crazy children (with a sabre), the pair having done away with Alta by stabbing her with a big knife.

The final revelation of what lies behind the wall probably won't come a big surprise (especially for those who enjoy a bit of E. A. Poe), but it wraps up the film neatly, with Prescott looking quite dismayed as the missing loot is retrieved and taken away by the police.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ho Hum, A Haunted House...Right, Then
josephbrando19 February 2013
Unmemorable by-the-numbers haunted house flick with a great cast (Joan Collins, Christopher Lee, Herbert Lom, Jean Marsh, Jane Birkin) and decent story that could and should have been better. But unfortunately it is bogged down by its less than stellar direction, uncharismatic camera work and lame main actor Robert Hardy, who is about as interesting as a Saltine cracker...without the salt, of course. Lee & Collins play an unscrupulous couple trying to manipulate their hands onto the money that is hidden somewhere inside of the Marr Estate mansion which has just been willed to Robert Foster (played by Hardy) by its original tenant Andrew Marr (also played by Hardy) whose family was killed inside of the house and now is haunting it. Herbert Lom is the next door neighbor who is sort of helpful, but also wouldn't mind getting the cash into his pockets. If you didn't know better, you'd think this was a made-for-TV film, virtually wasting its great locations by filming the goings on as you would a family reunion. And again, there is too much Hardy and not enough Lee, Collins or Lom. But if you are a fan of haunted house films or British horror, there are certainly worse options out there. Then again, there are much better.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Joan Collins can haunt my house any time!
mark.waltz22 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
While I of course enjoyed her as the campy Alexis on "Dynasty", it's her film work from prior to that Primetime soap opera that made me a fan. From her early ingenue days in British films to young leading lady in Hollywood to Gothic horror queen later on, she was fascinating. Of course, her status as a leading lady isn't legendary from those days, but she is quite commanding in even the worst of these films, and paired with legendary horror icon Christopher Lee in this creates a legend. They are actually siblings, how to find hidden money in the mansion owned by the troubled Robert Hardy whom Collins seduces with the intent of gaining his trust. The scene of Collins seducing Hardy and the aftermath is unforgettable. It turns out that Hardy has a twin, a widower of an insane woman with insane children. He's involved with the equally beautiful Jane Birkin, and the tie-in of the two characters played by the underrated Hardy is intriguing.

So we've got an intriguing mystery set up already as well as a haunted house and the presence of Herbert Lom as a rather shady solicitor. This is a B film for sure, but it's well done with better-than-average performances, a screenplay that creates an intriguing plot that goes in many different directions and some lovely scenic photography. You also never know what world you are really in whether two characters that Hardy plays are actually each other, or possibly living in an alternate universe that involves the same house. Or is the second character played by Hardy along with Birkin only in the other characters mind? Lee, while still playing a character in a horror movie, is not a monster here, although his motives are villainous. Collins easily wins this one but Hardy for me is a chilling close second.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Edward has issues...
planktonrules6 April 2024
"Dark Places" begins with an elderly man dying in some sort of asylum. Soon Edward (Robert Hardy) moves into the abandoned mansion owned by the dead man, as apparently he willed the place to him. The place is an absolute mess and looks as if it's sat derelict for decades. Supposedly, within the manor is some sort of hidden fortune...and folks who run the asylum ALSO want to get their hands on the money. The problem is that the longer Edward stays there, the longer ghosts from the manor begin to take over the drive him over the edge. How will all this end?

The main story idea isn't bad at all. But the way the story is handled technically is pretty bad. All the 'special effects' that show you Edward is experiencing bad things are more annoying and hard on the brain than anything else. The worst is at the 100 minute mark as well as those ultra-cheesy bats...they just look cheap and stupid. Overall, not a terrible movie but one that also isn't very good and is, surprisingly, a bit dull.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Forgotten classic with brilliant cast!
martijn-5619 December 2010
I have been looking a long time on the internet for this one and the only copy available is a DVD-r made of a video rip so I guess this is probably as good as it gets. And how good it gets indeed! Wonderful Hammer-style gem, creepy deserted house, hidden money and a tragedy from long ago that lies hidden in the walls. Robert Hardy (also active in similar flicks like Psychomania) lives up to his name of being an actor of versatility and depth. His transformation into the previous landlord of the house he has bought, is so well done you see his whole Shakespearian career in a flash. As if Joan Collins as femme fatale (and Jane Birkin!) isn't enough to make this a top notch cast, Christopher Lee plays her untrustworthy brother. So we are all set! I always love they way how Joan Collins manages to make being strangled look to sensual, it makes you think she has done it before - which she did in Tales From The Crypt but there it was Santa. And she did it again. When it came to the classic scene in Dynasty she had practiced this to perfection; who doesn't remember Blake trying to take the breath out of her? It would be great if this movie became more widely available on DVD in good quality.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all!
JohnHowardReid27 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Despite a plot line that is not only obvious and predictable, but somewhat slow-moving and even worse - overburdened with dialogue and directed in a multitudes of TV-style close-ups by Don Sharp - this is a film that is still worth viewing. The director, the players and the script still manage to convey an appropriately unsettling atmosphere.

Lensing on real locations certainly helps the mood. Subdued color photography as well as the music score and art direction also make major contributions to invigorate an audience's interest. And although he is not called upon to be outrageously villainous, audience favorite Christopher Lee has a fairly meaty role - of which, needless to say, he takes full advantage. Also to be applauded are Robert Hardy, Herbert Rudley and most especially, Joan Collins!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dull Places
kamikaze-420 March 2023
If it weren't for the last ten-or-so minutes, this movie would be committing the unpardonable sin of being dull. The plot, such as it is, concerns a doctor who inherits a mansion from one of his patients. The Mansion is said to be haunted. A subplot of missing money hidden in the house also figures into this plot. The first eighty minutes consist of a collection of non-threatening scares and the introduction of Christopher Lee and Joan Collins as conniving next-door neighbors looking for hidden money. In the last ten or so minutes, there is a flashback explaining what occurred in the house that put the original owner into an Asylum. A minor twist makes the movie slightly palatable. This movie is only good as a trivia question. The question? What movie did Joan Collins and Christopher Lee star in?
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Weak thriller.
Pacey-824 May 2000
This film is rather entertaining but the chills are pretty weak. However, it has strong leads by Robert Hardy and Christopher Lee. I bought this video for five bucks at the Reject Shop, so what was I expecting? Not much, obviously.
6 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
They're coming to take me away, haha
myriamlenys23 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A man inherits a large house from an aged mental patient with a tormented history. The house interests him greatly, mainly because of the fortune said to hide within its walls. Meanwhile most sensible villagers stay away, having grown afraid of the numerous accidents happening all around the place...

A horror movie of the haunted house variety, "Dark Places" tells a story about a modern-day man getting sucked into a decades-old tragedy. Old vices and old terrors reach out in order to fuel a new bloodlust, with disastrous consequences. It is clear that the movie was made with a lot of care. The sets and locations are impressive and the cast is exceptional, featuring people like Robert Hardy (yeah !), Christopher Lee (yippee !) and Herbert Lom (hurray !) Also present is a Joan Collins in fine fettle, doing her "cold-hearted siren" thing. The result is a well-made movie, notable mainly for its fine lead performance and for its cunning intermingling of past and present, reality and hallucination. The ending is a nicely ironical comment on the futility of greed.

On the minus side, "Dark Places" relies a bit too heavily on the usual scare material, partially about things going bump in the night and partially about evil children. Consequently the movie suffers somewhat from over-familiarity, especially during the first half or so.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun!
BandSAboutMovies24 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Edward Foster (Robert Hardy) has inherited a mansion that is rumored to be haunted. Instead of being scared off, he decides to renovate it. What he doesn't know is that the doctor of the previous owner Andrew Carr, Dr. Ian Mandeville (Christopher Lee) and his sister Sarah (Joan Collins) as well as Prescott (Herbert Lom), the solicitor, know that there are two suitcases of money hidden somewhere.

They didn't count on Edward being violently deranged, as he can see the past of the house, as he looks exactly like Carr and experiences the last days of that man's life, in which he plans to leave his wife Victoria (Jean Marsh) for a governess named Alta (Jane Birkin). This house seems to lead to mental illness, as Victoria is impossible to be around. She knows Andrew is leaving, so she has her two children kill her rival while she's seducing her husband. When he finds out, he strangles her and kills the little ones with a sword, bricking up all of the dead bodies - and the money - inside the house.

These flashbacks lead to him ridding his home of the others, just in time for the police to show up. Poor Joan Collins, yet another movie where she gets strangled! For her part, she said in her autobiography Past Imperfect, "I became known by the British press as Queen of the Horror Films - a title I didn't particularly relish. But I was resilient. A survivor. I considered myself lucky to be working so much after such a long period away from the British screen, particularly since I was well into my thirties."

Dark Places was directed by Don Sharp, who also made The Creeping Flesh, and written by Ed Brennan and Joseph Van Winkle. This was shot in an old asylum which, while run down, made it the perfect location.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dull As Dirt...Wasted Cast...Violent Bloody Ending Hardly Worth the Wait
LeonLouisRicci11 June 2023
Endless Scenes of Dusty Dirty Floors with Broken Toys and Broken Floor-Boards, Tapping on Walls, and While Wasting Name Actors Christopher Lee, Herbert Lom, and Joan Collins, Make for a Disappointing, Dull "Haunted-House-Supernatural-Thriller.

The Slow-Slow-Slog that Meanders Along with some Titillation from Joan Collins, Looking Fine at 40, Filmed in a Real-Life Asylum, Never Manages to be Truly "Haunting" or "Thrilling" with the Story of Hidden-Treasure and Insanity.

The Back-Story Revolves Around a British Actor Virtually Unknown Outside the UK, Robert Hardy, Concerns His Early Life and Dysfunction with a Wife and 2 Precocious Children.

It's All Rather Routine and Cliched in the Genre, and the Film Chooses to Let it Slow-Burn for 2 and a 1/2 Acts Before it Spurts an Extended "Money-Shot" of Revelatory Ultra-Violence.

It's Way too Late to Rescue the Boredom of Watching Repetitive Machinations Looking for Hidden Money and Children Giggling from Behind the Walls, that Made and Makes the Movie Forgotten and Forgettable.

For the Miss-Used Cast and the "Real-Life" Asylum Sets, for 15 Minutes of Bloody-Mayhem, and to Ogle the Effervescent Joan Collins...Horror Fans May Give it a Pass,

For Them it's...

Worth a Watch

Others Won't be Missing Much if They Miss this Miss-Fire.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best ghost films
tardesdete2 April 2010
I mean it.

I investigated systematically on the ghost genre and I can say this is one of the scariest ones. It surprised me, i didn't expected much from it, but it's very skillfully done, the way the flashbacks (or dimensional passages) start and stop are a masterwork.

It's a sort of a cheesy film but somehow, at the same time, is an excellent piece of cinema.

Here's the scariest scene of all my investigation: the one where our hero is knocking on the house's walls to find the place where the money is hidden, as he is tortured by the children voices, and they go "no, no ,no, no , no..."

You should see it if you didn't. And in the case you like it, try "The Haunting", "The Innocents" and "Picture of Jenny".
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ah, the mentally insane...you gotta love 'em!
Coventry7 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
(Small SPOILERS) It's such a shame that this film wasn't produced by the Hammer studios (or Amicus…or maybe Tigon), because if that were the case, it probably wouldn't be so underrated and overlooked as it is now. Dark Places has suspense, a professional director, a great cast and – especially – a truly cool plot. Asylum administrator Edward (Robert Hardy) 'inherits' the large mansion of a deceased patient. The legend says he hid a fortune somewhere in the walls of this house but he also went mad there after the murder on his wife, his two children and the governess. Edward begins the search for the lost money but there are more rivals in the field. The town's doctor (Christopher Lee) and his ravishing sister (Joan Collins) constantly try to intrude the house and even the seemly honest notary (Herbert Lom) becomes greedy…but then, the house itself becomes the biggest threat.

As you can read, this film offers great excitement. Asylums, treasure-hunting and haunted houses! What more could a Brit horror-fanatic possibly ask for? The tense climax is terrifically built up and the film features quite a lot gore considering the time it was shot. The budget is low and the project obviously lacks efficient make-up effects. But the wholesome is very atmospheric and quite original so I don't really care if it doesn't look too convincing. 'Dark Places' was directed by Don Sharp, who previously made the Hammer classic 'Rasputin: the Mad Monk' and several other great horror titles, such as 'Psychomania' (very underrated as well), 'The Brides of Fu Manchu' and 'Kiss of the Vampire'. Robert Hardy plays an excellent double-role, while Lee and Lom look as ghoulish as ever. The nearly perfect cast is completed by two stunningly beautiful actresses: Joan Collins and Jane Birkin. In case you're a devoted Hammer fan, or just an admirer of ghostly 70's stories, Dark Places is the ideal film for you. Severely underrated horror fun!
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than most haunted-house flicks... which isn't necessarily saying much.
fedor816 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A relatively obscure British film, though with a recognizable (and solid) cast. It's yet another haunted house tale, but more original than the usual generic stories and predictable nonsense that we get in a lot of these spook films.

As the history of the place unfolds, we find out that the previous owner had killed his wife and children, which in itself is nothing revolutionary or new, but the clever twist involves the fact that his wife and even his kids were deranged, basically unhinged psychopaths hence that their murders were basically justified. The final twist, involving the real identity of the new "owner", is also a fun bit of writing, though perhaps a tad far-fetched.

There are some interesting twists and touches, and style-wise it's pretty good for a TV movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
With great patience comes great, dark, tragic reward
I_Ailurophile2 October 2023
One may well take note of the several very recognizable names and faces to appear here; the cast is nothing to sneeze at, and filmmaker Don Sharp has some noteworthy credits of his own. Be that as it may, I'm more pleased with the nervous energy and atmosphere of unease that the feature ably manifests. Strange goings-on, paired with superb art direction and a splendid filming location, serve to activate that instinctual alert to Something Wrong while simultaneously cultivating an able-bodied mystery, and a story where there is clearly some underhanded scheming at hand. Wilfred Josephs' original score isn't wholly remarkable in and of itself but very capably lends to that ambience, and his own way Teddy Darvas' keen editing also contributes in select instances as the narrative ducks and weaves. Moreover, that commendable cast certainly contributes just as much to those airs. Of them all I'm least familiar with Robert Hardy, starring as our protagonist, yet he arguably outshines Herbert Lom, Jane Birkin, Jean Marsh, Joan Collins, and even Christopher Lee as his portrayal of an increasingly troubled, beleaguered man is marked with a range of intense emotions.

All that's to say nothing of how dark and haunting the story proves to be as it advances. 'Dark places' doesn't make a major impression at first; I'll freely admit my mind wandered a tad at the start. I don't think it's unfair to argue that it somewhat leans on its atmosphere for a fair bit of its length to help carry the day as the narrative threads progress. Yet Ed Brennan and Joseph Van Winkle penned a fabulously smart, engaging tale that in due course begins to rise to the fore amidst all those other elements that have caught our attention early on. The source of the horror shifts slightly over the runtime, but make no mistake that it's firm and meaningful, and surely leaves its mark. The scene writing is terrifically bright and adaptable, at once laying the foundation for the overarching, dispiriting disquiet while propelling the narrative, and twisting in time to allow the plot to take prominence once all the building blocks have been laid in. The characters are rich and vibrant, fertile ground for the seeds that the actors nurture, grow, and explore as they will, and even the dialogue is unexpectedly impactful as the course of events marches onward.

There are a few different flavors to present over these ninety minutes, from the dour mood of the creepy house, to suggestions of supernatural occurrences. The bread and butter of the tale proves more and more to be in a sly psychological facet, however, as protagonist Edward is overcome by the totality of the events. Above all, as the saga of murder and madness climbs toward a crescendo in the latter half, there are notes of profound, terrible tragedy in multiple capacities that give form to a sense of horror that's deeper, more disturbing, and more lasting than the more conventional aspects. It's a tremendous credit to Sharp as director that he is able to so shrewdly manage these component parts, providing balance and ensuring that all in turn is allowed to serve its purpose. It bears repeating that the picture doesn't sound like anything special from the outside looking in, and it is initially somewhat meager at the outset. Our patience bears immense reward, however, and at length I'm all so pleased with how enjoyable, absorbing, and well made 'Dark places' is. I'd stop short of saying it's perfect, for there are occasional embellishments that feel unnecessary, and the very, very end feels a tad too neat and clean. The value this boasts speaks for itself, however, far outweighing any faults. As a matter of personal preference it won't appeal to all, and again, there's no disputing that it starts slow. For those viewers who are receptive to the more wily and underhanded side of horror, however, and willing to wait for a movie to work its magic in its own time, this is well worth seeking out. I, for one, am very happy with just how good this 1974 flick turned out to be, and I'm glad to give it my high and hearty recommendation!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed