Ghost Story (1974) Poster

(1974)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
GHOST STORY (Stephen Weeks, 1974) **1/2
Bunuel197611 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
To begin with, the title of this film was changed in the U.S. to MADHOUSE MANSION because, when it first played there, the 1981 GHOST STORY had already been released; ironically, it was originally to have been called ASYLUM but, when director Weeks submitted the script to Amicus back in 1972 for possible financing, that company turned him down but soon after produced a movie of their own under that very title! Oddly enough, the director has made very few pictures: beginning in 1968 with the WWI-themed 1917, his subsequent output was shared equally between horror projects – first a serviceable if uninspired rendition of "Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde" named I, MONSTER (1971), followed by this one – and two versions of the very same Arthurian adventure – the second, SWORD OF THE VALIANT (1984), made in view of the fact that the first, GAWAIN AND THE GREEN KNIGHT (1973), had been re-edited by the studio against the his wishes (the irony being that the remake still came out lame!). For the record, I only have 1917 and GAWAIN left to watch and, curiously enough, two of these – MONSTER and GAWAIN itself – have turned up on local TV over the years.

Anyway, the film under review is ultimately more interestingly-styled (being a period piece) than compelling narrative-wise. The accompanying feature-length "Making Of" documentary states that there never was a horror movie quite like it, but I do not agree in this regard: coincidentally, I had watched another ghost story just a day prior to it – DARK PLACES, made that very year – and which, like this one, has its protagonist being witness to tragic events from the past under the influence of a haunted house; besides, it transpires that he was chosen by the house and will subsequently not be allowed to leave (a plot point which is common to THE HAUNTING {1963}); and, of course, countless movies have been made before and since involving creepy dolls! This is not to say that the film does not indeed evoke a unique atmosphere – but this has to do with the fact that, while it is supposedly set in England, shooting took place in far-away India on estates and in palaces dating back from the British colonial era! Perhaps its main fault, then, lies with the realization that the inside story, as it were, is more interesting than the central narrative: the latter revolves around a decidedly fey trio of males who convene upon the property for a weekend hunting session – one is the rather apprehensive current owner (played by Murray Melvin), another is a dead-shot as well as an amateur ghost catcher (though the only thing he manages to trap is a moth!), and the last an eager-to-please yet naïve fellow but who is the one who proves most receptive to the 'phenomena'. Another unusual concept (which is, however, barely stressed: again, the film is essentially too low-key for its own good) is having the protagonist unaccountably meet the characters from by-gone days in his own time (inside a bar and sitting at table out in the open).

Through the hero, under the influence of a porcelain doll (an authentic 19th century relic), we begin to piece together the story of the house's previous owners: a brother and sister (Marianne Faithful supplying much-needed marquee value) are incestuously drawn to each other and in order to definitely separate them, the girl (with the boy's consent) is passed off as insane. In a nearby asylum (co-run by former Hammer regular Barbara Shelley, here in her final theatrical appearance), she undergoes the type of hardships recorded with respect to the treatment of mental illness in this uninformed age; Faithful's devoted female companion breaks in to liberate her but, not knowing in which cell she has been placed, begins to indiscriminately open doors after taking possession of the keys and, before long, the loonies are running loose and, needless to say, take this opportunity to exact revenge on their tormentors (with the more enthusiastic towards this end being a man decked-out in a 'Coffin Joe' outfit!) and set fire to the place. Faithful herself manages to escape but she has really gone mad in the interim and, upon reaching her former home and seeing the brother who betrayed her, stabs him! Having now pieced the story together, the hero is about to leave with Melvin (their friend having quit in disgust earlier on) but, as I said, the house is opposed to this and the doll (which he had tried to destroy but was also literally led by it to the site of the by-now abandoned asylum) turns on him!

The film certainly looks good (especially in this edition culled from the Nucleus 2-Disc R2 set, since I had earlier acquired it via a substandard VHS source), with the genteel overall approach (which could sometimes be mistaken for a Merchant Ivory offering!) being counterpointed by an eerie soundtrack courtesy of Ron Geesin.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Genuinely haunting, a good old fashioned compelling ghost story Warning: Spoilers
When I first saw this I expected it to be one of those horrible, undecipherable trippy 70's flicks. The film was indeed very vague and bizarre, especially towards the end, and I have really hated that approach in other films made in the late 60's/70's, but in this instance it was..somehow satisfying. The film got more tense and atmospheric as it went on. And while I never totally got the plot it didn't bother me too much, I enjoyed the atmospherics and surreality of what was going on. Although it never got exactly mind blowing for me, it was much more interesting and a very different kind of supernatural horror film than I initially gave it credit for. It had some moments and sequences that were genuinely unsettling and very creepy to me. So very few ghost themed movies are what they're meant to be, tragic, chilling, and indeed haunting like in this very uncanny ghost tale of old vengeance coming back to expose sinful and dark deeds long since buried! It certainly doesn't do it perfectly or hardly anything perfectly for that matter, but I think Ghost Story does what a decent ghost movie should do; it relies on tension rather than gore to achieve its chills and more horrific themes. It's always nice to come across an older movie that uses a more lighter touch to convey the shock and horror aspects. This film is no forgotten masterpiece, but it does deserve a little consideration by anyone who enjoys a More subtle slow burning kind of ghost-themed horror picture. It's a real shame the film isn't a little better than it actually is though, because something that really brought down the tension and overall quality for me was how ridiculously campy and eccentric the three dashing country gents were. They were so grotesquely pompous and weird and off putting that I didn't know quite how to take them and it frankly made it very hard for me to even give the slightest damn as to what might happen to them. I didn't find any of the three strange men to be particularly impressive or even remotely likable. The scene where the nonentity with the moustache sneers at them of his disgust for jam on his sandwiches or something and leaves in disgust, how the hell am I supposed to grasp the meaning of that, that's isn't how a human being is supposedly act! Some very bizarre acting and direction done with those three... And the one that surely was meant to be gay or if not what the hell, if he wasn't then the man had camp down to a fine, fine art! The film looked Really clear and quite beautiful and crisp to say it was made so long ago. The bright country scenes outside, and the shadowy dusky interiors of the grand mansion really contrasted beautifully and I was all shot really well, I got no beef with the cinematography of the movie at all. I always like a horror movie with a really great dark house and that mansion really fit the bill, it was a fantastically atmospheric Gothic looking place with all its wonderful dark corners and twisting corridors and grim old secrets waiting to be awakened... It was a real classically spooky joint, and I like spooky, and the magnificent dwelling itself was my favourite thing about this movie. The evil possessed doll in the film, was one of the genuine creepiest little things I've ever seen in a horror movie, and didn't even really did anything but just that little face! I don't think I could sleep in the same house as it let alone room! It really scared me in the scene where the guy with the glasses is in the dark with the doll and all you can see is its face, and he says "you're horrible" and then it closes in on him with the lightning flashing and everything, that's an excellent little scene and I must have seen this at some point when I was very little because I swear I dreamed that exact scene once.. I don't agree with the other reviewer who wrote that a ghost story is not a horror story. Genres can cross in a thousand different ways and go off in as many directions, very often too many directions. That's one of the reasons I liked this, it was pretty freaky at points but it was nice and focused! I found the scene set in the past where all the mad inmates seize and murder the staff of the asylum to be very disturbing and impressively done. I loved everything to do with the strange story element of the ethereal trips to the asylum in the past as the girl's tragic story of perversion and betrayed is uncovered as well as how her beloved doll came to be haunted by what is very likely her spirit. What a different and brilliant idea to have in this kind of ghost movie, and it was even a little ahead of its time in that regard, it's certainly got a lot of years on Quantum Leap! This film worked for me. I honestly don't know why but it managed to win me over at some point, I must be getting soft! I think it was because it reminded me fondly of all the great old British short pulp horror stories I have loved to read over the years. This is a very enjoyable very low-key ghost chiller, probably best not to question it too much and just enjoy the ride of it, kind of like the one 'lil nightmare Dolly hitches at the end!! Good watch, very well done. x
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pretty lacking ghost story
Red-Barracuda22 April 2014
Three college acquaintances spend time in an old Victorian mansion. One of them starts seeing visions of events from the previous century, involving a young woman who previously lived in the house. These hallucinations seem to involve an incident where her brother committed her to an insane asylum despite nothing actually being wrong with her.

Ghost Story has a reasonably interesting cast at its disposal. It includes the ultra-camp Murray Melvin (The Devils, Barry Lyndon) as the effeminate host who invites the others to the mansion; friend of The Rolling Stones Marianne Faithful also stars in the role of the ghostly girl, while To the Manor Born's Penelope Keith also appears. But unfortunately, even with this cast there is terrible chemistry between the actors. Meaning its difficult becoming very involved in their story and it is a weak story at that. The narrative is split into two threads – the current day and the ghostly flashback – but the period story is far superior to the anaemic contemporary one. This means that when events return to the three foppish central characters the film really drags. There are admittedly some decent sequences in the ghostly section such as the scene in the asylum. But overall, there really isn't enough good material here to make this obscurity worth checking out.
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Withnail And Us!
philipr0920 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The small but select compendium of reviews here give an excellent description of the plot of this film; any attempt to add to them in that regard would be redundant. However, I would say that Stephen Weeks has done a fine job here of making a specific 'genre' movie: the good old Traditional English Ghost Story. His cast is well-chosen, Murray Melvin in particular is brilliant as McFadyen, a character for whom the term 'effete' could have been invented -his every gesture conveys exactly the aristocratic ennui and fragility that you would expect. The exception is Marianne Faithful, who (as in 'Girl On A Motorcycle') just about manages to be Marianne Faithful. She has a decent musical career behind her but, already rather matronly for the part in 1974, was never going to win any Oscars. It hardly matters though, because the characters are all stereotypes, as is pretty much required in this kind of tale. Critically, the atmosphere is perfectly managed throughout the movie. I did find the music (Ron Geesin) a bit much at times; stylistically it fit well but...less would have been more. Larry Dann is a little over-the-top as the 'living proof of university entry by scholarship' Talbot, the member of the three-man shooting party who is 'chosen' to receive visions of a past tragedy played out in the old house in which they are staying, and powerless to change past or present. Vivian MacKerrel is the third guy, Duller: a crack shot with a foppish interest in the paranormal. It was MacKerrel, whose otherwise undistinguished acting career, heroic indulgence in booze and early demise, was the inspiration for the titular Withnail in 'Withnail & I'. Worth seeing for this if nothing else!
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointment for Faithfull fans
rdigby2 April 2000
Insomniacs apart, the only viewers likely to be attracted to this curiosity are fans of Marianne Faithfull. If they hope to find a forgotten gem of her career, this will disappoint them. A weak story about the haunting of an English mansion is compromised from the start because the location, which was in India, looks nothing like an English mansion. A feeble script and direction leave even such reliable hands as Penelope Keith and Anthony Bate uncertain of how to play. Followers of Marianne Faithfull will find her in ill fitting costumes and photographed from unflattering angles. The overall effect is amateur.
16 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Very strange ghost story that fails in most aspects. What's wrong with Jam, by the way?
poolandrews28 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Ghost Story is set in 1930's England where two Duller (Vivian MacKerrell) & Talbot (Larry Dann) meet at a train station & recognise each other as both having been invited to the countryside to stay in a large manor house recently inherited by one of their old college buddies McFayden (Murray Melvin). Once Duller & Talbot arrive McFayden is rather vague about his plans but they try to make the best of it, in the middle of the night while in bed trying to sleep Talbot is attacked by a large porcelain doll which disappears as suddenly as it appeared. The following morning Talbot witnesses an argument between some people he has never seen before in the house which looks different than it did when he arrived but they also disappear quickly & the house returns to it's present state. Talbot thinks that McFayden & Duller are playing tricks but it turns out that McFayden invited the pair their to try & prove the existence of ghost's & whether his new house is haunted...

This British production was co-written, produced & directed by Stephen Weeks & is a real oddball obscurity from the early 70's, until the recent 2009 British DVD this had only ever been released on VHS in the US once under the exploitative title Madhouse Mansion & had a few airings on UK telly but otherwise was pretty much impossible to watch. The script has three credited screenwriters & it felt to me like each of them had their own ideas & were pulling in the opposite direction to the other's which makes for a bit of a weird, jumbled mess of a film that simply didn't work for me. The three main character's are amongst the oddest & most eccentric you are likely to see, they are all just plain weird & it's impossible to relate to them or feel any sympathy or care about their story. Every scene the three are in is just so stiff, unnatural & strange I couldn't work out what I was watching. Of course some may like this odd feel but I most certainly didn't & what the hell's their problem with Jam? Then there's the extremely poor ghost story itself, I mean the script doesn't even offer up any good scares & the only memorable supernatural activity of note is when a large creepy lifelike doll comes to life but again it's at odds with the straight flashback style ghost story of terrible events in the past coming back to haunt the present aspect which many ghost stories consist of, the scenes featuring the doll feel like a killer toy film & the final twist when McFayden drives off & the dolls arm pokes out of the suitcase on the the back of the car feels like a million miles away from the dull supernatural ghost story that Talbot gets to experience. Even these flashbacks to the past have no logic, I mean at first Talbot experiences these visions in parts of the house where they happened while later he just has visions while looking at an old insane asylum sign, his behaviour & reaction feels so different to what any normal person might do that it I suspect the makers wanted him to come across as creepy, he's certainly more bizarre & creepy than the predictable & lame ghost story offered up.

At just over 80 minutes Ghost Story feels a lot longer, not that much actually happens. Take away the living doll scenes & this isn't even much of a ghost story but more of a discovering past horrific events story that don't seem to have any great relevance to anything. Shot in real locations Ghost Story looks alright but the low budget lighting & camera-work might be a good or bad thing depending on your opinion. Personally I though it looked somewhat amateurish & like it was made cheaply for telly. Forget about any blood or gore as there isn't any but that's not what Ghost Story is about, it's about atmosphere & telling a story neither of which it does very well unfortunately since it's all over the place.

This must have had a really low budget, the whole look & feel of it is cheap although it's a puzzle as to why this British production supposedly set entirely here in Britain was filmed in India. I personally didn't like the performances at all, everyone seemed to play it wrong & nothing seemed right or natural & it was all so awkward & odd.

Ghost Story is a mess, the story has no great internal logic & the actual ghost story about a few patients escaping from an old insane asylum is lame, a living doll that might be alive or might be possessed or might be haunted is the only memorable aspect to this dull & dreary film notable for it's strangeness but little else. Not to be confused with the better Ghost Story (1981) starring Fred Astaire of all people.
10 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I Remember This From Years Ago...
Theo Robertson1 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
... Which means it was rather good or rather bad . I've got to confess I don't have any good memories of it

It's set between the two world wars with three spiffing English chums staying at a mansion where one of them finds himself transported to the same location in Victorian times . The strange is that while he can see and hear the characters in Victorian times they can't see or hear him . The whole effect is unintentionally funny as the " time traveler " hides behind doors as soon as he hears people approach

The story revolves around a young woman being committed to a lunatic asylum by her brother even though she's not mentally ill . One of her relatives tries to free her only to unlock the cell of a raving psycho who kills her and frees the other inmates . While all sorts of people were detained in these asylums in Victorian times GHOST STORY unforgivably gives the impression that being mentally ill is the same as being a violent nutter and there's a sequence where the villain is given a shave by one of the lunatics wearing a top hat , smoking a cigar and carrying a giant knife who is now running the asylum . This whole sequence would have been laugh out loud funny if it wasn't so objectionable .

I do realise that a ghost story is not the same as a horror story so it's wrong to criticise it for being something it's not . However the director fails to produce any type of tension or atmosphere with the whole feel of the movie being sterile and static and if my long lasting impression of GHOST STORY is anything to go by I'm in no hurry to ever see this movie ever again
11 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very British Ghost Story
ladymidath11 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Three old university chums arrive at an old mansion that one of them, McFayden inherited. The other two, Duller and. Talbot stay with him until Duller, tired of the old country manor and disappointed that he was not able to find evidence of ghosts ends up leaving while Talbot is puzzled as to why he was actually invited. First told it was to hunt, it becomes clear that there is something else going on. McFayden actually wants to see if the rumours of the house being haunted are true and are hoping his 'friends' will help him find out.

Talbot is the one that actually sees the ghosts with the help of an pld antique doll. Slowly the tragic past of the house and it's former occupants unfolds.

It's nice to see Penelope Keith even in a small role here. The three leads are competent and likable in their roles. Even the dour Duller.

Vivian MacKerrell as Duller is fine, he was also the inspiration for Withnail in Withnail and I. Murray Melvin is very interesting as McFayden and Larry Dann plays the poor hapless Talbot.

The movie, while not perfect is atmospheric and there are some unforgettable scenes like the ones in the asylum and when it's exploring the past.

Fans of old fashioned ghost stories will enjoy this one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Enjoyable - but it's a hodgepodge that doesn't completely fit together as it is
I_Ailurophile3 October 2023
It's a tad difficult to completely take this seriously. With the exaggerated mannerisms of speech and body language of those chief characters to whom we're first introduced, and the off-kilter dynamics between them, all that's missing is discrete comedy for this to come off like a P. G. Wodehouse movie. While always enjoyable in its own right, Ron Geesin's music also seems quite scattered: sometimes appropriate and lending atmosphere, sometimes curiously ill-fitting for the proceedings, and sometimes almost parodic; a theme to greet our ears in a scene just after the one-hour mark sounds like something Mike Patton might have recorded with Mr. Bungle or Fantomas. (Could Geesin have just been ahead of his time, to the detriment of this title?) With that especially in mind it's hard to tell what tone the picture is trying to strike, and even more so as the tone rather shifts from one scene to the next. The storytelling itself pointedly jumps around a tad, only complicating matters, and as the halfway mark rolls around there's still little cohesiveness to be had. There are some facets that are decidedly dark, and others that are wry; a singular element to take prominence, not least in the last minutes, raises a skeptical eyebrow; some dialogue is almost laughable, and between the writing of Talbot and McFadyen, and the respective performances of Larry Dann and Murray Melvin, one can't say who comes off more peculiarly. The narrative does gel as the length enters its home stretch, but still the connective threads between the two halves are questionable, and the audience is asked to take a lot purely on faith with the benefit of active suspension of disbelief.

Mind you, I do think 'Ghost story' is more well done than not, and there's much to appreciate here. The panoply is odd, but I do actually like the acting, above all the strange energy that Dann and Melvin bring with them. Geesin's music is a true smorgasbord, but I kind of love it. Stephen Weeks illustrates a keen eye at times for orchestrating shots in a way that helps build the intended ambience, especially with some smart use of lighting. The filming locations are splendid, and the art direction; those stunts and effects that are employed look swell. Though it's a long and uneven road to get there, ultimately we are treated to the horror flavors that we crave, with underhanded dread airs and some nefarious goings-on. I can honestly say that I did enjoy this, and I'm glad I took the time to watch. Yet the fact remains that a viewer must put in some work to find the value herein - not because the feature is abstruse or cerebral, but just because the entire experience is very much all over the map. At some points it's earnestly creepy, and at others nearly inspires mocking snickers; scenes that are tongue-in-cheek or sprightly are adjoined with others that are violent and grim. None of this is accidental. I see what Weeks was doing, as director and as producer, and what he and his co-writers assembled. It's not that sum total doesn't work, but only that it doesn't come off very well; instead of a calculated conglomeration, the film feels more like a slapdash kluge of parts that don't entirely fit together. I mean no disrespect to Weeks or anyone else involved when I say that it would have taken an especially delicate, expert touch to make this work as it is, and failing that, the concept needed some reworking.

When all is said and done it is worthwhile, but it is hardly something that demands viewership. 'Ghost story' is a piece to check out on a quiet day, and not something for which to specifically set aside time. I'm glad for those who appreciate it more than I do, and I can't begrudge those who engage honestly and view it less favorably. I say this best suited for the audience that is receptive to all the wide possibilities that cinema and the genre have to offer, and who can look past the shortcomings to find the worthiness within. So long as one is open-minded and willing there is a great deal to admire here, and that is perhaps the best mindset to adopt when sitting to watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
To The Manor Bored!
hitchcockthelegend7 December 2013
Pretty awful British mystery disguised as a horror film, Ghost Story pitches some poncey people into an old country house retreat and one of them starts to see spectral images that nobody else can. Directed by Stephen Weeks (I, Monster) and starring Anthony Bate, Larry Dann, Marianne Faithful, Sally Grace, Penelope Keith, Leigh Lawson and Vivian MacKerrell, what transpires for the 90 minute run time is utter boredom and bad writing.

There's too many unanswered questions hanging in the air throughout, the pace is straight out of the snail derby, and the musical score is wholly inappropriate. Faithful gives good value as a tortured soul, and Weeks shows a good turn of ingenuity for some atmospheric scenes in an Asylum, but other than that, this is a cure for insomnia and rightly it has vanished into relative obscurity. 3/10
6 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An excellent and atmospheric ghost story.
artilevel11 March 2006
I totally disagree with the other comments I've read here.

I regard this as one of the best ghost stories I've seen. I love the atmosphere of it, the English gentlemen going to a luxurious country retreat, and the creepy feel of the place that the film conveys superbly.

The music used is highly effective too, especially the scenes where the doll appears.

The only scenes I wasn't that keen on were the ones shown in the lunatic asylum.

I loved the scenes filmed in the country house with the three friends, from the moment they arrived to the final scenes.

The 1920's music, and the McFadden character, {Murray Melvin} dancing to it, as he played a record, was a lovely touch that added to the enjoyment. It is the sort of house that I would love to visit for relaxation in beautiful surroundings, redolent of better times.

It has been many years since I had the pleasure of seeing it, and I long for a DVD release of this wonderfully filmed ghost story.
40 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lot of story, hardly any ghost...
Coventry20 April 2022
With a title as vague and dull as "Ghost Story", your film must be pretty darn amazing and suspenseful to be memorable! Alas, this 1974 TV-production is weak altogether, and I guess that's why nobody has ever heard of it. The story, setting and atmosphere certainly hold a lot of potential, but the film is too talkative and slow-paced, with unlikable characters and too many plot-aspects that don't make any sense. Three former college mates gather at an old gothic and remote mansion that one of them inherited, supposedly for a reunion, but they clearly never were close friends. That already causes for a big dent in the plausibility. Through sleeping in a room with an eerie porcelain doll, Talbot - the nerdy one of the bunch - gets a spiritual connection with Sophy Kwykwer; a woman who used to live in the mansion. Sophy was emotionally tormented and eventually submitted to a mental asylum by her no-good husband. A handful of sequences, some involving the doll and some taking place at the uncanny asylum, are noteworthy, but "Ghost Story" isn't worth purchasing. The two most famous names in the cast, namely Marianne Faithfull and Barbara Shelley, hardly have any screen time. Before this film, I only knew Faithfull from her fantastic song "The Ballad of Lucy Jordan". The story and dramatic tone of this four-minute chant is already a lot more intense and impactful than this entire movie.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I'll Find a Guest Bedroom and Nap This Off
NoDakTatum21 October 2023
In 1930's England, three university chums are reunited at an old mansion for a weekend of hunting. Talbot (Larry Dann), the kinda odd one, begins having trouble with an old doll he finds in his room; it seems to have a mind of its own. The house is appropriately creepy, having been abandoned years before by its previous occupants. As the weekend progresses, Talbot suddenly finds himself as a spectator to some spectres. He watches scenes unfold from many years before that occurred in the house, yet none of the ghosts see him. In these scenes, Sophy (Marianne Faithfull) is a young woman committed to the local insane asylum because her brother feels some urges that would better be spent on a non-blood relation. Talbot finds the doll belonged to Sophy. Committed against her will, Sophy escapes and has her revenge on her brother at the same time Talbot and his companions try to leave the manor.

Stephen Weeks, responsible for Sean Connery's worst film, "Sword of the Valiant," is completely unfocused in this very boring ghost story. The fish eye lens is used ad nauseam, and Weeks forgets to make the film scary. The insane asylum scenes, while brief, provide the only chills. The writers can never make up their minds as to what and who is doing the haunting. Is the doll haunted? Is Talbot insane? The ghost cast is huge, are all of them ghosts or is this the memory of a few? If the house is haunted, how can Talbot psychically leap to the asylum, which is some distance away? Why does Talbot space out for minutes at a time, and his friends do not notice? Why doesn't Talbot tell the other two what he sees? Instead, we get some very dry, very boring scenes that consist mostly of the men deciding what to eat for breakfast. Faithfull is alright, but she is not given much of a character to play. The rest of the very British cast does their best in what should have been an old-fashioned ghost story, but just turns old. Aside from the too few chills, I cannot recommend "Madhouse Mansion." Also known as "Ghost Story."
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very unlikely to spook you.
BA_Harrison12 April 2024
Behind this film's uninspired title lies a really uninspired storyline: in the early 1930s, three university acquaintances convene at an old country house for a few days of hunting but one of the men discovers that the building in which they are staying is haunted. Now this well-worn plot might not have been so bad had director Stephen Weeks cranked up the tension and gone all out with the scares, but his film delivers tepid chills and zero suspense and is unlikely to unsettle all but the most lily-livered of viewers.

It doesn't help that the three central characters are such an unlikeable bunch: there's effeminate fop McFayden (Murray Melvin) who lies about the true reason for the reunion; Duller (Vivian MacKerrell), who is rude and arrogant; and wimpy Talbot (Larry Dann), who is afraid to tell the others about what he is seeing and hearing in the old house. In a series of 'visions', Talbot sees glimpses of the past, when a previous occupant of the house, Robert (Leigh Lawson), committed his own sister Sophy (Marianne Faithfull) to a nearby loony bin -- because he had incestuous feelings for her. Sophie gets her chance for revenge when the lunatics break out of the asylum and she is able to pay Robert a visit...

Ghost Story is so trite that it even resorts to that hoary old horror cliche, the creepy doll, which appears to be possessed by Sophy's spirit and ultimately kills Talbot and McFayden. Why? I haven't the foggiest, but I didn't really care -- I was just happy that the film was finally over.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Campstravaganza!
highcamp2 December 2023
A singularly disjointed and eccentric Murray Melvin vehicle pulling in tropes, inspirations, and homages from left and right, delightful until the last second of the closing credits. Production and costume design are something else entirely-so many questions that yield no answer. I suppose people come in for Marianne Faithful but the film is so blatantly uninterested and unaware of women the leading lady looks more like an afterthought. I wonder if this is a TV movie or people actually went out to watch it in theatre at the time of its release, as the aesthetics, the campiness, and the narrative structure are more reminiscent of TV productions yet it is not marked as one. Very seventies and yet timeless.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bizarre, eccentric cinema equals a good and quite unnerving film. MILD SPOILERS
ContinentalOp5 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
'Ghost Story' is a pseudo-surrealist and dreamlike film. The plot is quite simplistic in a technical sense. In the 1920s or early 1930s, McFadden (Murray Melvin) invites two fellow university students to his mansion. One is Talbot, a somewhat nervous and mild fellow, and another more forceful and rude friend who leaves the house earlier in the film as his relationship with McFadden - more of an acquaintance than a real friend - doesn't really warrant him staying in a place he obviously finds uninteresting.

Talbot, on the other hand, does stay and experiences ghostly occurrences involving a Victorian doll and ''dreams'' of an insane asylum which is the key to haunting's in McFadden's newly inherited mansion.

The film is low-budget but well directed by Stephen Weeks, a very underrated filmmaker who also filmed 'I, Monster' which was one of the closer adaptations of R.L. Stephenson's 'The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde'. The films have similarities and differences. Whilst 'I, Monster' was quite straight forward in its direction, 'Ghost Story' had more surrealist touches woven into its imagery; scenes often jump back and forward from the world of dreams to reality, blending together creepily. In fact the film itself is rather dreamlike with interesting camera work and photography which, when mixed with the imagery of the Victorian doll and the scenes of the asylum, make the film unsettling and disturbing. The filming location was in Tamil Nadu Indian, though the locations chosen pass for very beautiful, yet eerie locations that are found in England.

Another interesting aspect of the film is that it was co-written by Rosemary Sutcliff, more famously a writer of historical fiction, most famously the tremendously popular 'The Eagle of the Ninth', and Philip Norman, an author and playwrite most famous for his biography of the Beatles 'Shout!: The Beatles in Their Generation'. The film is also of interested to fans of M.R. James and other writers of the 20s as it is set in the same era and has a similar feel to those works of literature that are now often found in omnibuses of classic ''ghost stories''.

'Ghost Story' is an underrated and nearly forgotten horror film, which beautifully paints a cinematic treat of unsettling scenes and images instead of going for shock and gore.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed