Women Reply (1975) Poster

(1975)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A "cine-essay" by a filmmaker who knows her cine and her essays
StevePulaski15 March 2014
Agnès Varda's "Women Reply: Our Bodies, Our Sex" is a "cine-essay" that attempts to answer the anthropological question "what is a woman?" by showing a wide-variety of unique women in the purest and sometimes most conventional form. For eight minutes, Varda depicts women addressing the audience about how they are more than a role, more than a babymaking unit, and more than meets the eye, most of all. Varda was a filmmaker during the time of the French New Wave, as well as a filmmaker who brought upon the importance of documentary/feminist filmmaking throughout her work in the sixties, seventies, and eighties. "Women Reply" Our Bodies, Our Sex" tries to coherently answer its question by first addressing the fact that women are more than the sum of their breasts, buttocks, and vagina, by showing us them in the purest form. It then shows heavier women, skinnier women, pregnant women, short women, and tall women, providing us with the ideas that all of these women have the potential to make a large difference in modern society as we know it. In 2014, these ideas sound like age-old answers to some of the most redundant questions asked. Looking at this particular short from the perspective of 1975, one sees its true value and artistry thanks to its directness and its willingness to take a stand and answer a very broad, open-ended question, even if the stand and the answer may be worth more than an eight minute short.

NOTE: The film can be viewed on the popular website MUBI, mubi.com/films/women-reply-our-bodies-our-sex

Directed by: Agnès Varda.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Feminist but not boring
guy-bellinger1 February 2008
What is it like to be a woman in 1975? This is the question Agnès Varda is trying to answer 'Réponse de Femmes', in a style quite characteristic of the politically committed cinema of the 1960's and 1970's. This short could accordingly be awfully outdated but for Varda's ability to turn a series of boring slogans into a stimulating experience, inventive and poetic as her findings are.

In what she calls a 'ciné-tract', in fact a short made for French TV, Varda has various female persons, ranging from a baby girl to a top model to an old woman appear before her camera and tell the spectator about themselves (except for the baby of course!): about the way they look, about sex and desire, about advertising and last but not least about the disputed motherly instinct. They can be beautiful, unprepossessing or outright ugly but little does it matter: they want to be treated as persons and not consumers and sex toys before ending up asold ghosts good to be forgotten and discarded. They protest against the conditioning imposed on them by society and the stifling sex roles that go with it.

The most striking thing about this pamphlet is the scene in which a pregnant woman dances naked in front of the camera and without the least ounce of shame for that. It is beautiful and moving. Of course you must not be a puritan to appreciate such a rare scene,like some of the Antenne 2 viewers who at the time of release complained to the channel about such a 'scandal'. But there is more to life than a series of taboos, isn't there?
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sadly inaccurate elaboration on an otherwise important subject
Horst_In_Translation9 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"Réponse de femmes: Notre corps, notre sexe" is a French French-language short film from 1975, so this one is almost 45 years old, maybe over depending on when you read this review. It only runs for sligthly under 8 minutes, so this is a really long title for a fairly short movie. The literal translation would mean something along the lines of "Women's Answer: Our Body, our gender". But the official English-language international title is simply "Women Reply". This film is part of a series of films on women and probably the most known today, which mostly has to do with the fact that behind the camera here was Agnès Varda, a female filmmaker who died not too long ago around the age of 90. Now her work here is not really about women being discriminated in the job world, but really very close to gender in a biological sense too. We see a baby girl early on and later on naked women on several occasions. I think the idea behind this film is good because honestly there was so much discrimination still in the 1970s, but there isn't really today anymore, even if all kinds of social justice warriors and white knight want you to think otherwise. But back then, there was. Sadly, the execution here is very shoddy and I will give you a few example why I don't think this film came even close to achieving what it should have. The main problem is that it depicts men as evil. Every man basically. They need to stop seeing women as humans whose only purpose to satisfy men. Now that is really absurd. There may have been many men who thought so, but in fact there were also so many caring husbands and fathers who do not deserve one bit of this categorization. The moment when they say that men who don't have kids should not be seen negatively either is very correct, but it is still projecting. And yeah moments when we have one woman say she wants kids and the one next to her say she doesn't, it's not the most creative part to be honest, especially in terms of writing. All in all, this is definitely a feminist film and in its attempts to move forward in terms of gender equality, it is crossing the mark too often and not managing to stay on the fine line between too careful and way over-the-top. The latter description fits this film very well on several occasions and you will recognize these occasions when you see then if you decide to watch it. It is still somewhat interesting from the perspective of life in the 1970s at times, so the film is not a complete failure, but at times, it comes really close to. It is certainly closer to being a failure than to being a good watch, but overall I would categorized it as a weak movie. Don't watch unless you are a Varda completionist.
0 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed