High Road to China (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
71 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Extraordinary aerial adventures , thrills , explosions and enjoyable romance
ma-cortes29 May 2009
A drunk previous WWI pilot (Tom Selleck) and his underling (Jack Weston) are hired by a young heiress (Bess Armstrong) who must encounter her dad before her contender (Robert Morley) takes over the inheritance . They will face dangerous bandits (Brian Blessed) , numerous adventures and risks .

This exciting story gets an agreeable look and feeling to vintage adventures , exotic places , dastardly nasties and daring getaways than ever before . Packs action enough with explosion galore , especial aerial effects with impressive images of flight and dogfighting , comedy , tongue usefully in in its check , all that make it a cinematic roller coater ride . It's made like a classic's 30s-style adventure reminiscent of early serials and in the wake of ¨Raiders of the last ark¨ . Tom Selleck is a hard-drinking former air ace , he's a dashing and intrepid pilot , Bess Armstrong is perfectly cast as feisty heiress looking for his father , she's continuously irritated with the smooth talker and alcoholic adventurer . Both of whom play a special love story in a screwball-romance style . Besides , displaying spectacular images of Selleck and Armstrong gliding over extraordinary landscapes with musical background by John Barry , perhaps copied by Sidney Pollack in ¨Out of Africa¨ with the couple Redford and Meryl Streep , flying in similar plane and soundtrack . Regular cinematography by Ronnie Taylor filmed in Yugoslavia and England, the colors are worn-out , it's necessary an urgent remastering . The film was lavishly produced by Fred Weintraub and Raymond Chow , producers of ¨Operation Dragon¨ starred by Bruce Lee . This was 27th highest grossing film of 1983 at the American box-office . The picture was frequently considered by the film-going public as being a rip-off to Raiders of the lost ark (1981) when in fact the movie had been in development since the late 1970s , formerly the famous Spielberg adventure.

The film was well handled and professionally directed by Brian G Hutton, however was a flop and failed to give cash . Hutton started his career with little and prestigious films , such as ¨Wild seed¨ and ¨The Pad¨. There after , he veered off into big budgeted and all-star movies, proving which he could handle big scale production , as ¨Where the eagles dare¨, one of the best from Alistair McLean , furthermore with ¨Kelly's heroes¨ added humor to the warlike action . His next picture was ¨High road to China¨ marked a partial return with panache to his previous form but faltered at the Box-office , in spite of being quite amusing and with occasional touch of directorial skill, for that reason is a must for adventure buffs .
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Those old action/adventure films
bkoganbing12 March 2017
With tongue firmly in cheek Tom Selleck, Bess Armstrong and the rest of the cast give us a spoof of all those old action/adventure flicks from the 30s and 40s. The film is set in Kuomintang China which has always been a good source for these films, a fluid political situation, a weak central government and a lot of warlords in business for themselves.

Industrialist Wilford Brimley has gone to Asia and vanished, but that hasn't stopped his daughter from spending his money like it had no end. But the end might be coming as his partner Robert Morley wants him declared legally dead and by terms of their partnership he gets control of the company and daughter Bess Armstrong is out in the cold. She might have to do like others do and actually go to work.

Heaven forfend so she hires former air ace Tom Selleck who comes with two World War I era biplanes and a mechanic played by Jack Weston. This partnership takes her to Afghanistan, Nepal, and finally the westernmost province of China Sinkiang in search of Brimley.

Along the way all the old clichés concerning these films is employed and of course chemistry cannot be denied. Selleck and Armstrong become an item and Selleck finds some use for his former aviation combat skills.

By the way I loved and I'm sure you'll love Brimley's explanation as to why Armstrong will be well taken care of despite efforts to the contrary.

Those efforts are being directed by Robert Morley who I can never resist seeing in any film. There's also a nice performance by Brian Blessed as an Afghan warlord.

Tom Selleck's fans should love High Road To China.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
simple action adventure
SnoopyStyle27 November 2017
It's been 3 years since socialite Eve Tozer (Bess Armstrong) heard from her wealthy father Bradley Tozer (Wilford Brimley). His business partner in London is trying to declare him dead. She has only 12 days before the partner steals the family business and the entire fortune. Her only option is hiring drunken war hero Patrick O'Malley (Tom Selleck) and his mechanic Struts (Jack Weston). Under fire from pursuing gunmen, they fly two biplanes from Turkey to Afghanistan and eventually China where Bradley is leading villagers in a battle against a local ruthless warlord.

It's a rather simplistic 'road' movie. It's an action adventure following the successful footsteps of Raiders of the Lost Ark. The characters are simply drawn. Certainly, Selleck has a bit of Indy in him. The romantic chemistry is also drawn from that road map. I do like the flying although action is not always there. At least, that's what I remember most before watching it again recently. Of course, it's inferior to Raiders but it still works.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I love this movie. It is one of my favorites!
Mad Professor3 March 2001
While true that this movie isn't Academy Award material, it is very enjoyable and touchingly romantic. The scenery is breathtaking at times and the film flows well. It starts in a party atmosphere and becomes a romantic adventure story. It is a good cross between a "Chick Flick" and an adventure story. I have flown open cockpit biplanes and perhaps that makes the film even more enduring for me.

There is plenty of flying and small war skirmishes are smattered in with the search for a rich brat's father. She (Bess Armstrong as Eve Tozer) must find the father and get him to a British court before the deadline or she will lose all of her money. If the partner, Bentik, can have Bradley Tozer (Wilford Brimley) declared as dead in a British court then he gets the whole company; thus relieving Eve Tozer of the heaps of her fathers money. And it is about money that this girl lives for, or so it seems. She enlists the help of a derelict and decrepit old WW1 ace, Tom Selleck, who has the only two available airplanes to get her to her father in time. Assassins are employed by Bradley Tozers partner to keep him from being found adding more tension to the already danger filled trail.

While the romance angle is as predictable as it is in just about any film, the story does flow well and the scenery also helps to keep ones interest. Rent this one and settle down for some fun. I would rate this film as three out of four stars.
47 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
They don't make them like this anymore...
paulclaassen11 April 2020
It's actually so sad to think they don't make movies like this anymore. 'High Road to China' is an enjoyable action adventure comedy in the vein of 'Raiders of the Lost Ark', blending these genres to perfection. The premise is simple, without complicated issues or shocking twists - which seem to be the norm nowadays.

I always find films before CGI to be better film making. Given the fact that actors were shot on location as opposed to a studio with almost everything being added in post-production, I also found the acting to be more natural and realistic.

Romance between the lead characters is predictable and inevitable, but in this instance the chemistry between Patrick O'Malley (Tom Selleck) and Eve (Bess Amtrong) was so endearing (and even funny) that I was hoping for it, and enjoyed it.

The film offers a good dose of humor, action and adventure in equal proportions, and the climatic finale is action-packed and simply put fantastic! I really enjoyed this!

Would I watch it again? Hell, yeah!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A boys adventure novel put to film
smccar7711 March 2011
"High Road to China," is a film that is challenging to a 21st century movie reviewer. The troubling issues arise when deciding how to contextualize the film and story devices. Essentially this is an adventure comedy done with very dated sensibilities. As an example of technical skill and cinematography, HRtC meets and occasionally exceeds all of the conventions of early 80's film making. However, the character types and cultural representations are somewhat crude and naïve by current standards.

Essentially, this is a film version of a 1950's style boys adventure novel. HRtC contains the requisite action, foreign locales, dashing characters, and subdued romance. The story is straightforward and focuses more on thrills than on breaking new ground or developing characters. With such a story, the film does require the use of stock characterization and a higher degree of stereotyping. The stereotyping is the single aspect of the film that leads to the most problems. To begin, the main protagonists are quite likable but noticeably hollow. Selleck would have made for a dashing pilot had the script given him more personal exposition and less snide quips. Armstrong plays the plucky dilettante to a tee. Again, her character is never given any dialogue to develop the character beyond a caricature. The second issue regarding stereotyping is the depiction of various Asian cultures. In maintaining a faster pace, any attempt at humanizing the tribal cultures is neglected. The Arabs are misogynistic tyrants. The Nepalese are doe-eyed mystics. The rural Chinese are barely functional in-fighters. While these caricatures do hearken back to pulp adventure novels, current audiences may cringe at such simplistic and imperialistic representations. The effect of these less than stellar characterizations is a film populated by hollow facades rather than relatable human beings.

Even with its faults, HRtC is a very enjoyable film. As mentioned above, the story is simplistic yet engrossing. The action sequences are well done and have a wonderful early 20th century flavor. The cinematography is, at times, breathtakingly beautiful. The score is poignant and expertly coupled with the mood of the scenes. Essentially, this is a highly accomplished film on a technical level that falters in the gross stereotyping and mawkish dialogue. To be sure, HRtC is great entertainment; it is just great mindless entertainment.

On a personal note, I really like this film. The fact that HRtC is a clear Indiana Jones copy in no way detracts from this movie. Steeping myself in high flying adventure from by-gone days is pure nostalgic bliss. I see this film as having great potential as a family film. The movie provides great entertainment and an opportunity to open up discussion on film and cultural representation. I will probably recommend this film to my father, so that we may relive past days and mull over just how correct Said was in "Orientalism." 6.5 of 10 stars.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
High Adventure
gcd7011 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
From the novel by Jon Cleary, this high adventure (ala Indiana Jones) flick is a sight better than most. An enjoyable cast and a reasonable plot do help a lot.

The interaction between Tom Selleck and Bess Armstrong is a lot of fun. Brian Blessed's nasty Khan is a hoot, as is "Heinz" man Robert Morley. Brian G. Hutton directs it all at a pace.

The whole affair of "High Road to China" is capped by John Barry's heroic theme and fantastic cinematography from Sandra Weintraub Roland and S. Lee Pogostin.

Saturday, April 10, 1999 - Video
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as good as I remember
gkmcc27 October 2021
I am sure that I saw this movie when it was first released to theaters, and I remember liking it. I put it in my Netflix DVD queue on a whim and upon watching it again I wonder what I saw in it before. The storyline has promise, but the production values are poor, and the acting and direction are abysmal. Bess Armstrong and Tom Selleck spend most of their time onscreen yelling at each other stridently, as if trying to outdo each other in a "high, whiny voice" contest, and Wilford Brimley's "Bradley Tozer" comes across as more caricature than character. It's hard to believe that this film was directed by the man who directed "Kelly's Heroes".
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good Old-Fashioned Escape Movie
director16165 August 2001
The best thing about "High Road to China" is that it does not try to change the world by making a social statement. It does not try to do anything but be an escape for moviegoers. Is it a perfect film? No. But this is one of my favorite films because it does just that - it allows me to escape. This much under-appreciated movie tells an excellent story: a rich brat living in the Roaring 20's hires a flying ace to find her father in a remote part of China. From a cinemagraphic point-of-view, it is a very good-looking film. Bess Armstrong never looked better on screen. And although her character of Eve Tozer is not always believable, I liked her as the rich brat who thinks everything has its price. I was never a Tom Selleck fan, but as Patrick O'Malley, he makes the perfect flying daredevil - a hard drinker who has trouble showing that he has a heart. The late Jack Weston, who was one of the better character actors of our modern times, is perfectly cast as the sidekick mechanic Struts. And the late Robert Morley provides good comic relief in the midst of being the heavy.

The movie simply looks good with its gorgeous locations and colors. The flying sequences - especially the dogfight between O'Malley and the German ace (complete with references to the famous Red Baron) is first-rate, and the battle scenes are shot very well. The pace of the film is not always even, but one sequence after another has our protagonists in some dire predicament. And it is fun watching them try and get out of each one. It should have done better at the box office, for the film is still a favorite of cable movie channels and people who discover it on video for the first time. I would recommend this film to anyone, because it is simply a little gem and a wonderful film for movie buffs who wish to escape.
37 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Perfect for 1960's... still nice for now
etsenberg24 December 2018
I was surprised that this was a 1983 movie because it looks 20 years older - the very classical 1960's style. The plot seemingly collected all cliches of the adventure genre, starting from the very beginning - a young daughter of a rich man hires a drinking war (WWI) hero to find her father in exotic lands, through all dangers they meet (from a cruel barbarian who wants to get the girl to evil German ace) and all the conflicts between themselves. to the final kiss right before the credits in the very end (thanks to the authors. nothing worse than that, no sex scenes which I totally absolutely hate). Still, the girl is not a typical rich spoiled doll, she is brave and she is a good pilot herself - this is probably the most original point in the film. But, while being very classical or trite, whatever term you prefer, the film is really nice, especially for antique aviation fans like me. It's not humorous enough to be a comedy, but not too serious, let alone tragic, as well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Harmless, old-fashioned comic adventure.
rmax30482324 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not sure why Tom Selleck's career as a leading man stalled when it did. I'm told he's handsome. And he has that cracked Jimmy-Stewart voice. In interviews he seems bright and articulate. He doesn't do a bang-up job in this light-hearted zap number but who could? All he's called upon to do is act drunk once in a while, and if he doesn't do as good a job as John Wayne did in "True Grit," well, maybe it's because Wayne has had so much more practice. Oh, and Selleck is also given lines like, "Surely, the great Suleman the Exquisite would not harm a small servant of his grateful guest." Something like that, anyway. Selleck did a fine job as Dwight D. Eisenhower in a recent TV movie -- "Ten Days to D-Day," perhaps it was.

The plot here -- self-indulgent pretty socialite hires handsome drunken pilot and his mechanic side kick to fly around most of Asia to find her missing father before she's disinherited -- is pretty familiar stuff. Runaway socialites and canny pilots. I keep thinking of Jimmy Cagney and Barbara Stanwyk lost in the desert. The photography is a bit gloomy but the locations are unusual and the action and comedy balance each other nicely. There's even a dogfight, which the slower, heavier two-seater with its single Lewis machine gun would surely have lost against the more nimble single-seater with its two machine guns. The reason the clumsier airplane wins is that it is flown by Tom Selleck, whereas the superior machine is flown by a stereotyped square-jawed blond German with no sense of humor.

The music is lush and romantic. The scenery rolling. The old airplanes fun to watch as they sputter along or flop over in hammerhead stalls. The dialog sort of lumbers along in the same way, without enough funny lines or wisecracks. Still, it's not offensive in any way. The kids will probably enjoy it. Maybe they will even learn a little something about Buddhism, such as that a world religion by that name exists.

Not a gem, but not bad.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I don't know why this adventure-comedy is so under-appreciated.
Chazzzzz23 February 2000
Given Tom Selleck, Bess Armstrong, Wilford Brimley, Robert Morley, Brian Blessed, and Jack Weston, and a bunch of excellent aerial action scenes, this is a terrific film. So what if there isn't a great message, or outstanding drama. For what this is... a comedy-adventure... it's great. Tom and Bess have always been extremely watchable to me, and they continue that tradition here. A solid 9.
54 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than its reputation
DPMay30 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film will probably always be compared to "Raiders Of The Lost Ark". Compare most films to "Raiders..." and they will come out second best and, sadly, that is also the case here. However, High Road To China has lots to commend it and, taken on its own merits, is a very enjoyable film. On the surface, it's hard to see what's wrong with it. There are some superb flying sequences using vintage aircraft, some excellent cinematography, a score by John Barry (never a bad thing) and the two lead actors, Tom Selleck and Bess Armstrong, deliver excellent performances.

And yet... there's something lacking. Where does it fail? It's hard to say exactly. Maybe the stakes aren't high enough - the quest is only so that the heroine, Evey, can find her father and save her inheritance, but when she's throwing about tens of thousands of pounds to hire O'Malley, it's difficult for the viewer to believe she's in dire need of financial security. Then there's the villain of the piece, Bentik. He's played well by Robert Morley, and whilst his scenes are quite amusing they're basically brief inserts and seem largely unconnected to the main events. He never meets the main protagonists at all.

Overall, High Road isn't quite as inventive as Raiders, it's not quite as pacey and perhaps the humour isn't quite as strong. The heroes do most of their fighting in aircraft, so it's less of an action picture in that sense, but the budding romance, although clichéd, is handled very well. Both Selleck and Armstrong act to a point where you can see what's going on behind the eyes, which helps make their on-screen relationship much more credible.

Battlestar Galactica followed in the wake of Star Wars and was too easily dismissed as a weak clone of that film. Its good points were overlooked for years, but eventually its qualities won recognition. Now, dare I say, the same re-evaluation is required for High Road To China. Write it off as a weak clone of Raiders Of The Lost Ark if you like, but you're missing a lot of good points in this decent film. It won't have you on the edge of your seat, but it will certainly hold your attention throughout.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
High Road to Yugoslavia
michaelarmer22 December 2019
I say that because most of the movie was filmed there and it looked like it was there, not in the countries it was supposed to be in, which did not look good.

Apparently this film was mooted before Raiders of The Lost Ark and other Adventure films of that nature, but production was late so it did not get completed until after that and others, and that's the problem, because all the good money went into Raiders and this can't have had much since it was made on the cheap, if it had gone into production earlier we might have had a different situation ? But that's the way the cookie crumbles sometimes.

What was then Yugoslavia seemed to be a popular destination for movie makers in this period as quite a few were made there, not without merit as the scenery is beautiful, however it does not look like Afghanistan, India, Nepal and China, in fact nothing like Nepal and China. So not a good base.

The acting was poor, Tom Selleck plays himself as the Airman Adventurer, he's Ok but not great, no acting required, Bess Armstrong looked the part but can't act, she plays a spoilt upper class English woman, but not very well, she sometimes breaks into her american accent, she's from Baltimore, Maryland. Jack Weston was the best, at least he can act but did not do much here, Wilford Brimley, another american playing an Englishman, is also a good actor, but not here, he does not even try to hide his accent. They can't have been offered enough money. The supporting cast and extras were ok to a point, we did actually get some Indians playing Indians and some Chinese playing Chinese, but several were westerners, including the Chinese Warlord who, despite being part Chinese but mostly Brazilian (born in Guyana) looked like he had too much make-up on. They had recruited a pretty good cast apart from the ones mentioned, there was also Robert Morley, Brian Blessed (a very dodgy looking Afghan), Michael Sheard, Lynda la Plante, Timothy Carlton, Dino Shafeek, Peter Llewellyn Williams, Ric Young and Robert Lee, all good support/character actors who were either underused or not putting much effort in.

The direction was not great, photography was ok but wrong scenery, the music average and many many mistakes, plot holes and missing dialogue, they must have done extensive editing. Like I said, made on the cheap and it looks it. I gave it a 5 because of the story which was good (until it was butchered in editing), the planes and for Tom Selleck who looked the part and I liked the character.

Perhaps this is a good project for a re-make (which is all the rage these days since no one will put money into an original idea), using the correct locations and with a Director who can get the most out of the scenery and the cast. I notice that most re-makes are of films that are already well rated, and the re-make is not up to the same standard, I think this is erroneous, if they do a re-make it should be of a poor film that had a great story, like this one, that way it should be better and be well received, what do you think ?
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good old-fashioned chemistry
Chicago_Jake23 June 2001
Brian G. Hutton's "High Road To China" is a classic example of good old fashioned chemistry. Lost-generation flapper hires boozy WW-I flying ace to help find her father, lost somewhere in China, to avoid losing her inheritance. You just know that they will eventually get together, and plenty of facial expressions and body language promise an ending that eventually delivers. Some great scenery and flying scenes, and burly he-manning from Brian Blessed, keep you in stitches. If this had been filmed in black and white in the 40s, it would have been up there with Casablanca, et al. Lots of low-expectation fun.
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A pleasant feel-good film
johnrp-14 July 2004
Okay, giving this film a 7/10 might be being overly generous. The writing is substandard, the acting is over the edge, and the plot is .. well, there really isn't any plot to speak of.

But still, I enjoyed this film immensely. Bess Armstrong is a babe(!) and Tom Selleck is his usual wonderful self. Selleck typically acts like Selleck (much like John Wayne always acted like John Wayne and Cary Grant always acted like Cary Grant). But the fact is, I happen to like how Selleck acts. He always has the slightly-evil smirk that makes you stand back just a bit.

Bess Armstrong is the only one that keeps the film from dying on its feet. She was a rising star when she did this movie and it always amazed me that she didn't do better afterwards. Bad manager I suppose.

Anyway, the movie has its moments and if you don't mind the obvious high-school-like plot and bad costumes, you'll enjoy it also!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
High road to China - The road is long towards a good film
eightylicious1 April 2022
Upon its release, 1983's "High road to China" was considered a cheap imitation of "Raiders of the Lost Ark ". While some elements are there, the cast's commendable effort and the engaging plot make for a film with its own special character.

During the First World War, a wealthy socialite (Bess Armstrong) finds herself in an utterly threatening position. Her father, the head of a powerful business, has disappeared, and if she doesn't find him in the space of twelve days, the enterprise will be passed onto his partner. She finds the solution to this problem in the face of the flying ace O'Malley (Tom Selleck), a drunkard, irritable man, and his naive sidekick. This incredible trio of adventurers set off for a trip to deep Asia, that will bring them, in the end, to the war-torn China.

While the plot brings at a relatively slow pace, as soon as the trip starts, it accelerates, like the speed of Selleck's biplane. From British Afghanistan they will travel to the Asian steppe and , of course to China. Through a mix of crazy situations - in one scene, the heroes are chased by some henchmen of the evil businessman while they try to get the plane off the ground - and convincing performances.

Speaking of which, the actors were the ones that transformed the film from a failed adventure story to an engaging feature. Selleck, in his first major role, was extremely enjoyable to see as the distant, selfish hero, and his pairing with Armstrong rendered the film both romantic and comedic, due to their contradictory personalities.

Adventure is not the primary quality of this film. This is a movie balancing comedy and romance, with a healthy dose of toned-down action. The reason why it succeeds as a film is the director's skill at combining these different genres into a story that not only makes sense, but is appealing too. Without bordering on the absurd, the comedy mostly stems from the neurotic nature of the two protagonists.

"High road to China" does have faults; in spite of its enjoyable plot, the film feels a bit long-winded in some scenes, while the sequences involving a Mongol leader could be considered off the mark at best, offensive at worst. The way that this culture is represented feels out of place in an otherwise innocent movie, perfect for family entertainment.

The reason I used that last characterisation was because the film doesn't come off as a serious aventure feature à la "Raiders of the Lost Ark", but rather as a comedy with adventure elements. Its seriousness exists only on the surface, quickly replaced by humour and a little absurdity.

For all that, the total result is one of a film that wanted to be a critically acclaimed feature, inspired by "Raiders of the Lost Ark", but missed the mark. Still, it successfully transformed itself to a commercial romantic comedy, where adventure is only the pretense. The heroes found their (cinematic) purpose, even if they needed to go all the way to China in order to do so.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Indiana Jones, chick flick version. Pretty good.
JamieF13 June 2001
Warning: Spoilers
MINOR PLOT SPOILERS BELOW.

OK, so my summary is a troll, but I maintain that it's accurate. Romantic setting, romantic theme. Could be Romancing the Stone, could be Indiana Jones, could be Star Wars, but it's this movie instead: pretty brat falls for initially repulsive scoundrel over the course of a wild adventure. Scoundrel turns out to be a hero in disguise; brat turns out to be a sweetheart. Of course. Maybe it's obvious that the leading man and leading lady end up together but just in case, you were warned.

Predictable romantic plot aside, the movie was quite entertaining. As a Magnum P.I. fan I have to say Tom Selleck influenced me to like the film. He did a great job. Ms. Armstrong is no Hollywood sex bomb but she makes a good leading lady in the role of strong willed spoiled brat turned strong willed cutie. Great scenery during the voyage. Bentik and his assistant are pretty funny too. Nice battle scenes throughout. All in all, a winner for an afternoon cable movie or in-flight movie, an OK rental.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Should have been titled "Slow Leaky Boat to China"
kira02bit20 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The behind-the-scenes story behind the casting of Indiana Jones for Raiders of the Lost Ark has become Hollywood folklore. After screen testing and considering dozens of actors, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas opted for TV actor Tom Selleck. Alas, Selleck was contractually tied to his hit TV opus Magnum P.I., which forced him out of contention allowing Harrison Ford to make screen history. Anyone wondering how Selleck would have fared in the role had a chance to see when two years later he appeared in the Raiders knock-off High Road to China...Boy, did Spielberg and company dodge a bullet!

The plot, such as it is, is set in the 1920s and features flapper heiress Bess Armstrong being informed that she will lose her inheritance unless she locates her father (Wilford Brimley) last seen in the wilds of Afghanistan. She hires the services of boozy aviator Selleck to launch a search and a shoddy by-the-numbers adventure/comedy/romance results. See Tom and Bess get off on the wrong foot. See Tom and Bess bicker incessantly. See Tom and Bess make goo-goo eyes. See them bicker some more.

The film's problems are many. First, there is no decent villain. Robert Morley appears as a business partner who throws assorted problems in their path, but he is never a believably menacing adversary and his obstacles never seem more than irritants. Indeed, there is very little actual danger confronting our intrepid twosome, resulting in a dearth of suspense. At no point does it seem the leads are in any real jeopardy, unless it is from nodding off like the viewer.

Some of the scenery is lovely and John Barry contributes his usual reliable score, but therein ends the kudos. The screenplay is filled with groan-worthy dialog and an almost pathological lack of interest. The action sequences are positively stillborn and then film moves at the exhilarating pace of hardening concrete. I swear I grew a full beard by the end of the first hour.

Worst of all are the leads. Armstrong has never been one of my favorite performers and she demonstrates why here. Her heiress is so darn perky, she about bounces off the ceiling. Armstrong and company no doubt find this characteristic endearing, but I find it insufferable. To say she has no chemistry with her leading man is an understatement of gargantuan proportions, but then I am hard pressed to remember ANY leading lady that generated even minimal sparks with Selleck.

Selleck is a disaster. I freely admit, I never got his celebrity or his longevity in the business. He comes across as a handsome lumbering block of wood on screen - completely free of charisma. His idea of comedy is a bargain basement drunk impression and belching in the face of his leading lady. There is zero chemistry with Armstrong and it often appears that he is not even trying. He undergoes everything in the film with such a low wattage effort that he literally lowers the blood pressure of the viewer with each passing frame until one is nearly on the verge of losing consciousness.

With no chemistry between its leads, low-octane performances from its stars, no memorable villain, deadly dull action sequences and dialog penned by a grade-Z hack, this is one flight that viewers should definitely miss.
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A perfect adventure movie!
pug-1317 October 2003
This is one of the best adventure films I've ever seen. Tom Selleck and Bess Armstrong are great and Jack Weston as Struts is hillarious.

It has some great scenes of the planes flying across country. And John Barry's music is excellent.

The story is simple: Rich woman (Armstrong) hires drunken pilot (Selleck) to fly her to China to find her missing father.

Meanwhile, people are trying to have her killed, and each stop they make along the way allows for a sideline adventure.

All in all, one of my favourite films, and a rare treat of a movie. They don't them like this any more. I wish it were available on DVD!
38 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What went wrong!
rleather18 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
With all the will in the world this could have been a barn stormer. But then it was ALWAYS doomed for critical backwash.

The history of Tom Selleck and his tie to the Magnum contract that prevented him starting the Indiana franchise (and possibly ruining a decent film) is well documented. So much so that it almost appears as though this film was created as a consilation prize. "You didn't get Raiders, so here's some variation on the theme".

Sadly, despite the assitance of Brian Blessed (surely I was not the only one waiting for him to say "Indi, Indi!" alla John Rhys-Davies) it never got off the ground..... if you pardon the pun.

Still John Barry music good, if a little somber.

Oh and plot? Crape paper could take lessons from it.... plays out like a 1930's B movie, with all the trimmings. Mercilessly cut up for Sunday afternoon TV viewing during quiet summer months.

Still, only set Tom's movie carrier back 5 years... so can't be all that bad. And the ending. "No need to come out, all the value of the company is in patents". So a wasted journey.... You would have thought she'd have checked that before setting out and saved us all 2 hours.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Underrated Gem of a Movie
autotronic8 July 2005
Today, when I bought a consumer DVD recorder, and went through a stack of 300+ laserdiscs to dub some not-available-on-DVD-yet films for a very long flight to London tomorrow, this was the second disc I dubbed (Grand Prix was the first) and realized just how perfect a movie this remains, even after 20 years. First off, the John Barry score is first-rate; as someone else mentioned, the master took the easy way out and simply revised it for Out of Africa a few years later (and it works as well there as it does here).

I'm not sure what defines screen chemistry, but Selleck and Armstrong (one of my all-time favorite actresses) have it here. While there is conflict between their characters, it seems apparent to me that they are having a good time acting out this tightly scripted adventure/fantasy. The underlying sexual tension (again as someone else noted there's zero nudity here) between the two is palpable.

The aerial sequences stand up well over time; certainly better than the computer-generated crap that looks so fake (like Pearl Harbor) that passes for special effects today, will look in 2020.

While image quality of the laserdisc is certainly better than VHS, it falls short of what we've come to expect today, 10 years into the DVD era. Why this film hasn't made it into the 5-inch medium, with a cleaned up Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack (to better showcase the John Barry score), is beyond me.

When one sees the utter dreck that is released today, scraping the bottom of the film vault barrel, it amazes me to wonder why this neglected gem sits in a vault somewhere. As there are no true A-list stars in this film filled with wonderful performances, why Warner Brothers, has this not been given a full bore DVD release? I wonder if it's available in some market outside of North America.

Clocking-in at a bit less than two hours, this is a movie in the mold of similar films produced in the immediate post-WWII era. I think that when I watch it on the plane Sunday, I might even watch it in black and white.

A great reason to keep you laserdisc player, watch auctions on eBay for this to pop up on LD and to buy a DVD recorder as this is a movie you can watch over and over and enjoy it each time.

Shame on you Warner Brothers for not putting it out on DVD.
45 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
is he going to eat us, or feed us.....
FlashCallahan2 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
An alcoholic bi-plane pilot is hired by a spoiled industrialist's daughter to search for her missing father through Asia.

But searching for her father eventually involves them in a struggle against a Chinese warlord....

This obviously was Selleck trying to show Spielberg what he missed out on when Selleck couldn't take the part because of his obligation to Magnum.

So this is his Indiana Jones, and I bet Spielberg drew a big sigh of relief. Selleck is fine in the first act, when he is filled with booze and falling all over the place, but then we get into the second and third acts, and it turns into one of the most clock watching films I've seen in a very long time.

The first act is full of so much promise, some good humour, genuine banter between him and his token sidekick, fantastic aerial camera- work, and quite an intriguing plot.

But then it goes as dry as the desert when we bump into Brian Blessed as the very loud, sexist, whatever nationality he's supposed to be leader.

He hates the three of them at first, but as soon as Selleck slaps the female lead, he's his best friend!!

And then it plods along until we bump into Wilfred Brimmley who has the rest of the budget so the film can have some explosions in the final set piece.

Selleck is a good actor, but some of his output was just inexplicably bad in the eighties, because the scripts he received must have been Magnum in prison, Magnum and baby on the door step, and Magnum in WWII.

This is Magnum on autopilot.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For fans of slapstick & VCA's (Veteran Character Actors)
mangoman18 November 2004
Drama, funny, & veteran character actors out the kazoo. Robert Morley (rest his soul) is great as the malicious bumbling nemesis, & Wilford Brimley is letter-perfect as the eccentric good-guy geezer. Jack Weston is stellar as sidekick, Brian Blessed is appropriately malevolent as Suleman Khan, & Timothy Bateson is 1st-rate as Morley's sniveling toady. All of this is overshadowed (but not over the top) by the absolutely perfect chemistry between Selleck & Armstrong, though. Yeah, sure, the conceit of the snotty-rich-girl-drives-the-heart-of-gold-tough-guy-crazy love story has been done to death, but never executed quite like this. These two make an on-screen couple at the level of Bogey/Bacall, Fred/Ginger, & George/Gracie.

Selleck's charisma normally dominates other actors' presence; Armstrong more than holds her own, which is saying a lot for any actress, much less one not on the A-list. The cinematography is exceptionally well-done. All in all, this is one seriously underrated flick, & a movie I'd buy in a heartbeat if it ever became available on DVD, which sadly I doubt it ever will. :(
37 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Redeemable only by it gorgeous cinematography and beautiful score.
buffety7 April 2006
This movie is only worth watching for its lovely scenery and the original score by renowned composer John Barry, perhaps best known for Dances With Wolves and Out of Africa as well as Bond films. This movie has dreadful dialogue, story-line, and is so chopped up and convoluted it's worth seeing in the so-bad-it's good category. Shame really since it had a killer cast with the exception of Tom Selleck who always guarantees a big screen flop unless you cast him with a couple of genuinely funny guys and a baby. This poor guy is so likable on the small screen but just does not translate well onto the silver screen. Think Lassiter and Quigley Down Under.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed