I Want to Live (TV Movie 1983) Poster

(1983 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Conviction By Accomplice Testimony Alone
bkoganbing10 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Lindsay Wagner took on a real challenge in this made for TV remake of I Want To Live. Susan Hayward's performance as Barbara Graham that got her the Academy Award for Best Actress in 1958 was still fresh in everyone's mind. It's one of the greatest acting jobs in the history of film on sound. Lindsay bit quite a bit off to chew.

I think she digested enough of it so that she doesn't have to be ashamed of anything she did in this version of I Want To Live. In one way Wagner's version has an advantage over the Hayward film. This one concentrates on her whole adult life and how through the bad associations and bad choices she made, she slipped into a life of crime.

The issue in the Graham case was not her criminal career. She clearly was a criminal and was not above a lot of things. The issue was whether she could be convicted on nothing more than accomplice testimony. Don Stroud's character may very well have lied about her participation in the murder of Mabel Monahan for reasons of his own. There was no independent evidence establishing her presence at the crime scene. That was her argument and still remains the main reason why she should not have gotten the gas chamber at San Quentin.

As in the 1958 film, she was her own worst enemy in many ways. She had a previous rap for perjury and when she was caught trying to buy an alibi for the night of the homicide, her goose was cooked. In fact she did a whole lot of dumb things her whole life, consistently made the worst choice in any situation.

Still because you see a great deal more of her life before the Mabel Monahan homicide, you do develop a lot of sympathy for her. The sympathy you feel in the Hayward film is strictly because of the jackpot her criminal friends have put her in. In fact Harry Dean Stanton and Seymour Cassel do fine work as her criminal partners as does Martin Balsam as her overwhelmed lawyer during the trial.

Nothing can compare to Susan Hayward's performance in the first film version. But Lindsay Wagner did a fine job supported by an able cast. She wants to live, but on her own terms.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bland TVer
taggerez9 February 2009
This is a dreadful remake but it has its moments. I doubt Lindsay Wagner ever looked better even though she can't act to save her life. Harry Dean Stanton does an odd Emmett Perkins and Seymour Cassel is fine as the evil John Santo. But Pam Reed as the gratuitous bitchy feminist reporter is ridiculous. Robert Ginty is also good as Bab's junkie husband, Henry.

Just like the original, this bland made-for-TV flick tries to paint Barbara Graham as a well trod-upon girl-who-never-got-a-break. It also tries to make her out as innocent of the Mabel Monohan murder. That is all bull hockey. Babs was a mean as hell and guilty to boot. Throw in the obvious feminist slant and it's enough to put you off your TV dinner.
20 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A++
belovedbarbie28 July 2001
I seen this TV movie back in 1989 it was so great so sad I would love to see this movie again .. I know what she done was bad but what they put her though is worse ,, my children where very young when this movie was played on tv back in 1989 I have talk to my children about this movie many times over the years and I keep a eye on my tv guide list hoping that someday they will add this movie back on tv once again for all the young hearts to see .. this movie is a A++ to me .
10 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty embarrassing
HotToastyRag4 October 2022
In a smart move, the teleplay of this remake is vastly different from the 1958 classic. Instead of mostly focusing on her life during and after the murder trial, half of the film is dedicated to her earlier years and arrests. It was a good call because not only would audiences always be comparing the film to the better version, but Lindsay Wagner didn't have one-tenth the acting chops of Susan Hayward; had it been a scene-for-scene remake she just couldn't have handled it. As it was, she still couldn't handle it. Her delivery, mannerisms, and expressions were straight out of high school drama class. I was almost embarrassed for her.

Martin Balsam plays Lindsay's defense attorney, and since we all know the story, it's a perfect casting choice. I've seen him play a lawyer in so many movies, and he always loses his case! Perhaps it's because he's so honor bound, he stands up in front of the jury, points to his client and shouts, "He did it! He did it!" Oh, wait, wrong movie. I love him so much in Murder on the Orient Express, I forget that he doesn't always act that way in every role.

I really can't recommend this tv movie unless you really love Lindsay Wagner and want to see her try to act in a drama. For anyone who loves Susan Hayward or enjoyed the original story, this is just embarrassing. Why remake it with such an inept actress, or if the story is going to be so altered, why remake it at all? And why leave out one of the most famous details of the story: the blindfold?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Different times, different audience
mls418227 August 2023
I was a kid when this came out. Lindsay Wagner had her public relations people working overtime telling the magazines what an excellent actress she was and how she had been wasted in The Bionic Woman. We, the public actually bought it

Fast forward forty plus years. We became adults. We actually saw some GOOD acting and performances. We realized the Bionic Woman was unwatchable as adults. When revisiting Lindsay Wagner's dozens of TV movies we realize how bad they were and her acting worse.

This film is an insult to the 1958 original with Susan Hayward. There was no point in this remake other than to give a vanity project to a TV star and to fill commercial time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A great example of just how bad a movie can be.
joegarbled-7948217 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This pretty unwatchable unnecessary rewarming of the original 50s hit movie lacks any redeemable feature as it stars the vaguely attractive Lindsay Wagner in the famous Susan Hayward part and the totally unnattractive Pamela Reed taking on Simon Oakland's trailblazing press reporter role and turning him into a loathsome feminist hag. Her presence is permanently grating as Reed has only got one facial expression: SOUR.

They obviously DIDN'T want any close comparison to the original here, well they succeeded in THAT! Really, the only aspect they matched well was the questionable acting of the lead female. The job of portraying Barbara Graham was a dream role for any actress, a rare title role, and a truly meaty part in a true-life thriller. Susan Hayward overdid the acting and because timescale was lost after the murder trial, she seemed limited to overdoing the Bi-Polar flip-flop between "Hey, life's a ball, turn up the radio, I wanna hear that jazz!" and "Peg, I'm going to go to the gas chamber! I wish the waiting were over, I wanna die!" Thus it wasn't Susan's best film performance, merely the best part she ever had. Her job was to oversell the maker's objection to the death penalty and I suppose that coloured every aspect of the movie. As Wagner couldn't act, it's hard to tell if this was her best effort.

The original film had some serious acting talent, in the re-hash, Martin Balsam was pretty much on his lonesome. I suppose budgets count, but even the great Mr Balsam couldn't save this rotten movie, not even unwitting comedy could save this clunker, but fast-forward to the gas chamber scene and Wagner's facial expressions, it's acting right up there with the Pink Panther discovering the only food in the house, a carton of eggs, have gone rotten.

A solid 0/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed