Screwballs (1983) Poster

(1983)

User Reviews

Review this title
43 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Almost exactly what you'd expect
jdollak8 December 2011
After I finished watching this, I checked the description, and saw that it was described as being the "granddaddy of teen sex movies." It seems hard to describe it that way when it was released in 1983. There's a very minimal amount of plot to the movie. In fact, it seems strange for a movie that is so laser-focused on having a series of sex gags back to back. If I were back in 7th or 8th grade, I would absolutely love this movie. I would have found it hilarious, and probably pretty erotic. But as an adult, I didn't find it terribly funny. In fact, this is one of the strangest movies I've seen. Usually, in a teen sex movie, there's a serious plot of some sort. There will be a romance, there will be some sort of lesson learned. There will be someone struggling to pass a class... This one doesn't. This one is so singularly focused on just providing one titillating moment after another. There's only a single character who isn't fully sex-obsessed, and that's a teacher that has been bound in a wheelchair. Most of the other teachers are portrayed as being anti-sex, although later, they are shown to be just as obsessed as the core cast is. There are a few things that are memorable, but ultimately, the movie is an example of what happens when you pull all of the heart out of a movie. It narrows the audience that will enjoy it.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Screwballs
Scarecrow-882 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The school jock(Peter Keleghan as Rick), rich Lothario(Kent Deuters as Brent), nerd(Alan Deveau as Howie), tubby masturbator(Jason Warren as Melvin), and new arrival(Jim Coburn as Tim) all partake in a quest to either score with or see the breasts of Homecoming Queen and high school virgin, Purity Busch(Linda Speciale).

Purity is a rabble rouser who likes to stir up trouble for the hormonal boys of her school who get all hot and bothered for the opposite sex. Purity knows she's desirable and that all the boys wish to have her as a conquest, so this is used as a tool to tease and antagonize. In other words, Purity uses her virginity and seductive charms as a weapon against the horny males. But, our gang will pull out all the stops in order to see those tits once and for all, even if they can not lay claim to having bed her.

Raunchy and spirited, unsubtle sex comedy, with plenty of lewd content, aimed almost exclusively at the Porky's crowd. Like Porky's, "Screwballs" is set somewhat in the 50's, with flaws in it's attempts to evoke that period elaborately. Almost entirely made up of little vignettes dedicated to unleashing sexual innuendo and cheeky, hearty humor about teens and their ribald antics involving all matters involving naked girls and making out. But, getting even with Purity is of definite importance as each male tries his own strategy, most of the time failing in their individual efforts, coming together at the end to develop one last attempt, taking place at the Homecoming basketball game. Such hi-jinx include strip bowling, a function turned upside down when punch is accidentally spiked with Spanish fly, a trip for the boys to a strip club, Rick's numerous disguises(..a doc examining school girls' breasts, dressed in drag as a Home Economics teacher), Howie's various tricks(..read from books)which backfire(..such as a mirror gag and poolside fiasco attempting to use hypnotism which ends miserably for him), Brent's disastrous near-tryst with his hot Biology teacher, and a drive-in movie which turns into a riot after Tim finds that Brent is making a move on his sister. Co-writer Linda Shayne(..as Bootsie Goodhead), all smiles, gets carried away(..and I wouldn't have it any other way), in her role as a free spirited, enthusiastic, and sexually liberated teen(..the movie's tone matches her personality). Shayne, who is quite yummy, even sacrifices nudity in an embarrassing gag for her character after her skirt gets caught in a van door, her breasts pressed against the vehicle's window! Speciale is perfectly cast as the object of desire, and she is quite the nice bit of eye candy, particularly in her two piece, white bikini. The sequence, I reckon which will remain a memorable moment in the film, is when a bowling ball gets caught on Howie's pecker.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This is a movie only worth watching for T&A and I would go into this with the appropriate expectations
kevin_robbins17 March 2022
Screwballs (1983) is a movie I recently watched on Amazon Prime and tells the tale of T&A High School and a bunch of horny guys doing everything they can to see nude females.

This movie is directed by Rafal Zielinski (Fun) and stars Peter Keleghan (Ginger Snaps), Linda Shayne (Big Bad Mama II), Nanci Chambers (JAG) and Jan Taylor Hendricks (In the Heat of the Night).

The storyline has little to no meat but there are some fun sequences throughout the film. The dialogue and reactions are hilarious and the teachers are over the top cliché. The sign hanging opening was perfect for this genre and the mirror idea in the hall was brilliant. The drive-in and "My First Strike" scenes were great and the pool sequence was pretty random. I will say they did a good job "picking their talent."

Overall this is a movie only worth watching for T&A. I would score this a 4/10 and would go into this with the appropriate expectation.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Classic 80s Teenage T & A Comedy
Schlockmeister6 May 2001
You don't go into this one expecting Shakespeare, folks. You expect first off, a little skin, and if you are lucky, a lot of skin. You expect broad locker-room type sex jokes. You expect that someone will be sexually humiliated at some point ( a must in the genre ). You expect all the cliques at your high school to be wildly parodied. You expect teachers to be portrayed as Nazis. You go in expecting all this and this film delivers. This movie was made just before video broke big time. Thsi was one of the early hits and many video hounds from way back can fondly look back as this being a rental they enjoyed. Check brain at the door and enjoy. It's all done in s spirit of goofy sexy fun and that is the spirit it needs to be seen in. Would make a great double feature with "Porky's".
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Close to the worst movie ever
cwrieden4 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Literally the ONLY reason you might gut it out until the end is to finally see the Prom Queen's talent...because there is no other talent to be found until the end. Oh, you will see plenty of other pairs of talent, in various shapes and sizes, but waiting for these moments is pure agony. Its shockingly difficult to understand how this movie was EVER sanctioned, but if i read it right, this movie pulled in north of $20 million at a cost of just over $200k. If true, then this explains how such a brutally bad movie like this was ever made.

On a side note, rolling credits that blocked the payoff moment was a virtual finger given to all of us who persevered to the end. Was that necessary? Nooooooo.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The McDowell's version of Porky's
Nolamoviedude8 February 2019
A movie that could only be made in the early 80's. It has a very USA "Up All Night with Rhonda Shear" vibe to it except with a lot more nudity. It's very much Porky's redheaded step child as the entire plot is 5 high school guys trying to see a high school virgin named Purity's boobs. A mission that no man has yet to accomplish. Yes that is the plot.

There's a scene where they go strip bowling and the stereotypical typical nerd gets his member stuck in one of the holes. A couple girls get him all worked up and he "shoots" the ball down the lane for a strike. Why did I give this movie 3 stars again?
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you like boobs and screenwriters who couldn't tell a joke if their lives depended on it...
zetes3 March 2013
Mind-numbingly awful 80s sex farce. It's probably one of the worst made movies I've ever seen, but it's so awful that it kind of goes back around to becoming almost fascinating in its pure horridness. Almost. Man, these people have no idea how to construct a gag. You watch it, and you kind of know what they were going for, but it misses its marks by so far that you kind of feel sorry for it. I really do feel sorry for all the poor actors and, especially, actresses who appear in it. The story has five high school guys who plan on getting revenge on the high school's only virgin (Linda Speciale, playing a character named Purity Busch) after she gets them in trouble. Kind of a must-see for lovers of terrible movies.
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
not too good
disdressed1228 March 2011
i didn't find anything special about this alleged sex comedy.i think i laughed twice throughout the movie.the whole thing is really random and incoherent in my opinion.but it wasn't the worst movie i've ever seen or the worst of the genre,for that matter.it isn't very memorable though.in a day or two,i'll have forgotten most of the movie.i thought the soundtrack was pretty lame also.there are a fair amount of naked breasts in the movie,but that alone doesn't make it worth watching,in my books.it's touted as a raunchy sex comedy,in fact 'the raunchiest sex comedy of the 80's' but i didn't think it was raunchy at all.for me,Screwballs is a 3/10
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't they have sex in Canada?
rlcsljo30 December 2000
Why is it that Canadians are so funny in the United States, but are so lousy in their own country? Did all the good ones leave? Does the Canadian government exercise too much control over productions.

Canada is so close to the U.S., I cant believe they don't have a similar sense of sexual humor. Except for one very brief gag, this movie makes no attempt to convey even the slightest motivation as to why teenagers pull the type of pranks they do. Even if you just assume they are just horny adolescents, their gags are highly unoriginal and/or have no original outcome.

Perfect example of how to take an 16mm camera, a large cheap cast and make a throw away film.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rates high on the T&A scale
a972233341019 August 2012
Wasn't the greatest of movies, bad acting, slow at times. But did deliver with lots of T&A. That's good considering this movie was made before Hollywood went silicone, all natural women. This movie reminded me a lot of Revenge of the Nerds as an unlikely bunch of high school boys share a common need of revenge on the popular hot girl. They vow to get even and the hijinks ensue! No big names in this movie and the characters are forgettable but it delivers great nudity. So leave your thinking caps at home, pop some popcorn and grab a beer because this movie is available on Netflix streaming right now! 7 out of 10 on the T&A scale.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
TTTTTT
SnoopyStyle12 January 2020
It's the 60's at Taft and Adams (T&A) High School. The boys are sex obsessed. Five boys get detention for sexual misconducts. Purity Busch is responsible for the demise of some of them. The boys vow to get back at the impossible Busch.

This Canadian high school sex romp tries to follow the great success of Porky's. The production is lower level. It certainly doesn't have anything as iconic as the shower scene. It's a poor attempt at a money grab. Some of the pranks are confused. It does precede Revenge of the Nerds. The difference is that the guys are not really friends. There is no character work here. It's just an excuse of T&A, mostly T. I'm guessing the local strippers got some extra work. The only joke that worked is the name of the high school. It's so on the nose that it's funny. Otherwise, non of it is funny. This is weak.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
If I'm a moron for enjoying this, then so be it.
Hey_Sweden25 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Screwballs" is one of the most priceless of 1980s sex comedies, a deliberately nutty, over the top farce set in the 1960s and intended to be styled like a comic book. True enough that it doesn't have very much of a story, and is mostly a series of outrageous sexy gags. But who in their right mind is going to *want* a story when it comes to this sort of thing? They get exactly what they want, and that's titillation writ large. To hell with subtlety, am I right? The actors are all very enthusiastic, and the movie does have a certain energy and charm that makes it impossible to resist.

Basically, the set-up is that five disparate, incredibly horny guys - Rick (Peter Keleghan), Brent (Kent Deuters), Howie (Alan Deveau), Melvin (Jason Warren), and Tim (Jim Coburn) - meet in detention. They become obsessed with the reigning virgin / tease at their school, the aptly named Purity Busch (Linda Speciale), and make it their mission to either get with her, or at the very least, get an eyeful of her breasts.

Co-written by Jim Wynorski and co-star Linda Shayne (who plays the easygoing Bootsie Goodhead), and directed with verve by Rafal Zielinski, "Screwballs" is pretty damn childish, but that's the point of this whole thing. Among the assorted escapades, the sleazy quintet run afoul of their uptight principal, Stuckoff (Donnie Bowes), play a game of strip bowling, create havoc at a drive-in (where the Roger Corman production "The Arena" (or, as it's titled in this movie, "The Wild Women of Wango") is playing on the screen, ogle a stripper (who's played by the great Raven De La Croix), and contrive some methods of leering at the private parts of the many attractive female cast members.

There's just enough female flesh to satisfy, and the filmmakers do make sure that there's a proper payoff at the end - after which the end credits promptly start rolling. They do know how to send you away with a smile.

Eight out of 10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great movie
pbregmanjc16 July 2020
The Movie they saw at the drive in is an actual movie, but the name of it is "The Arena", it may be very similar to the one they said they were going to see called "The Wild Women of Wongo", but its not that one
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing memorable
welhof110 October 2019
This movie jumped around so much I couldn't keep up. There was really no plot, just a bunch of scenes and ideas thrown together much like this review. The gratuitous nudity was nice, it bumped the rating up a notch. The acting was bland but I wasn't really expecting a whole lot. Definitely not worth your time. I found myself staring at the time waiting for it to finish.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Linda Shayne is more interesting than her movie
SERVOMOORE17 July 2004
This film will definitely cause you to rewind a few times, and fast-forward a lot more, because huge sections of it are predictable and flat to the point of humorless. The four main male characters... I hated them, but they seem to be somewhat accurate. Rafal Zielinski is a competent director, and the editor has rendered some rather effective "speed up" gags.

Here and there, a good line is said, or a good piece of physical comedy is shown, but it's usually the script, not the way it's delivered, that's funny. And most of the nudity... To be frank, you get sick of it by sheer repetition (Wow, EVERY character is sort a deviant... boring) and want to see a character you can actually like.

Now, on to Linda Shayne,

She's hardly a prolific director these days, and some of her material is borderline vomitably kid-oriented(Flying Ryan, Purple People Eater), but she is still skilled at suiting the needs of the right target audience. Plus, she is more attractive than the rest of the female cast combined. It's a shame that she couldn't have gotten herself the female lead as Purity: her acting skills and physique are much better. Much more likely to draw a guy like me over to the cause of feminism than Ann Coulter or Oprah Winfrey

In short, she's the reason I am really mad that the local movie rental has lost its copy of this tape.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lowbrow but inoffensive.
gridoon5 April 2001
A raucous, stupid teen sex comedy that's rather bearable, if you start watching it knowing more or less what to expect. Short on laughs and genuine eroticism, to be sure, but voyeurs may still be pleased, since there's a load of nudity. Nevertheless, it's a generally inoffensive picture. (*1/2)
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Crazy antics lead to dull comedy
Floated212 August 2023
Many consider this film a classic teen sex comedy and one of the originators to have inspired later films such as American Pie. The film is as one would expect. The description and plot synopsis is accurate to how the film turned out.

With a short runtime they make sure to include several reoccurring scenes of skin and nudity. This film just feels like a mash up of unrelated skits pieced together. Nothing plotwise exactly flows together. No laughs in the film but it's relatively lighthearted and predictable. The drive thru theatre and bowling scene were done of the highlights. Very predictable ending.

The lead characters came across as try hard perverts where it was hard to root for. Of course the end has the famous pay off where they finally get what they wanted. This film has the skin but overall not that great of a story.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Typical skin-flick
dprkforum13 November 2012
This movie, as with almost all movies of this type, is not meant to be thought-provoking, intelligent, logical, or based in reality. If these are the things you are looking for, this movie will be terribly disappointing. However, if you are looking for skin, there is plenty here, but just enough not go beyond a heavy-R rating. In this day and age, this kind of movie is probably a dying genre.

As a younger guy with little recourse, these movies were the way to go. They were considered "comedies" and I could rent them with a slight snicker from the clerk. That, and as a teen with percolating hormones, I was not allowed to venture to the section "behind the curtain". So movies like Screwballs it was.

Watching this movie again, it takes me way back, and nothing more. I would not recommend this to anybody other than that purpose.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Substandard "Porky's" Clone
Uriah432 April 2021
This film essentially begins with several teenage boys all trying to be the first to gaze upon the breasts of one particular high school student by the name of "Purity Busch" (Linda Speciale). Unfortunately, when all of their individual ideas backfire they then decide to work together to expose her cleavage for all the world to see. What they don't count on is just how difficult this will turn out to be as Purity has the full support of the school faculty behind her. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say this was a rather typical coming-of-age high school comedy produced during this particular time period. To that effect, it uses the same clichéd formula and includes the usual stereotypical characters by incorporating a fat slob "Melvin Jerkovski" (played by Jason Warren), a nerd named "Howie Bates" (Alan Deveau) a rich kid by the name of "Brent Van Dusen III" (Ken Deuters) along with a couple of other losers thrown in as well. Again, nothing out-of-the-ordinary. Throw in some sophomoric humor and a paper-thin plot and that pretty much sums up the basic premise of this film in a nutshell. Admittedly, it was somewhat commercially successful and there were a couple of attractive actresses like Linda Shayne (as "Bootsie Goodhead") and the aforementioned Linda Speciale to brighten the scenery. Be that as it may, however, it never amounts to more than a substandard "Porky's" clone and I have rated it accordingly.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Back in the day
kosmasp3 June 2013
Now if you watch/view this movie with "sentimental eyes", than you might enjoy this more. Also if you do weigh in the fact that it was made in a time, when it wasn't easy to come by nudity, you also will vote a bit more in favor of it. But time hasn't been good to the movie. It did not age well. There are a few very good and funny scenes here, but overall it has lost a lot of its "magic".

There is nudity and there is a lot of foul jokes in there. It was obviously inspired by "Porkys" and other sex teen comedies. They don't deny that, they actually embrace it, if you watch the interviews on the disc. There's also a special from a website that is covering nudity in movies. For them, the movie is in the "Hall of fame" ... of teen comedies that is.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disturbing tennis racket abuse
Call_me_Valerie26 May 2022
Just an awful, awful film production with horrific acting, writing, sound, lighting, and every other aspect that makes a good film.

I often wonder how these type of films get green lit. But then again, it was the early 1980's when pubescent titillation was hard to come buy for teen boys. So, so many awful jokes, one liners, and plays on words.

The girls are beautiful.

Taft and Adams? Really? In Canada nonetheless.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant!
Rumples24 June 1999
As a classy movie this one rates a 0 - but as a fun frolicking teenage sex romp it is unquestionably a 10! I would have to say that this is a classic of the genre and I must agree with the other comments that have been made here (and totally disagree with Leonard Maltin). If you like this type of raucous fluff and you're into a titty movie that isn't a full-on porno, this just might be what you're after. They definitely don't make them like this anymore, pity really, they were lots of fun and every boy's dream.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Typical of its type
Leofwine_draca15 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
SCREWBALLS is very much a typical teen sex comedy of the 1980s, inspired by the likes of PORKY'S and made on a relatively low budget. As usual, a bunch of male characters are extermely horny and trying to get off with every girl in the school, although part of the plot follows their vendetta against a prom queen. The emphasis is very much on bare female flesh and men spying on girls, but the humour isn't too bad at times and a precursor to the likes of AMERICAN PIE. Some of the characters, such as the geeky Howie, are fitfully amusing too. No classic, but it passes the time if you like the genre.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The misadventures of five pathetic reprobates
Monkasi26 September 2002
In my review for the similarly themed ZAPPED AGAIN!, I noted that it came across as a whitewashed T&A offering that was much better received as a puerile comedy than anything voyeuristic in nature. SCREWBALLS, which was apparently made on a much lower budget and with much less renowned performers, is the exact opposite - a chaotic carnival of soft-core porn in which the humor is at best unremarkable and at worst painful.

Some have compared this movie to NATIONAL LAMPOON'S ANIMAL HOUSE, but that comparison is extremely unjust. You see, ANIMAL HOUSE was not just an excuse to show drunken frat boys and girls in their underwear. It also tackled such trenchant topics as class conflict, race relations, and the lure of irresponsibility in a hopelessly puritanical and joyless world. I view it more as a poignant examination of the trials and tribulations of adolescence than as the purely tawdry slice of camp which it's usually tagged. The makers of SCREWBALLS do not deserve to lick the boots of John Landis and company.

SCREWBALLS was put together by a gaggle of confirmed slackers with absolutely no regard for taste and decency. The movie is unabashedly politically incorrect (granted, the idea of "political correctness" did not exist as such in the early 1980s; but these guys violated most of its tenets just the same) and is based on the erroneous belief that high school boys do not care about anything other than sex. While the members of Delta Tau Chi may not have been above reproach, at least they didn't spend most of their time trying to separate the prom queen from her clothes.

If you are a diehard fan of this genre, I don't want to spoil the ending for you. Let's just say that it involves sartorial decay and magnets, and leave it at that.

Female moviegoers will probably not enjoy SCREWBALLS because of its sexist nature, so I recommend that they skip it. Their male counterparts, on the other hand, might have a good time. But remember this, fellows: a movie about female stripping becomes less and less entertaining every time you see it - so limit your viewing of SCREWBALLS to one night.
7 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Where was the fun?...
paul_haakonsen8 October 2022
Granted, as I stumbled upon the 1983 comedy "Screwballs", I had never heard about the movie prior to watching it. But it seemed like a movie in the spirit of "American Pie", so of course I opted to sit down and watch it. Perhaps I had been missing out on something hilarious.

Turns out that writers Linda Shayne and Jim Wynorski failed to provide me with much entertainment in what they wrote for the script and storyline. The storyline felt as if it was lacking a red thread to tie together each scene. And as such, the movie felt like something writers Linda Shayne and Jim Wynorski were writing independently without talking together.

The acting in the movie was adequate enough, I mean for a movie such as it turned out to be. Needless to say that I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble in "Screwballs".

I didn't laugh once throughout the 80 minutes that the movie ran for. And having suffered through director Rafal Zielinski's 1983 comedy without a single laugh, I have to say that I am not even going to bother with the 1985 sequel.

My rating of "Screwballs" lands on a two out of ten stars.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed