Rawhead Rex (1986) Poster

(1986)

User Reviews

Review this title
86 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Rawhead Rex and the forgotten monster horror genre.
Excaliber8230 April 2011
So the year is 2011 and time has not been kind to poor old Rawhead Rex (1986) and the monster horror genre in general.

Anyone who has read Clive Barker's short story Rawhead Rex knows that this is a downright disturbing and wicked tale. The monster Rawhead has sexual issues, he hates women, he pisses on priests and has an appetite for eating small children/babies. However, all these awful things are what makes the story such a page turner and adds more depth to what would otherwise be a mindless monster work.

The movie Rawhead Rex (1986) suffers from a very low budget. The main offender is Rawhead's mask itself. Its cheap rubber with little to no animatronics and the rubber shakes as the actor tries to move quickly. A higher budget would have done this monster so much justice, if only a creature master like Stan Winston had gotten involved, this would have been a whole different movie experience.

I would love to see Rawhead Rex remade today with all the trimmings, but unfortunately Hollywood is a complete mess. Bad actors are thrown into quick PG-13 horror crap fests and CGI technology has become the only main focus of everything.

I think it's time for someone to step up to the plate and re-boot the monster movie genre. Rawhead Rex could be an action/monster movie extravaganza if remade correctly. Hollywood simply refuses to take any chances and because of this, the horror genre is more or less dead. In the end, Rawhead Rex is still an enjoyable monster flick for the bored late night horror buff. But it just doesn't measure up to the more well-made 80s monster classics like "Pumpkinhead".
36 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Tons of fun for any fans of tongue-in-cheek trash
tomgillespie200226 March 2018
As well as delivering some of the shoddiest straight-to-video horror efforts ever made, the 1980s were also notorious for making stars of the real brains behind most projects - the writers. Popular authors such as Stephen King and Dean Koontz saw their names frequently advertised above the movie's title, used as the main selling point over any actors attached or the director in charge of the adaptation. One of the biggest names to emerge in the decade was Clive Barker, whose pull-no-punches approach and love of the stomach-churning side of sexuality provided a racier alternative to the milder King and Koontz. He would really make his mark in 1987 with his directorial debut Hellraiser, but before that came Rawhead Rex, adapted from a short story from Volume 3 of his Books of Blood series.

Just why Barker seemed so intent on bringing Hellraiser to the big screen himself is made perfectly clear after watching Rawhead Rex, a cheap, schlocky monster movie which Barker himself wrote the screenplay for, but quickly disowned after seeing the final product. Set in Ireland, Rawhead follows American Howard Hallenback (David Dukes), who drags his whole family to the cold, wet countryside in a bid to discover his roots and research sites that may be of religious and historical significance. But little does he know that nearby, a farmer has moved a sacred stone and unleashed the snarling demon Rawhead Rex upon the world. The peculiar priest Declan O'Brien (Ronan Wilmot) starts to act even more bizarrely when he encounters a strange vision after laying his hand on the church altar. Soon enough, mutilated bodies are being unearthed and citizens are vanishing, and with the police seemingly clueless, it's left to Howard to uncover the truth and send the monster back where it came from.

Directed by George Pavlou, Rawhead Rex is a terrible movie, losing points on everything from the camerawork to the acting (although Dukes actually isn't bad). The monster itself looks like hastily clumped-together paper mache school project, with a permanent open-mouthed expression unable to disguise the clear signs that the actor inside is struggling to see where they're going. It's offensive to the Irish, and just about anybody else with reasonable taste in cinema. Still, like many horror movies from the 1980s that receiving a pounding from the critics before gathering dust in the local video store, this is tons of fun for anybody with a weakness for tongue-in-cheek trash. It has a sense of humour, and certainly isn't afraid to have the most helpless of victims be dragged away by the rabid beast when you really expect them to turn up alive. Barker was understandably embarrassed but this certainly doesn't damage his reputation, and is enough to tide us over until Barker hopefully gets around to his long-planned remake.

www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cult Trash
claudio_carvalho24 July 2020
The writer Howard Hallenbeck (David Dukes) is spending vacation in the countryside of Ireland with his wife Elaine (Kelly Piper) and children researching legends and myths for his book. Meanwhile, a farmer is trying to remove an old column on the field and accidentally unleashes the evil pagan god Rawhead Rex that begins a crime spree in the village where Howard and his family are lodged.

"Rawhead Rex" is a cult trash written by Clive Barker in the beginning of his successful career in the film industry. The plot is flawed and silly, but it is funny to see. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "Monster - A Ressurreição do Mal (VHS)" ("Monster - The Resurrection of the Evil") / "O Senhor das Trevas (DVD)" ("The Lord of the Darkness")
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rawhead Rex has its own special place in its genre!
y2campo8 April 2000
Im the kind of person who alot of the time will buy movies before I have even seen them. That was the case with this movie. I loved this movie! People say it was cheezy, maybe a little but if you love cult horror, get this movie. Its defently a fun little satanic film and I would recomend it to anyone that are fans of the horror / cult genre.
24 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
read it
leah-mcclure29 June 2005
It's really simple: dire film, fantastic short story concerning entities older than organised religion, which also looks at the idea of the female as divine, without being preachy or even vaguely normal. Like all Barker horror stories; dark, twisted and original, if you don't own the Books of Blood, you should. For the uninitiated the Books of Blood (1-6) are collections of short stories. As well as containing the short story 'Rawhead Rex', the Books of Blood also contain the short stories 'The Forbidden'(which was filmed as Candyman), 'The Last Illusion' (filmed as Lord of Illusions), 'The Body Politic' (filmed as part of Quicksilver Highway)and 'The Yattering and Jack' which was also committed to screen as an episode of Tales from the Darkside. The only good thing about this film is that it prompted Clive Barker to start making his own text to screen adaptations, starting with Hellraiser.
15 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
irish filmmakers come up unlucky
mcfly-3116 January 2001
Dull terror pic in which a big damn demon is released from underground and runs amok in a small Irish town. The make-up is rubbery, the pacing is awful, and despite two big fangs, the monster resorts to strangling and slamming people into walls to kill them (yawn). Or when he does bite, the view is from the back of his head, twitching back and forth to create the illusion of chewing. Far too many scenes of people investigating houses, or the woods, where they walk slooooowly and carefully for a good two minutes without anything happening. The only blood you see is stained on the victims clothes in the aftermath of the attack, as there is nearly zero gore here. Lots or restraint shown throughout, especially in the scene dealing with a pregnant woman, where the monster is about to tear into her exposed belly, but decides to spare her. And when he kills a young (though very jerky) boy, it's done offscreen. Clive Barker wrote this?? Technically it looks great for a low-budget horror from overseas, but its empty plot and lame action do it in. Apparently the demon has some sort of religious connection, which is discovered in some very annoying scenes set in a church. People's hands get possessed, then shows them something (the monster?) running past trees in a forest. Oh, and please don't miss the cheapo moment when it looks like the monster is kissing a victim. His mouth barely touches the guy's face, only to have 12 gallons of blood explode everywhere. Tsssss! You may enjoy the foul-mouthed priest or some nice atmospheric shots of the spooky countryside, but otherwise, this is useless.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ghastly, ghastly
mail-199119 September 2006
Awful, awful, awful. I am so disappointed I wasted 89 minutes of my life watching this dross. I'm thinking of turning to mighty god and asking for those valuable minutes back. I remember wondering into the video shop with a mate asking for a video to 'scare us out of our wits'. He told us about Rawhead Rex, and the box read just what we were looking for. How could we not be scared by something described as Pure evil, pure terror and so on. We had hardly got comfy when the film had started and you saw the 'purely evil' Rawhead Rex in the first nano second of the film. So the suspense vanished in a nano second too. So from there the film, leaps from awful to disgraceful. I never thought that the most 'evil thing in history's' idea of being evil would be to trash a caravan by spilling sugar, smashing trinkets and generally making a bit of a teenage mess. If you do see this video nestling in some box at Oxfam, pay no more than 20p (give a £1 to charity) and are curious about it, I suggest you do watch it, just to see how bad it really is. Then dispose of the video promptly to stop anyone else being exposed to it. I wish I had protested at the time, to the maker and protested in the most serious terms about him taking up another career, and also asking for my £1.00 back. I did ask for that back from the video shop arguing that the goods were not sold as described. I suggest that you just watch the hell raiser films over again and again... and again.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A great low budget monster film with irish people, explosions and good gore...
m_chubbs19 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film isn't a big budget, CGI ladened, epileptic fit inducing block buster, but it's still fun. There are some good moments like the monsters raid on a caravan camp and the stand off between Rawhead, his human follower and the Riot police. The film starts in the Irish countryside with a strange boulder being found out in the fields. A farmer then disrupts the ground with his plow, it gets struck by that awful lightning thats 2D pasted onto the screen. Anywho, surprise surprise, it's the tomb for the title monster, who then rips the farmers face off, good introduction, Rawheads skills as a people person is shown further by having him kill another farmer, then, in a random scene, spare his wife for she's pregnant, or something. All through this, a strange alter glows red and disrupts morning mass. Then, a camera man realises more about Rawhead, who then kills his son. It's not done on screen, but, it's still quite disturbing, better than if it was done on show. He then, goes on a personal vendetta against the monster. After, Rawhead destroys a caravan park. This is where the best parts lie. People are thrown around, ripped apart, explosions happen cause someone falls and shoots a gas line. It's great, cheesy, and a gruesome. After, this policeman gets possessed by Rawhead, he leaves his partner to death in the car and goes to the church where the police have blocked off because, Rawheads in there, and his crazy priest friend. So, crazy cop blows up the police and burns to death, the vicars ripped up, the alter turns out to be hiding their statue that will kill Rawhead, then 80's special effects kick in, Rawheads dead, kinda... There's, many more points of interest, but, I don't want to ruin the whole film for you, watch it for yourself, it's a good cheesy movie, just, don't treat it seriously and it'll be a good time.

Also, you do not want to screw with Rawhead, he is a beefy thing that'll screw you up!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Movie poisoning.
Howlin Wolf24 March 2007
Clive Barker is known for liking things bloody, but apparently he doesn't like them *raw* - and after seeing "Rawhead Rex" I can't say I blame him for wanting to maintain a safe distance between himself and this movie.

Rex was apparently ruling Ireland before all the priests turned up and managed to have him banished, which may explain why life before his reappearance reminds one strongly of Craggy Island. Unfortunately, some fool disturbs his burial ground and it's up to a tourist dabbling in amateur photography to try and minimise potential casualties. Not before Rex stomps about tearing limb from limb and seeming rather annoyed about the general imposition, of course...

So there we have your solid setup for what should become a decent enough monster movie. Crucially though, what we are lacking is a decent monster. Imagine the original King Kong's uglier cousin, lumbered with a costume creating movement that wouldn't look out of place in a 50's stop-motion Godzilla film. They were all serviceable effects in their day, but this was made in the '80's, and disappointingly things don't seem to have gotten better over time. Add to this some appalling acting - particularly from an evil priest who's brainwashed by his radioactive church into siding with Rexy - and it feels like you're watching a throwback that's unworthy of its place in Barker's oeuvre. Just to top things off, there's a ridiculous finale with effects that rival those of "Hawk the Slayer" in terms of pure naffness.

Admittedly, these are all elements that contribute to the entertainment in their own especially awful way, so "Rawhead Rex" is the type of film that might be good for laughs with some alcohol handy. It's just a shame that the crew also look to have had a few too many nips of poteen in its making, as well...
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Is there any connection between the murders?" - "Yes, they're all dead." Not brilliant but quite fun.
poolandrews22 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Rawhead Rex is set in Ireland where a farmer is trying to clear a field of a huge stone pillar, as he does so lightening strikes the pillar & it falls over. From under where the pillar stood an ancient 8 foot tall demon known as Rawhead Rex (Heinrich von Schellendorf) is released, the farmer is turned into mincemeat. American photographer Howard Hollenbeck (David Dukes) his wife Elaine (Kelly Piper) together their two young children Robbie (Hugh O'Conor) & Minty (Cora Lunny) are on holiday, a holiday on which Howard is working on his book of sacred religious sites. Meanwhile Rawhead Rex kills a local farmer named Dennis (John Olohan), Ireland's finest Detective Inspector Gissing (Niall O'Brien) is on the case. Rex then attacks a caravan site & kills some more people which annoys everyone, Inspector Gissing doesn't believe the stories of monsters told by Howard who saw Rex in the woods. As the Hallenbecks are leaving town Robbie is attacked & killed by Rex, Howard is distraught & sets out to kill Rex with the knowledge he has learned from his investigations of the local Church & it's mythology...

This English Irish co-production was directed by George Pavlou & is a pretty bad film in all respects although it's fun to watch if nothing else. The script was written by Clive Barker based on his own short story, it moves along at a fair pace & it's never boring but it's just too silly to be completely effective. The film feels like a basic monster on the loose randomly killing people with a few of the complex religious ideas & themes that Barker likes so much shining through but they are ultimately lost in the daftness of it. There's a scene in which a woman runs through a wood with her boyfriend supposedly holding her hand but when she checks she is holding his severed hand, as if you wouldn't notice. The dialogue is funny at times & the film has no subtly at all as Rex walks around making silly roaring noises, the bizarre Verger Declan O'Brien (Ronan Wilmot) who at first is just plain creepy & then suddenly turns into a foul mouthed nutter who worships Rex & gets a golden shower off him in a unique baptism ceremony! Some of the stuff this guy comes out with needs to be heard to be believed, very funny. I honestly think the filmmakers set out to make a disturbing, scary & effective horror film but it just comes across as silly & downright funny at times much of which has to be laid at the door of Rawhead Rex himself. Rex looks absolutely awful, his has crossed red eyes, rubber claws, a very rubber face, rubber teeth, a really bad mo-hawk hair-do, a stupid outfit & you can actually see actor Heinrich von Schellendorf's teeth at the back of Rex's mouth, this is most apparent at the rubbishy twist ending when he bursts out of the grave. To it's credit it's good fun to watch & provides a certain amount of dubious entertainment & unintentional laughs.

Director Pavlou does an OK job but there's nothing spectacular about it, it has no real style or visual flair. There isn't much atmosphere, there's no scares or shocks & most of Rawhead Rex's entertainment value comes from it's silliness. The most effective scene is when Rex first bursts out of the ground at the start. There's a few decent bits of gore, a few decapitated heads, some bites, a severed hand & some dead bodies.

Technically Rawhead Rex is OK, it's well made throughout except for the dodgy rubber monster suit that is. The acting was OK, some of the accents & dialogue are funny at times but that all adds to the cheese factor.

Rawhead Rex is a decent watch, it's fun in a way the filmmakers probably didn't intend & I sort of liked it overall. Worth a watch for sure. Apparently Barker was so disappointed with this & other adaptations of his work that he set out to make his own film & thus the brilliant Hellraiser (1987) was made with Barker as director, at least that's one thing we can thank Rawhead Rex for.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Leprechaun's evil brother
p-stepien10 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
If you were not frightened by the atrocity of The Leprechaun I must say that that movie has an older brother, which is even more atrocious and even more not frightening.

Something evil in the forests of Ireland lurks - the terrifying Rawhead Rex. It has awoken from a centuries long slumber released from its womb of the earth.

Red-eyed, ripped like Arnie in Commando and apparently 8-9 feet tall. Albeit the last feature is not much of a feat in countryside Ireland, since most Irish seem to be the same height as Rawhead Rex. It could be possible that Rawhead just didn't want to seem too tall on set (tall actors are mostly perceived as bad actors) and decided to crouch, so that he could see eye to eye with his meals. I must however state that he does try to give a delicious performance as a reject from Twisted Sister with a bad hair day and a piranha attached to his face.

The movie itself can be used for Irish sex lessons for the catholically challenged. It gives great insight as to why pregnancy is a gift and also convincingly introduces you to the notion that kissing is gross.

Apart from that one must admire the tremendous acting abilities of a certain priest (played by Ronan Wilmot), who hands out very well verbalised 'fcks' and does as stand up job as a latrine.

Must give some negative comment about the lack of good screaming actresses, which did subtract somewhat from the watching pleasure. Also not enough chasing of females in woods and people tripping over their own feet.

I had to double check if this wasn't a Troma film. Surprisingly it wasn't. I also double checked if Clive Barker really is responsible for the... ugh... I'll go out on a limb and call it a story. Amazingly he was.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
hugely entertaining cheapo horror
kevin-caprani15 August 2005
This film just doesn't get the credit it merits, its a cheaply made film which inevitably relies on the viewer to accept the limitations of the genre and "go with it", just as an old tom baker doctor who episode never had anything going for it except the characters and storyline so it goes with rawhead rex,the story and characters are good enough to carry the film, the setting in celtic ireland and the roots of the beast from the underworld are classic horror fare and i just don't see what more you can expect from this genre, its a blast from start to finish with gore and an unusual baptism scene for good measure, I've seen much worse major budget films, some of the acting . particularly the irish priest is gloriously over the top and all the more entertaining for it, its funny and gory at the same time, it sort of meets hammer and the evil dead and comes up with an entertaining movie, i voted a ten to hype the figures lol but its a good seven if truth be told:)
48 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I thot the monster was half werewolf half Vincent Klyn aka Fender Tremolo from Cyborg (1989) but my 7 year old nephew nailed it by calling the monster a monkey gone wild.
Fella_shibby20 March 2016
Cartoonish special effects, silly ending n wtf end credit scene but was passable for an 80s monster film. First saw this in the late 80s on a rented vhs. Revisited it recently. I thot the monster was half werewolf half Vincent Klyn aka Fender Tremolo from Cyborg (1989) but my 7 year old nephew called the monster a monkey gone wild. The setting is right with sweeping landscapes but the rubber mask n glowing red eyes is very laughable.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Oh dear
pamelaloughray25 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Rawhead Rex was one of those that should have been much better. The settings right, but the films effects are shoddy, acting is hammy, and ending isn't all that satisfying. The creature itself maybe looked scary back then, although nowadays a rubber mask doesn't work too well. It seemed to only have two facial expressions. Mouth shut and mouth open.

Most die-hard horror fans will like this the first time round, but come away feeling it isn't worth another viewing.

If there ever was a film that should be remade its dear old Rawhead Rex. This original however can only serve a single viewing before you feel you've just wasted a couple of hours of your life.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
These Reviews Floor Me!
mlevans28 April 2002
"Rawhead Rex" was one of several "unknown" films I prided myself on "discovering" during the late 1980s, when friends would visit for a day or four. I seemed to have a knack (seemingly lost, now!) to pick out videos I had never heard of, which turned out to be surprisingly quite good. Rawhead Rex was one of these.

I found it a quite riveting, scary movie. As with almost all horror movies, I thought a few things could have been done better. Still, Rex was infinitely more satisfying to me than a number of present-day "horror" flicks which center on someone hacking people up with a knife for no apparent reason or which drift confusingly between reality and halucination.

I thought the monster looked pretty convincing -- then again, I was weaned in the pre-Speilberg era. I have to agree with the reviewer who said the scene where Rex kills the farmer in the shed and the wife sees him from the kitchen window, then tries to hide, is quite scary. So was the boy glancing up from his comic books in the van, to see Rex standing outside.

I loved the touches with the stained glass puzzle & the chief detective's stunned "I'll be d****, the Yank was right" when he looks at the horrific crayon drawing made by the young survivor of the trailer park attack, too stunned to speak. (The severed arm was a very nice touch, too.)

Anyone who thinks Rawhead Rex was "hilarious," is no horror fan. It may not have been one of the genre's best efforts ever, but it was one of a number of very meaty horror flicks of the 1980s which are still have plenty bite today (pun intended)!
23 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
painful
dispet3 June 2004
the original story upon which this film is based is an incredibly powerful raw piece of horror. and in writing the script for this film, clive barker managed to capture that, and write some of the best dialogue ive heard from a horror film in a while, just natural and real, without seeping into cliche and trashiness, and while there was not a lot of character development, the characters were again, not cliched. it also had the guts to push boundaries that are normally avoided, even in horror cinema, or should i say especially in horror cinema (but thats a different rant). however, the director deserves to be executed. the entire thing stinks of a dodgy cheap bbc doctor who episode. no imagination in the direction, and not even a documentary style, just a plain old no effort made for tv look, which really hurts the power of the script, totally removes it in fact. add to this the fact that the "monster" looks like something from doctor who as well, except doctor who usually manages to come up with horrors far more scary than this trash. with someone who could actually direct a movie in the helm and some actual effects as opposed to the childrens toy junk that is on offer, this could have been a classic of the 80s. but instead its just a nightmare for all the wrong reasons....
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"It's a bloody massacre!"
lost-in-limbo3 July 2010
An Irish farmer ploughing his fields removes an ancient seal from it, to only release a demon and Howard Hallenbark an American historian on a working vacation in Ireland might be the only one who can put an end to its terrifying rage.

An over-the-top and daft, but deliriously entertaining monster (ancient Irish demon) on the rampage low-budgeted opus. "Rawhead Rex" is an adaptation of Clive Baker's short story, who he also penned the film's screenplay. The ideas covered by Baker are unhinged and fascinating enough, but the tacky and sloppy execution of it is hard to take seriously and this especially goes for the monster creation. It's simply looks like a mutated head-banger crossed ape with its rippled muscles, long black hair and googly red eyes attached to a rubber mask. Oh it's a sight --- just wait for its spectacular entrance and you don't have to wait long either! While toweringly imposing in presence I didn't think it created much fear, but it sure was aggressive and destructive when in action/and gnawing upon its victims. Little bit of gruesome gore is chucked in and some bright optical FX work within its climax, but it remains pretty cornball. Where it scored high points for me was the choice of locations, rich rural Irish backdrops were atmospherically brought across and it was professionally photographed. Even the sound effects had certain eeriness and the music score, while overcooked was forebodingly judged. Something about its air had a dark mythical (its religious outlook) / fairytale (good vs. evil) edge, which only cemented how unusual it was and within it had that old-fashion tailoring of older monster features. Only if it didn't succumb to its pulpy silliness, but director George Pavlou (who also previously directed another Baker adaptation "Transmutations") presented some ghastly and humorous moments along with few stunning images. The performances are reasonable, as David Dukes is committed in the central role. Niall Toibin, Niall O'Brien and Ron Wilmont offer fine support. Could have been better, but still trashy fun.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Rex cries out for a remake!
udar5529 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I'm usually down on remakes, but I think this could really work if redone properly. After a farmer removes a large stone from his property, an ancient beast is unleashed on the Irish countryside. The monster (inexplicably named Rawhead Rex) takes wayward priest O'Brien (Ronan Wilmot) under its spell while American writer Howard Hallenbeck (David Dukes) tries to convince the cynical police this monster killed his son. Clive Barker adapted his own short story for this low budget flick and the results are pretty bad. The titular beast looks great in stills, but terrible in motion. Regardless, there are still one or two effective scenes in the film like when Rex attacks a trailer park. Kudos to director George Pavlou for having a woman pulled out of a window and getting her clothes torn off by the people inside trying to save her. That is a top exploitation move. Barker sticks in some jabs at religion at the end (Rex's baptism of a priest is an eye-opener), but it is too late in the game. Worth seeing for Wilmot's wide-eyed acting though. Given the amount of crap Clive Barker slaps his name on nowadays, it is interesting that he has disowned this film (and the Pavlou's other Barker adaptation TRANSMUTATIONS).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Death goes in fear of what it cannot be.
Hey_Sweden26 October 2017
When a field is plowed in rural Ireland, the title demon is loosed from its imprisonment beneath the earth. Rawhead Rex (played by Heinrich von Schellendorf) proceeds to terrorize and slaughter various unfortunate souls. An American writer named Howard Hallenbeck (David Dukes), who's come to the country to do research, gets caught up in the gory goings-on, and in fact it will be up to him to piece together the story and learn the means of dispatching the fiend.

The extreme cheesiness of the monster can't help but diminish whatever horror that director George Pavlou might have otherwise created. As it is, this agreeably goofy creature feature has some great Irish atmosphere going for it, as well as a spooky music score by Colin Towns.

Scripted by the legendary author Clive Barker, based on his story, this often plays out like a standard American horror film. One cannot blame Barker for being disappointed, especially as this movie version sidesteps any sort of nuance in favour of clichés. (Such as the classic moment we've seen in countless genre films where the hero describes the monster to the authorities, and wearily intones, "I know how this sounds.")

That said, there is some nifty gore to go with the onslaught of cheese, as well as some capable supporting performances by Niall Toibin (as a priest) and Niall O'Brien (as a pig headed inspector). Hugh O'Conor ("Botched") and Cora Venus Lunny play Hallenbecks' likable children. Kelly Piper (the nurse from William Lustigs' "Maniac") plays Hallenbecks' wife. Ronan Wilmot is a scream as the crazed verger Declan O'Brien. And Dukes is a very amiable hero. Some of these people give this schlock better performances than it deserves, especially Dukes after tragedy has befallen him.

That's not to say that the movie isn't pretty damn entertaining, because it is. (If only because it's utterly laughable a lot of the time.) Still, there is some potency to the material here and there, and the tale being told has an excellent forward pace, allowing the movie to clock in at a reasonable hour and a half long running time.

The highlight? A "golden shower" scene with the monster.

Seven out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Predictable without its Charm
Sheol181213 April 2023
Like it or not the benchmark here is Hellraiser. And this one falls incredibly short of it.

The film plays out more cartoonish and comedic than what the subject matter asks for. With an antagonist looking more like a Saturday morning cartoon monster than a threat to Irish faith.

I am on the record by saying I've never read any of Barker's novels/short stories, but film wise blasphemy and sacrilege as a subject matter is done considerably better in the Hellraiser series.

If you're a B-movie buff then by all means watch Rawhead Rex (which in this case you've probably done so already). Otherwise, your time is better invested in other titles.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rawhead Rules!
darkwolf_kjp13 May 2005
OK, this is NOT going to be a spoiler review or something to entice you more so than you may already be interested. What I do have to say is that out of the 1,000 odd horror/sci-fi movies I have seen this is one of my all-time favorites. Not only because I found it eerie, but in comparison to all demons-monster-things out there, this is the King baby. The tag line from the cover says it all, and if you are a fan of creative stories (that is not holding the screen play to the original writings,)and powerful evil then this will be your cup of tea. Rawhead is pretty much the king of all demons in the movie universe and beyond! I recommend this above most of the stuff out there, if you can find it that is.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Somewhere between "so bad it is good" and "Deserves a much better remake"
larrycosgrove-4542223 March 2019
If done the right way, this Clive Barker piece would be both extremely scary and possessed of wicked humor. But the monster looks stupid and not at all frightening, and the cast and Irish countryside are not used to full effect.

Every great once in a while, you see what the movie could have been. A backstory was obviously needed, and David Dukes, God rest his soul, was wrong for the part (although those playing the priests were spot on). This is not the action-every-minute movie that it needs to be. Think about it: a monster flick that is boring in spots, with the titular demon looking like some drunk at a company Halloween party.

I suspect that if a better director, higher budget, and more meaningful casting were used (keeping Ireland in play, which is an excellent locale for this type of cinema), this could be a monster hit.

Cheap pun, yes I know!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No "Dog Soldiers", but worth seeing......
microfame21 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Though not without faults, this movie has some damned effective moments. Particularly chilling was the scene of the family driving away from the Rawhead-plagued village, and them seeing "something" large in a field, through a break in the brush and stone walls. When they stop the van, and begin backing up to "check it out", it's a classic "Don't do it!" moment. Of course, it's a fake scare, but then something bad does come to pass...

In this day of everything being put out on cheap DVD, it's frustrating that this movie is not in production. I'm sure there's money to be made on a DVD re-release. They put out the god-awful Alien 3000, which makes Rawhead look like Oscar material.....
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watch it expecting to laugh a fair amount and you won't be too disappointed.
BA_Harrison24 October 2008
Apparently, writer Clive Barker was so incensed by this laughably bad adaptation of one of his short stories that he decided the next movie to be based on one of his books would be directed by himself (the result being the rather excellent Hellraiser!). I can't say I blame the poor bloke: for an author to see his hard work turned into such a dreadful movie must be a painful experience.

It's an experience, however, that fans of really bad horror movies will probably find quite pleasurable, thanks to the fact that it not only features some truly terrible acting, but also one of the least convincing movie monsters of the 80s: the titular monstrosity looks like a bargain basement 'predator' (from the Schwarzeneggar movie)—a bizarre combination of pro-wrestler, a Mad Max-style warrior, and a bog-eyed mutant pig with ridiculously huge fangs!

The film opens with an Irish farmer attempting to remove a huge, ancient, neolithic monument from his field (he's obviously a man not too concerned about his country's heritage); when he finally gets the stone to shift, Rawhead Rex, a monstrous, nine foot tall creature that had been trapped underneath, is set free...

The rest of the film is pretty much your basic 'creature on the loose' movie (dressed up with some nonsense about a church built on a site originally used in pagan, pre-Christian rituals) which sees the ancient beast creating bloody havoc in the rural community before finally being defeated by 'girl power'. Along the way, viewers are treated to some pretty cheap-looking gore, a funny moment when the church verger is 'baptised' in urine by Rawhead, a shocking performance by the actor playing the scared gypsy kid, and a wonderfully gratuitous spot of female nudity when a woman is dragged though a caravan window by the monster, causing her top to fall off!
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Read the short story
Krug Stillo20 September 2003
The short story Rawhead Rex is a gory and stomach churning piece of literature appearing in Clive Barker's Books of Blood Volume 3. Reading it one sees the possibilities of a good old fashioned monster on the loose movie. Unfortunately, most of the graphic violence of the story is removed from the film that followed. Although many of the character details remain the same, except that the protagonist and his family are Londoners instead of Americans in the short story. The setting, score, a few actors and the occasional scare make the films worth seeing for true Clive Barker completists. Be warned, what does make the proceedings less alluring is the fact that Rawhead himself is a great disappointment; the direction somewhat poor and from a script by Barker himself I expected more. Not even in league with his superior Hellraiser, effective Candyman or intriguing Nightbreed. Though I must admit I must've seen this film about eight times since it was initially released.

Trivia note: The mother of the American Family is the actress who plays the nurse Joe Spinell skewers in Maniac.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed