Death Nurse (Video 1987) Poster

(1987 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Fascinating precisely because of its badness.
Hey_Sweden13 February 2016
Good old Nick Millard, with his tiny, tiny budgets and crude lack of filmmaking finesse. He once again gives us a true groaner that somewhat entertains the viewer, if only because it's just so damn awful. Granted, the feeling that writer / director Millard does seem to have his tongue in his cheek helps to a degree, but that doesn't change the fact that this is just plain bad, bad, bad. The bargain basement gore is fun in its mind blowing tackiness, as is the acting that is phenomenally putrid right across the board.

Millard re-teams with his "Criminally Insane" lead Priscilla Alden, who here plays Edith Mortley, a sadistic nurse who works with her "doctor" brother Gordon (Albert Eskinazi) at a clinic which they run out of their suburban home. They're psychos AND they're scam artists, continuing to bill the state even after they've butchered their patients. Their trouble truly begins when the nosey Faith Chandler (Frances Millard, a. k. a. Nicks' mom) begins to poke around.

You can see that Nick knows damn well that he doesn't even have ONE hours' worth of story here, so he pads and pads the running time (even so, this only runs 58 minutes!) with archive footage from "Criminally Insane". Some of it is even used more than once. This is supposed to represent the dreams of the Edith character.

This is a singularly untalented cast, the kind that truly does make you want to look away. Millard also casts his wife Irmgard as the alcoholic, lusty patient Louise and even plays a part himself, that of the very ill Mr. Davis. Alden, at the least, does seem to be having fun.

"Death Nurse" is going to come off as a major waste of time to most people, even in light of its brief running time, but if you're anything like this viewer, its complete ineptitude should strike you as hilarious often enough to make this tolerable.

Five out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
DeathNurse1987
gavcrimson19 September 2020
Death Nurse (1987)

Some more amateur gore filmmaking...this time emanating out of San Francisco, and the remarkable Millard family, whose history with exploitation movies dates back to the 1920s. Family patriarch S.S "Steamship" Millard was one of the original 'Forty Thieves' of the roadshow era, exhibiting fare like 'Is Your Daughter Safe?' and 'Pitfalls of Passion' across the states in the twenties, and earning a spell in San Quentin for his troubles. His son, Nick Millard, was a chip off the old block too, directing tons of trippy, dreamlike porn throughout the 1960s and 1970s, with the occasional foray into horror. Satan's Black Wedding (1976) might be the closest Millard ever came to making a legitimately 'good' film, but it is 1975's Criminally Insane (aka Crazy Fat Ethel) that remains his most well known and notorious movie.

By the late 1980s, Nick Millard had taken the step down to shooting on video, with senior cast members who look like they should be turning up to play bridge with the director's mother rather than starring in a gore film. 1987's Death Nurse retains Millard's heavyset star of Criminally Insane, Priscilla Alden, who brings a degree of professionalism and insult spitting malice to this tale of a murderous doctor, who along with his crazy fat nurse sister, runs a bogus medical clinic out of their suburban home. The clinic is, of course, a front for them to do away with sick, rich patients by suffocation, stabbing and one of the largest hypodermics seen outside of The Amazing Colossal Man.

Filmed at the director's own SF home (note all the film cans in the doctor's garage) and padded out with scenes from Criminally Insane, irregardless of the ten year plus age gap in the footage or the fact that Criminally Insane was done on film and Death Nurse on video. Meaning that whenever Nurse Alden has one of her bad dreams she is ten years younger and dreaming on film, only to then wake up in a shot on video world. Millard also put his mother Frances in Death Nurse, thoughtfully casting mum as a "drunk bitc*" who demands sex from the significantly younger Doctor. An aspect to the role that Mrs. Millard presumably enjoyed and took to heart....in the early 2000s, when she was in her nineties, Frances Millard became a porn star.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Moldy Cheese
Chainsaw Slasher26 February 2006
I've seen some classic shot-on-video movies from the 80's, such as Blood Cult, Dreamaniac, Boardinghouse, GoreMet Zombie Chef From Hell, Cannibal Campout, 555, etc. All these movies in which could have some laughable entertainment value and noticeable effort to make a film on literally a zero budget. But then we have Death Nurse.

This movie, well, why even call this a movie? There was no effort put into making this mess. like the previous reviewer has stated, it seems they had filmed this film and ripped the tape right out of the camcorder and thats exactly how it feels. The editing must've been done on two VCRs, and a good 15 minutes of the film are clips from the Directors previous film, Criminally Insane, keep in mind this movie is only about 55 minutes long, not even a full length movie. Its quite obvious that this film was made to fill the box art it came in.

The only reason to watch this film is for the learning experience on how low cinema could go just to cash in a buck. This is absolutely the lowest your going to find. I once thought that Blood Lake was the worse, well, Death Nurse takes the cake.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
*Head shake*
Illyngophobia17 August 2009
This is one of those very poorly made,straight to VHS movies from the 80s.I don't know where to begin with this.Well we have two siblings.Edith and Gordon. Edith is a nurse and Gordon is a doctor.They open this clinic (and it doesn't even look like one I might add) and we find out that they kill the patients for their health care and money.The movie is about 60 minutes in length.

This movie is just awful. The acting is really bad,the quality is bad.And when they transfer it,a frame can get stuck and it makes it look really bad.Plus,they extend scenes for way too long.For example,Gordon digging a whole takes almost two or three full minutes then it cuts to him eating ice cream.Not to mention that the actors are all from Nick Millard's other movies like Criminally Insane.So a third of the movie is nothing but clips and scenes from Criminally Insane,and we're suppost to believe that these are Edith's dreams.

Just stay away from this movie.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Home Movie Shot in Tacky House Masquerades as Cinema!
TheMikeJustice27 October 2000
This movie was horrible. It looked like bad porn! It was supposedly shot by the same party behind CRIMINALLY INSANE, but compared to that tarnished little jewel, this film is utter and complete trash. Unedited, unscripted, and un-acted, this piece of VHS video was obviously ripped clean out of the camcorder and thrown onto video store shelves without even the most rudimentary post-production tinkering.

The film supposedly takes place in a state-run "clinic," although the viewer soon wonders why the state would refer patients to a tacky tract house with cottage cheese ceilings and bad wood paneling.

Terrible. Simply terrible. And disappointing, too. Quite sad, actually. I'm crying right now because of this film. That's how bad it was.

This was not a real film. This was a home movie.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Usual Millard recipe: impossible to sit through and still fascinating
Sandcooler10 February 2015
You know how in most god-awful B-movies, directors try (and usually fail) to come up with some kind of creative solution when they can't find the location or prop they're looking for? A boiler room can double as a prison, a school classroom can fill in for a police station, an ambulance can just be the production van after a quick paint-job: it's a lot of work, but it seems like one of the perks of low-budget filmmaking. "Death Nurse" director Nick Millard however takes the bold decision of simply not giving a damn. His screenplay requires some kind of clinic but screw it, his dilapidated house will probably be fine. I'm not sure which state this is set in, but please don't get sick over there. Whether you're an alcoholic, a terminal tuberculosis patient (who, I kid you not, is walked to the clinic) or a woman whose illness is never explained and probably just doesn't have a bed at home, you'll always be sent to some dirty, rat-infested house in the suburbs with just one doctor and one nurse (a death nurse at that). Oh yeah, that clinic whose patients without any exception are never seen again and where they call a regular kitchen knife a scalpel: if those people can't help out, who can?

Nick Millard is an incessantly intriguing filmmaker because he takes not caring to such a bizarre level: his only goal is to fill an hour of videotape, and he's not keen on hiding it. Almost a third of this movie is stock footage from Millard's earlier (and much better) work "Criminally Insane", but it's not even really stock footage: he literally just plays the movie on his TV and films the screen. Even with just forty minutes of new footage, the padding keeps on coming. Death nurse makes tea, the doctor digs a hole and then makes himself a sundae, that doesn't need to be shown in real time for an audience to understand but Millard takes no chances. Then suddenly, an hour of your life has vanished and you get the most ridiculous non-ending you've ever seen...thank God you also have "Death Nurse 2". Nick Millard is one hell of a drug.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
my least favorite bad movie, in fact, i hate all bad movies, but this my most hated!
Transformers_Carl19 December 2013
nick millard's 1987 sov slasher, death nurse, is a movie about a overweight nurse and his brother, who has this clinic where they take care of people, but what people don't know, that the nurse is a rampaging murderer with the thirst for blood to keep up their bills.

now may i want to ask, why do i hate this movie so much other than it's a shot on a camcorder movie? nothing literally happens at death nurse! it's poorly edited, it has absolutely no soundtrack, no good special effects, and you know what's the worst part? this film is supposed to be taken seriously.

death nurse is a movie so bad it's funny, but not funny bad, it's awful. we never get to see the actual characters get a little touch by a plastic meat cleaver, the results end for one second or probably zero, the sounds always cut off, that's how bad the editing is! don't get me to the acting either, they're not even trying to act, they're not trying to even try at all, there's too many scenes of the nurse having nightmares of this other character which is not edith from criminally insane, and many other footage that has nothing to do with the plot! f*ck this movie! the term "worst movie ever" isn't enough to describe this poor effort. nothing can. only a s*it brown would.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse...
alanmora28 July 2009
I didn't even know this movie existed until recently and now that I've seen it, I know why! What a horrible, hideous, god-awful waste of time and effort this one is! Just like it's predecessor "Crazy Fat Ethel 2" "Death Nurse" is shot on video. It is also a pseudo-sequel to "Criminally Insane". Talk about milking a story to death! Obviously Nick Millard aka Nick Phillips was totally devoid of all thoughts and ideas at this point and simply decided to recycle the same old lousy story for a third time. To make matters even worse, he put even less effort into this "film" (and I use that term loosely) than in the previous sequel. Once again we get recycled, crappy footage from "Criminally Insane" and a rapidly aging Priscilla Alden cast in the lead. The storyline in this 'film' is not even remotely related to that of "Criminally Insane" and Priscilla Alden's character has a name change which makes all of the footage from "Criminally Insane" seem awkwardly out of place. There is nothing about this "film" that makes any sense and I really do not get the point of wasting time making it!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh My God! Kill Me Now!
EatMyFlickboxers23 September 2013
The movie starts out with Priscilla Alden playing as Edith, who works as a nurse, lives with her brother in a suburban house. They kill new patients to keep up the bill for their state care. Okay, the plot is decent, but that's the only good thing about the film. Alden also has a nice creepy laugh.

I was very disappointed by this film. It's simply one of Nick's worst movies, and I felt like I got the biggest b*tch slap in the face. I mean what happened? This film is so incredibly boring that I couldn't get along with the plot any longer. The opening and ending titles, this movie doesn't have any. It's only footage that he ripped from Criminally Insane. There is very little gore, and very little kills. The whole movie itself is poorly edited, there isn't any originality into the sets, the sets were only re-used from Satan's Black Wedding for this movie. Nick, what were you thinking? It doesn't take this much to make a simple horror movie. You put effort on your other movies, they had nice quality, good sound, and it looked it you took time to make those movies. This looks like some crappy home video you and your family recorded, put it together with two VHS's, and sold it off as a "horror" film. Not even I would enjoy it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A darkly comical masterpiece!
dmkenneyjr18 September 2022
A mixture of hilarity, archive footage, and mayhem! Priscilla Alden's masterful performance as Edith Mortley pulls the entire movie together and is spot-on. A fine example of a pre-internet era homemade film, it isn't merely a film, it is a work of art. Alden's acting depicts perfectly Edith's attitude in life. Edith sometimes utters expletives, and her hateful, cantankerous behavior does not cover up one bit her severe case of psychopathy. Given, then, that she has medical problems of her own (terrible mental health, that is), it is paradoxical that she is doing what she is doing. She "takes care" of the patients as the "nurse". Her brother, Gordon, is the "doctor" among the scene..
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ugh
BandSAboutMovies31 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The health care crisis and the rising silver wave of seniors in the need of extended ambulatory care are major worries that our society will be dealing with for decades. What does not worry or deal in this would be Nick Millard's 1987 Shot On Video scummiest Death Nurse, which gives us the Shady Palms Clinic, which is run by the brother and sister team of Doctor Gordon Mortley and Nurse Edith.

Their John Waters-style plan is to take in physically and mentally ill patients that no one wants, do surgical experiments and then keep billing for their care. The only patient that has survived their madness is Louise Kagel, who is always drunk and regularly services the ungood doctor sexually.

There are so many problems in the way they do business. Why would they believe that a dog's heart would work inside a man's? Why would they have a cat running around that would steal that heart? And then, they throw the body to the rats, which means more and more rats arrive, as if this is one of those we replaced this predator with this predator and now we need a new predator situations and when the law sends an EPA man down to check, they stab him because no one keeps track of government agents, right?

Everyone has to pay, whether they eat rats, get injected with poison or just get stabbed. The bodies pile up, the cops find the bodies and we end with Edith just sitting on the couch, knowing the end is coming soon.

I kind of love that this movie has 35 minutes from Criminally Insane in it, so that when I watch Death Nurse 2, I know that I will think I'm, well, insane and that I'm rewatching the same movie. Because I will be, if you think about it.

This is a movie made for...someone. I don't know who. But I'm very afraid of them.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
About As Bad As You Can Get
Michael_Elliott30 November 2015
Death Nurse (1987)

BOMB (out of 4)

Edith (Priscilla Alden) and her brother Gordon (Albert Eskinazi) work in their house as "doctors" but in reality they're just nuts who welcome in patients so that they can brutally kill them. They welcome in a man and kill him quickly but his annoying "keeper" continues to check in on him, which causes a problem for the doctors.

Director Nick Millard and star Alden hit exploitation gold with CRIMINALLY INSANE. That ultra low-budget movie just had something about it that appealed to drive-in fans such as myself but he followed that up in 1987 with a horrid sequel. That sequel was about forty minutes worth of footage from the original movie and twenty minutes worth of new scenes. DEATH NURSE is considered the unofficial third film in the series since it does feature the same director, star and sets but I think it plays out better as its own film. The problem is that it features a lot of stock footage from CRIMINALLY INSANE.

You know, I admire people who go out there and make movies no matter of their quality. I review movies as a passion but even the worst movie ever made deserves more "credit" than someone like me who simply watches them and talks about them. DEATH NURSE is a really awful movie on so many levels but I guess this should be expected. The special effects are bad. The music and cinematography are bad. The editing is bad. Everything is pretty bad here and what's worse is the fact that so much stock footage is used.

The good old days of VHS stores had countless movies like this on the store shelves. I actually found CRIMINALLY INSANE to be entertaining but this film here is just really, really bad.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another jaw-dropping anti-masterpiece from Nick Millard
Woodyanders1 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Murderous heavyset nurse Edith Mortley (a deliciously wicked portrayal by Priscilla Alden) and her quack doctor brother Gordon (a perfectly jerky turn by Albert Eskinazi) run a medical clinic out of a suburban home. Although the deadly duo kill their patients, they nonetheless continue to bill the state for their care.

Man, does this choice chunk of celluloid excrement possess all the right wrong stuff to qualify as a real four-star stinkbomb: We've got ham-fisted (mis)direction from Millard, a plodding pace, lots of tedious filler (for example, Gordon spends what seems like an agonizing eternity making and eating an ice cream sundae), strained attempts at dark humor, crude and unconvincing gore, slapdash editing, static and muddy cinematography, zero tension or creepy atmosphere, flatly staged murder set pieces, a meandering narrative, an absurdly abrupt non-ending, and even copious footage from Millard's previous magnum opus "Criminally Insane." Nick himself has a small part as sickly and coughing tuberculosis sufferer John Davis, his wife Irmgard plays pathetic alcoholic Louise Kagel, and that's Nick's dear old mom Frances as pesky health official Faith Chandler. A hilariously horrendous hoot and a half.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed