Le miniere del Kilimangiaro (Afrikanter) (1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Let's face it, only cheese lovers are going to enjoy this
Leofwine_draca28 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The Italians tried their hand at a number of Indiana Jones rip-offs throughout the '80s, with the result being that most, if not all, turned out to be unsuccessful. THE MINES OF KILIMANJARO is no exception, a silly and poorly-made film done in through an ultra-low budget - which precludes the use of any major action sequences - silly characters, and bad casting in the part of the leading character, Ed Barclay (played by unknown-to-the-genre Tobias Hoesl, when better choices like Al Cliver and Oliver Tobias - who at least have some experience of the genre - sit lower down in the cast in worthless cameo roles!).

The plot jumps from place to place and is full of absurdity. The simple plot, set in 1934, involves the hunt for some secret treasure or other which is located in the mines of Kilimanjaro. Seeking the treasure are a diverse bunch of people, including a secret society of monks, a fierce tribe of warrior women desperate for a man, a race of violent leopard men (yep, guys in shabby leopard-skin leotards again), the Nazis, a Dutch businessman named Rolf, a Chinese drug lord, and a British expedition! It's not as interesting as it sounds, with far too many of the action scenes shot in extreme close-up, so you can't see what's happening, a lethargic pacing, unexplained character motivations, blatant mistakes, and dull music. The only thing the film has going for it is some interesting safari-type footage, including our heroes watching a buffalo stampede, a surprisingly efficient shot. Ageing Italian director Mino Guerrini once proved himself to be a capable director adept at making crime films in the '70s but displays little of his previous skill here. Stock footage of elephants pads out the production and comes as light relief from the corny dialogue that litters the rest of the movie. Exploitation values are low, with no nudity (although an amusing plot development sees the chief actress lose her skirt somehow) and barely any blood or gore to speak of (aside from a couple of shootings).

The film seems intent on offering up cheap and unrealistic effects as often as possible. Watch out for the stupid moment when Hoesl is menaced by a plastic snake! There's also an absurd plastic bat attack and a man being force-fed white mice for no explicable reason. A tug of war game with a screaming native at the centre could have been a great gore scene a la CUT AND RUN but the opportunity is wasted. Watch out for the scene in which Hoesl goes back into a burning building to retrieve his beloved hat, the most open of the Indiana Jones rip-off moments.

The cast includes a number of Euro-veterans, most of whom are used to ill effect. Christopher Connelly is on screen for all of ten minutes, playing Professor Smith, and this proves to be one of his less distinguished appearances, as well as one of his last. Also turning up is veteran actor Gordon Mitchell as Dutchman Rolf, but the role is rather extraneous to the plot, although Mitchell's performance is excellent and the best aspect of the movie. Hoesl is useless as the lead and leading lady Elena Pompei one of those instantly dispensable Italian actresses of the '80s, whose faces you can't remember ten minutes after the film finishes. Not one of the genre's highlights, this is suitable only for cheese addicts and Euro-fans desperate for new material.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Goofs and Diamonds Are Forever
Zantara Xenophobe24 March 2002
Warning: Spoilers
MAJOR SPOILERS IN THIS!

Well, the movie box got me again. The glittery picture on this blatant rip-off of the `Indiana Jones' movies made me rent something that was sure to be bad. And it was. Very. But at least it was so unintentionally funny that it was watchable (unlike `Temple of Doom,' which I think is garbage). This movie is about a murdered college professor's assistant going to the heart of Africa in the 1930s to search for a secret mine full of diamonds. Seems as if the Nazis have been funding their war efforts with African diamonds that the professor knew about. So, without a clue, he bumbles into the jungle with a team of English explorers, followed by nasty foreigners and running into vicious natives. Yes, it is like many other rip-offs, only this spouts off bad dialogue, stock footage, horrible music, and complete stupidity. Rather than do my usual format, I made a fun list of questions and comments about most (but not all) of the silly things I saw. Be aware there are MAJOR SPOILERS in them, so don't read on if you don't want them revealed...

How exactly did the Chinese, Dutch, and English all learn about the German diamond mines? For that matter, how is it that everyone knows that Professor Smith knew the whereabouts if he had changed his identity?

Those diamonds in the flashback look like they were cut by an expert.

Professor Smith wants Barkley to retrieve some `item' in Africa. What item? The journal? Why would Smith need that? If not the journal, than what?

Why do the Germans wait twenty years before they kill off Professor Smith? If he has stayed silent this long, why would he spill the beans now?

Groovy glasses, German dude!

You'd think that Barkley would have found out exactly what the Zetuang was with telegrams, phone calls, and research BEFORE making the trip to Africa.

That hook the African uses against Barkley sure looks like the one Barkley later carries on his belt, the one he has owned for years.

Barkley somehow gets out of the basket the Chinese henchmen throw him in, yet the henchmen never realize the weight difference of the basket? And why did Barkley stick around?

Did I hear Ti-Ling say, `Take a load off, sweetheart,' to Barkley?

What? No compassion for the man that just died setting you free, Barkley?

A guide is shot by an arrow and crawls back to the Kenya rangers in civilization. Yet he doesn't bother to warn or seek help from his comrades who are asleep in their tents right next to him!

Instead of massacring them with everyone else in normal procedure, the Leopard Men take Barkley and Eva captive. Yet they leave that huge hook on Barkley's belt.

Barkley and Eva take refuge inside the witchdoctor's tent, which the regular tribesmen are not allowed into. Why didn't the witchdoctor himself simply walk in and throw them out?

Barkley conveniently finds a knapsack full of Professor Smith's notes in the witchdoctor's tent. This stuff would have been invaluable to Barkley on a personal level, and there is a journal all about the 1917 expedition. But Barkley rips out a page with a crude map and leaves everything else behind. And when he tears it out, it is ripped so the top left quarter of the page is still in the journal. That part of the page happens to be where Kilimanjaro is drawn!

Barkley tells Eva that the map tells them to travel Northeast to get to Kilimanjaro. But then he admits he doesn't know what direction they are headed. Were they going in the right direction by blind luck?

Eva is wearing tall boots when the Leopard Men capture her, but sandals afterwards. During the journey after they escape, Eva is without her sandals. There is no reason for her to take them off and they have no where to put them as they walk. But then later she has them back on.then she doesn't.then she does again.

The Dutchman and the Chinese henchman, Tim, use a female African as a tracker. But how does she track anyone when riding in the back of the truck?

And why do the bad guys place a bomb in their truck? What if they needed it to return later?

Barkley and Eva are rescued by the priests and stay with them until the German assassin shows up. They kill the German and then inexplicably flee for the desert.without taking food or water!

The all-woman tribe..yikes! Through some genetic defect, they haven't given birth to a man in seventy years. There are plenty of tribes around, why not grab a man from one of them? And how did the empress learn how to speak perfect English? And why was she white? And where did she get that make-up?

We find out Lord Killbrook was not the father of Eva. If that is the case, why did he insist on going after her and Barkley ALONE in the jungle with no supplies? And how in the world did he track them down?

Lord Killbrook shoots one out of four bad guys with a rifle at long range, and then starts to stumble down a hill. The other three ARMED bad guys don't shoot back, but simply surrender.

After being slaves for ten years, the Zetuang sure pick the ideal time to revolt.

But what happened to the main German officer??? You know, the head man whose name we never get to know?

Well, gee, the mine caved in, so we'll just assume no one told the rest of Germany where its location is.

A feel-good ending where our young couple head out into the sunset.But they STILL don't have any food, water, compass, or clue how to get out of the jungle!

Anyhow, have fun making your own list. If you can stand sitting through it all! Zantara's score: a (generous) 3 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
ADVENTURE TALE SET IN 1930 WITH EVERYTHING IN IT
larryanderson1 May 2022
I bought this movie on Beta in Buffalo NY. I finally got around to watching it. It is also on Y/T for you to enjoy. Set in 1930s Africa, the movie claims to have been shot in Africa. If you watch enough of these Italian action movies you will recognize the terrain of the back lot used in many a movie shot just outside of Rome. The first one I saw shot in this location was Morgan the Pirate from 1962. The story has EVERYTHING you can dream up for such a movie. Amazons (Horney at that), diamond mines, Nazis, jungle, tribesmen, animals, explosions, just everything you can think of. Gordon Mitchell gets killed near the end. An OK time-waster.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unsatisfying Italian adventure
lor_23 March 2023
My review was written in December 1987 after watching the movie on Imperial Entertainment video cassette.

"The Mines of Kilimanjaro", a 1985 Italian production originally titled "Afrikanter", begins like a lame clone of "Raiders of the Lost Ark' and ends up a pale variation of "King Solomon's Mines". You know you're in trouble when the only name actor in the cast (Christopher Connelly) gets killed by a poison dart in the opening reel.

Connelly's main student, Tobias Hosl, is sent to Africa on a pre-W. W. II mission to find a legendary diamond treasure the Nazis apparently have discovered and are using to finance their expansionary program toward world conquest. He teams up with a cute archaeologist (Elena Pompei) and they trek to the mines at Kilimanjaro, finding a lost tribe (being used as slave labor by the Nazis) in the process.

Subpar production values and a sudden, unsatisfying finale sink this would-be adventure pic.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed