Boulevard of Broken Dreams (1988) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Almost Horrible
dansview1 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This was perhaps one of the worst films ever given the green light in galactic history. Having said that, there were redeeming qualities.

The first 15 or 20 minutes were like an 80s mood music video. Since I love the 80s sound and the picturesque settings of both coastal California and Australia, I didn't mind. But I was starting to wonder when any plot development would begin.

Since I'm a writer and always dreamed of being wealthy like this main character, I enjoyed seeing his Mercedes and his hotel suite, and the way he was able to effortlessly fly first class, and tip bellboys.

The lead actor John Waters is apparently a big deal in Australia and partially because of this film. I never heard of him before or since. The film was about an Australian playwright/screenwriter who had been living in the U.S.for 10 years.

I didn't notice the trademark accent with this guy, so I figured that he is supposed to have lost it after having been away for a while. But if you look up the actor's bio., he's not even Australian. He's an English guy who moved to Australia when he was 20. So that detracted from the Australian feel of things.

Anyways, you see endless melancholic footage of him drifting through the damp streets of Melbourne or smoking in his suite. You know from some bad dialog back in L.A. that he wants to stop running from something and patch up the past.

Turns out he was an alcoholic and neglectful husband and father of one small daughter. Now he has quit drinking and lost his writing muse. (Writers are notorious for needing the stimulant of either a drink or a woman to keep their creative juices flowing.) He tries to get back with his ex and she intelligently rejects the idea. This actress did a fine job. She explains that he is who he is and the hurt they caused each other has permanently altered their course. There's no return path. He's devastated by the rejection.

We later find out that he's very cynical about his work. He explains in a press conference that he writes a play and emotionally abandons it afterward, since other people rewrite it and act it out through their own interpretations.

So he's a broken spirit with no passion for his work, no booze, and no family. There is absolutely no character development to explain how he became an enormously creative, deep thinking person to begin with. He seems like a nice enough guy, but we don't have a compelling reason to care about him. One Australian reviewer said the character even approached resolution with his wife from a self-centered position.

The best part of the film by far, is when he tries to help his old writing partner who still lives in Melbourne and never made it. This guy is filled with self doubt, and our lead selflessly helps him find confidence and rhythm.

This John Waters is stunningly good looking. He looks almost exactly like Mel Gibson, but he does a good job of showing inner turmoil with his facial expressions.

The plot is incredibly slow. You could say that everyday life is also slow, so this was true to life. But a movie is not a documentary. It's supposed to entertain and this one doesn't.

There are too many scenes of this guy feeling sorry for himself and using others as a soundboard to vent his regrets. Booooring.

At some point a huge secret is revealed and we are forced to reevaluate our opinion of him and his predicament. The secret is a bit heavy-handed to say the least. Talk about "stacking the deck." I would have liked to have seen more external shots of Melbourne landscape, maybe one cathartic emotional breakdown scene, although a few came close, and more meaningful flashbacks. There were a few poorly produced black-and-white flashbacks that told nothing of who he had really been.

Some nice moments and efforts, but lacking depth, execution, and entertainment value.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mediocre attempt at a self discovery film
jjj-1221 November 2000
John Waters gives a reasonable performance as Tom Garfield an Australian playwrite -made good- in the US. Tom is not happy with his life in the states and returns to his home to attempt reconciliation with his estranged wife. Whilst home we see his voyage of self discovery and associated temptations.

The movie had its moments but the once the twist in the plot was revealed it was quite predictable. There could be worse movies to waste a Sunday afternoon on.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Melodramatic Treatment of Tired Themes Provides Nothing Tangible of Interest.
rsoonsa20 September 2005
Tom Garfield (John Waters) has attained such success as playwright and screenwriter that he is immediately recognized wherever he may be, yet the Australian becomes aware that his early dreams (although they probably were about his being just as famous as he is) have been abandoned because he has given up his "soul" to irritating (albeit well-paying) demands from Hollywood and New York producers, and he returns to Melbourne in an attempt to recapture the affections of his wife and young daughter. However, reinstating himself within his small family will not be readily managed as his spouse Helen (Penelope Stewart) resists his emotional appeals and, after ostensibly having overcome alcoholism, Tom now must combat painful terminal cancer that is purportedly limiting his life to a further six months, although by rights a viewer cannot feel greatly supportive of his struggle since he smokes constantly throughout the film during his efforts to relocate the early cravings of his "soul", whatever they may be (they are not revealed by the dialogue). Director Pino Amenta's background with television series is apparent for this wan melodrama that unaccountably was nominated for seven Australian Film Institute Awards, winning two, in spite of its trite screenplay and bottom tier production values, additionally being hampered by a weakly composed, didactic (virtually prescriptive) score, along with a lack of fluidity and cinematic flair, most scenes being depressingly predictable as the work wends its way to a groaningly hackneyed conclusion confiscated from the archives belonging to the genre of soap opera.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As Bad As It Gets
werefox082 October 2013
When the leading actor is totally un-convincing, then any movie has huge problems. John Waters is just plain wooden as successful writer Tom Garfield. The boring story plods along....with no surprises along the tortuous way. The use of music is almost unbelievably awful. The script is terrible. The B grade Australian actors try....but television is where they belong. It feels like a 1975 film, and I was amazed to find out it was made in 1988. SO---Who should watch this trash ?? Young actors, directors, writers etc. etc. etc. They should see how bad a movie can be, and try hard not to forget it. I am completely sure John Waters never watches this...and never speaks about it
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed