Double Standard (TV Movie 1988) Poster

(1988 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Give it 6* ----- 2* for story/drama, 10* for humor ------ average "6"
caa8212 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I'm thankful I'm a healthy person. I am fully-satisfied with my cable service in my own home. I have 70-some channels, 50+ not counting all the infomercial ones and the unavoidable evangelists. The only thing lacking in my package which I wish were included are the Sci-Fi and TCM channels - but that aside, I'm happy with a good large-screen t.v., just the simple cable connection, and need no other bells, whistles, equipment boxes, etc. So I would not have caught this flick if I weren't visiting friends over a long holiday weekend. They have the big plasma set, and it seems about several hundred channels. While they were on an errand, I surfed to a channel I don't get. This movie was just beginning, and my initial curiosity led to my watching the whole thing, thoroughly fascinated by it.

I suppose I have to classify this as a "spoiler" under this site's parameters, but I can't imagine anyone regarding this as a suspenseful story where one must not be aware of its ending (anyhow, you can see it coming from a mile down the road).

Why I'm glad I am healthy is that towards the end. Robert Foxworthy actually says, "We need to get some perspective on this." Upon hearing this line, I literally choked for a few moments laughing - was in no danger., but if weaker, might have passed-out.

This guy has a conventional marriage, wife and sons. He then has a "love-child" with young Michelle Greene, and after a lot of initial nonsense, and their daughter being merged into his first family - he tells his wife Michelle wants the young girl back. This provides her with the angst one would expect, but she readily accepts, since hubby happens to be an important lawyer.

But he then proceeds to marry young Michelle (before a judge, yet), and to establish a second family with her and the young daughter. Over the course of the film, this moron juggles both families, then runs for judge, with billboards with his name an face all over - and even runs into the judge at an election party with his "first" wife, and simply denies he's the man the judge married to Michelle.

Of course, the daughter discovers the ruse - when she applies for a job and her name appears in their checking her out - finding the record of her having lived at Foxworthy's first family's address in lieu of the one she had listed (it's government-related, of course, and this must be clarified). She, of course visits the "first family's" house; she runs away with her boyfriend, and when Foxworthy comes to their trailer, and has the gall to admonishes them both, she flees in the boyfriend's jeep. Naturally, she is killed at 100 mph, and the same reporter (who interviewed him in his race where he was elected judge) now must inquire about the dead girl's name, who she is, etc.

All the time this bastard acts as if he's the one bearing the burdens, only wants the best for his family, and has the temerity to make the fore-mentioned comment that "we need to get...perspective..." In "The Jerk," Steve Martin played Navin Johnson, perhaps the most stupid character ever in filmdom. But this was meant to be an over-the top comedic character, all was funny, and Steve Martin does over-the-top comedic characters better than anyone.

In this flick, Foxworthy's Leonard finally presents someone more stupid even than Navin. But here it was unintended, and "Robert Foxworthy is no Steve Martin." Many of the characters in this film are pretty dumb. The rest are pretty much insipid. But all are "funny." Watch it for the latter.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It is a true story
berni215130 August 2006
I know that this is a true story. I went to school with the children from the second family. Including 'Sharon' (not her real name). I talked with 'Sharon's' younger brother (who has since passed away) back in the 90's. He told me that 'Sharon' had died in an accident, but did not tell me how or why. When I saw the movie; I cried for days.

By the way.... this did NOT take place during the 70's, and 80's.... more like the 50's, and 60's. It is odd that this story takes place in St. Louis, and in 1965 my family moved from where the actual town where this story originated to Missouri. That blew me away.

The reason that I contacted 'Sharon's' brother back in '94 is because I found out that I was illegally adopted, and I knew that he was a lawyer. I thought that he maybe could help me, but considering everything that he had gone through, I didn't ask.

This movie is a must see. It moved me so much that I want to see it again, but the emotion for me is heartbreaking because I knew, and loved these people.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great movie, Michele Greene is hot! Would've liked more detail.
jr4notaxes7 February 2005
Personal: I could've fallen in love with her myself. Shows that a person really can love more than one person - not that it's morally right: it's not. But for the mistress (played by Michele Greene) to love "Lenny" no matter how often he was away shows her commitment - albeit at the expense of Lenny's wife.

Premise/Plot: A married lawyer - Leonard "Lenny" Harik (Robert Foxworth) - with two kids (and one on the way) opens an office less than two hours away from his home. He needs to hire an assistant. He interviews a number of girls - the movie shows him telling one that he must make a "final review" before making his decision. In walks Virginia "Ginny" Brymer (Michele Greene) to apply for the job. Although she was not on the list of approved candidates from the local high school, she is enterprising enough to apply for the position and show a letter of reference from one of the school's faculty.

It is better left at this point for you to watch what happens, but suffice it to say that there are many "positions" these two characters will get themselves in!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An awful lot of stupid people in this
TC-46 March 2002
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS WATCH OUT. I watched this movie only because it was a true story. After watching it I cannot believe that there were so many stupid people. Harik had a beautiful wife and he fell for a teenager almost instantly then his wife never fell for the fact that he was always at the office etc. How this could have happened for years without getting caught is hard to believe especially when he was up for public office and was on the news all the time. There are many other incidents which I will not reveal except that it is worth watching to find out just when he will get caught.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stupidity abounds....
alliesmom9725 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Like another reviewer, I watched this because it was a true story and I am a sucker for "true story movies".

The movie itself wasn't that bad. The acting was decent and the story was told pretty well. But it's just TOO aggravating because you hate to believe that are really people in this world as stupid as Leonard Harik's wife! I hesitate to say too much in the interest of spoilers but let's just say Harik's teenager daughter was smarter than his wife...at least she could sense something wasn't right in her family.

Considering how irritating the story was, the movie didn't do too bad a job of telling it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good argument for polygamous marriage????
pennibelle3 April 2006
Incredible how such a thing could happen involving a man of such prominence! I'm sure this was almost incomprehensible back in the '70's and '80's, though not as unthinkable during our times today. The acting is stellar and very believable.

I would highly recommend this movie for viewing as would like to submit that maybe this movie could also be used in an academic discussion or debate regarding the issue of polygamous marriage since this is definitely a hotbed issue during out times.

Of course both wives would need to 'be on-board', but I still feel that this particular story would definitely bring up different thoughts and feelings.

I would say that is is a MUST WATCH movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed