Drugstore Cowboy (1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
117 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Matt Dillon's best work
nova_caine2 January 2006
Matt Dillon igives his best performance in this movie, gives an minimalistic, sympathetic portrayal of a junk addict trying to go straight.

The subject matter may be a bit dark for those that like to see life from the "sunny side". It is set after all, in gray, gray, Portland Oregon in the 70's. It deals with a crew of four, two couples, that go around ripping off drugstores for opiates. It does not attempt to judge or condemn this behavior, it just tells the story of a group of junkies, and one of their attempts to go clean and find out what the straight life is like.

Those of you that have experience with any form of substance abuse may find that this movie rings true. I loved the quote by Bob something to the effect of: "In life, you never know one minute to the next how you're going to feel. But a dope fiend just has to look at the labels on the bottles." By no means does this movie glamorize drug use. In fact, it shows it for what it is, a temporary fix that leads nowhere but destruction.
33 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Still a Great Film after Almost Twenty Years
claudio_carvalho25 August 2018
In 1971, in Portland, Bob (Matt Dillon), his girlfriend Dianne (Kelly Lynch) and his friends Rick (James Le Gros) and his girlfriend Nadine (Heather Graham) are smalltime thieves of drugstores and hospitals. They spend their lives drugged and Bob is chased by the abusive police detective Gentry (James Remar). They decide to move to another city and soon Nadine has an OD, affecting Bob that decides to return to Portland and be clean. But he is haunted by his past.

"Drugstore Cowboy" is still a great film after almost twenty years. Gus Van Sant discloses a true story and based on an autobiographical novel by James Fogle. Matt Dillon is amazing and the rest of the lead cast is also fantastic. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Drugstore Cowboy"
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good sleeper film...
smakawhat24 July 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Ah yes another movie about drug addicts. This movie is set in the Northwest US during 1971. It's a story about 4 friends who are addicts and get their stuff by robbing drugstores. They end up robbing them not by violent pistol holdups, but by usualy creating diversions while a friend sneaks behind a pharmacy counter to crack open drawers, or run into a hospital storage room to bust a cabinet with a crowbar.

The movie has a neat look and a neat story. It has to be the only movie about addicts that I have seen where the characters are neither glamorous nor do they look like they are festering with sores and pains and needle marks. I had to say though I was taken with the film, it has a neat story and has that American Beauty type ending (where the main character finaly makes it to redemption even if it is too late).

But it is a unique film and the movie has a look as if it was truly made in the 70's even though it wasn't. The movie starts off with Dillon being driven away in an ambulance as his voice over tells us about his life, and you feel that you know the story, but you don't as you watch the movie unfold and then realise at the end that the reason he is in the ambulance is not what you think is the obvious answer you thought of at the begining of the film.

Not the the best drug addict movie I have seen (I'd give that to the Canadian film 'H') but a very good film none the less.

Rating 7 1/2 out of 10
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great road movie. A great drug movie. A great black comedy. One of the best movies of the 1980s.
Infofreak17 March 2003
'Drugstore Cowboy' really knocked my socks off when I first watched it about 12-13 years ago, and it still impresses me every time I view it again. An unsentimental drug movie that doesn't resort to knee jerk moralizing, it is one of the very best movies of the 1980s, and still one of the best movies of its kind (Alison Maclean's underrated 'Jesus' Son' is one of the few recent movies to come close to it). Gus Van Sant looked like he was going to be one of the most exciting directors of the 1990s, but after the excellent 'My Own Private Idaho' it quickly proved not to be so, his career ending up with awful saccharine "uplifting" Hollwood dreck and his misguided remake of 'Psycho' that's best if we pretend never happened. Whatever he went on to make there's no denying that this is one brilliant movie. Matt Dillon gives one of his strongest and most complex performances, and he is backed up by an equally impressive supporting cast of Kelly Lynch (easily her best role), the wonderful James LeGros ('Floundering'), future sex symbol Heather Graham ('Boogie Nights'), and quirky character actor fave Max Perlich ('Truth Or Consequences, NM'). Also keep an eye out for the shoulda-been-a-star James Remar ('The Warriors') and a cameo by the legendary William S. Burroughs as "the Priest". 'Drugstore Cowboy' has energy, humour, depth and honesty. I love it. A wonderful movie and highly recommended.
42 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
junkies on the run
mjneu5915 November 2010
Watching a quartet of teenage junkies rob pharmacies and get high may not be everyone's idea of a good time. But director Gus Van Sant looks beyond the desperate urge for another fix and finds a good deal of insight into the addict's pursuit of slow death in the fast lane, with Matt Dillon giving a memorable performance as the leader of the sometimes comically pathetic outlaw gang. Van Sant's unflinching depiction of the junkie lifestyle is entirely sympathetic but totally unsentimental, showing the non-conformist need for a high without ever glamorizing the drug culture. The episodic story is set (and with good reason) in the year 1971, after the mysticism of experimentation had long since become the grim reality of addiction, but it loses some momentum after Dillon enters a rehabilitation clinic, at which point the film attempts to express verbally what it already proved it could show visually. But the script never sells out for any tidy moral lesson, and the presence of Beat Generation icon William Burroughs in a small but notable cameo role lends a measure of credibility to Van Sant's intentions.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Please see below
Doctom19735 September 2009
This movie has much personal meaning to me. In 1990, I had the unfortunate pleasure to be incarcerated at the Northern Nevada Correctional Center in Stewart(Carson City, NV.) Yea, we had cable TV, and first run movies. This was one of them. After viewing the movie, I laughed w/ my co-horts about suing for copy right infringement. (joking, of coarse). My prison stint was drug related. but the interesting thing is: I and my girlfriend at the time made these sames moves:(Seizures and all)at a southwestern state small town where the Dilaudids were actually kept on the shelf.(1981-83)We hit this one pharmacy -3- times(largest haul:470 Dilaudids-1,2,3,and 4mg--Smallest: one bottle of 100 # 4's).I lived in Nevada all my life. I did several small stints in several prisons. In closing. I wanted to write this and note, it was a looong time ago. I have lived in Portland ,OR. now for 19 yrs. And I celebrated my -11- year clean anniversary date last Thurs. (8/28/09). After a medical detox, I hooked up w/ a local methadone prgm. and never looked back. It saved MY and my WIFE's life. Take from this what you will. But it's true and I still get a kick out of this movie and "my story" as it relates w/ it. I rarely tell it often. But I did want to post this message. Thank you for allowing me to express myself...Sincerely, doctom1973......
130 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Is This Dilaudid That I See Before Me?
rmax30482311 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Man, is this story familiar. A drug addict (a "polysubstance abuser" to your doctor) runs with some friends and lives the wild life from one high to the next. One companion ODs. The addict decides to go straight, leaves his loving but terminally addicted wife, enters a methadone program and gets a job, but his past catches up with him and he gets shot but, probably, will survive.

It has all the mythological constituents. Jack Lemon has been here before and Frank Sinatra and Al Pacino. And yet this is a movie of unusual originality. In fact, it's pretty good.

The script is well written, the direction individualized, and some of the performances are memorable.

There is a narration by Bob (Matt Dillon) that wobbles somewhere along the edge of insanity. The dialog brims over with irony. "A junkie will do anything to get over the problems of existence like tying your shoes in the morning," or something like that. "There seems to be no more room in the church for an elderly drug-addicted priest." "She left us an OD'd stiff which in this state is paramount to murder." (Paraphrases all, but it gives you the general idea.) It hardly matters how melodramatic the situation is because there is always a source of humor hidden somewhere inside it.

The direction can't be faulted either. Van Sandt not only moves the bodies around efficiently but know when to cut for maximum effect. At one point Dillon is in an attic trying to wrestle a dead body through an opening in order to pass it to his wife (Lynch) who is helping him from the room below. The corpse is dead weight and it slips out of his arms. He swears fiercely, there is a muffled thump, and when he peers out of the opening we see his wife pinned on the floor by the corpse. Now, there's nothing funny about maneuvering a dead body around, but if this had been a Laurel and Hardy movie and the object had been a piano? The temptation here must have been to show the body falling and Lynch collapsing under its weight, but the temptation to do it the easy way is avoided throughout the movie. Van Sandt inserts touches that aren't necessarily unique -- not after David Lynch -- but they are not overdone, they don't draw attention to themselves, and they tell us about the characters. If Van Sandt gives us closeups of drug vials early in the movie, he gives us closeups of a cup of tea after Dillon gets clean. Dillon's fantasies drift, sometimes computerized, across the screen -- double exposures of arrests and the bars of a jail cell, or dead leaves floating on water that somehow turn into silhouettes of people on horseback.

The performances are all good, but two are standouts. It's probably Matt Dillon's best performance. He has just hidden the dead body in the attic of a motel room and there is a knock on the door. He rushes to hide his stash and clean up, then opens the door to find the motel manager telling him he and his friends have to leave immediately because his room is reserved for a sheriff's convention. His expression hardly changes and yet we can see it morph from anxious concern to horror. He doesn't say a word.

I don't know whose idea it was to cast William S. Burroughs as the drug-addicted retired priest but it was inspired. He's unforgettable in his appearance, demeanor, and dialog (which he must himself have written). "Tom was a king," Dillon says of him. "Whenever he made a good score he made sure he passed it around to all the kids. His a** was covered in this life and the next." The first time we see him and Dillon meet in a crummy lobby, Burroughs twists slowly around in his seat (he's pretty old) and greets Dillon, saying, "That reminds me. I've been feeling a little sick lately. Are you holding?" I'm afraid I've made it sound like a comedy, but it isn't. The matter is a serious one and Van Sandt never really lets us forget it. It's just that he and the writers have brought a little Brechtian distance to the story that leaves us in awe of the foolishness and the humanity of the people we're watching.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
an unregarded masterpiece
meisterpuck20 January 2001
This is a period picture that takes place in 1971, but there are no references to Vietnam, the flower power movement, Kent State or any other issues or events of the day. This is because the characters have nothing to do with that world. Bob's thoughts revolve around drugstores like planets around the sun. His family of dope thieves lives in almost total isolation. Even junkies who come to do business are admitted to their home with reluctance and then rudely sent on their way. Their only contact with the "other" world is its drugstores and its cops. They live in a world not ruled by the authorities, but by "the dark forces that lie hidden beneath the surface, the ones that some people call superstitions: howling banshees, black cats, hats on beds, dogs, the evil eye..." In his world, Bob's lunatic logic makes perfect sense and serves him as a guide for living better than any "sane" worldview.

When the crew goes "crossroading" to the tune of "the Israelites" we realize that they, too, are like children of a different god; wanderers whose only contact with others is hostile confrontation. They are either "attacking" drug stores or being attacked by ball-breaking cops.

Kelly Lynch, who plays Diane, said in an interview that, "The first take was terrible and Matt (Dillon) said he wouldn't support the film." It is not surprising that a film this ambitious should run into some snags. A great film like "DC" is a tightrope act. The best scenes in the film are also the riskiest; they would have fallen apart in the hands of lesser actors.

If you like the film you might get a kick out of the autobiographical novel on which it is based, by James Fogle, the original drugstore cowboy. At the time of the film's release (1989) Fogle had spent "thirty-five of his fifty-three years in prison on drug-related charges." I wonder what ever became of him.
86 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A serious case of miscasting and lack of attention to the events of 1971 hamper what could have been a masterpiece
yaseminturkish28 April 2002
The most poignant scene in the film Drugstore Cowboy arrives in the opening moments when a drug-addicted foursome uses some skillful maneuvers to steal drugs from the local drugstore. The scenes that follow lack the quality of this interesting opening (rarely in film do addicts rob drug stores though it would seem to be a preferred method of acquiring their drugs) and we are left with a paint by numbers movie about addicts and the lengths that they will go to to protect their habits.

What did Roger Ebert see in this film that I couldn't? In every scene with Kelly Lynch as Dianne I had an incredible desire to watch paint dry. It was almost as though the casting directors were looking for Juliette Lewis or Winona Ryder but somehow ended up with Kelly Lynch. I never once believed that Dianne and Matt Dillon as Bob were married because Kelly Lynch looked older and more mature than him. It seemed that she was more of a bad mother than a wife to him. Matt Dillon did his best with a fairly one-dimensional character but once again it was almost as though the role was designed for someone else and the directors got stuck with Dillon. Heather Graham found herself in the position of being forced to play the role of a pathetic teenage drifter so that she could write it on her resume and go on to bigger and better things in Boogie Nights. I couldn't help but believe throughout the long two hours that the film would have packed a bigger punch if the casting directors had acquired Brad Pitt and Winona Ryder for the lead roles.

Drugstore Cowboy may have been somewhat thought-provoking in 1989 but it hardly deserves mention today when stacked up against Trainspotting and Requiem for a Dream. The film was set in 1971 and wouldn't it have been nice to find out why this foursome adored drugs so much? Was it the horrors of Vietnam that upset them? The high of being a product of the flower-child era? The movie refuses to delve into these issues and instead fixates itself solely on the premise that drugs cause damage but are the most important thing in the lives of the foursome. Perhaps the film would have been more entertaining and visionary if it had occurred to the writers and director to use the 1971 setting to explain the characters motivations. The so-called redemption of the Matt Dillon character is merely an attempt to end the movie at the 2 hour point rather than sooner and the scenes with the former drug addicted old man are trite and unnecessary. Drugstore Cowboy has aged badly and should only be viewed by those who use Roger Ebert's advice as their Bible for opinions on movies.

6/10
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I saw many, many people like these in the 1970's in San Francisco
jingster66626 November 2007
I lived in San Francisco all through the 1970's and saw tons of these kinds of people. They all tended to "group" together for the common purpose of scoring and getting high on any kind of drugs available, but the drug of choice always seemed to be heroin. These groups, or small communes, always tended to have a strong leader who ran the whole show for the group and issued "orders" like a drill sergeant, but interestingly, in a very "loving" way. And nobody ever seemed to question this leader. In fact, HE always seemed to be treated with complete deference (reverence???) as if HE were some kind of a star. Everybody in the group seemed to have a specific "job" to do within the group, and their jobs seemed to define their value to the group and, hence, their "right" to be there. Except for the fact that they existed in the general "hippy" milieu of the time, they never showed any signs of being interested in the presumed hippy world view. I always felt the groups simply represented highly efficient, small business concerns. These people were known thieves, drug dealers, and small-time con artists and, if left alone, they were not considered dangerous. In fact, they were typically very intelligent and interesting people, but very closed-off to the world outside their group. Each group was like its own little cult.

The group portrayed in Drugstore Cowboy would have fit in perfectly with what I remember from that time, except that there were typically more people in the groups than just four. I would say these groups numbered more like six to eight people, certainly enough to occupy a large flat or house in one of the cheap neighborhoods. The fact that the cost of living was so much cheaper back then allowed for this type of lifestyle. And it was only when the real estate boom in San Francisco in the mid-to-late 1970's precluded this type of communal existence (lease applications, leases, personal references, high deposits, etc.) that these "illegal" groups tended to disappear. The ease with which the group in DC moved from one living space to the other would become impossible due to these new economic and social realities (higher rents and stiffer rules). Yes, even in Portland.

Anyway, this movie really resonnated with me and triggered my memories of that time, and I think it's accurate to say that this is truly a "period piece." I'm certain that the DC group could have only existed in the early 1970's, and certainly no later than say 1974-5.

I have no idea why I felt compelled to write all this seeing as how it has very little to do with the movie, which I loved. Thank you!
86 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disappointing movie with half developed characters
hokiemo30 December 2003
The beginning of "Drugstore Cowboy" starts out well and the robberies are interesting, but that's all this movie has to offer. Matt Dillon acts well in the first half of the movie, but his acting deteriorates in the second half. His turnaround to the good life is not acted with enough emotion. The script is also poor so Dillon isn't totally to blame. On the plus side, Heather Graham does a fine job in the film and its too bad her part is so small.

A truly great film about the drug life is "Requiem for A Dream". That movie chews up and spits out "Drugstore Cowboy". Ellen Burstyn should have won the Oscar for Best Actress that year.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
As great as anything
Boyo-231 May 2000
This is easily Gus Van Sant's best movie and contains Matt Dillon's best performance. The other cast members are also terrific, but the part of "Bob" is greatly realized by Dillon and he shines. The movie is difficult to watch at times but you get something out of it to think about when its over. I also must mention a great scene between Lynch, Matt & Matt's mother, played by Grace Zabriskie. To top it all off, this is also Heather Graham's best movie and she delivers as well. A blues soundtrack and beautiful cinematography make this one to remember.
52 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting but a little dull
KnightsofNi1129 July 2012
Gus Van Sant's films all seem to be set at a different level of indie quality. That indie level usually seems to depend on the number of big name stars appear in the film. His films like Elephant or Paranoid Park star non-actors in leading roles, and they're some of the most experimental of his films. But the experimentation goes away slightly when stars like Matt Dillon or Kelly Lynch are introduced like in Van Sant's 1989 film Drugstore Cowboy. Drugstore Cowboy is about a group of junkies who spend their time robbing pharmacies so they can use the myriad of drugs available to get all sorts of new and crazy highs. But after a while the crew has to take their show on the road, and things quickly get complicated in this bleak real world drama that may or may not accurately capture the essence of drug addiction and the lengths some go to fuel said addiction.

I said the experimental reaches Gus Van Sant goes to are quelled slightly for this film, and they are, but there is still some interesting and trippy things going on. Van Sant employs a surreal quality to his whole film, capturing the character's highs as dream like mind trips with all sorts of hidden meanings that don't make a ton of sense. But then again, they don't entirely need to. The whole film has a somber and dream like quality to it that drives the whole story and is fuel for the characters motivations, what little motivation these characters have. It's a very strange and loose story about some very strange and loose people.

The problem with swathing this film with such a bleak and dreamy tone is that it makes Drugstore Cowboy kind of dull. It starts out with a lot of promise and plenty of potential. The film opens by interesting Matt Dillon's character, Bob, as he narrates an introduction to what he does and who he does it with. We then see one of their robberies take place in a tense and quiet moment. From there the plot starts to sink in as the characters lives grow more and more harrowing and the situations they find themselves in become increasingly grave. But at a certain point the film sort of plateaus and stops being interesting and you stop caring so much about the characters. I was never painfully bored with this film and I watched with a keen and interested eye all the way through, but I was by no means enthralled and the story didn't grip me like it should have.

Drugstore Cowboy is a very interesting film and it does plenty of things right. Unfortunately it's just a little boring, and the events that play out aren't terribly original, and I felt like I was just watching another reformed junkie film with a little bit of a Gus Van Sant twist. This is still a pretty decent film, but don't expect too terribly much from it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stiff acting and boring directing sink this one
Arsenic Drone30 May 2007
Matt Dillon seems to have improved as an actor over the course of his career. In this film about pharmaceutical drug use, Dillon has the majority of lines and is also the narrator. His performance is disarmingly wooden, and is a constant reminder that he is really an actor reciting his lines, rather than the character he is playing.

In Drugstore Cowboy, Dillon and his wife (played well enough by Kelly Lynch) rob drugstores with a younger couple (James LeGros and Heather Graham, who was actually not bad). The film is basically a story about how that lifestyle is not so simple. The story and the cinematography are both fine - plenty of gloomy shots when things aren't going well, and some beautiful shots of Oregon. However, the directing and editing seem to be off in a hard-to-quantify way. It's not particularly fast or slow, and not all that long at 100 minutes, but the pacing fails to pull the viewer in. The story is not overpowering, so it needs a directorial style which dwells on the atmosphere and feel, which it doesn't get. At times it starts to veer off nicely towards the somewhat surreal (for example, the "hex" scene). Most of the time though, it's very representational, simply presenting the facts, and that more slowly than it could.

As a side note, William S Burroughs was apparently not meant to be an actor, and the way in which his character exists only to make a point is frustratingly blatant. I think this appearance only diminishes him.
16 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A poignant but realistic look at the drug subculture
csm2318 May 2002
If you're one of the so-called `art-film' aficionados who was disappointed, as I was, by Requiem for a Dream (and even if you weren't), you'll love Drugstore Cowboy. Directed by the man who gave us such classics as To Die For and Good Will Hunting, Drugstore Cowboy is, without doubt, Van Sant's greatest work. It's a magnificent time capsule from the early seventies, having no reference to the Vietnam War, Kent State, or any other icon of the period. It's purely about the drug subculture.

Set along the affluent north Atlantic seaboard, where pharmacies and drugstores litter the urban landscape, the drama revolves around four friends who support their drug habits by robbing the official dispensaries of addictive substances. An interesting and compelling setup all by itself, in lesser hands, the script and action would be enough to produce a decent flick; but, it goes way beyond that. Matt Dillon gives what I think is his best performance ever, a perfectly charming substance abuser who has created a little cocoon of a world all to himself. Like little moons revolving around his dreamy and sometimes terrifying little world, the drugstores he stalks all promise a one-way trip to a different place. As viewers, we're all sucked in by the gravity of his world, such that we even begin to understand and believe his peculiar little superstitious rituals. In this special existence, they make sense. To transgress against the rules is to court disaster. And like Adam in the garden, he eventually breaks his own rules, and pays the price.

But it's a fortunate fall from grace. Drugstore Cowboy is completely realistic in its portrayal of the full-blown addict's hitting rock bottom, an experience that is foundational in the wisdom of AA. The recovery scenes are moving in their sincerity and simplicity, none of which is sugarcoated or saccharine. And yet, the recovery scenes are both joyous and heartbreakingly poignant. God, what a great movie.
24 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dope-fiends robbing drugstores
The_Void6 July 2006
I've got to admit that I don't rate Gus Van Sant very highly. Most of his films are disappointing; and, of course, he was also the man responsible for the entirely pointless Psycho remake - but Drugstore Cowboy is a major highlight of his filmography, and a film that I wouldn't hesitate to name as the best that he's directed. Drugstore Cowboy takes place in the seventies, and is a story of a self confessed 'dope-fiend'. Bob is a man wrapped up in superstitions, and a man that cares for little outside of where his next fix is going to come from. Along with a small group of like-minded friends, Bob robs pharmacies. However, his life changes when he believes that he's been hexed. The plot sticks closely to its subject material; and the director and cast do well in aptly portraying the mind of a drug user, whether it be through pseudo-dream sequences or the actions of the central protagonists. Following a man that robs drugstores isn't the most obvious base for a film; but it provides a good point of view for a story like this, and this film is almost completely successful throughout.

Gus Van Sant appears to enjoy making films with documentary elements; 1995's To Die For is key in this respect, but there are several instances where it appears that Drugstore Cowboy is attempting to analyse it's characters from a documentary standpoint. Lead actor Matt Dillon has had a varied career, and many of his films haven't been the best. He can, however, be very proud of his lead performance here. Dillon looks the part that he's meant to be playing, as his good looks brilliantly offset the 'in the gutter' character and his acting talent, which has never been under question if you ask me, is allowed to shine through also. The rest of the cast don't stand out over the lead; although it's worth noting that this film features an early performance from Heather Graham. The atmosphere of the movie is gritty and dirty, and this is helped along by the grainy film stock that the movie has been shot on. The locations are well used also, and Van Sant ensures that the film takes place in the sort of atmosphere you would associate with junkies. Overall, this film is a good dissection of drugs and drug users and comes recommended.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent story of a junkie who tries to straighten out his life, only to find out that things aren't much better than they were before.
Anonymous_Maxine20 December 2002
Matt Dillon delivers one of the best performances of his career in Drugstore Cowboy, a gritty film about the real life of junkies. There is heavy drug content in this film, but in no way is the drug life glorified. We see the more realistic life of drugs on the streets, which is probably what makes this such an aesthetically unpleasing film. No one in the movie looks good, it has just about as much ugliness as a spectacularly ugly movie like Buffalo '66, which enhances the realism of the film. Much of the film is shot in a documentary style, giving it a gritty, realistic feel, almost like a twisted home movie.

Dillon plays the part of Bob, a young junkie in the early 1970s who goes around with his group of friends breaking into pharmacies and drug stores and stealing random bottles of prescription bottles looking for their next high. The movie starts at the end of the story, with Bob riding in an ambulance and telling us the story of how he got there, but has the pleasing distinction of not leading you exactly to where you knew you were going to be. Even by showing the end of the story there is nothing given away. This is a powerful drug film that doesn't hold anything back. It is not pretty to look at, but also like Buffalo '66, it's hideously unattractive counterpart, the movie has something to say.
43 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Low key junkie flick
youngcollind7 May 2021
We all know the arc of a drug addict movie; drugs are fun, until they're not. Drugstore Cowboy keeps the stakes low and calmly drifts along with aloof swagger, not opting for Requiem for a Dream level theatrics. So what it gains by not being over the top, it loses in truly gripping drama. Points for a near autobiographical cameo in what would be the twilight years of William S. Boroughs' life.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent look at a subculture. This film grows in stature over time.
jjvmadden24 July 2008
Drugstore Cowboy takes a look an element of the drug/crime subculture without glamorising, sensationalising or demonising it. I honestly can't think of another film on a similar subject that has managed to pull off this balance so successfully.

We care about the characters, but are completely aware of their (many) flaws. We are shown that drugs are pleasurable, but given a realistic portrayal of the great damage they can do. The crime scenes are exciting but we never lose sight of how risky and sometimes pathetic the crimes are.

This film is moral without moralising and humane without romanticising or sentimentalising the subject. Drugstore Cowboy may lack the visceral punch of a film like Trainspotting, but has a subtlety, depth and heart missing from other more voyeuristic cinematic treatments of drug use.
30 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
good one from gus v.s.
ksf-223 July 2022
Another film directed by the awesome gus van sant. In 1971 portland. Matt dillon, kelly lynch. Bob and his crew knock over the local pharmacies for pills. We can tell when bob is tripping... trees and animals go flying across the screen. They keep making sloppy mistakes, as they try to stay one step ahead of the cops. It doesn't help that bob is superstitious, and they keep on jinxing themselves with bad luck. Or maybe its just because they make really bad decisions. He wants to get into a rehab program, but he's also smart enough to know the challenges he is facing. This one is much more finished and professional than mala noche, an earlier film by gvs. Pretty good stuff. Based on the story by james fogle.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent Film
SupremeMovieKing16 May 2020
Excellent movie that stands the test of time and is likely even more relevant today than when it was made. Not exactly a feel good flick but if you're in the mood for a little depressing drama, this movie will not disappoint. Excellent characters, script, and acting. Matt Dillion crushes this role and a young Heather Graham is icing on the cake. Really a well done film across the board, definitely worth seeing
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Off-beat, visionary
gcd705 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Off-beat, visionary film about dope fiend Dillon and his group of misfit drug addicts who go from drug store to drug store looking for the ultimate high. Gus Van Sant's critically acclaimed picture tells the story very well, with good performances from all his lead players. The plot is never riveting, but Van Sant gets you interested early and keeps you so throughout. "Cowboy" is a short film, either due to excessive editing, or the fact that Van Sant ran out of material, probably the more likely of the two.

The definite highlight of the movie is the visual and original cinematography, as we are confronted with some detailed and different camera shots. Worth a look.

Wednesday, April 15, 1992 - Video
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
great work from all 4 actors and creative style from Van Sant
SnoopyStyle15 November 2015
It's 1971 American Northwest. Rob (Matt Dillon), his girlfriend Dianne (Kelly Lynch), his second Rick (James Le Gros) and Rick's girl Nadine (Heather Graham) are all drug addicts. They rob drugstores with well planned schemes. Federal agent Gentry (James Remar) stakes out the group waiting for them to slip up.

Director Gus Van Sant brings a jazzy hypnotic sense to the feel of being on drugs. He infuses the movie with an off-center sense of humor. The four leads all contribute some great work. Matt Dillon is a terrific lead. Kelly Lynch is a perfect match. She has the same power without the manic personality of Dillon. James Le Gros is a great second and Heather Graham is build to be a victim in this movie.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Drugstore Cowboy
jboothmillard21 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
From director Gus Van Sant (My Own Private Idaho, Good Will Hunting), I am sure that I tried of few minutes of this film and got bored, but having remembered the title for so long I was definitely willing to give it more of a chance. Basically highly suspicious Bob Hughes (Matt Dillon) and his wife Dianne (Kelly Lynch) are drug addicts, and are love doing various pharmaceutical drugs, like dilaudid, morphine and cocaine, and keep their habit going they and another couple often steal from pharmacies. They are aware a police officer is getting too close for comfort for them, so they move their operation to another town, but it isn't long after doing this that one of the crew overdoses and dies. They unintentionally have checked into a hotel where a sheriff's convention is taking place, but they do have to move the body from out of the hotel room to into their car, they narrowly avoid getting caught doing this. Believing his warnings is what caused the incident Bob decides he does need help, but he is too scared to join any methadone or any kind of drug eliminating program. Worse comes when junkies he saw earlier ambush his apartment and try to score drugs, and having decided to go straight he doesn't have anything for them to take, so they beat up and then shoot him, but in the end he lives long enough for an ambulance to take him away. Also starring James Remar as Gentry, James Le Gros as Rick, Heather Graham as Nadine, Beah Richards as Drug Counselor, Grace Zabriskie as Bob's Mother and Max Perlich as David. Dillon does well as the junkie who finds it very difficult to let go of his addiction and then later to even try to kick it, I admit I didn't feel as enraptured in this story like I did with Trainspotting, but the drug taking culture is definitely emphasised, not in a judgemental way, and there is interesting provocative material, so all in all it is a worthwhile drama. Very good!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dreadful Movie, Poorly Done: Possible Spoilers
gelman@attglobal.net10 July 2009
Virginia Wolff committed suicide by loading her pockets with stones and wading into a stream. Would that some would-be suicide could round up all copies of "Drugstore Cowboy," load them into a sack and jump into the Mariana Trench with the sack tied to his or her body. It's not just the unpleasant subject matter, which others have described as "realistic." This film-goer can handle realistic. But the movie has the worst acting, especially by Matt Dillon as the principal character, of any that I can recollect. It was made 20 years ago by Gus Van Sant and both he and Dillon have learned a lot in the interim. But Dillon does nothing with his character that is remotely interesting. His decision to enter rehab is unexplained, except in retrospect, and it is totally unconvincing. Among the other characters, only Heather Graham displays any acting talent (in a relatively undemanding role). Kelly Lynch could have been replaced by a department store clothing dummy. As for Van Sant, the best that can be said is that his name was prettily displayed in the credits.
15 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed