Jaadugar (1989) Poster

(1989)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
The Clash of Jaadugars
nadkarnisumeet25 August 2020
Jaadugar review :

1989 was a pretty bad year for Amitabh Bachchan. He started the year on a sour note with Gangaa Jamunaa Saraswathi (GJS) ( released December 23rd 1988) crashing at the box office in its second week. Director Manmohan Desai (MKD) was particularly devastated by its failure and decided to postpone his son Ketan's Toofan initially scheduled for February release.

MKD requested a reshoot from Amitabh as he wanted to make certain changes to Toofan's screenplay particularly downplaying the lost and found angle after GJS failure. Amitabh couldnt refuse..

At the same time, Prakash Mehra was filming Jaadugar aiming for a mid year release. Amitabh was simultaneously shooting both the films and it was slowly turning in to a race as to who would release first.

Toofan made it to theatres on 11th August. Not a bad film for 89, it took a good opening but slumped in its second week due to new release Elaan-E-Jung hogging the show. Jaadugar arrived a week later on 25th August and bombed badly. Toofan was also declared an underperformer by that time.

What was appalling was that Amitabh Bachchan played magician in both the films. Toofan was about a superhero and his twin brother Shyam jaadugar while Prakash Mehra's Jaadugar had magician Goga exposing the fake godman Amrish Puri. As if that was not enough, the characters of Shyam and Goga were similar in nature - humourous, flirtatious and talkative.

Expectedly, the print media accused Amitabh of sabotaging both MKD and Prakash Mehra and held him morally responsible for this mess. Prakash Mehra gave stinging interviews stating that MKD had pinched not just his titular character but even some of his magic tricks. He also lambasted Amitabh for hiding the fact that he was playing magician in both the films.

Amitabh Bachchan, in one of his interviews, clarified that as a professional, he never questioned his directors nor divulged any details about his films.

Jaadugar ended Prakash Mehra's successful jodi with Amitabh (they made hits like Zanjeer, Hera Pheri, Muqaddar Ka Sikandar, Laawaris, Namak Halaal, Sharaabi together) and they never worked again. Mehra turned to Anil Kapoor for his Zindagi Ek Juaa (1991) and Mithunda for Dalaal (1993). Similarly, Manmohan Desai didnt make a film with Amitabh again and the last film under his banner was Rishi Kapoor's Anmol (1993) which released a few months before his death.

Personally, out of the two, I prefer Toofan as it has its moments of fun and the superhero concept appealed to the kid in me. Goga Kapoor asking for a matchstick every day for fourteen years in order to escape jail was also an interesting element by writer Salim Khan. "Dont worry be happy" albeit copied, is one of my favorite songs of Bachchan.

As for Jaadugar, it was arguably the worst film made by Prakash Mehra with bad editing and some cringeworthy songs like "Padosan apni murgi ko rakhna sambhaal". Having said that, its basic theme of fake godmen influenced a lot of later hits like OMG : Oh My God (2012) and PK (2014).

Regards, Sumeet Nadkarni
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No Jaadu! (Magician without Magic)
ArvindVyas17 March 2004
Bad script! Bad Direction! Things gone haywire!

Prakash Mehra and Amitabh Bachchan made a very good pair in past. Great entertainment in history. The movie could have been a good one, considering it had a novel theme. A Fake Godman (Amrish Puri) exposed and in turn defeated by a magician (Amitabh Bachchan) in his own game! The icing was the magician is brought to game by none other than the son of the Godman (Aditya Pancholi).

But the script was lost, at times songs and dialogue become vulgure. Acting is average and the movie, it appears was made only for the front benchers, and was perhaps even rejected by them.

There are some shades of past brillience, on screen its not worth, but on vedio / DVD - thanks to technology - we can fast forward what we don't like. This movie perhaps can be watched in double quick time.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A classic stink!
vsathe20 May 2006
This movie is a classic example of the terrible movies Amitabh acted in late 80's. Really childish, overacted and long movie. About the only thing notable about this movie is the title song sung by Kumar Sanu marks his entry in Hindi movie industry in a big way (he had a couple of stints before it.)

If you liked "Shahenshah" there is a chance you might like this movie. Songs are so-so, acting is mediocre. There is too much silly/bad Amitabh in this movie even for an Amitabh fan like me. I watched this movie in theater when it came out and had to force myself to stay in there only because I had paid 7 bucks to watch it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blindness is Everywhere !
elshikh41 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is a case where you have to respect the movie's idea and message, but not the movie itself!

At that point, the Masala was living a sparkling era in the Indian cinema. (Amitabh Bachchan) and (Amrish Puri) were the perfect lion and tiger. And melodrama was the boss. This time, the same elements, without much melodrama, were used for something else, something more serious. The movie is about the deception under the name of god, and turning religion into business. The intro of the story is so right; an encounter between a simple magician who wants to entertain people, and a dangerous quack who wants to rob people. Just the idea is catchy when the first wages war against the last, and by his very own weapon; smart quackery. So far, so great. However, the rest isn't!

The first half is a strangely inserted romantic comedy, so boring and ridiculous, starring (Bachchan) and (Jayapradha). Then, we come to the basic story, which the movie was made for, where the naivety rules and wins.

Don't ask about motives, because this is a massacre of motives; why this magician, a helpless womanizer, becomes a sacrificing man, who gives all of his money to rescue this village? Why (Pran) hates (Puri) so much? How the son of (Puri) believes so easily that (Bachchan) is becoming another quack? And so on.

The movie is extremely poor, with nothing sharp along the way. The magical games between the 2 teams are campy at best. The dealing with the idea is low. Some events can't be taking place in a kids' show; such as the fake murder of (Pran)'s character, then framing it to (Puri). The transforming of (Puri)'s henchman, who went to kill (Bachchan), by only a loud speech is laughable. Cutting off the hands of (Puri) later is even more laughable. The dialogue seems like something written in 2 days. It's wholly as direct and dry as public service announcement, however less convincing!

Add to that, the talented star (Amrita Singh) is so wasted, a male sidekick would have been more useful than her! (Aditya Pancholi) isn't powerful, being the least interesting factor. (Jayapradha) and (Bachchan) himself are ghosts in a weak drama, rather heavy guests in a light ad. (Puri) does fine as the evil man because he always does fine as the evil man, whatever the movies' quality!

Except the first number of (Bachchan) as a dazzling entertainer, a few - and I mean a few - comic moments, along with the main good intention--this is emaciated and forgettable. (Bachchan) needed so much to change the taste of his roles and movies at the time, let alone passing the failure of his previous ones (Gangaa Jamunaa Saraswathi - 1988) and (Toofan - 1989). However, the thing that he didn't need at all is (Jaadugar). It is something rare, sorrowfully not as a meaningful comedy, but as a self-destructive one! Selecting to work in movies made by that level is sure why this phase of the big B is now descried as the end of his career as the one and only leading man of the Indian cinema once.

As you see, the blindness of some kind people, due to their ignorance and foolishness, could hurt them.. in and outside the movie!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed