Small Sacrifices (TV Mini Series 1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Very well done on all levels.
triple86 January 2005
I had read the book, and have to say the movie, for the most part, is very similar and is just done very well. Everything from the acting, to the directing etc etc, is superb. This movie is, sadly, a true story. It stands at 4 hours or so but it always keeps your interest. Farrah Fawcett loses herself in her character, and I have to say, I don't see how this movie can be watched, without the watcher coming away with a very healthy respect for Ms. Fawcett.This true life story is so disturbing, the thought has to flash through your mind whether you can sit through a 4 hour drama about it, and although of coarse some scenes are extremely difficult to watch, as you'd expect them to be, this movie is not something you can turn away from once it's on and is both shocking and horrifying.

It is directed and acted on a level as good as major big screen releases and the character development is great as well. There isn't one bad piece of acting in the movie and this Is the best I've ever seen Fawcett.
34 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fawcett is compelling and convincing as a cold-blooded killer...
moonspinner555 May 2002
After playing TV-movie victims for years, Farrah Fawcett is terrifically good (almost surprisingly so) cast as real-life child-killer Diane Downs, who tried to convince the police she and her kids were victims one night of a car-jacker with a gun. One is tempted to go on and on about Fawcett's multi-layered portrayal of a sociopath, yet this is a long movie--four hours with commercials--and Farrah has the burden of it resting on her performance (she carries it off with gusto). Ryan O'Neal is very strong, too, playing the lover who doesn't return her affections. A sad, violent story, but told with an intense, focused energy which makes it completely absorbing and ultimately moving. Farrah does Emmy-worthy work.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A cut above the rest.
CindyH11 May 2002
Today, we've been true-crimed to death. Yet, this story was one of the firsts of it's kind and not to mention the best. Akin to Burning Bed, Fawcett rings in an absolute superb performance as she realistically and accurately portrays the sociopath known as Diane Downs. The movie carefully plots the turn of events without over dramatizing. The moving portrayal of Christie Downs (known as Karen Downs in the series) is quite haunting. Many true crime dramas leave me with a taste of ratings-desperation in my mouth. The focus of these are not feelings but instead dramatic effects. This series however was much different. What you find here is Diane's self-centeredness and apparent inability to feel sorrow contrasted with a child who, even without speaking, manages to convey a fear of her mother as well as true love for her in a very tender heart wrenching way. While this description may very well sound overly dramatic it truly isn't. This is just such a well made series. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of Farrah's best performances
Sylviastel27 June 2003
I watched Small Sacrifices again just recently after many years. Farrah Fawcett should have got an Emmy for that portrayal of Diane Downs. Her performance in this mini-series is incredible and the fact that the mini-series follows the book closely. Ann Rule's book of this horrible crime leaves you wanting more. So much that I reread the book again. Farrah should be honored for such a fabulous performance. Just watch her in the Burning Bed as a battered wife. Farrah Fawcett headlines Small Sacrifices but everybody else in the film including John Shea who plays the District Attorney and her then real-life lover, Ryan O'Neal, plays Diane Down's married lover who does not want children and would help the police convict his former lover. Ryan, John, and even Gordon Clapp are all wonderful and memorable in their roles. They do not make television mini-series like they used to anymore with cable making the movies for television. If this film was released in the cinema, Farrah would have been nominated for an Oscar for this role. She probably would have won the award!
27 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Excellent True Crime movie about a woman who tries to kill her kids to get a man.
freebird-102 September 2001
Here's TV doing true crime the way it should be done--slowly unfolding plot through character, threading the cops and perps stories together, good courtroom drama--it's spellbinding. Farrah Fawcett is exceptional as Diane Downs, the woman who manages to kill one out of three kids. The two surviving kids are also stand-outs, especially the small daughter who must choose whether or not to testify against the monstrously narcissistic Downs. John Shea is also good as the D.A. A must-see for crime buffs.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The most outrageous crime drama that I have ever seen!
cinemakim20 August 2004
Two thumbs up to Farah Fawcett, Ryan O'Neal and the ever talented John Shea.

So much for being a dumb blonde - Farah rocked. She took being "unfit" to a whole new level. I thought I had seen the best in her in "Extremities" but she once again showed the "acting world" that she is a force to be reckoned with. Ryan has still got the good looks and the acting to go with it.

John Shea's portrayal of the Prosecutor was RIGHT ON! He exhibited a determination that wasn't his job . . . . it simply was the right thing to do for the protection of the children.

A must have for a movie collector (it needs to be in DVD form also)!
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A great film about a sickening crime
cosmic_quest15 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is a film based on a story that defies belief that someone, especially a mother, could be so cruel. Based on a true story that occurred in 1983, a wounded Diane Downs claims that she and her children were attacked by an armed man leaving her eight-year-old daughter in a coma, her three-year-old son paralysed and her five-year-old daughter dead. But DA Frank Joziak and Detective Doug Welch aren't convince and build evidence that proves the person who shot the children was Diane herself.

The actors in this film all give great effort in bringing this shocking story to life. Farrah Fawcett is excellent as the pathological liar that is Diane Downs, portraying the role as a woman almost bored with motherhood. John Shea's Joziak was nicely depicted with a sense of warmth, determination and anger for what he knows Downs did while a young Emily Perkins gives a strong performance as the deeply traumatised Karen Downs, the eight-year-old who awakens from a coma with the knowledge of what her mother did.

This film is fascinating on a level that will shock and disgust the viewers as it is reveals just how insidious and self-obsessed Diane Downs is, how she tries to lie her way out of the court case and the reasons for why a mother would commit a monstrous crime upon her own small children. The story is sickening but it is one that should be told, if only to emphasis to people why Downs should never be allowed to be free.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Farrah Fawcett shines in this compelling drama!!!!
kennyg26428 January 2007
Farrah Fawcett plays Diane Downs,a woman who shoots three of her kids in order to be free of them so she can be with a man who simply doesn't want kids. This movie is a two-part movie, Farrah keeps your attention and gives a powerful performance. The movie is based on Ann Rules book. Ryan has a small but interesting role in this film, and John Shea is awesome in this movie as district attorney Frank Joziak, who's interaction with Diane's daughter Karen is troubling and moving at the same time. Diane Downs is convicted and sent to prison where she escapes and is later caught and returned to prison. Her narcissism throughout the whole story is sad, but more pathetic.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Performance by Fawcett
whpratt114 August 2006
Enjoyed viewing Gordon Clapp,(Detective Doug Welch),"Splendor Falls",'99,)(NYPDBLUE), who starred in this picture and really gave Farrah Fawcett,(Diane Downs),"The Cookout",'04, a very hard time because of things that happened to her very own children. This story is about a Diane Downs who is desperately seeking to find true love in her life and winds up going from one husband to another and plenty of one night stands. Diane claims that her very own father molested her many times and gave her very little attention except for sexual advances. This story goes into great detail about all her affairs and there is a very long trial which Diane has to encounter. Farrah Fawcett gave an outstanding performance and I wish she would perform in many more pictures.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another amazing performance by Farrah
herrick41619 December 2018
Just when you think Farrah can play an incredibly sympathetic passive victim (the Burning Bed) or a victim turned enraged avenger (extremities) here comes a sociopathic monster you'd like to strangle for her arrogance and cruelty This is the best characterization I've ever seen from a once pretty face who turned heads with her beauty and serious ability to act. We miss her since we lost her far too early This is based on a true story and fascinating look at the antithesis of motherhood.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
hungry like the wolf
SteveSkafte29 October 2010
The TV movie format has been used endlessly to depict true crime stories, from parents who kill their children, to children who kill their parents, to rape, to theft, to abuse. I myself saw two or three similar films just last week. So what makes a rather unassuming TV movie from 1989 like "Small Sacrifices" stand out so much? It's hard to say. Certainly the acting has a lot to offer. Farrah Fawcett, Ryan O'Neal, and John Shea - three well-known actors whom I was familiar with but never previously cared for - are the dramatic core of the script. They all perform well beyond expectations. Fawcett, for example, who I would've thought incapable of such depth, is alternately terrifying and emotionally unhinged. It's a breathtaking performance. The real surprise, however, is young Emily Perkins. Or not such a surprise for me, because I'd been familiar with her heartbreaking role in the last four seasons of "Da Vinci's Inquest". But even at the tender age of twelve, she is a fully realized actress of incredible range. Her testimony on the stand is so emotional that it left me in tears. This is a performance without cliché.

"Small Sacrifices" isn't yet another painful exercise in domestic unrest, like it might appear to be on the surface. David Greene seems very aware of what he wants to get out his film here, and he directs the human interaction brilliantly. It's a hard film, sure - really hard - but powerfully dramatic. One of the best of its kind.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Farrah Fawcett Gives a Superb Acting Job in This Film!
BreanneB12 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I have been a fan of Farrah Fawcett ever since I first saw her performance in "The Burning Bed." She no doubt plays just as good in this film. I was sad when she died.

I'm going to read the book that this movie is based on. Diane Downs was an eccentric, enigmatic, cold-hearted selfish person who would stop at nothing to get what she wanted. She even went to the extreme of killing her one daughter and trying to kill her other daughter and her son just so she could be with a man. Scummy bitch.

Of course when she is questioned by the authorities she gives them this bogus story that when her and her kids were driving down a dark road some bushy haired guy flagged them down claiming to need help. She also tells them that he then brandished a gun and fired at them. How ridiculous is that? Nobody would stop on a dark street in the middle of nowhere and let a total stranger get near them like she claimed.

Diane got away with it for awhile but she finally got caught, thank God. Also, I'm glad she was sentenced to two life terms plus some other additional time. She deserves it. I'm also happy that the DA in that case adopted her two surviving children. They deserve loving and caring parents, not a scumbag like her.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Farrah's Powerhouse Performance makes this one work...
Isaac585522 May 2007
Farrah Fawcett's Emmy-nominated performance is the centerpiece of SMALL SACRIFICES, a riveting, ABC mini-series based on the true story of Diane Downs, a cold-blooded woman who was sent to jail for murdering two of her three children. This teleplay presents Downs as the lonely, divorced working mother of three who appears on the outside to be a devoted and loving mother but as no qualms about putting her own needs first when the opportunity presents itself. While working at a post office, Diane begins a romance with one of her co-workers, Lew Lewiston (Ryan O'Neal)and things are going well until Diane learns that Lew doesn't like kids and has no desire to be a stepfather so Diane decides to kill her children. Fortunately, her daughter, somehow survives the brutal shooting and is taken into protective custody not only to protect her from further harm by her mother but to use her to help build a case to convict her mother. Fawcett gives the performance of her career...an icy, heartless bitch who shouts of her innocence throughout the proceedings, even though all evidence points to her and has the nerve to be baffled by the fact that her daughter wants nothing to do with her. O'Neal's role here is more in the way of stunt casting as he was Fawcett's real life romance at the time and is wasted in a thankless role, but there are two solid performances from John Shea and Gordon Clapp as the two police detectives caught in the deadly cat and mouse game of trying to slip Diane up in order to nail her for this horrendous crime. Despite it's almost three-hour length, I found this movie fascinating from start to finish, thanks primarily to a powerhouse performance from Farrah Fawcett who got the role of her career and ran with it.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Predictable TV formulas spoil the result
khatcher-215 April 2002
I was drawn to watching this TV film as seeing the main actors were Farrah Fawcett and Ryan O'Neal, I was misguided into thinking it would be a good evening's viewing.

I say that, not because either of these actors played their parts badly; indeed, O'Neal only has a rather small part. Having such good actors, and John Shea was rather good, it would have been befitting if the film had moulded itself to a different architecture: the so predictable style for television films made all acting concepts be limited to the same formula. Thus, frequently, Ms. Fawcett tended to overact rather than interpret the complicated characteriology of Diane Downs.

The unfolding of the story, the telling of it, and the directing was so glued to preset standardised TV formulas, that there was very little any of the actors or anybody else could have done to add more depth and realism to the job. The end result, therefore, is as disappointing as the predictability: unadventurous and trite and no surprises anywhere to help it along.
4 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Farrah Fawcett Gives a Great Performance as Diane Downs!
dhainline124 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Small Sacrifices" is based on the story of Elizabeth Diane Downs aka Diane Downs who shot her 2 daughters and 1 son in 1983 on a lonely country road while she was driving the kids home from a friend's house late at night. Diane said time and again a strange man with shaggy hair came out of the shadows and demanded her car. When she refused, he shot her sleeping children. In the book by Ann Rule, the kids are named Christie, Cheryl and Danny. In this treatment, they go under the aliases of Karen, Shauna and Robbie. In a way this confuses me because the real names of the kids are in the well-known book and in the TV movie of the same title they go under other names and everyone can find the real names by reading the book!

Mild criticism aside, this movie shows another great performance by the late, wonderful Farrah Fawcett! She is so good as the narcissistic, sociopathic Diane Downs who wanted her new boyfried, Lew Lewiston (Ryan O'Neal) to be a father to the kids even though he went the permanent route of ensuring he would never have children by getting a vasectomy. After his rejection, Diane basically loses it and writes him letters proclaiming her love for the married Lew. This was the catalyst for the shooting of the three children by their mom.

All the performers are great in this movie! John Shea goes toe-to-toe with Farrah as Frank Joziak the prosecutor and he really cares about her children. A very young Emily Perkins is also wonderful as the traumatized Karen who saw her mother shot her brother and sister and her. She is the one who testifies against her mother because Shauna was shot to death and while Robbie was paralyzed by the bullet, he was too young to testify in court. Next to "The Burning Bed" Farrah has another winner in the TV movie arena!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
great acting by Farrah Fawcett...
AlsExGal20 August 2023
... and that's not to say that the rest of the production and cast are not top notch.

The film starts with Diane Downs (Farrah Fawcett) arriving at the hospital with a bullet in her arm and her three children seriously wounded. The fact is that the middle child is already dead, but that is not known at this point. Diane tells a tale of a "bushy haired stranger" who came up to her while she was parked on a lonely road, said he wanted to steal her car, and then just shot her and her children. The police are called in to begin investigating as well as one ADA Frank Joziak (John Shea). But as the investigation continues there are inconsistencies in Diane's story and suspicion begins to fall more on her. Her two surviving children, have injuries that will last a lifetime. Robby, 3, will be permanently paralyzed from the waist down. The oldest daughter, Karen, 8, is old enough to say what happened, but she has had a stroke from blood loss and cannot speak. This may or may not resolve with time. When Diane comes to her bedside and speaks to the unconscious sedated girl, her pulse and blood pressure rise dramatically, indicating she is fearful. Why?

All of the performances were good here, especially the child actress playing Karen, whose account of what happened that night is of key importance. But Farrah Fawcett is extraordinary portraying the complex sociopath Diane Downs who wants what she wants when she wants it. She is clingy, rather scary when told No, and lies like a carpet to the point I think that she believed her lies. For example, she says she gave up medical school for her married ex-lover when she is in fact a high school dropout who couldn't concentrate long enough to get through night school.

The earliest thing I remember seeing Farrah Fawcett doing was "Murder on Flight 502" in 1975, and she wasn't very good in it. Or more precisely, she just had no presence. 14 years later her performance makes this film.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So sad, but a great crime drama
Smells_Like_Cheese27 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
After watching a 20/20 program about Dianne Downs, they had played a little clip from the movie Small Sacrifices. I was absolutely horrified by this story, I couldn't believe how a mother could so coldly shoot her children and almost without thinking twice about it. But the movie had me intrigued, it's been over a year since Fawcett's tragic death, I heard that this was one of her finest performances so I decided to go ahead and check out the movie. Knowing before what the outcome was going to be, I just hoped that Small Sacrifices wasn't going to romanticize what happened as it was discovered that Dianne's motive was due to wanting her boyfriend to love her back. Hollywood sometimes likes to do damage to real life tragedies, but it turns out that they actually over all did it right this time and showed the true heart break that came from this story but ended up leaving with a little hope.

On 19 May 1983, Dianne Downs drove to the hospital with a gunshot wound to her arm and her three bloody children. She claimed that an unknown assailant attempted to carjack her and shot her the children: Karen, Shauna, and Robby. Shauna was dead on arrival at the hospital. Eldest daughter Karen was badly injured, but survived suffering a temporary loss of speech due to a stroke after the shooting, but recovered sufficiently to serve as a witness in court against her mother. Diane's son was paralyzed from the chest down. Downs was eventually tried and convicted of murder, attempted murder, and assault. Downs had started a romance with a man, but he discontinued the relationship as he did not want children. Downs planned to kill her children to be free to pursue this relationship. Going to show the small sacrifices she had to make for the man she loved.

I can't imagine what pain Farrah went through to channel this performance for this evil woman, she gave such an incredible performance, I was absolutely amazed. It's so sad she never made it really to the big screen, she was a true talent and beauty. The children actors also did a terrific job, Emily Perkins as Karen was great. I remembered her from the TV Mini Series IT where she pulled in a good performance, I'm surprised that she's not a bigger name now, but who knows the reason behind that. I'm glad they didn't glamour the story up, it was pretty hard to watch. I'm not sure if Small Sacrifices should have been as long as it was and I'm a little disappointed they skipped over Dianne's clumsy videos of her reenacting the carjacking, how she's laughing and giggling while her children are barely holding onto life in the hospital and one's life is lost. I thought that was one of the major keys into her being a suspect of her children's injuries and death.

However this was a good movie, I would recommend it if you are interested in murderers or the story of Dianne Downs and her children. Watching the updates on the news to find out that her children are now doing fine and have moved on was wonderful, but so sad that they have to live with the fact that their mother wanted to take their lives for such a petty reason. Farrah gave a great performance and the film was well done and very realistic, not for the faint of heart. Much love and happy thoughts towards her children and the family that they will never have to go through this pain again and that Downs is locked away where she should be.

7/10
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Small Sacrifices
a_baron6 December 2018
Like "To Catch A Killer" (about John Gacy) and "Karla" (about Karla Homolka), this lengthy television film was not made to simply entertain. Farrah Fawcett's film and television career was largely celluloid trash, but here she turns in a stellar performance alongside her real life lover Ryan O'Neal as the mother who quite cynically murdered one of her young daughters and came within an inch of murdering both the other one and her son.

This eponymous film is based on the book by Ann Rule, a friend and colleague of serial killer Ted Bundy who turned to writing non-fiction crime books after she realised the shocking truth about "The Stranger Beside Me". This book is based in turn on Diane Downs who committed her shocking crimes one dark night in May 1983 and attempted to palm them off on a mysterious stranger. Not mentioned here due to chronology is the testimony of Dan Newby who claimed the real killer was a man named Jim Haynes. Nor the fact that the father of Elizabeth Diane Downs who was accused in court of sexually abusing her as a child, remained a passionate believer in his daughter's innocence. Downs would later recant, but that accusation and her other behaviour reveal her as a clever and quite cynical manipulator of especially men.

A Change Dot Org petition several years ago calling for the release of Downs attracted only 25 supporters, and her appeals have led nowhere. No one but the gullible need have any doubts about her guilt, especially in view of the competent living witness, and that's before we mention the forensic evidence, which was also mentioned in the film, including a mock up of the murder scene that was used in the actual courtroom.

Downs has been compared with Susan Smith, who a decade later murdered her two young sons from a similar motive, but the none-too-bright Smith is not in the same league as this sensuous, highly intelligent sociopath.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Fugitive From A Puzzle Factory.
rmax3048239 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A young blond woman, Diane Downs, shoots her three children in her car on a country road at night. One dies. One survives, paralyzed. And the older girl recovers with some loss of mobility. Downs claims "a bushy haired man" did it. After an investigation, the police arrest Downs and she is convicted of murder and sentenced to life. Evidently the latest love of her life, a married man devoted to his own wife, didn't want to be a father to her children. So she tried to get rid of them.

Just for the heck of it, I'll add that there was an almost identical case, involving a woman named Susan Smith, in 1995. Smith drowned her two sons, claiming a black man did it, because her boyfriend had told her he didn't want a "ready-made family." I'm developing a theory that attributes cases like these to a consumer mentality in which one buys, say, a vacuum cleaner and uses it for a while before discovering that it no longer works the way it's supposed to. The store won't take it back, so you throw it out. The moral lesson is that we need a Goodwill Industry for children.

I'm not being serious about that, but it is a puzzle. How does a woman murder her own children? The bonding between a mother and a newborn infant is a biological reflex, with about a 48-hour launch window. In other words, there is some hard wiring involve. It takes a special kind of mother to kill her children in order to acquire a new lover.

This is Farrah Fawcett's movie and she's pretty good, with her wildly sexy looks and debauched Texas voice. I only saw her in two other films, both junk, and don't remember her performances well. Her opposite number, on the side of the law, is DA John Shea, who isn't given much to do except look prim and determined. Ryan O'Neal has little screen time. The photography and location shooting are colorful and evocative.

The story is based on a book by Ann Rule, who is a first-rate writer of true-crime books. She's not an artist but, man, does she know how to put a story together without boring or insulting the reader. Some of the more curious parts of the book are not covered in the film. The murder weapon, a Ruger .22 pistol, was never found. But the film never describes the police search for it, whereas Rule followed that dead-end path to the end and turned it into a masterpiece of folly. The cops finally identified a man living in Mexico who they thought might now own the gun. They sought to interview him on the phone, but were advised that they were babes in the woods on questions of this sort. "First of all, you don't pick up the phone and directly call somebody living in Mexico. You have to figure out someone you can try to reach in Mexico who HAS a telephone." Some time ago, a team of German scientists studied the extent to which women wiggled their rear end when they walked. (I'm not making this up.) Being German, the experiment was all very precise. The young woman walked at a given speed on a treadmill and were videoed from behind, the arc of their hip movements measured in millimeters, and so forth. One finding was that women who were ovulating swayed their hips more. Not that they necessarily knew they were doing it, but it was a fact. They radiated more sexual heat as their fertile periods approached.

Diane Downs seems to have been like that -- all over. She had not only given birth to her own three children. She'd been paid as a substitute mother, and was pregnant again at the time of her incarceration. Rule's book has a photo of Downs at the time of her arrest. She's pretty, in an ordinary way, and her default expression is a kind of helpless grin. She probably smiles in her sleep. The court's shrink diagnosed her as "hystrionic personality disorder." It's a fuzzy category, but okay. They're the kind of people who attract attention by a kind of constant self display. They may be flirtatious, as Downs was, exchanging google eyes with a juror. They may talk to themselves in public, as in supermarket, "Now, where did they put the pork and beans?" They over dramatize their lives as if on a stage and become flamboyant lovers or victims of some hideous incident, as Downs not only played for sympathy before the TV cameras but accused her father of abusing her, which wasn't true.

But in court, Shea calls her "a deviant psychopath" and he's wrong. She's a murderer but not at all crazy, just too impulsive. She carried on long-distance love affairs while she was locked up. I forget whether that was before or after her temporary escape -- or both.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Should have been done more seriously
OneAnjel2 May 2024
I don't recall if I watched this in the 80s. I loved Charlie's Angels, every teen girl tuned in weekly. And I remember The Burning Bed. But for me, Fawcett was the wrong choice here. I know a lot of people will disagree because the fans just want to adore her. But Downs was a homely looking woman with an equally uninteresting wadrobe, a sarcastic demeanor and an inability to stop talking. Yet the producers not only don't attempt to make Farrah look the part or fully characterized Diane but actually accentuate her figure and flaunt her hair always with full make-up and logs of the glamorous smile. The only acting seemed to be adding a grovely twang that I wouldn't characterize as Diane or Farrah, and a lot of eye rolling. It makes the film seem to be about Farrah. And let's face it, much like Lee Majors was the reason she got the part in Charlie's Angels, O'Neil is the reason she got this part.

I am not anti Farrah in any way but I'm the most objective review on here. Over the years, beautiful but talented actresses have bared it all to prove their acting ability - Nichole Kidman, Angela Bassette, Elizabeth Taylor, Betty Davis... But Fawcett is always playing to the camera instead of acting.

So what we get is a frame of a tragic, shocking story that we can barely tell is in this film because it's so focused on making it all about Diane in order to put Farrah in front of the camera for 90% of this endless mini series.

I know that back in the 80s it was all about getting the most viewers for as long as possible to use for advertising spots. But this was a huge story in the news and anyone could have played Diane and gotten high ratings. Heck, just having Ryan O'Neal would have bumped the ratings way up. Farrah was pigeon holed for Charlie's Angels and nite she was in the past until her new boyfriend wanted to help get her back in tv.

People forget, when she broke her contract with Charlie's Angels she was black listed from the industry; no one would touch someone they couldn't depend on. When she started dating O'Neal, he became her leverage.

But bad acting and famous hair only gets you so far. She destroyed any hope of being taken seriously when she demanded to be put on a poster practically bare in a time when soft p-orn was deeply frowned on by average American households. Things are different now, though not necessarily improved.

Farrah was used for her attraction to men and was never a serious actress. We could say that isn't her fault but this film deserved to be taken more seriously.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed