In the Shadow of a Killer (TV Movie 1992) Poster

(1992 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Uneven writing accompanied by uneven performances
Ankhoryt30 January 2007
The earliest scenes are the most awkward scenes, particularly those in which Our Hero, Detective Mitchell (Scott Bakula) is blasted by other cops for being insufficiently bloodthirsty as far as the death penalty goes. Even the masterful Miguel Ferrer has a hard time seeming credible with the lines he's given. Mitchell's refusal to do a public service announcement pushing capital punishment offends the police department's leadership, and, if we are to believe the script, the police department's grunts as well. All manner of aspersions are cast on Detective Mitchell's character, on up to suggestions that he is in the pay of the Mob to try to keep mafiosi off Death Row.

However overdone in spots, the film is interesting for the chance to see many men who would later go on to be major character actors in the crime-drama field:---Robert Clohessy of "Oz" and the "Law & Order" franchises;---Luis Guzmán of "Oz," "NYPD Blue," and dozens of crime films;---Tony Sirico, who would become Pauly Walnuts on "The Sopranos"---Joe Viterelli, a constant presence in second-tier Mafia shows;---and J.T. Walsh, who, like Viterelli, is no longer with us.

Bakula overacts in the first half of the film, but that might be problem of direction. His part is well-written, in contrast to the ham-handed lines given his opponents. Another complaint about the writing: a priest tells Mitchell, "Capital punishment is not inconsistent with Church doctrine." Yes, it is, and even back in 1992, the script's fact-checkers should not have missed this. Opposition to capital punishment is in the top three of the most pressing political priorities of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, and Pope John Paul II himself frequently made calls to governors to attempt to stop executions. This was a blunder that discredits the "true story" credentials of this tale. (I never did figure out which "true story" this film is supposed to represent, after an hour mining Google for every combo of terms I could think of.)

For all that the movie improved significantly from the hokey opening scenes to the competent end, it couldn't hold my interest. The first impression of polemical tripe was too strong. For those who are interested in either the issue or the lead actor, Bakula returns to the issue of the death penalty in the 2000 film, "In the Name of the People," in which he plays a man on death row.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pedantic and sketchy police story.
rmax30482330 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The sociologist Robert E. Park wrote in the 1920s about marginal people, by which he meant individuals stuck between two statuses, neither fish nor fowl, unable to identify with either. His analysis focused on roles that stood in some shady area between "management" and "labor." As examples he used white-collar workers and factory foremen. According to this movie, which is "based on a true story", he could have included police detectives on NYPD who were opposed to the death penalty.

The story is set in 1968 and illustrates the two attitudinal poles. It begins by showing us the takeover by students of Columbia University in New York. Then, immediately after Detective Mitchell wins a decoration from the department, it shows him turning down what amounts to an order from a public relations officer to broadcast a message in favor of New York's death penalty, which was then under review.

Boy, is this guy marginal. His fellow officers do everything but spit on him, even after he heroically brings down the killer of a brother officer. His family, his friends, the DA's office, all turn against him. He could be Frank Serpico.

One wonders whether that critically and commercially successful earlier film was in the minds of the people who greenlighted this rather sketchy and overdone tale. The film has the feeling of having been rushed through production. The acting is perfunctory. The locations unevocative. The moral lesson is that we should all do our jobs and tell the truth and justice, as the community defines it, will out. That's what Detective Mitchell says on the witness stand during a critical scene at the end. Of course we've heard it before, only it usually comes at us as, "I'm a soldier, not a politician." The movie is stacked against the death penalty, not so much by any logical or ethical argument, as by direction. Mitchell has a couple of nightmares of people being electrocuted and wakes up gasping for breath. Everyone who counsels him in favor of execution seems either grasping or mentally stunted. Fortunately we are spared scenes of the victims actually being electrocuted, which have come to be practically de rigeur since they seem to satisfy some morbid sentiments in some of the audience members, those who can't pass a highway accident without hoping for a glimpse of the mangled body.

I found the film preachy and not well executed though, for what it's worth, I would endorse its message.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Thought Provoking drama about capital punishment
Purewishing29 July 2014
I think this is a decent and entertaining TV film from 92. It is based on true events in the life of a former police officer turned technical adviser, Jurgenson. Deseret News article written by Scott D. Pierce in April of 92 has a good article detailing Jurgenson's involvement. IMDb doesn't want us to post URLs, but I found the article in a 5 minute search. I've watched it twice and was engrossed each time with different details which I won't give away. I would recommend it to anyone interested in police stories, or reflection on capital punishment. I would agree with a previous reviewer that the church does not support capital punishment.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
BRILLIANT AND HEARTWARMING
TAZ2110 March 2002
Scott Bakula plays Detective David Mitchell apprehends a Mafia enforcer and a cop killer that the whole police department has been searching for. It is Detective Mitchell's testimony in court that can send this cold blooded killer to the electric chair. Although he wants justice for his fellow officer the Detective does not believe in the death sentence and he and his family undergo abuse and terror for these beliefs. He has a contract out on his life and all he wants to do is stay alive and do what he believes is right. This is based on a true story and is very well written and extremely well acted. This is a must for fans of Bakula and also anyone who like me loves a true story or weepy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed