Original Intent (Video 1990) Poster

(1990 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Mawkish garbage...
Pussytiddy16 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I watched it and wondered about Candy Clark's career decisions. I have had a soft spot for her but she sure has been involved in some clunkers and this is one she could've done without. Her character as the career wife has her made out to be almost the bad guy in this movie about hand wringing pity for the homeless getting in the way of the bad big business types.

Worst of all are the parts played by Kris Kristofferson and Martin Sheen. Sheen turns in his standard performance as an alcoholic ("Beyond The Stars", "Shattered Spirits")and Kristofferson is the goody two shoes worker at a shelter for the homeless. They aren't believable. Sheen is so bad that he's almost comedy...Kristofferson is merely puke inspiring.

Jay Richardson as the lawyer who had forgotten his 'original intent' (to help people) is cardboard...soft and floppy cardboard soaked by the rain. He wrings his hands and gets the guilts that he has never really noticed the homeless before. WHY should he?? Add to this 'plot'/ baloney that his wife is in cahoots with (and can't afford to upset) the big bad businessman that wants to tear down the Shelter for the Sheen...well it's contrived hokum designed to jerk tears, with homeless mothers begging a bed for the night for her young daughter (Garrrrd give that girl a carrot!) and the shelter being full. (It's a wonder that they resisted throwing in Christmas)

It could've been worse...they might've turned this garbage into a TV series! 4 out of 10 simply for the Candy factor.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Do good, pretty please?
lor_24 July 2023
My review was written in July 1992 after watching the movie on Paramount video cassette.

Well-meaning to a fault, "Original Intent" is a squeaky-clean plea for individuals to change their values and help the homeless. Playing like a born-again tract, this hokey feature is unlikely to soften any hard hearts in videoland.

Filmed in 1989, pic was acquired by since-quiescent Studio Three, and later by Skouras Pictures, but never released theatrically. It bears superficial resemblance to Lawrence Kasdan's subsequent conscience-tweaker "Grand Canyon" but is hopelessly square in script and execution.

Jay Richardson is a successful Los Angeles lawyer whose wife, Candy Clark, is an equally successful ad agency exec. Their contented life is turned upside down by a visit from Richardson's college chum Kurt Fuller, a relentless do-gooder who brings up plenty of nostalgia for the militant 1960s. He talks Richardson into doing some legal work to prevent Robert DoQui's ghetto shelter for the homeless from being evicted.

]Toothless vilain of the piece is Vince Edwards, a ruthless industrialist intent on not having the homeless anywhere near his proposed real estate development project. In a corny plot twist, it turns out Edwards owns a toy company that represents the biggest account for Clark's ad firm, so Richardson's fight will cost his spouse her job.

The selfish characters gradually see the light, with extremely puerile consciousness raising subplots. When Richardson takes in a homeless black youngster (Patick Malone) who's having trouble at school, the kid of course steals his electronics equipment as a test of his phony liberal attitudes.

Filmmaker Robert Marcarelli's heart is obviously in the right pae, but he lacks the style and wit of a Frank Capra needed to pull off such a self-righteous task. Guest stars including Martin Sheen, as a dazed homeless man, or Cindy Pickett, as a newly homeless mother, provide sincere, one-dimensional support.

It's nice to see Richardson, usually cast in t&a exploitation films, play a normal guy for a change and the underrated Clark is also effective in her first leading role in over a decade.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Homelessness...What's Up With That?
NoDakTatum7 October 2023
This film wears its heart on its sleeve. It is against homelessness. So sit back and enjoy it, you greedy unfeeling jerk with your big screen television and giant cups of gourmet coffee. Matthew (John Henry Richardson) and wife Jessica (Candy Clark) are a power couple with two bratty children and a live-in maid. Matthew is a lawyer, Jessica is in advertising, and they cruise around in imported cars and live the shallow life. Matthew's college buddy Alex (Kurt Fuller) is a homeless-persons advocate. He asks Matthew to look into a case. Ben (Robert Doqui) runs a homeless shelter in downtown Los Angeles populated by actors like Martin Sheen, Kris Kristofferson, and Cindy Pickett performing in bit parts and cameos. The evil landlord Daniels (Vince Edwards) wants to close the place down, and Ben and Alex ask Matthew for legal advice. The timing could not be any more perfect since Matthew happens to be suffering a midlife crisis and wants to inject some meaning into his existence. You would think things would start working out for poor Matthew, but the opposite happens. By coincidence, Jessica's agency is handling Daniels' toy store chain account. Matthew's law partner is getting impatient with the unpaid time spent on the new case, and Matthew is always late picking up his whiny son from baseball practice. Matthew tries to be nice to troubled youth Bobby (Patrick Malone), but this kindness backfires. Matthew must choose between his conscience and his familial obligations, and a silly tragedy limps along in time for him to make his decision.

I am not making light of homelessness. This film is decades old and the problem is much worse today. I am making light of this film's sincere but abysmal tackle of the problem. This is the kind of movie safe enough to play in church basements, I counted less than ten minor curse words. Beating the viewer into submission with one issue means other causes like mental illness, alcoholism, lack of education, addiction, high medical costs, and more are only hinted at. Richardson is average as Matthew, his most memorable scene is his speech in the judge's (Joe Campanella) chambers where he does a hilarious, unintentional impression of Jimmy Stewart. The cameos and bit parts detract- why look who's at the party, it's Caitlyn (as Bruce) Jenner and Linda Thompson! The terrible music score and sappy uncredited songs drown out the onscreen dialogue. The original intent of "Original Intent" was to expose the gaping wound that is homelessness in America. Instead, we get preachy nonsense wrapped in dull speechifying. Want to help out? The film makers give you no ideas except be careful who you invite to the house for the weekend, and be sure to hate your local big evil corporation- ironic, this was distributed on VHS by the mom-and-pop operation Paramount Home Video. The film makers bit off much more than they could chew, playing the guilt card and whining instead of educating the viewer and compelling them to do something.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Starts out hokey, gets better, heartwarming story.
sherryssecretsister28 January 2004
Plot: a busy lawyer gets involved with defending a homeless shelter that's about to be forced out of its building by a big corporate mogul. The crisis comes when Matt (the lawyer) begins to neglect his family, alienating and endangering them, in favor of his work for the shelter.

When I first started watching this, I almost turned it off after a few minutes. The acting was SO bad! Reminded me of a badly-done high school play--- fakey voices and overdone expressions and gestures. The family situation was just too trite. The lawyer's secretary was like some sort of exaggerated caricature of prissy secretaries. But it got better when Kurt Fuller came on as Matt's old college buddy with a favor to ask (Kurt is the actor who plays Father Pat in "Joshua"--- kind of offbeat personality, very likeable). The story got interesting when the scene shifted to the homeless shelter, solid performances by Kris Kristofferson as a compassionate displaced Vietnam veteran and Martin Sheen as a bewildered homeless guy. I loved the characters of Ben and Lily (Robert DoQui and Virgina Capers), the couple who ran the shelter--- full of warmth and understanding, tough but full of faith. The music by Ernie and Debby Rettino fit in just right. Vince Edwards put in a good performance as the big bad corporate mogul who wants the shelter out of the way for his big development in the city, and Joseph Campanella did a convincing (if chilling) job as the jaded judge. Most of the characters, though, notably Matt, his wife and kids, and the homeless mother who came seeking help, needed to tone it down a little to be believable. Matt's speech in the judge's chambers was melodrama at its most unbelievably melodramatic. But I still liked the movie. The thing I disliked the most was the totally unnecessary use of four-letter words and use of "God" as a swear word. I would like to have had my son watch this movie, because the story and meaning were good, but this kind of language made it inappropriate for him. Hard to understand why they put that in there--- didn't they have enough faith in the plot, dialogue, and characterizations to get the message across? Oh, well. Go figure. If you liked this movie, may I suggest "The Boys Next Door", a Hallmark Hall of Fame presentation that stars another actor from "Joshua", Tony Goldwyn, as a social worker involved with a handful of mentally/emotionally challenged men living together in a sort of halfway house.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It might be a Christian propaganda film, but it's not all bad
Leofwine_draca4 July 2015
ORIGINAL INTENT, a straight-to-video drama from 1992, might be a Christian propaganda film but it's not all bad. The story is straightforward enough, as a crusading lawyer joins forces with the owners of a homeless shelter who are currently battling the legal demands of a developer intent on razing the place to the ground and building expensive apartments in its stead.

Where this film shines is in the moral dilemmas it sets out to the characters. It turns out that the protagonist's wife actually works for the guy who's planning to build the redevelopment, so there's a conflict of interests between the two and one which quickly bubbles over into their marriage. Meanwhile, other characters get bogged down in the legalities of it all, and there are cheesy songs on the soundtrack and an expectedly heartwarming ending.

The cast boast performances from a typically gruff Kris Kristofferson, a cameo from Martin Sheen, and a nice role for Robert DoQui, a favourite of mine for his performance as the tough chief of police in ROBOCOP. Everything plays out here exactly as you'd expect, but ORIGINAL INTENT is surprisingly well made and engaging for what it is.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed