Bloodstone: Subspecies II (Video 1993) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
36 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
good little flick
dr_foreman2 February 2004
This is a straight-to-video vampire movie. Were some of you expecting a masterpiece? I wonder why people take such a perverse joy out of bombing a film like this! It really is much better than its low rating would suggest.

Moody directing, lush Romanian locations, and deliciously over-the-top villains like Radu and Mummy add up to a gruesomely wonderful viewing experience. Denise Duff gives a sympathetic performance, and it sure doesn't hurt that she's a "10" on the Brian scale. The folk music score is another highlight.

I've shown this movie to a number of people - gals and guys of different professions, with varying levels of sanity - and all of them have liked it. If you want to rent a horror movie that's violent but not repulsive, and clever enough to hold your attention when there aren't killings on screen, then "Subspecies II" is the flick for you (sorry about the bad poetry there!).
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than the original
angelynx-213 April 2000
Having sensibly disposed of Stefan and focused on the far more interesting Radu, the Full Moon crew really gets this series rolling with its second film. Michelle (Denise Duff, replacing the first film's Laura Tate) escapes Castle Vlad and flees to Bucharest, taking with her the precious Bloodstone. Desperately battling her own developing vampirism, she begs her sister Rebecca to take her back to America, but when Rebecca arrives, Michelle - ashamed of her condition - finds it near-impossible to face her. This sets up the film's central game of cat-and-bat-and-mouse, as the worried Rebecca and the resurrected Radu hunt Michelle through Bucharest's night time streets and Rebecca assembles a motley gang of Fearless Vampire Hunters [TM] to pursue her sister's tormentor. A terrific mixture of macabre and down-to-earth characters, with Duff standing out as the terrified but strong-willed Michelle, Melanie Shatner fine as brave and concerned Rebecca, Michael Denish enjoying the Van Helsing-esque role of Prof. Popescu and Ion Haiduc especially good as the pragmatic Romanian cop Lt. Marin.

The movie, however, *belongs* to Anders Hove as Radu. Hove brings a completely unexpected level of sympathy and emotion to the character. He gets under the skin of the monster makeup to wonderfully suggest the childlike nature, terrible loneliness, and unfed craving for love that offset Radu's displays of cruelty and sudden violence. The scenes with his horrific mother are genuinely affecting, as he tries desperately for even a moment of her approval. Hove's performance is certainly the core of this film and bids to become the main reason for further Subspecies films.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Radu: the vampire Yoda
Smells_Like_Cheese11 July 2008
I got the great opportunity last night to see all the Subspecies movies, normally when you get into the sequels, they're disappointing and you don't get into them, they also ruin the series. But thankfully Bloodstone: Subspecies 2 is a different story. This is a fun sequel that really develops a story instead of the typical bite and gore vampire film. We get a little closer insight of Radu's history, who he is and how he has become Radu, also that he has mortal feelings at times, especially for his new protégé, Michelle. The reason why this series is so interesting I think is because it provides the scares while going into a very interesting story about vampires and makes it a great night for horror movies.

Radu is back, after arising from his decapitation, well, you'll have to see how they pull it together, he finds his brother, Stephan resting and kills him. He goes to another coffin to find Michelle, who is waiting for her transformation of being a vampire, but before Radu can kill her, the sun comes up and burns him, he runs, Michelle grabs the bloodstone and gets as far away as she can. Megan, her sister, has come to Romania to find Michelle, but finds out about Michelle's new... life style.

Bloodstone: Subspeices 2 goes deeper and isn't the typical horror movie, it has a great story. It of course still delivers on the good scares, of course mostly due to Radu and how chilling his performance is. Then his mom comes into the scene and makes The Mummy look like Madonna with that chilling look. We are family in this sequel, it's fun and definitely worth the look, this is such a cool series to get into, I recommend it for the horror genre fans.

7/10
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
By far the best of the subspecies series
Bynovekka11 April 2001
From puppetmaster to Castle freak Fullmoon pictures collection of lowbudget horror films have graced or in some cases disgraced the screen for sometime. Yet even in Fullmoon's lamest efforts we see the attempt to achieve a certain level of low end quality. Sadly, they tend to fall short. But occationally they hit the bullseye. Such is the case with the solid series of vampire films, Subspecies.

As with most modern vampire flicks, Subspecies serves up the standard amounts of gore and undead erotica. What sets them apart from other lowbudget horror films is good acting, moody atmosphere and well defined charactors.

In the subspecies series we are treated to an interesting game of cat and mouse waged between two erstwhile vampires. Radu Vladislas, a cadaverous master bloodsucker and the object of his desire, the fetching fledgling Michelle Morgan.

After a pedestrian first outing subspecies 2 elevates the series with the addition of talented Denice Duff in the role of Michelle. She and well regarded Dutch actor Anders Hove who plays Radu share an excellent on screen chemistry.

Picking up where the original film left off we find Michelle fleeing castle Vladislas for the imagined saftey of Bucharest. Radu, with the aid of some slick, shadowy special effects, pursues. In Bucharest the two vie for possession of the bloodstone, a mystical artifact known to 'drip with the blood of saints'.

As events unfold, both Radu and Michelle acquire allies to aid them in their respective causes. It is through these secondary charactors interesting insight into Radu and Michelle is given.

In conversations with his 'mummy' we discover Radu to be nothing like the vile nightcreature we have come to know. He is more like a frightened child. Shunned by his family. Unable to mingle with normal humans due to his ghoulish appearance, Radu is lonely. He is terrified by the prospect of being alone throughout enternity. He needs Michelle as much for company as any sexual desires he may harbor.

In Michelle we find not the cringing co-ed from the first film. Miss Duff's interperetation reveals a fiercely determined young woman valiantly struggling against the bloodlust of Vampirism. Her mortality lost she opts for the next best thing. She plans to use the bloodstone for sustenance rather than attacking human beings. In this way she hopes to retain a semblence of her humanity.

Rarely has such depth been given to charactors in a film of this level.

The movie itself moves along at a steady pace ending in a satisfying cliffhanger climax. By the far the best of the subspecies series.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Every bit as enjoyable as its predecessor...
paul_haakonsen22 March 2019
I was given the chance in 2019 and sit down to watch three movies of the "Subspecies" franchise, which I did and watched them in rapid succession of one another.

First of all, I must admit to being so very thrilled and content with the fact that "Bloodstone: Subspecies II" is a direct and continuous sequel to the first "Subspecies" movie. By that I mean that this sequel picks up exactly where the first movie left the audience hanging. I enjoyed that tremendously, and it is rare that you actually see that done in movies.

I found "Bloodstone: Subspecies II" to be equally entertaining and the first "Subspecies" movie and subsequently also as the third movie in the franchise as I watched that directly after having finished "Bloodstone: Subspecies II".

The Radu character, once again portrayed by Anders Hove - and done so with so much grace and perfection I might add, is fleshed out, pardon the pun, in greater detail in this sequel. While the storyline is a continuation of the first movie, we still get a much more in-depth look into whom the Radu character is, what drives him and how he came to be as he is.

While these "Subspecies" are within the horror genre, they are not actually based on being scary or being able to make the audience cringe from gore and violence and jump out of their seats from a myriad of jump scares. No, this franchise is based on character development and a continuous plot and storyline. And that really carries the movies quite some way.

They definitely upped their game in terms of make-up and special effects in this 1993 sequel to the original 1991 "Subspecies" movie. And while it wasn't sorely needed, it made for a more enjoyable viewing of course.

I thoroughly enjoy the "Subspecies" franchise, and I find the Radu character to actually be the most memorable vampire character that I have seen throughout all the vampire movies I have watched over the past three decades give or take.

If you have not yet gotten acquainted with the "Subspecies" franchise and the long-fingered monstrous Radu character, I can definitely strongly recommend that you do so if you are given the chance.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Radu returns
BandSAboutMovies31 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Didn't Radu die in the first Subspecies?

Well, yeah. But now his minions have simply reattached his head and taken the stake from out of his heart, allowing him to Hicks and Newt the hero of the first film, Stefan, killing him within moments of the film's opening, sending heroine Michele to Bucharest with the titular Bloodstone in the hopes of getting help from her sister Becky.

Meanwhile, Radu's mother - yes, known as Mummy - comes on the scene and tries to help him turn Michele to the side of the vampires, which leads directly into Bloodlust: Subspecies 3, which was shot at the same time as this film.

A rare sequel that is even better than the original, this starts strong and gets even better, with actually scary moments and a multi-layered antagonist. I don't own the box set and action figure of Radu for nothing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a fun half of a movie
movieman_kev19 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The evil Radu returns with a vengeance after his subspecies minions help put him back together. After taking care of his brother, the dastardly One finds that Michelle, his brother's love interest/newly turned vampire (also newly Denice Duff, replacing Laura Tate who lijkely balked at doing the nudity) has run off with the precious Bloodstone.

This one being filmed back-to-back with part 3 should clue you in that you shouldn't expect any real semblance of an ending to part 2. So if you're not fully prepared to set aside around 3 hours to watch both together, you'll likely be disappointed by a fairly large cliff-hanger.

That gripe aside, I enjoyed Subspecies 2 as much, if not more, than the first. It has more action and meat to the story.

Eye Candy: Denice Duff provides a full-frontal
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good, but inferior to the original
Jonthan2220 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Having seen and enjoyed the original, I saw this on late night TV and was excited because I didn't realise there was a sequel to Subspecies. (I have now seen them all)

Although I enjoyed this movie (and Anders Hove was great as Radu as usual), I have two major gripes with it that bother me too much to see it as an equal to the original.

1) Stefan. Now I'm not debating that Radu was definitely the better character of the two (more conflicted, better actor etc) but I liked Stefan, the noble do gooder Vamp. And I liked the whole idea of the warring Vampire Brothers fighting over their birth right! And if I thought killing him off was a huge mistake, it wasn't nearly as bad as how they did it. It just seemed so.....bleh! Thats about all I can say really, just a total Anti-climax to the originals ending and a complete cop out (I know they could not get Michael Watson back for the sequel, but they could have recast him and let him day a little while into the movie, or even come up with ANYTHING but the death scene they eventually came up with. Bad bad writing.

2) Michelle's Sister. She just bothered me throughout, I found myself wanting her to get killed by the end, just to get her off my screen, didn't like the actress or the character.

In all though, the plot was pretty decent and even though the actress who played Michelle was changed (and grew her hair in record time) the film still maintained a level of enjoyability that kept me watching till the end. Like before the sets and locations were beautiful and the musical score was good. Anders Hove is a great actor in this role, it seems tailor made for him.

A good film, let down by one bad plot line and one bad actress.

5/10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beauty & The Beast
Gafke13 April 2004
This film picks up right where the first film left off. Brand new vampire Michelle must flee Castle Vladislas after the eternally slobbering Radu kills her lover, the Good Vampire Stefan (no great loss, really). Michelle has not gone away empty handed however; the life-giving Bloodstone is now in her possession, and Radu wants it back. Finding Michelle is no problem, but killing her (as he had originally intended) proves much more difficult as the hideous Radu decides he wants both the Bloodstone and Michelle for his own.

Denice Duff is quite good as the new Michelle here, stalking victims in humid European nightclubs with a seductive coldness, while at the same time desperately trying to deny the murderous impulses which disgust her. She is heartbroken without being whiny, tragic and lost but refusing to be anything other than what she has become. Her scene in the hotel is one of the best in the film, as she cries herself to sleep and then wakes up screaming as the full light of morning comes burning through her window, forcing her into the cold refuge of the shower stall where she is later discovered, presumed dead and carried off in a body bag, only to awaken at dusk in full panic once more.

New characters include Michelle's sister from America, responding to Michelle's desolate and panicked phone call. Joining her later are a young police detective and a Van Helsing-ish man who leads them to Castle Vladislas. Radu's "Mummy" is here as well, a cackling lawn gnome of a woman who is in desperate need of some Oil Of Olay. But Michelle and Radu always remain central, Radu disgusting in his cruelty and yet almost pathetic in his newfound love for the pretty Michelle; Michelle horrified and yet drawn to the ancient vampire who was responsible for making her what she is. Their relationship is most unique, a true Beauty and the Beast pair.

While not as Gothically creepy as the first Subspecies, Bloodstone is still a strong entry in the series, visually compelling and with a good, strong storyline to boot. All the actors are earnest and believable simply because (with the exception of the Immortal Michelle and her icy-white radiance) they are approachable looking, attractive without being blindingly so. And then there's Radu...

Radu is the main reason I am as big a fan of these films as I am. He is gross, manicure-impaired, ugly as all hell (literally!), and yet he's also aristocratic and cunning with a wicked sense of humor and an intelligence that has escaped most new vampires. He's not ashamed of who or what he is. He enjoys his cruelty, and his bloodlust and his eagerness to show Michelle the ropes is like the worlds most perverted Hallmark card. It's great! I said it before and I will say it again: Radu is what a vampire should be, and his presence makes these films totally enjoyable. 8 stars out of 10 for this one.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good sequel
Groverdox17 September 2020
Just as with the first "Subspecies", I liked this sequel, but I'm not really sure why. I didn't really understand it too well, but found it enjoyable regardless.

I guess the movie takes off where the first one ended, with the girl now turned into a vampire and her sister coming to Romania to look for her.

Anders Hove thankfully reprises his role as the vampire Radu. He is to the Subspecies series what Angus Scrimm is to Phantasm.

Subspecies and Phantasm are similar franchises. They have trappings that draw you in, and not much in the way of story or characters to complicate matters.

And if you liked the first entry in both series, it's highly unlikely you won't like the second.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mediocre
Volstag26 August 2004
As with most movies of this type (i.e. B-grade horror), my hope is to find one that is unintentionally hilarious, every step of the way. One that promotes constant riffing from me and my friends. Picking a good "bad movie" appears to be more difficult than picking a good "good" movie (if that makes any sense). Unfortunately, "Bloodstone: Subspecies II" [B:S2] is neither bad enough to be good, nor good enough to be good.

This might sound weird, but B:S2 was written, directed and acted by folks with a modicum of intelligence. I will also begrudgingly admit there's a small degree of artistic talent exhibited as well. The best bad movies are made by people who have no business making movies (for an example of what I'm talking about, rent "Troll 2" or "The Keeper of Time" -- those movies are priceless. Nay, they're National Treasures).

Don't get me wrong, this movie is bad. But it's not bad enough. The brand of "bad" portrayed in this movie is the slow, plodding, monotonous variety -- not the "insanely stupid bad" that I crave. It's for the same reasons that it's not "good" either. The pacing is too slow for a B-grade horror (IMO). It starts on a strong note, and then slowly dwindles into nothingness -- until its brief resurrection near the very end. I believe this came about due to Mr. Nicolaou's attempt at "creepy/moody atmospherics". There's very limited dialogue, and what little there is makes no attempt at driving the story.

Most of the movie centers around Michelle Morgan (Denice Duff) shambling around Bucharest looking scared and sedated. I also got the strong impression that Mr. Nicolaou wanted to make the most of his "on location" shoot, by shoe-horning every piece of gothic architecture he could find into the movie. Another thing we found weird was the "Bloodstone" itself. Ostensibly it's the centerpiece of the story, even though they never mention, or discuss it, for a good 2/3rds of the movie. Huh? Apparently the Bloodstone can dispense the "blood of the saints" for a vampire to suckle on. Okay, so what? They never really describe why it's so important to Radu. Does it make him into a super vampire? No. Does it give him extra powers? No. What the heck does it do?

I've wasted enough time discussing this.

Good movie score: 5/10. Bad movie score: 6/10. In short: mediocre... no matter how you look at it.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another solid Fullmoon outing///might be spoilers
BloodTheTelepathicDog27 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Subspecies 2 picks up right where the first one ended, with Michelle(portrayed by the far more appealing Denice Duff) fleeing from a resurrected Radu. In Denice's possession is the Bloodstone, an ancient relic that contains the blood of saints, that Radu is determined to retrieve.

This doesn't suffer from the typical sequel downfalls, as director Ted Nicolaou keeps the set creepy and paces the film marvelously. Anders Hove, as cinema's most accurate vampire, albeit Max Schreck, is the only returning cast member from the original. Laura Tate does not reprise her role as Michelle, leaving the character to a far more capable and attractive Denice Duff.

As Denice struggles with her new found lifestyle, she calls her sister, portrayed by William Shatner's daughter Melanie, to help her. Obviously not thinking about her sister's safety, Denice delivers her to near certain death. Helping Melanie are US embassy stud Kevin Blair and oddball professor Michael Denish. Kevin portrays the skeptic, but is enamored with Melanie, so tags along.

I have seen all of the Subspecies films and this one is my second favorite, right behind the original.

VIOLENCE: $$$ (Denice struggles with feeding on a grungy rockstar wannabe while Radu indulges. There is moderate vampire mayhem here but the gore in the original was superior).

NUDITY: $$ (Denice takes the patented horror film shower scene which Ted plays more for characterization than for skin. He shows the tortured woman weeping under the showerhead and doesn't use the gratuitous angle).

STORY: $$$$ (The screenplay is rather solid despite Denice's characters lack of regard for her sister's safety. The story emphasis is on Denice, as we must watch and see if she can resist Radu and if Radu can control his "fledgling").

ACTING: $$$$$ (Exceptional acting, supplied chiefly by Denice Duff. Ms. Duff has the unrivaled ability to capture every emotion in the human emotional handbag. Her work far exceeds Laura Tate's boring portrayal of Michelle in the original. Denice Duff should offer acting lessons to all those A-List sorry excuses for actresses that the tabloids love so much! Anders Hove was better in the original; much more fiendish than he is here).
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A well done sequel.
Hey_Sweden6 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Bloodstone: Subspecies II" *does* assume you've seen the first in this Full Moon vampire series. It begins as evil blood sucker Radu (Anders Hove) is resurrected. Michelle (Denise Duff), our lead from the first movie, has been "vampirized" and is struggling with her drastically altered existence. Radu is now quite taken with her, but she's managed to steal the precious "Bloodstone", the ancient artifact that drips the blood of the saints. Radu becomes determined to get this object back and to win Michelles' favour. Meanwhile, Michelles' distraught sister Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) takes a flight to Romania to lend whatever help she can. Rebecca is soon joined by a kindly old professor, Popescu (Michael Denish), and Mel (Kevin Spirtas), a hunky young man from the American embassy.

"Bloodstone" bucks the odds and succeeds at being even better than "Subspecies" # 1. It's got absolutely beautiful atmosphere, having actually been filmed on location in Romania like several other Full Moon productions. The Old World flavour really helps a lot. The music and cinematography further assist in this regard. The makeup effects by Michael Deak and Wayne Toth are superb, but not that plentiful. The opening resurrection is particularly neat. The David Allen created title creatures appear only fleetingly. Although the material (director Ted Nicolaou also wrote the script) is treated with a great deal of seriousness, it leaves room open for some comedy relief, courtesy of a well meaning Romanian detective played appealingly by Ion Haiduc.

The actors are all terrific. Both Duff and Shatner make their characters sympathetic, and Denish is a delight as the helpful old man who becomes quite eager to play vampire slayer. Pamela Gordon is vivid as Radus' extremely decrepit old "mummy", and their scenes together are effectively creepy. But the real star, once again, is Hove, who's as solid an antagonist as one could hope to see in a horror film.

Overall, this is good entertainment, competently made and decently paced. It wraps up with a cliffhanger ending, setting up the next sequel, "Bloodlust: Subspecies III".

Seven out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
a Sunday afternoon flick
trashgang22 December 2008
As I regular search the flea markets after some OOP's or obscure horrors I became aware of this one due to his cover. At home I did my research and came up with the fact that this is a trilogy and this one is part 2. Okay, never seen part 1 and 3 I plugged it in and watched it. First thing I noticed was the fact that you don't need part 1 to understand part 2. Second thing I noticed was the fact that they used stop/motion. I thought, this can't be good. Not that I have anything against stop/motion but mostly it becomes childish except for Evil Dead. And it was made in the nineties so why use old effects. But it became clear, it's a Full Moon Production, well known for Demonic toys and other stop/motion flicks. Luckely it was only in the first minutes they used it, why, I don't know, maybe they used it in part 1. Anyway, it is not a bad movie. The red stuff flows on a regular base. But it is never frightening. Even thou the vampire is believable, it's the mummy mother that makes it a bit Tales From The Crypt. A vampire that have a mummy as mum, a mistake. The editing is okay, it made you watch without boredom. The storyline is okay. Although there aren't popular actors in the film they all are okay. The vampire itself is well-done. The use of light and shadows made me think of the old black and white movies "Schatten" and "Nosferatu", even the hands made me think of Nosferatu. Overall, good movie if your in for a familyreunion and have a chill now and then. Or if your children would like to see a vampire flick not too gory.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My favorite Sub movie!
bookworm-1123 March 2001
Oh wow, I stumbled upon this movie on Sci-Fi channel and fell instantly in love with it! The shadow effects were the most amazing I'd ever seen, and the actress, Denise Duff who plays Michelle was so awesome! Also Radu,Anders Hove was superbly chilling yet lovable at the same time.

Awesome eerie, gothic vampire movie!!! A bit gory, on the blood and cutting off of body parts, but all in all the rest is awesome.

When you crave a dark, gothic, chiller, this is the one to see!:)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Blood loan
barnthebarn21 April 2009
Straight-forward sequel to Subspecies, this time Michelle - now a fully fledged vampire - attempts to escape the evil Radu who wants her as his very own love mate. Thus she steals the ancient bloodstone and forces Radu to pursue her for both reasons. Meanwhile her obsessive sister Rebecca (Melanie Shatner, William Shatener's daughter) travels to Rome enlisting the help of a local Police lieutenant.

Denice Duff in her debut as Michelle is exceptional, a grand actress and attractive too. The casting generally is very effective and Anders Hove as Radu - though perhaps less sinister than in the first film - is fitting more comfortably in to the character. Another fine effort from Ted Nicolaou and as riveting as fans might expect. Fine.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Maybe the best of the bunch.
poolandrews13 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Bloodstone: Subspecies II starts immediately after the events of the original Subspecies (1991) as the evil Vampire Radu's (Anders Hove) little monsters help reattach his head. Enraged by what has happened & that his brother Stefan & Michele (Denice Duff) have stolen the Bloodstone he seeks revenge, Radu kills his brother but impending sunlight saves Michelle. Waking up Michele realises that she is now a Vampire herself, distraught she run & travels to the city of Bucharest where she checks into Athene Palace hotel & calls her sister Rebecaa (Melanie Shatner) for help. Rebecca flies to Romania from the US but is told by the local police that Michele was involved in some strange accident, as Rebecca searches for her sister she discovers that Vampires are real & tries to help Michele as Radu wants both her & the Bloodstone...

Written & directed by Ted Nicolaou who ended up directing all the Subspecies films to date so far I actually thought Bloodstone: Subspecies II was an improvement on the original, it wasn't a ground breaking leap forward but I did think it was a slightly better film on all counts. The plot this time definitely has a lot more to it & more going on, the fact that Michele has become a Vampire, her sisters search for her, the police investigation, Radu's search for the Bloodstone & his deal with Mummy add up to a film with more depth, not a lot more depth but more depth all the same. The gore levels have improved considerably which helps & that awkward broken English dialogue isn't here. The pace is good, at only just over 80 odd minutes it's short enough not to outstay it's welcome & overall it's a better film than I was expecting. On the negative side Radu's little monsters only make a brief cameo at the start, in the original Subspecies Vampires didn't mind the sunlight but here they do, there's nothing that original or gripping here & it is kind of forgettable. It's OK to watch while it's on but you really won't have taken much from it when it's finished, or at least I didn't anyway.

Bloodstone: Subspecies II was mad around the time when Charles Band's Full Moon Entertainment had a deal with Paramount for theatrical distribution but that fell through & this went straight-to-video which is a shame because it's a fairly handsome film & certainly could have played cinemas. There's strong use of light & shadow, the period Romanian locations add considerable atmosphere to the film & there's some nice imagery here to like Radu's living shadow or the fact that Michele sleeps in an elegant glass top coffin during the day. There's more gore here, the graphic reattaching of Radu's head at the start is a neat effect, a Vampire is staked & decomposes, there's a fair amount of blood splatter & neck biting & there's this woman zombie thing as well who Radu calls Mummy for some reason.

Shot back to back with the next Subspecies film Bloodlust: Subspecies III (1994) on location in Romania, this is quite a nice looking film with good production values & was probably one of Full Moon's higher budgeted films. The acting is alright, Anders Hove returns as the evil Radu (how does he do anything with those long fingernails?), playing Michele this time around Denice Duff replaced Laura Mae Tate while Rebecca was played by Melanie Shatner who just happens to be the daughter of Captain Kirk himself William Shatner.

Bloodstone: Subspecies II is a decent enough horror film, it has a bit of atmosphere, a bit of gore, a bit of style & an OK plot but it's nothing amazing & it won't really last long in the memory. Followed by Bloodlust: Subspecies III & Subspecies 4: Bloodstorm while Vampire Journals (1997) was a spin-off film.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than average production values and a less campy tone elevate this Full Moon Features film
a_chinn6 May 2018
The vampire Radu return for this Charles Band produced sequel. Radu's head is reattached, the wooden stake removed from his heart, and he is then good as new, ready to unleash his undead malevolence upon the unsuspecting populace. The titular bloodstone serves as the film's MacGuffin, in which all the characters, both human and undead, are chasing after. I'm a huge fan of Charles Band's Full Moon Features and this film was made during the production company's heyday, when they actually had an Romanian castle at their disposal, which they inserted into the story of a number of their films ("Trancers 5: Sudden Deth" being the most forced). Not only did the European location shooting give the film added production value, this film features some better acting than most Full Moon films, which more often than not tend to be rather hammy. I also appreciate that writer/director Ted Nicolaou set out to make a more serious and straight-faced horror film than most Band productions, although there are still some elements of camp here and there. Overall, this is a classier of production than most Full Moon films, and although it's not among their best (that would be "Pit and the Pendulum," "Puppet Master III: Toulon's Revenge," "Shrunken Heads," or "Trancers" if that one counts as a Full Moon release), it's far better than their worst (i.e. "Evil Bong," "The Creeps," "Prison of the Dead" and many others, although I must admit that I still enjoy even the worst Charles Band production).
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Awful.
Peach-217 November 1998
This movie is terrible but it has some good effects.
0 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A truly great horror film....
jpowell1809 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Full Moon certainly has a well-deserved reputation for cheesey (and sometimes truly CRAPPY) movies, but I'm happy to say this isn't one of them! This vampire movie was filmed on location in Romania (seems it started a Full Moon trend as a few other Full Moon pics such as Lurking Fear, Dark Angel: The Ascent and Bloodlust: Subspecies 3 were also filmed there) and has a truly unique atmosphere that I've seen nowhere else. The lead character is Michelle, played by the lovely Denice Duff (who totally rules!), who has been made into a vampire by Stefan, a good vamp who mingled his blood with Michelle's to save her life (this takes place toward the end of Subspecies 1). Unfortunately, Radu (magnificently portrayed by Anders Hove, who is well known for his work on General Hospital), Stefan's evil brother who supposedly was decapitated at the end of Subspecies 1, has been reassembled by his Subspecies, apparently little creatures that form out of his blood and are seldom seen in the Subspecies series. Radu kills his brother and sets out to kill Michelle when he is stopped by the sunrise. When the sun sets Radu sets out to find the Bloodstone - a supposed holy relic that fills up with "the blood of the saints" - this is apparently very potent blood which can drive weaker vampires insane with it's power - but it also assures a vampire of an unlimited supply of blood. Michelle makes a break for it, taking the Bloodstone with her, and heads for Bucharest (capital of Romania, as if you didn't know). Radu fails to find the Bloodstone on his brother's now-skeletal remains, and simply loses it - ripping his murdered brother's skeleton apart, throwing it to the floor and then stops on it repeatedly (THAT'S brotherly hate!). Radu assumes correctly that Michelle will head for Bucharest so he heads that way as well. Michelle checks into a hotel and calls her sister Becky(played by the lovely Melanie Shatner, daughter of William Shatner of Star Trek fame). I don't want to spoil the rest of the film, but basically Michelle has to struggle with her newfound vampirism, Becky goes to Romania to rescue Michelle, and Radu falls in love.....it's well worth the watch, as are Bloodlust: Subspecies 3 and Bloodstorm: Subspecies 4. These are the finest films Full Moon has ever produced.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty Good Follow-Up
gwnightscream4 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This 1993 horror sequel stars Anders Hove, Denise Duff and Melanie Shatner. This picks up where the original left off where vampire, Radu (Hove) is revived, killing his half-brother, Stefan whose love, Michelle (Now played by Duff) has fled with an ancient, bloodstone containing blood of Saints. Radu searches for her while, Michelle's sister, Rebecca (Shatner) is in town doing the same, but soon discovers she's become a vampire. This is a pretty good follow-up, I like the music, make-up effects and Hove & Duff are great in it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing sequel.
cpu-44 September 2020
"Better than the original", "best of the 4", ... are you kidding me? I really enjoyed the original, but this was a stinker.

The new Michelle was helpless and pitiful, with a singular expression of desperation on her face all the time. She did not even try to put up a hint of a fight until the very, very end. I have to wonder what kind of person finds watching a helpless victim for an hour and a half satisfying? To make things worse, her sister was plain annoying, as were the "professor" and the embassy guy.

We kept hoping for things to pick up, but ultimately the movie ended up being a chore to sit through. Radu was still good, there were a few worthwhile scenes, but as a whole I wouldn't recommend this flick to anyone.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great!
muffugga13 October 2000
This movie has all the classic horror appeal of the old Hammer films; mood, darkness and Romania! Radu is wonderful and his skeletal, domineering mother is great also. I love when she starts licking the blood from her dead son off of a knife presented to her by Radu. She enjoys blood so much that she begins to bite the blade. Great savagery!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Fine Effects Fueled Follow Up To The First Film
meddlecore6 October 2021
The first five minutes of Subspecies: Bloodstone is a masterful special effects extravaganza.

It picks up right where the original leaves off...but quickly makes a u-turn, when the evil vampire is revived from the dead by his little minions.

Upon reawakening, he murders his brother, and attempts to murder our protaganess- who is the same character as before, just played by a different actress...now with long hair. However, she is saved by the rays of the rising sun just in the nick of time.

This allows her to escape with the Bloodstone, but she ends up dying before her sister- who is a different character, played by the same short-haired actress from the original- arrives in Bucharest to help her.

Police are confounded when this, seemingly, dead woman gets up and walks out of the morgue.

So they agree to hand over the Bloodstone, and rest of her belongings, to her sister.

Without the Bloodstone, the vampire sister must find someone on which to feed.

But she's still averse to the idea of killing.

As she attempts to search for answers, her sister returns to the vampire's castle, with hopes she can learn more about what was going on there.

Leading the two sisters to cross paths, and exchange the Bloodstone.

However, the evil vampire follows them...and takes it back for himself...for it belongs to his beloved mother, the dark vampire queen.

The Bloodstone is so sought after because it drips the blood of saints, and never runs dry...making it the Holy Grail of the vampire realm.

Turns out the young vampiress ends up unwillingly forced into submission in a bonded marriage as a result of her situation.

So, it's up to her sister to try and save her.

But who will end up saving who in the end?

This film is noticeably darker than the first, and as a result the production quality seems better.

It's a nice continuation of the first storyline, that leaves one ready for the next chapter, despite the drastic turn of events at the beginning.

And the special effects are simply awesome.

Highly reminiscent of films like Evil Dead and Tales From The Crypt.

A great follow up to the first film.

7.5 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Quite as Good as the First, But Watchable
gavin69425 August 2008
Radu (Anders Hove) won't let a simple thing like beheading keep him down. His minions reattach his body and he is risen before dawn, ready to kill his brother and his brother's freshly-vampired consort Michelle. But she escapes with the Bloodstone, and calls her sister to Bucharest. Also, the police get involved.

"Subspecies II" doesn't quite have the full power the original had. The lead actress has been replaced, which takes a bit out of the continuity (but at least the new chick -- Denise Duff -- is better looking). And the pace is somewhat slower. And the Bloodstone seems to have lost all its blood. But the film has some nice additions -- Kevin Blair, who has a bit of horror credentials under his belt. And Duff, unlike her predecessor, has little difficulty in being convinced into doing nude scenes, which really seemed a bigger aspect of the first.

Radu seems less menacing, not able to kill as many people or turn them into vampires or create new minions. And that's too bad, because he's a very interesting vampire creature. He also seems very susceptible to sunlight, much less so than Michelle. Is it because he's older? Typically, vampires get more powerful with age. But who knows? There's a good scene where Michelle is falsely believed dead, but beyond that nothing stands out in my mind. It's a decent sequel, and I'm eager to see part three (and maybe even four). So it didn't turn me off by any means. Pretty much entirely the work of one man, this is a film worth seeing if you liked the original.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed