Hong lou meng (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A lovely, though not perfect, adaptation
eddiechongky27 December 2017
This is a lovely adaptation of the Dream of the Red Chamber, China's greatest classical novel. It has been compared - often unfairly, to its detriment - to the great 1987 CCTV TV series adaptation which was screened just a year ago before this long movie (765 minutes) hit the cinema. But this movie has strengths of its own, especially in adapting some episodes which was neglected in the TV series. So the whole movie starts in the Land of Illusion, from chapter 5 of the novel, which was quite exotic and beautifully done.

Comparing the two adaptations, I think what sets the two adaptations apart is in the role of the male protagonist. Unfortunately, the 1988-9 film prefers to use a woman in drag for the role (which was a practice of Chinese operas, to make sure the male and female leads do not develop romantic feelings for each other). It does not really work in the movie - Qia Qing was good and decent but at no time do you forget she is really a woman. She was no substitute for Ouyang Fengqiang in the TV series, a perfect Jia Baoyu. However, both the Lin Daiyu and Xue Baochai are excellent, the Lin Daiyu surpassing in grace and beauty though Chen XIaoxu better portrays the character's wittiness and melancholy.) Fu Yiwei is very pretty and makes an outstanding Xue Baochai, though I marginally prefer Zhang Li for being just as beautifully but a bit more prim and proper. Deng Jie's 1987 Wang Xifeng trumps Liu Xiaoqing's movie portrayal however. An unsung heroine is Tanchun, whom I feel is superior in acting skills to the actress in the TV series.

In short, I think the casting of the 1987 version is superior to the 1988 movie adaptation, but if you stop comparing the two you will discover the strengths of the cinematic version. It is in general very faithful and affecting, even though I really dislike the Cheng-Gao ending, with excellent acting skills. This movie is certainly very long, but this can only be a good thing if you are watching the film because of the book. The colors of the print I watched wasn't perfect, but I can imagine the resolution and color to surpass that of the TV series if China were to restore this in 4K. And I really hope they do.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masterpiece of Social Criticism in ancient China.
zzmale1 December 2003
The film deserves a perfect ten for accurately reflecting what was in the original novel. What is more important is that equal if not higher credit must be given to the original novel and its author as well, because back when this novel was first written, imperial China was far more intolerant than now and criticizing traditional Confucianism take huge courage.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The 3rd attempt to make the 18th century novel into a movie
zzmale4 December 2003
The only reason this movie is better than the previous attempts is that this one is in color. However, the performance of all three are equally good, and all deserves a perfect ten. The only dissatisfaction is that due to the time and budget constrain, many details in the original novel was left out.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed