Traces of Death (Video 1993) Poster

(1993 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Overall worth a watch if you like dark stuff.
thesavdog12 May 2011
I agree with D Segura that most of the film especially the autopsies need some narration of some sort as they tend to get a bit boring if you don't know what is happening. Its still fascinating in some parts. The sex change operation is painful to watch if you are a man ha ha. The pigs getting burned I could have done without though, very cruel indeed. The Faces of Death series at least had some sort of structure to it and it feels as though this has just been thrown together in no order.

Some of the scenes were short/poor quality and not explained at all.

The narrator is a giggle with his horror voice.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sick & Nasty Junk
Texas-Chainsaw-Massacre10 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is the most nastiest piece of junk I've ever seen. Forget Faces Of Death, this is all real and very graphic footage of well, let's see, Medical Operations, Accidents, Autopsys, plus pictures of suicides and police photographs. The shockementary is badly edited and is clearly meant to be exploitative and as sick as they, the producers, could get it. It's that badly edited in fact, that it just looks like a 2 VCR editing setup with a MIC attached. The commentator only rarely speaks, and when he does, his comments are gibberish and just to poke fun at the mayhem what unfolds. (During a scene of 'death' pictures) Comments include, " You will witness visions so incredibly graphic that your brain will surely comprehend the ghastly images it will receive!". Although, this footage is supposed to be 100% real, you won't know what the circumstances behind the scenes were, and therefore I found it boring and just vile. At least in Faces of Death, the commentator explains each scene so you know what has happened. Traces Of Death also includes the televised suicide of Bud Dywhite. This scene is replayed in different angles, replayed slowed down, and plainly just played till it would make you sick. If your after a rambling collection of death scenes this is your dream DVD!. However, if your after a serious documentary, then don't bother with this. I see its also banned in the UK, normally I think censorship is abhorrent, but in this case the BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) should be given an award instead of the baseball bat!!!!. At this point I'd also like to point out this part does NOT have any death metal music. It's sick, vile, disturbing, and is strictly for adults over 18 what has a open mind, In my opinion, if you want a real shockumentary, Get Bumfights Presents: Terrorists, Killers & Middle East Wackos. Be warned, this is very graphic. I'll give Traces of Death a 3, because of it's pure exploitation!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining, in that so-freakin'-sick-you-just-have-to-keep-watching kind of way.
Cowman30 August 2001
Adequate compilation of grotesque archive footage, including actual scenes of murder, suicide, animal attacks, surgeries, autopsies, and (unfortunately) a whole lot more. This poorly edited and atrociously narrated tape is a real endurance test for anyone who's never seen this kind of imagery, and despite its many negative points, it certainly succeeds where FACES OF DEATH doesn't: it's all 100% real. This particular volume features former Pennsylvania State Treasurer R. Budd Dwyer blowing his brains out on live television, a male to female sex change operation, Pit Durnet being eaten by lions at a drive-thru safari in front of his shocked family, and among other things, a pig being burned alive with a blowtorch. Quality entertainment for the entire family!
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Fascinating
baileycrawly9 December 2020
Most human beings look at death with a sense of fear, but also of great interest, and this film caters to that interest. It speaks to the side of you that pays close attention when passing car accidents on the highway in the hopes of seeing as much as you can, that side of you that has always wondered what the process of an autopsy looks like, or what really happens in a gender-reassignment surgery. This film shows it all, and in gruesome, no-holds-barred detail. It showcases countless individuals' final moments, as well as freak accidents, among other things that can't really even be mentioned here. This film is ultimately nothing more than a compilation of footage from external sources. There's no plot; just a series of grotesque images and scenes playing out with a narration that tries too hard to be frightening. It is, without question, one of the most exploitative pieces of entertainment ever made in the sense that it makes a spectacle (even editing footage of a man shooting himself into the kind of early, pre-meme style editing you would see in the beginning days on YouTube) of other people's deaths, suffering and medical procedures. That being said, the medical procedures themselves are highly interesting, and feel a lot less exploitative. They take up a large chunk of the film, with music playing behind the procedures. Again, it speaks to that part of you that wants to wander behind closed doors and see exactly what happens. It satisfied a long-running curiosity, but at what cost? This is not a film that can really be recommended to anyone. In fact, it's best left forgotten as a product of its time, not given the time of day (I say as I sit here writing a review about it). It's blatant disrespect for the dead, and it's presented as one would expect a mockumentary of false events of peril to be presented; the entire film, while gravely serious in content, isn't particularly concerned with maintaining seriousness for the dead. It downplays the true tragedy of the loss of human life and, in turn, presents a message that "the reaper" is waiting for you and, one day, he's gonna catch you and you'll wind up like the people that were shown in the film. While that may technically be true, it's a tasteless message to drop in a film showcasing actual tragedies. Having watched everything they crammed into that 75-odd minute film, it does present an interesting perspective on mortality, and it's something that no modern horror film would ever give you (my thoughts immediately went to the recent, horrendous Stephen King adaptations that come a dime a dozen from the Warner Bros. and Netflix machines in these past few years... can we stop with those already?). This goes where traditional film refuses to go, and it feels as cheap as it is. On an estimated budget of only $18 (the footage must've all been public domain, so the budget was probably used to pay the voice actor for the 10 minutes or so of awful narration involved in the thing). One of the things that I cannot stomach in film, however, what needs to be talked about here, is animal cruelty. This film makes the ever-notorious Cannibal Holocaust look like a Disney film by comparison to this. At least in Cannibal Holocaust, the kills were relatively quick, according to animal rights reports. This has a too-long scene of a bound-up pig being torched alive. It has nothing to do with anything else you see on the screen; it comes out of nowhere, and it goes away with no purpose. It was one of the most uncomfortable scenes I've ever had the displeasure of sitting through, and something I can only pray to never have exposure to again.

Overall, this film is for the morbidly curious. It's sad in the sense that there have been VHS and DVD releases of this film that have been fairly successful, and that people have these tasteless exploitations of death proudly on their shelves. It's not something anybody can really enjoy. If anything, it's a harsh wake-up call to the realities of life. Part of life is death, and this film showcases that in a brutally blunt manner. It's something that's important to think about, but only the truly insane would dwell upon the content of this film, let alone suffer a second viewing and beyond. It's a one-and-done deal kind of movie.

I will not be viewing any of the subsequent entries into this "series."
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't waste your time with this pile of filth.
LoganWeasel10 April 2020
Thought faces of death was rough? well my friend this film, unlike FOD, is %100 real and its disgusting. I saw this out of sick curiosity and that was the biggest mistake of my film loving life.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
My vcr actually threw up after I put this video into it
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki19 May 2003
Without a doubt one of the most atrocious movies (made for $18?) you're ever going to find, "Death" or otherwise. The great majority of the movie is still-photographs of murders, suicides, electrocutions, car crashes, and it's mostly SILENT FOOTAGE, so that little bonehead Damon Fox added in some horrendous, canned background music, and his own idiotic narration to fill that particular void. Damon has the personality of a toilet plunger, so why would we need to hear what he has to say? Why did Damon not address the allegations of his pedophilic convictions, alcoholism, and various other sundry affairs in his bone- gratingly bad narrative, or in his lengthy, and wholly fraudulent, bio?

By the way, to Damon Fox, clever title that you came up with for this. What did it take you, maybe all of about four seconds to think of that title? "Faces of Death" and "Traces of Death" may have similar titles, but they're nothing at all like each other. Faces of Death was a brilliantly marketed movie. Its tag "Banned in XX countries" made people believe that it really had been banned in many countries all over the world, which only made many people want to see this to see what the big deal was. It was largely fake, but was coherently put together, and told its mock story well enough to make it involving.. Faces of Death at least had a sleazy, trashy documentary feel to it, some attempt at a sequence or progression from one scene to the next.

None of that here though.

This is just one still-photograph of brains splattered on the wall after another, another silent video of someone crushed in a compactor after that, all edited together without any progression from one scene to the next, with that annoying hairball Damon providing a thoroughly obnoxious and grating narrative. His fraudulent bio on IMDb is pitiful, claiming to be a big time film producer, musician, alleging that he graduated high school when he was 12 years old, etc. Why did IMDb bother to add such nonsense? What a pathetic fraud Damon he is, and what a pathetic video this was. We can only hope that his death comes soon. Few times has a movie made me as angry as this, or has a worthless waste of life like Damon made me as angry as this has. Rot in Hell, Damon.

Damon, and every copy of this, should be burnt, and the ashes sent into deep space, to never be seen again.
29 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If "Faces of Death" was the king of mondo-films, this is the bottom of the barrel
t_atzmueller20 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The original "Faces of Death" 'shockumentary' was many things in its heyday: the ultimate Mondo-movie, the closest thing to a real snuff-movie and, during the staged scene, an often (unintentionally) hilarious bogus-documentary. More than that, during the 1980's and 90's it was somewhat of a "rite of passage" for many teenagers, who tried to show off their psychological 'manliness' (and at the same time were hoping that the creeped-out girls in the audience would snuggle a little closer).

Those teens eventually grew up, possibly going to college and having long realised that 90 percent of "Faces of Death" had been fake, staged, pure bogus. But word had it – promoted largely by word-of-mouth, obscure Heavy Metal fanzines and a 14.4kbps internet – that there was a new, a "real" shockumentary around, and this shockumentary was "Traces of Death".

The entrepreneurial Metalhead Damon Fox had not only realized that the taste for gore among gorehounds had not faded, but that – unlike in the 70's – one no longer needed a film-crew to create a mondo-documentary. All that was needed was an editing device and enough shock-and death-footage from various news-sources, "Faces of Death"-clones and the internet to stuff 90 minutes into a video-tape.

Having culled and assembled said footage, all Fox had to do was to add narration (provided by himself in a distorted voice, all the time sounding like that creepy neighbor-kid who explains why pocking a dead dog with a stick is "good fun") and a soundtrack. The soundtrack itself is already the highlight – if we may speak of a highlight in this context – a minimal, yet haunting, pulsating Electro-sound-frenzy, both morbid and captivating at the same time. In consequent sequels the electro-sound has been dropped in favor of Grindcore, Black- and Death Metal, supplied by bands hoping to promote their equally gore-soaked albums and demos.

Where mondos like "Faces of Death", "Mondo Carne" or "Shocking Asia" still had unwanted humor in the staged scenes and an air of the forbidden, "Faces of Death" is just a an assembly of disfigurement, accidents, suicides and autopsies that, more than being shocked or grossed-out,leaves the viewer with the same impression of having spent a day at the slaughterhouse: desensitized and nauseated more by the smell than by the actual carnage.

Today "Traces of Death" is merely a footnote in the history of mondo-productions; the internet is full with infinitely more shocking images, videos and sites, free-of-charge for the jaded souls and ghouls who seek them (and have turned off the safety-mode of their search-engines). Even Fox himself has turned on his on "film-production", despite his cinematic and musical brilliance (which his IMDb-biography assures us of, no doubt composed by Fox himself).

"Traces of Death" remains a curiosity in the history of mondo-films, having no other merits than that. I'll give it two points from 10: one for the soundtrack and one for the sake of being a curiosity.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If i only could.......
barbaricfellow21 January 2006
I had seen all the "faces of death" films ,i wasn't shocked or anything at all with these films and as said before they had some documentary feeling However... watching this film (partly)i had the same feeling.... until the incredible evil torture against animals,this is so sickening violent that i had to to something,if only to warn people not to spread this filth,(as a torrent,(OR ANY OTHER WAY)To my amazement i saw that this movie is widely sold and advertised. Why anybody would wanna see this as entertainment is totally beyond my (and any sane person IMO)comprehension,so if the people who are making these films get a commercial success out of it, they are gonna repeat it! So the viewer will be responsible (to a certain extend) of what he sees. Think about that when u see this! i would say ignore it,also there are certain people like myself who would (and will!!!!!) pay a small fortune to get my hands on any of the persons involved in making the animal clips in this film,or providing someone else with the means necessary to make it for them!

(ADMIN,IF YA WANNA DELETE MY POST WATCH THE FILM AND YOU WONT!!)

"BARBARICFELLOW"
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Death Uncensored
mrdonleone27 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Traces of Death delivers what it promised to its viewers: raw footage of autopsies, murder scene investigations and purely mad disasters by speed maniacs (among some other things).

Is it cruel? Sure it is, but you knew that from the beginning. If they prepare a fish for you, you know it has been killed: you cannot eat the fish and act like you don't know you are eating something which had to be killed first to end up on your plate after. Vegetarians are crazy. Fish, plant or animal, it all needed to be killed in order for you to eat it, in other words: for you to live, you need to kill.

To act any differently would be crazy. Likewise, one cannot see a 'shocking' movie like "Traces of Death" without wanting or expecting to be shocked: you will be and you shall be, whether you expected this meat on your plate or not.

But this is not a culinary television program: it is a reality lesson at the school of life. We all die someday (unless Elon Musk or Bill Gates come up with the immortality serum): why behave like hypocrites??? We should be grateful doctors know how to handle our bodies when they need to, and it us logic just the same that they need enough experience on the field concerning this issue -thanks to animals and human corpses-.

It is this kind of imagery you get to see in these movies, and it is true, they do steal and copy from one another... executions, autopsies, animal attacks, animal torture, ... All these sorta things are awaiting the viewer in the "Traces of Death"-series, far out the most perfect Mondo movies around, for it all is real stuff inside, no scenery here, from successful suicide attempts to the ones who tried and failed but now need to live carrying the consequences of their all too often foolish behaviors. An interesting character study to a somewhat morbid main theme of the film: death, uncensored.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
alright
skrstenansky26 November 2021
This movie is a fine documentary if you are into gore and gruesome stuff. Almost all of the stuff in this movie is real which makes it even more authentic and better, it really shows death well in all types of ways, tragic, depressing,gruesome,sad. A fine but overall poorly put together documentary. 4.5/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Death is interesting
peter_bark_fan26 September 2006
I do think that it is extremely important people know exactly what they are about to see. People who watch this, are not watching it because they are disturbed human beings.Well, at least I am not. It is just like when you see an accident on the road. You may try to hide it, but most people want to see the dead body. Thats what this is. Yes, some scenes may be disturbing, but some people watch this stuff, and afterwords they feel like they have conquered their fear of death. All the things in this movie are real life, and I think its healthy to see it, rather than pretend this stuff doesn't happen. I recommend this to people who are fascinated with extreme human behavior, and extreme situations.
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Devistating
sneakychris16613 November 2003
This movie really opened my eyes because i watched it when i was 15...I dont think i will ever feel that same nautiousness i felt when i watched this for the first time....makes you realize just how precious life is and it can be taken away at any moment.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Mondo With A Shoe String Budget
Illyngophobia2 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The year is 1993. Fifteen years ago, the world was introduced to the shock mondo of the late 1970s; Faces of Death- supposedly banned in 46 countries. From that glorious day to the early 2000s, mondo films have been pushing their way into the masses. In 1993, Damon Fox presented the "Traces of Death" series to the world; four sequels would (the last would be released in 2000).

This low budget feature ($18 estimated) which grossed only $230; has a similar vibe as its father series, Faces of Death. What separates the two is a thin line. As motown stated, its not so much a film and its not so much a documentary. While both TOD and FOD show graphic accounts of executions, autopsies, accidents and other causes of death-- this has more authentic footage, which makes can make Traces of Death the true real shockumentary. Also shown include things such as car accidents, car bomb explosions, a story told by a man who survived a suicide attempt as well as tedious sex change operation footage.

Being made on a near shoe string budget; the movie is very poor in quality and narration; compared to FOD with a budget of nearly half a million dollars. While Dr. Gross narrates most of Faces of Death, Mr. Fox comes in rarely; and usually only makes dark humor remarks-such as that to be found in Faces of Gore.

With all of this being said, I will be generous and give the film a 5/10; its somewhat shocking for its time--but the quality decreases it quite a bit. I do give credit to the company for having more authentic footage, compared to Faces of Death; where most of it is reenacted.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The most sickest film I have ever seen
cheeseboy8019 July 2000
Traces of death is the most disgusting film in the world. All the deaths in this movie are 100% real. This movie is not for anyone who can't handle blood and gore. The nature of this movie is really graphic. This is not one of those Horror films with actors pretending to get killed. No, this movie is beyond that. It's real video footage of people getting killed. Watch this movie at your own risk.

I give this film 5 out of 10 (because it grossed me out sooo much)
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Faces of Death style shockumentary, not for the faint of heart or weak of stomach.
poolandrews10 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Traces of Death lasts for seventy eight minutes & is a collection of extreme footage edited together with a few brief & largely uninformative snippets of narration provided by writer & director Damon Fox.

Anyone familiar with these shockumentary style films will be feel right at home, having just watched Traces of Death I would say that it's 99% real footage of accidents, autopsies, suicides, crime scenes, morgues, gory medical operations & animal slaughter with the one notable exception being the scene at the end in which a man is supposedly killed by several Lions which is definitely fake & is actually ripped from another shockumentary from the 70's & even has Japanese subtitles like the only tape the makers could find was a Japanese one.

Some of this is very grim & very hard to watch, from Pigs being blow torched while still alive to autopsies in which intestines, spines & brains are graphically removed (I assume this is medical school footage filmed for teaching purposes, I simply don't know why else an autopsy would be filmed in so much detail (edit: a little research proves my initial thoughts to be correct & the footage is actually taken from something called Basic Autopsy Procedure (1961) made by the U.S. army)) to various medical operations that will make most wince just looking at them including an Asian sex change change in which a guy has his cock surgically removed & a nice new glory hole created. I feel queasy just thinking about it but I am almost positive I have seen this exact same footage before in Shocking Asia (1976).

There's the well known suicide of Pennsylvanian treasurer Budd Dwyer who blew his brains out during a live press conference, the close-up of Dwyer's face with blood pouring from his nose & mouth is yet another dubious highlight. Various crime scene photo's, sporting accidents & various other forms of human suffering, mutilation, death & pain are also included for our viewing pleasure.

The majority of this footage has no narration, Traces of Death is just scene after scene of human misery & suffering not put into any sort of context. Budd Dwyer's name is never mentioned during his suicide, medical operations are shown but quite what is going on is a mystery as are the outcomes & why the Pigs are being blow torched alive remains unanswered (although I assume it was some sort of horrible experiment).

The IMDb says this had a budget of about $18 which sounds about right, most of the footage is probably edited from other sources & randomly pieced together with no great thought behind it. Banned here in the U.K. the BBFC stated that it did not have any 'journalistic, educational or other justifying context for the images shown' which is just about spot on.

Traces of Death is brilliant if you like this sort of thing with it's graphic footage of murder, misery, death, suffering & pain but I doubt there that many people out there who will truly enjoy all seventy eight minutes of this. Followed by Traces of Death II (1994), Traces of Death III (1995), Traces of Death IV: Resurrected (1996) & Traces of Death V: Back in Action (2000).
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classic I Just Rewatched This
DarkSpotOn1 July 2022
Traces of Death is a cult classic, shockumentary, that provides footage of all sorts of death. People that are ranking this movie with a low ranking, i don't understand what did you expect from this movie? It's a shockumentary about death, what else could of you expected? If you can not watch extreme movies or more specifically shockumentaries real-life footage of death, why bother? This was made for specific people that can appreciate death and that can swallow the fact of a deceased. I will say that there's a lot of medical footage without any explanation, it would of been better if somebody went out of their way to explain what are we seeing in the long autopsy segments, because it is kinda hard to exactly understand what they are doing, and why. This was made in 1993, and to this day is a movie that loads of people still cant stomach. I want to clarify i have seen all other parts of Traces of Death from one to five, and if you enjoyed the first one, you most likely will enjoy the others too. You won't get bored at all in this shockumentary, except the long autopsy scenes might slow the movie down a bit for you.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure Gore!
Satan118 September 1998
One of the most goriest movies I've ever saw, not for people who can't handle blood! It's very interesting to see how people die, the highlight of the movie is when the pitbull attacks the animal control lady. Various scenes from traffic accidents, murder, and gang violence! Another highlight of the movie is when they show a sex change operation, the person goes from woman to man! All in all, a very good video if you want to gross somebody out!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
very real
nineinch13 February 1999
I have always thought that death films are like Faces Of Death...and I always think Faces Of Death is bad due to the fact it is 85% fake. But TRACES OF DEATH is 100% real and if you are at least squeamish or easily offended by actual scenes of human death, do not watch this film! But if you are like me, a pure reality death enthusiast, this film is for you! You will see actual suicides, actual autopsy, a sex change in very graphic detail, actual animal footage and much, much, more. So if you like death movies..this is the one to get!
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A true Mondo Film
rattman_324 December 2002
Wow theres not much that a user can say about this movie except maybe "Gross" or "wow" or "Shocking". But the movie is much more. A lot of people have badmouthed this film due to its violent content but that is just the point of the movie.

Although it doesnt live up to its image it is at times shocking and sickening. Its by far better than Faces of Death is. The narration is boring at times and it seems like the narrator is trying to gross people out and waste time instead of explaining the situations.

While it is more graphic than Faces of Death it does miss the storyline and the narrator explaining the things. There are several scenes that I found strange and would have liked to know some background on what I was seeing but it was not there.

Another low point in the film is the major hospital scenes. People under the knife and what not. This would have been truly shocking in the 80's / early 90's but now that we have shows like "Trama Life in the ER" scenes like this fall short of being shocking.

Overall the movie is well rounded in its style. Some times the movie does drag on but its much more entertaining than films like "Mondo Cane" and the like.

Overall I give this movie a 8 out of 10. While the film did keep me interested It fell short of being shocking. The prolonged warning at the beginning just made me hit the FF button.

***KEY POINT*** A key point to look for in this movie is towards the end they are "selling" body parts and other sick things.....its strange and without giving it away, just check it out for yourself. Its funny, strange, and shocking. I call it a reward for suffering through the whole entire movie. ***KEY POINT***

So overall I give this movie a 8/10. Its worth checking out if your a hardcore mondo fan...which I am not
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
No Bud! No Bud! No Bud!
jklein878713 November 2003
Forget Faces of Death, this tape is all real. Very hardcore and graphic. Images of Vic Morrow's death, suicides, car accidents, abortions, nose jobs, firing squads, and finally R. Budd Dwyer pulling a nice gun. R Budd Dwyer was a senator or a congressman who blew his brains out on national. That is really one of the most disturbing images I have ever seen. And we get to see it non stop in various camera angles. The metal music is great but the narration is almost laughable and too over the top. Still, if you are looking to be grossed out or just seeing what can shock you, rent this tape.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
good piece of s***
patentes29 March 2001
I prefer Faces of death, cause there's someone speaking to the audience telling every little detail about what you're watching, but this is definetly the goriest "mondo" bloody film that I've ever watched. There's two more parts and each one contain some boring footage (the one with the surgeries are terribly long, and without speaking) but it's worth seeing because of the other scenes, like explosions or real photos from the police. check it if you can stand it...
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Where Is Damon Fox (Aka. Bill Rocz)??
SacrifyX15 September 2017
I really enjoyed this compilation when I was a kid, I used to watch it a lot back in the day.

I always wondered where the director was (Damon Fox), he goes by the alias 'Damien Black' too, although his real, full name is William Robert Rocz Jr.. For those who don't know, his father was Bill Rocz, the local Tempe, AZ film critic. You can see him for a few seconds in Raising Arizona. I first bought a VHS copy of Traces at a video rental store when I was about 12. I also bought The Amazing Shocking Asia the same day. Traces was much better. Later on I discovered Damon's magazine, 'Foxx Entertainment Enterprises Ltd.', and I wanted so much stuff in the magazine, but by the time I discovered it, everything was long gone. Nobody has heard from Damon for years. I would love to know where he is today, he made some INCREDIBLE designs back in the day. And I'm also a fan of the Stormtrooper album 'Armies Of The Night' he made under the name 'Damien Black'. This review is not so much about the film itself, everyone else has already mentioned so much about it, anything I have to say would be useless.

This is just about the mystery of Damon Fox. Where is he today? And no, the Damon Fox that narrated Death Scenes and sang in the band Stormtrooper is not the same Damon Fox that is on Facebook right now. That guy is in the band 'The Cult' and he never responds to any questions whatsoever. A simple 'Not the same guy' would have been nice, but I suppose if you're not Kat Von D or some other semi-famous person, he doesn't have time for replies.

Anyway, if anyone knows where Damon Fox (Aka Bill Rocz Jr.) is today, please let me know. I would love to talk to him about Foxx Entertainment Enterprises. They had highly superior items, not the cheap low quality crap that gets mass produced today.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
only Death is real
jeffketvirtis66614 October 2009
if i could id give this a 666 out of ten, anyhow....

if you don't like this then you are normal. i am not and think this is a great (horrific) depiction of what could happen to us. I've seen up to IV and all are morbid master pieces...the other ones include glorious death metal/grind gore which i also enjoy. we shall all die and some of us shall die very, very, gruesome violent chaotic moronic disgusting deaths. a lot of us humans will also come into contact with hospitals via terrifying sadistic injuries. those stupid shows on true TV and stuff like that that claims its "worlds wildest videos" does not have anything on the wildness and bizarre images contained in this video. its not a movie and its not a documentary its just pure unadulterated death and human destruction. and if you are at all up set by things that happen in real life then stay away in your peaceful, ignorant world and leave the death to us. only black is true, only death is real!
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not that very shocking
vacaman-0050818 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Many people complain about this movie and how shocking it may be for some viewers, but let's say it is not that much shocking as I expected Sure, there are some crude scenes like the autopsy one for example, but in terms of shocking, I think there are worse things, I really enjoyed it though, the music was really good and fitting, the narrator had a nice way of talking that was also fitting with the context of some scenes, I wouldn't recommend it though, there are some scenes that as I said, could be shocking for some people, If you want to watch it, do it with caution, it is something that could get stuck on your head for some time, If you are a fan of shocking things or the "Faces of Death" series, this is something you would like to watch
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed