The Companion (TV Movie 1994) Poster

(1994 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Fine robot film that is worth seeing
rice_a_roni2 April 2003
I approach these kinds of SF movies with the expectations of, say, an Outer Limits (newer) episode. If the acting is adequate and the effects not too cheesy, then the plot and dialog determine my enjoyment level more than anything. And this film did not dissapoint. OK, it is a 'B' grade film, but there isn't much need for effects, as the android by definition looks and acts pretty much like a human. What effects were there were done fine. The acting was also fine, with both leads and the supporting cast turning in what for me were effective performances. In particular, Bruce Greenwood was competent at portraying the various levels of programmed emotion in his character, as well as the injured mode later in the film.

The plot and dialog were what really got me, however. Many elements also found in the blockbuster AI are also to be found in this flick, such as: what is love for / from a robot; does a robot really feel; how should we treat a machine that for all outward appearances is fairly human; etc. For me, these issues are broadly applicable, as they apply to how we treat other humans that seem somewhat "different" from us, and animals as well (pets/slaves/meat). Themes like this should spark debate in the viewer and help reframe issues that have grown worn with time due to their use as political footballs.

Real SF to me isn't just a bundle of action and special effects. The best SF explores the human reaction to technology. In this regard (and almost every other) I liked this film more than AI. If you are interested in a good robot flick, and like SF that showcases the interaction of technology and humanity, you might want to check it out.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Superior Sci Fiction Film
rbrb5 September 2007
Successful romantic novel writer, disillusioned with "love", retreats to the countryside for a while.

She takes with her a romantic companion, a life-like robot who can be 'programmed' at different levels.

And it is that programming and re-programming which is at the center of this drama.

First rate casting, with all the actors giving convincing and watchable performances. My only gripe is that the basic story is hardly original and seems to have been done in similar ways many times. Nonetheless the two leads are excellent and kept me viewing until the end.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Keeping things simple
kosmasp9 June 2023
Well actually they are anything but simple - still no pun intended! And no trying to blame technology for whatever. I reckon this being afraid of AI is nothing new - and this is working nowadays too. Even more so, when you consider the acting talent at hand here.

I probably would have loved this more if I had watched it back in the day (me as a teenager that is, also target audience in the 90s). Acting is good, but it is the story that is super predictable and you will not have problems seeing where this is going. Which almost makes the characters in this seem .... well not too intelligent ... but you have to have people not being too intelligent for stuff to happen ...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cautionary science fiction tale
myriamlenys12 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
After an emotional set-back, a writer of romance novels travels to a distant cabin in order to focus on her work. Her focus is less than laser-sharp, since she's discovering the various services offered by her android butler. Gradually she starts tinkering with the android's commands, determined to turn it (or him ?) into the perfect lover. More, the android should become the perfect man : strong but tender, passionate but safe, mysterious but reliable...

"The Companion" is a science fiction movie about the dangers involved in the manufacture and use of androids supposed to serve their owners everywhere, including in bed. It is hard to muster much sympathy for the female protagonist, whose actions are both self-serving and short-sighted. She does not only endanger herself ; she's harming and hurting another being capable of feeling, all in the name of some unattainable erotic fantasy straight out of a fourteen-years-old's dreams.

"The Companion" has its charms : the plot hangs together and the performances are fine, with a special mention to Bruce Greenwood as Geoffrey. The special effects, though used sparingly, work well. However the movie suffers from over-predictability. We, the viewers, suspect from the beginning that it will all end in tears. What's more, we can make a pretty good guess as to the whys and wherefores of the debacle. Consequently the thriller-like aspects are not all that thrilling.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Companion
BandSAboutMovies6 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Of all the Terminator clones, who knew that I'd be watching one with Bruce Greenwood - Pike from the later Star Trek movies - as a male companion named Geoffrey?

Romance novelist Gillian Tanner (Kathryn Harold, Raw Deal and Yes, Giorgio) has her agent Charlene (Talia Balsam) inform her that perhaps she should give up men - she just got cheated on by Bryan Cranston! - and get with the future. Yes, she is embracing the fourth point of the Church of Satan's five-point program for Pentagonal Revisionism: Development and production of artificial human companions: The forbidden industry. An economic "godsend" which will allow everyone "power" over someone else. Polite, sophisticated, technologically feasible slavery. And the most profitable industry since T. V. and the computer.

At first, she's cold to Geoffrey who is too perfect, too good looking and too willing to cater to her every need. It even puts off her friend Ron Cocheran (Brion James, cast as a reference to Blade Runner?*) and his way too young girlfriend Stacey (Joely Fisher). But when she allows Geoffrey to mess with his programming so that he can become more surprising and therefore her perfect man, Gillian learns that maybe she likes men that are bad for her whether they're human or machine.

Director Gary Fieder would go on to make Things to Do In Denver When You're Dead, Kiss the Girls and Don't Say a Word. You can see he was meant for bigger things when you watch this. It was written by Ian Seeberg, who also wrote and narrated The Naked Peacock, a documentary on nudist camps, and the movie Temptation.

The cast also has James Karen, always a good thing, as the robot salesman, and Earl Boen - as a holographic talk show host - and he was in Terminator, which is a nice reminder that this is referencing that movie.* Plus you get a quick roles for Stacie Randall (Lyra from Trancers 4 and 5), Courtney Taylor (Mary Lou in Prom Night III: The Last Kiss), Brenda Leigh (Scanner Cop) and Bob the Goon himself, Tracey Walter.

It was shot by Rick Bota (who also worked with Fieder on Kiss the Girls), who directed a few movies of his own, including three Hellraiser movies: Hellseeker, Deader and Hellworld. He was also the director of photography for twenty-three episodes of Tales from the Crypt, House On Haunted Hill and Valentine.

The special effects at the end - Scott Wheeler (300, Big Fish, Us, The Mangler, Demon Wind and so many more movies - look really good. Understated and very T800-like, but for a TV movie, it looks great. I had no expectations of The Companion when it started and I ended up really liking it. It feels like the kind of movie that a studio would make today and here it is, a low budget made-fot-TV movie that played on USA.

*Kind words to Matty Budrewicz from the incredible The Schlock Pit site for pointing this out.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed