Dream a Little Dream 2 (Video 1995) Poster

(1995 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Feldman as a Michael Jackson clone, Haim as a new age nerd in this mildly entertaining sequel. (spoilers)
vertigo_1426 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
As a sequel, Dream a Little Dream 2 tends to take a lot fun out of the first movie and attempts too hard to carry on what looked to be quite a finite ending in the first film as well. The Coreys return in this extremely low budget comedy/action as friendly duo, Bobby and Dinger. Only, they're no longer the apathetic adolescence we once knew in Dream a Little Dream. Feldman (though still emulating Michael Jackson here) trades in his pony tail for the yuppie look, while lovable Dinger trades in his threads for new age attire. Add to the mix a red head who plays Bobby's love interest and Dinger's sister (who knew?!).

The story involves Dinger being summoned through dreams by the now late Coleman Ettinger (Jason Robards in the first movie, who does not appear at all in this one, not even in photographs). Something that, at first, the guys aren't too sure about. Or at least, Bobby doesn't believe Dinger's warnings about what Ettinger is trying to tell him in those dreams. Meanwhile, Bobby and Dinger receive a pair of mysterious sun glasses with mystical powers of one person who is wearing one pair of glasses following the habits of the other person who is wearing the other pair. A blonde and another con are after the glasses and try to seduce both Bobby and Dinger in order to get their hands on their magic glasses. Sounds stupid, doesn't it? It is, but despite being achingly boring and wholly devoid of all the great things the first movie had to offer, it does get somewhat better as it moves along. At least forty minutes or so into the movie, when they finally pull some sort of story together. Once the movie becomes Feldman and the red headed girlfriend running around trying to figure out what's going on, and Dinger winds up in jail, things do get a bit more entertaining, in that cheap, early 90s low-budget comedy kind of way. In other words, turn off your brain, and you'll surely be entertained.

But, you won't miss anything in skipping the sequel, anyway.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More like a nightmare
culwin19 November 1999
This movie has nothing to do with the original, except for the Cory/Cory factor. This movie reminds me of Zapped! Again where the kids get super-powers from magic prune juice. Except in this one it is magic sunglasses. There is no surprise that Lou Bonacki gets star billing in the credits as "guard" because he is probably the best actor in the whole film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
At least this one made more sense.
jgusw5 November 2000
This movie wasn't as cool as the first, but it clear up some stuff about the first one. This movie is pretty low budget and thrown together. Not much very exciting to say about it. It's just one of those movies you can sit around the house and waste time watching.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Huh?
macgruder6 November 1999
What is this? This movie has nothing to do with the first one except the two main characters, All of a sudden Cory Feldman is dressed like Michael Jackson and Cory Haim tries to see how weird his hair can get in a movie. Truly a tragedy. I must admit, I am a fan of the two Corys but this movie is just so horrible. What does the plot have to do with the original DALD? Magic sunglasses? I know that they aren't getting top-notch scripts here but, PLEASE, read them before signing the contract.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What is this waste of film stock?
macgruder3 October 1999
Crap. That is what this movie is. Don't get me wrong, I like cheesy movies and I'm a fan of the Feldman/Haim duo(Lost Boys, License To Drive), but this movie was so stupid. Corey Feldman once again doing his Michael Jackson impression, and Corey Haim trying to get his hair to look as weird as possible. Was there even a plot? Oh yeah, something about a few pairs of "magic sunglasses"(what?). The plot was totally different from the original Dream a Little Dream, so I don't know how this movie interacts with the original. I'm guessing the only reason they made this movie a sequel to the original is because this way people who liked the original would actually think this movie had some redeeming value and waste an hour and a half of their life watching this crap.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The original was better
puppy_princess2926 October 2004
A lot of people think it has nothing to do with the original but when you stop and think about it, it does have to do with the original.

Honestly i am a huge fan of the Coreys(Haim and Feldman mostly Feldman)so in my eyes they can do nothing wrong and to me all their movies are good, even this one.

Although I will admit the original was better.

I would recommend this movie for people who want a movie with the Coreys to watch before you go to sleep.

But just to let you all know I liked it and my sister did too and so did a lot of other people that I know.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Embarrassed to say I saw some of this
rams_lakers31 March 2013
No I am not a fan of the Coreys, though I did like Lost Boyz and Goonies. No I do not usually watch movies with Feldman in them. Not a big fan. No I didn't sit down and plan to watch this movie. I'd rather stick 2 giant metal poles into my eyes and run outside during a lightning storm. There was nothing else on, and I have limited channels to choose from. This was "background noise." You know when you're on the computer and the TV is on.

Well, I heard enough, and looked up and saw enough to warrant this movie as garbage. The Corey's aren't bad as actors, but they sure make poor choices. This film had everything going against it. The writing is stupid, the editing is horrible, the directing is dismal, the acting is pretty god awful, especially the supporting cast. Just a low budget piece of trash, I'm embarrassed for everyone who took part in this. A total yuck fest! 1 out of 10 and one of the worst films of all time. Everyone should've just thrown their money away to their favorite charities instead of producing this stale cheese.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Real Snoozer
moviejim17 June 1999
I tried watching this waste of a film but fell asleep the first time and ended up having some dreams of my own. After waking up and rewinding, I found the dreams I had were more interesting than this films so called plot involving special mind-controlling sunglasses. Any fun the first film had is completely lost in this mess.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why? This movie has no relation to the original
bhh-3195521 October 2020
The first Dream a Little Dream movie is one of my absolute favorites! So I was pretty excited to watch this, but wow, what a disappointment. This movie only got a 3 because it has the two Coreys. I wouldn't recommend this flick
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A mockery
yvonne-2124619 January 2020
This movie was a total mockery. The first one is cute and has a nice bit of melancholy to it. This second movie however is not worth your time, at all. Don't see it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disconnected but not bad
drewjames-442171 February 2024
I feel like people are harsh on this movie because it barely relates to the first.

Is this a bad movie? No. Is it a cringe movie? Yeah, I guess but I've watched a lot of cringe movies and this was ok. I even got a few genuine chuckles out of it.

Now am I saying this is the best movie ever? No, it's not amazing. Not really related to the first apart from (technically) 3 characters. It's a more light-hearted movie but still tries to be more... Grown-up? I guess.

If I were to describe what it felt like, I'd say... It's like an SNL skit where they tried to make a fake sequel with multiple genres, including sitcom, romance and spy movies. And somehow this movie made more sense than the first one.

Probably better off watching this pretending it's a stand-alone film. Because once you get past the feeling of "these are meant to be the same characters?" It's quite enjoyable.

Not any of the cast's best work but it looks like it was a lot more fun than the first movie.

Overall I'd say it's worth watching at least once, as long as you don't mind questioning everything while watching.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent music and entertaining story line.
moretoys22 June 2001
Excellent music and musicians, Mickey Thomas and Mel Torme!!! Not a stellar film but entertaining. A movie geared towards pre-teens, teens, and 20's crowds. But enjoyable if you are not expecting a 5 star electrifying movie.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dreaming Of Stacie!
Brian-27212 May 2000
I rented Dream a Little Dream 2 from my local video store in 1995, that being my first viewing of the film, since then I have recently watched this movie a couple of times the last few months on the premium cable network Showtime. A decent comedy with the two Corey's involved in a dramatic tangle over a pair of special powerful sunglasses. The best thing about this movie is the beautiful Stacie Randall, hopefully we will see her in more movies so she can showcase her talent. All in all Dream of Stacie watch if you like Haim and Feldman but Stacie Randall is the best, this film is made to watch if nothing else better to do and to view Stacie Randall.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
worthy Haim and Feldman movie
sublimital_death18 May 2002
This was a case of a writer making a good comedy, and then at the last minute making it a sequel to a drama.. It was a good movie, that takes place years after the first, One might ask why Feldman was so much different, but in the first, Feldman's character Bobby Keller,wasn't Feldman.. If you watch you will see that Feldman (Bobby) was caught in a dream and Jason Robards, who played Coleman was inside Feldman's body (or Bobby Keller).. It made sense for Haim (Dinger) to be the way he was.. But this movie was clearly not a drama, and the story, or point that the first had tried to make you see was all lost in this movie.. There (like most comedies) was no message behind this story at all..

But, as a Feldman, Haim movie, it is worthy, and is a movie that should be seen by any fan.. The Corey's really can't screw up much in my opinion..
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pretty Hilarious
irishscout15 September 2018
This movie is actually so funny. unlike dream a little dream, this movie is way less confusing and more humorous in its goal. i think it still follows the trail of the first movie, even if it's loosely. but corey and corey were funny as always, and i really enjoyed their characters. if you're a fan of either of them, this movie is worth the watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Must Watch
kaysjos23 April 2000
You must watch this movie. People who put it down only did so because they were disappointed it wasn't really a sequel. The first one was a drama whereas this one is a comedy. It takes place five years after the first one.

Coleman has died. Feldman's character has become super neat while Haim's character is still wild. The best parts of the film are Feldman and Lively's chemistry-very funny and great acting-and the appearance of Leo Rossi and the other guy from Haim's Fast Getaway films.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dream a little dream 2 is something new
jellyneckr10 April 2000
Dream a little dream 2 is something new. It is different form the first ream a little Dream. This one is about a pair of magic glasses. Whoever has one set can control the person with the other set. Of coarse, this leads Corey Haim and Corey Feldman into trouble as two spys come after the lasses.

Funny, smart, and exciting! This is a must-see!
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I loved it!
darlenefraser20003 February 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Warning may contain spoilers! Although this sequel to the 1989 hit has really no comparasin(I think i spelled that right!)to the original. Which was a body switch comedy(very popular storyline in the late 80's)this sequel is faithful enough I suppose. The story has a sexy con artist after a pair of spec's, one pair has the ability to make the wearer of the second pair, do his or her bidding. Of course they land in the hands of bobby and dinger which sets them in yet another adventure. Although the film box would have you beleave that this was loaded with nudity, it's not. which is good. mainly because there are so many "sequels" nowaday's that take that territory out of desperation, to get money, and fan recognition. defanintly worth a look.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very good movie
aj-7421 October 1999
This was a very good movie. Yes, it had its cheesy moments, but what movie doesn't you know. All movies have their bad moments. This movie was really good and the chemistry between all of the characters and actors made the movie as good as it was. The actors deserve the praise for their talents and for making this movie what it was.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boring Corey story
Wizard-816 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit that I have seen so many movies, I can't remember if I saw the original "Dream a Little Dream" movie before watching this sequel. If I didn't, I suspect that I was not missing much judging from this movie. Being that this was made by the CineTel movie company, it comes as no surprise that the movie looks pretty cheap and tacky. However, the production values are just a minor quibble compared to the real problems in the movie. The script is pretty awful - the story feels very long and padded out to a ridiculous extreme. Curiously, the second half of the movie pretty much eliminates Corey Haim's character altogether, though this may have been intentional considering the private problems Haim was having even back then. There are also a number of unanswered questions, like how the bad guys found out about the magic sunglasses in the first place. And while the movie seems to have been aimed at the Coreys' youth audience, there are some elements in the story (violence, sexual material) that seem inappropriate for non-adults. The movie is more of a nightmare than anything else.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not as good as the original. - Spoilers
rudedude-118 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
While this was not the worst movie I have ever seen this one does pale to the original. First Corey Feldman's Bobby is now a suit. I guess that could happen but most of the movie seemed predominated by the conservative vs liberal debate between Bobby and Dinger's sister Rachel (Robyn Lively), a trend which we say way too much of in the '90s I also feel that Corey Haim was grossley underused. There's an unwritten law in sequels that says use your returning players as much as possible. I'm not going to argue the death of Jason Robards' character Coleman Ettinger because it would be one of the only ways to not have him appear, but I will voice my biggest gripes over the following: 1) that Coleman was actually conducting more experiments on a professional level and 2) that he was having sex with his assistant. Did the filmmakers of this one even bother to watch the original. The reason Coleman-as-Bobby endured high school life, fought Bobby's best friend and put up with countless other high school humiliations was so he could be reunited with his wife and after that he had given up on the experiment was because he just wanted to live his life with his wife. This movie did establish one thing: that Bobby, Dinger, and Rachel are from Cleveland. However this is not the worst movie I have seen and it was good to see these characters again. I had seen the original and liked it so it was almost like a reunion with old friends and I could think of worst ways to spend a Saturday afternoon.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed