Gunmen (1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Decent entertainment for B-action fans.
Hey_Sweden3 February 2019
Mario Van Peebles is cast as Cole Parker, a DEA agent in Mexico, who busts kooky smuggler Dani Servigo (Christopher Lambert) out of prison. Why has he done this? Because Dani's brother Karl was an associate of drug kingpin Loomis (Patrick Stewart) who absconded with the kingpins' $400 million fortune, and he thinks that Karl may have given Dani information as to the whereabouts of the money. Cole is also on a mission to find out who killed his father. Meanwhile, Loomis has sent an even worse bad guy, hired gun Armor O'Malley (Denis Leary), after the two of them.

"Gunmen" was an early screenwriting credit for future director Stephen Sommers, who went on to make big studio efforts like "Deep Rising", "The Mummy" (1999), and "The Mummy Returns". Here, you could already see that action and violence with a generous dose of humour was part of his style. The director of this one is Deran Sarafian, whose future credits include "Terminal Velocity" and lots of TV work. Deran casts his father, veteran filmmaker Richard Sarafian (best known for "Vanishing Point" himself), in a brief role as Van Peebles' superior.

Mostly, this is routine stuff, albeit reasonably funny, action-packed, and very swift (it clocks in at 92 minutes). The soundtrack is enjoyable, and the flick does have a suitably gritty look going for it. It's also full of violence, but not that much actual gore.

The main value lies in this cast, although Stewart doesn't get to leave much of an impression. He's been better utilized in other projects. Leary really is the main villain of the piece, and he's in fine form. The enticing Brenda Bakke is quite easy to watch as one of Leary's gang. Van Peebles is fine, but doesn't have a particularly great character to play. Lambert gets to have more fun; he always seems to be at his best when he gets to play an off the wall role. He and Van Peebles do make for an entertaining team. Kadeem Harrison has his moments as a talkative pilot, but much like Stewart, Sally Kirkland is wasted in a brief part as a gun runner. You may also recognize Robert Harper, who was crate monster fodder in "Creepshow", as a DEA agent. A handful of rap stars appear onscreen performing (Doctor Dre, Ed Lover, Eric B. & Rakim, etc.). Deran Sarafian himself has a small role as Bishop.

"Gunmen" entertains adequately for action-movie fans, with some standout moments along the way, such as a recurring motif of characters being buried alive.

Six out of 10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Paint By Numbers Action Flick
no-skyline3 January 2006
Christopher Lambert and Mario Van Peebles star in this run of the mill action tale of a drug dealers lost millions stowed away on a boat. This leads to the unlikely teaming of a small time crook and an undercover DEA Agent in a race against the sadistic bad guy Dennis Leary.

Van Peebles and Lambert work pretty well as a double act and Leary is over the top but acceptable as the bad guy, but the problem with this movie is that its so predictable. Every action cliché is there and it comes across as an over violent mix of a spaghetti western and romancing the stone. Patrick Stewart pops up as a gangster overlord but his character seems pointless more of a time filler than a significant plot element.

Basically its an OK but nothing special piece of action cinema, the same thing you've seen done better 100 times before 5/10.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's like they took the Good the Bad and the Ugly and removed class. Still entertaining though.
bh_tafe319 July 2014
Two mismatched rogues who hate each other are forced to work together to try and find a buried treasure, while a really nasty guy tries to track them both down to get the gold. One of our heroes knows the boatyard the treasure is hidden in, the other the name of the boat.

Christopher Lambert and Mario Van Peebles haven't exactly had glittering screen careers, and Denis Leary, the villain, probably enjoyed the peak of his film career in the mid 90s. But in this one they are all fun to watch. Van Peebles and Lambert have a certain chemistry on the screen that needs to be seen to be fully appreciated.

The film does go a little too far on the side of dirty in some scenes and stupidity in others. Patrick Stewart's presence is as ludicrous as his character's arc and demise.

In general this is well acted and directed and certainly not a bad movie. This is not essential film making by any means, but worth tracking down if you like action comedy buddy flicks that borrow the plot from classic westerns.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"I'm gonna hurt you for this! You know that!"
bannonanthony12 October 2003
GUNMEN is a brilliant action movie, and of course very funny. Once again, the great Mr. Denis Leary shows he has the chops to be a great screen villain. As with JUDGMENT NIGHT, he excels as a wonderfully nasty bad guy.

As for our leads, Mario Van Peebles and Christopher Lambert work brilliantly together as they joke and shoot on the way to find some laundered drug money. I don't know what everyone's problem with Lambert is because he's been brilliant in every film I've seen him in. I hated what I saw of HIGHLANDER 3, but that was just because the film sucked, not because of Lambert.

Strangely, there's no love interest for our heroes. But that's no problem. Patrick Stewart pops up in what is basically an extended cameo as Leary's boss. He's okay, but I'm glad that Leary is the main villain of the piece.

GUNMEN does not disappoint as there is non-stop action and side-splitting comedy on offer. Enjoy.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Lame...
fmarkland3231 July 2006
Christopher Lambert and Mario Van Peebles play two bumbling tough guys who go up against a mobster who Lambert stole money from, while Lambert and Van Peebles escape the bullets fired at them, a conspiracy is abound and the usual double-crosses take place in this dull movie which is so bland I can't even come up with a clever opener for my summary. Lambert has an interesting screen presence in his roles that almost always makes him more likable than most other B. stars, however his style is not a style that works with comedy. If you do not believe you can go and immerse yourself in the movie "Why Me?" (An appropriate title for the hapless audience) and see what I mean, Gunmen is painfully trite with dialog so tired and action so uninspired you just sit and watch in darkness as you hear your eyes glaze over and freeze in the sub zero temperature the entertainment registers in. Gunmen is an awful movie, so painfully obnoxious and obvious in it's set up that one would prefer the pairing of Lambert and Van Peebles only slightly over Chuck Norris and Louis Gossett Jr in Firewalker. Strangely this movie feels a lot like that 1986 dud. As reported by others watching Patrick Stewart swear is funny but aside from that, do you really want to see a movie that feels like a rejected TV pilot?

* out of'4-(Bad)
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
dull
winner5518 July 2006
Very confusing film, casually acted.

The problem here is that there is no moral or ethical center to this film, and what pretends to be ironic humor falls completely flat. It is this irony that should fill the space where the absent ethos is; but since the actors clearly don't care about their characters, why should we.

Of course all this would be easier to tolerate if we had a snappy story well-directed - but the fact is, after a half-hour, I realized I didn't know what was going on, and that I really couldn't care less.

I remember Van Peebles from New Jack City, how brilliant he was - what happened to him?
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly diabolical brainless pile of diarrhoea
jebstrong-116 September 2009
I can't believe some of the glowing reviews here and feel compelled to set the record straight as this web site is generally an excellent guide to movies. I am a big Chris Lambert fan and so tuned in eagerly to this one. What a waste of time. Everything about this movie screams out cheap, cheap, cheap! All I can think is the talented actors must have been desperate for some quick cash to get roped into this one. Its turgid, brainless and moronic. It has no plot, absolutely shameful acting and effects that make The A team look out of this world. Do yourselves a favour and do something more interesting like.... watch a snail make its way over the pavement for an hour and a half.
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good lightweight movie hampered by video format
midflinx0072 April 2002
It is a shame Gunmen didn't get fair treatment when it was brought to DVD. Originally shot in 2.35:1 widescreen, the DVD and obviously, the video are only available in 1.33:1 full TV screen format. Almost half the picture is missing, and it shows. Even ignoring the lush scenery cut off, too often the characters' faces are missing from the frame. Even worse is that the DVD transfer is rotten. It may have been from a S-VHS master from what it looks like. It is full of film grain which compresses awfully on DVDs, making the entire movie look muddy.

This is a terrible shame because Gunmen is a fun, lightweight flick of two guys, one good, the other bad, forced to work together against a common enemy. There are many funny one liners, and the action scenes are pretty good, though low budget. Denis Leary is always fun to watch when he's angry or evil, and he's almost always both in Gunmen.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Commitment frightens me....
FlashCallahan7 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
400 million dollars is hidden in a boat in some in South America by Dani Servigo's brother.

When his brother gets killed, Dani is a wanted man - by undercover DEA agent Cole Parker and also by Armor O'Malley, who is working for drug boss Loomis.

Together, Servigo and Parker search for the boat....

After Highlander 2 bombed big time, tins went a little awry for Lambert. He's never been box office gols, but he's always been reliable.

This film marks a turning point for his career, and it starts of pretty badly. It's trying to be some sort of action film where the makers think we will have a good time because Lambert plays some sort of moron and Van Peebles is the straight guy.

It fails miserably due to the fact that it's too incoherent and Leary isn't how he was in Judgment Night,mans he didn't get enough screen time.

Instead we have the two leads in different set pieces involving water dunking, waterfalls, and lots of random extras being blown to bits.

Twenty years ago, this could have been a lot of fun, but these days, the film is dull even at four in the morning when you cannot sleep.

At least Patrick Stewart is in it, and he is hilarious for all the wrong reasons.

Dull.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"If anyone is going to kill you. It's going to be me".
lost-in-limbo11 June 2011
A generically hip, but brutal offbeat comedy action joint that moves at a breakneck pace and offers a lot time for Denis Leary to do his ruthlessly lip-smacking viper bad-guy shtick (and constantly calling those who work for him "morons") … and lets not forget Patrick Stewart in somewhat of an unconventional role as a crippled, cold-blooded South American drug lord. I don't know why, but I had trouble seeing Stewart in the part. I guess Capt. Picard kept coming to mind. Anyhow Mario Van Pebbles finds himself teaming up with Christopher Lambert (who both shares a good chemistry) on the hunt for $400 million dollars of stolen drug money stole away on a boat with Leary on their trail that was hired by Stewart.

A very enjoyable, if inflamed b-grade action buddy fare that's held together by a vacant on-the-run narrative laced with self-irony and the screenplay was written by Stephen Sommers (known for "The Mummy" blockbusters). Razor-sharp one-liners fly about ("You talk more sh!t than a radio") and the edgy violence is explosively staged with some cracking (and over-the-top) stunt-work amongst some flavorous exotic locations. It's slickly made and the camera-work simply excels. Performances are fitting. Van Pebbles' brings a rough and ready trait to his agent character and Lambert gives his crooked character a twitchy, but capable side. Although his accent was a bit of a stretch. A bold Brenda Bakke also makes an impression as one of the mercenaries. Furthermore there's good minor support by Sally Kirkland and a comical Kadeem Hardison.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Gratuitous Violence
fdbjr28 August 2005
I happened to see the beginning of this picture because TIVO switched it on while I was otherwise occupied. The movie begins with a graphic and utterly repulsive scene of a woman being buried alive. The camera shows the hysterical victim being shoved into a coffin, the lid nailed down, and the coffin interred, while various bad guys look on. Her screams resound and then fade as the dirt covers the coffin. This absolutely nauseating scene is included for no other purpose than to provide a little thrill to voyeuristic sadists. It is inexcusable that an actor of Patrick Stewart's stature lent his name to a movie of this pandering quality. I have actually written to his agent about it.
2 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best 'bloke' movies ever made!
greenie424211 January 2007
This has it all - guns, comedy, a stupid plot, senseless violence, explosions, drug dealers, Denis Leary, cleavage, and none of that stupid emotional baggage most films seem to adopt at some point - what more could a guy want? Definitely a great movie to watch when having a few drinks with some mates. My friends all constantly come back to watching this movie after a night out, it just has everything. Great B-grade performances from some top name actors like Denis Leary, Patrick Stewart, Christopher Lambert and Mario Van Peebles. It's the sort of thing you could almost imagine yourself getting caught up in on a baaaaad holiday to South America.

I don't recommend any girls watch it, though I know a few who would find it amusing. To the people who say it is super-violent, try watching the nightly 6 o'clock news. Far worse stuff happens every day in real life.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A rarity - a genuinely funny buddy-buddy action movie
Leofwine_draca24 July 2016
GUNMEN is another of those buddy-buddy movies that were all the rage in the early '90s after the success of the LETHAL WEAPON films. This is probably one of the most undistinguished and easiest forgotten films of that sub-genre, but what the heck, I liked it anyway. The whole reason this movie is entertaining is solely down to the casting of Christopher Lambert and Mario Van Peebles, who have one of the best double acts I've seen in a movie. The script, by MUMMY director Stephen Sommers, wisely focuses on the natural humour between the pair and because they're having a ball, the viewer does too.

The story is nothing new: the hunt for an elusive boat, which becomes ultimately pointless by the climax anyway. It's just an excuse to have Peebles and Lambert being hunted through various types of terrain and gunning down villains at every opportunity. The action isn't even particularly inspired, following the '90s template of 'blow everything up', and there's little attempt at style here.

But I digress. Lambert is hilarious, the funniest I've seen him, playing a slightly unhinged criminal type whose laugh is completely infectious. He's a winner on good will alone, but Peebles rises to the challenge and equals him as the sterner one of the pair. There's a fine supporting cast, too, with most performances geared towards the comedic: Denis Leary, as an icy head honcho bad guy; Patrick Stewart, as a crippled crime boss; Kadeem Hardison as the comedy relief pilot; B-movie regular Brenda Bakke as a femme fatale. Still, in the end this film belongs to Lambert and Peebles. They have tons of good routines together, with the highlight being the 'first aid kit' trade-off towards the end. Still makes me chuckle just thinking about it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What the Heck?
TedMichaelMor19 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Had the makers of this movie developed something from the scene where the protagonist drops the little girl from his motorcycle to the nuns, they might have made a memorable film. Of course, the film ends on a note about the little girl and the nuns but that is not the movie one gets.

Roger Ebert recounts the secession of stolen elements from actual motion pictures and defines part of the problem with this mess. The film simply replicates quotes from other works.

Sometimes, the film has a certain visual beauty but nothing ever comes from that beauty. The narrative is incoherent. Threads form and disappear. Nothing happens in all the rush of action. Humour almost works but again never forms patterns or stories.

I do not know what the makers of this film intended. I doubt that they knew. Several films might have happened; not one did.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gun tooting comedy
Jonathan Horner25 May 2000
If you've read any of my other movie reviews, you'll know by now that i'm a massive Christopher Lambert fan. Gunmen see's Lambert team up with Mario Van Peebles who also stars in Highlander 3 with Lambert, in the same year. Lambert is a drug smuggling rebel with a soft side and Peebles is a tough cop. They team when they hear about 400 million dollars which are hidden in a boat somewhere, so they set out to find it. In their quest there are laughs, thrills and spills galore. But the two of them don't exactly get on together, they are like two little kids argueing.

For a low budget movie it's pretty good. I would say it was one of Lamberts better movies but not as good as Highlander and Fortress.

If you like explosive action and guns galore, this is the one for you.

Silly in parts but good fun.

I rated it 7/10
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Below average buddy buddy action film.
poolandrews14 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Gunmen is set in the jungles of South America where drug lord Loomis (Patrick Stewart) has hired mercenary Armor (Denis Leary) to find 400 million dollars of his stolen money, while moving the cash one of his men named Karl Servigo loaded it on a boat somewhere ready to sail off after meeting his brother Dani (Christopher Lambert). After Karl dies while being tortured by Armor the only other person who might know where the boat is happens to be Dani, however Armor isn't the only one looking for Dani as New York cop Cole Parker (Mario van Peebles) is aware of the money & breaks Dani out of prison in order to find out where the boat is. The hunt for the 400 million becomes a race against time as to who will get there first...

Directed by Deran Sarafian I have to admit to being rather disappointed by this lacklustre buddy buddy action thriller that doesn't have nearly enough action or thrills. The script by Stephen Sommers (who notably later went on to direct high profile fantasy films such as The Mummy (1999), Van Helsing (2004) & G.I. Joe: The Rise of the Cobra (2009)) is a light hearted affair with plenty of banter between the two mismatched leads who inevitably become good friends by the end & a quick succession of one-liners but I thought there was a real chemistry lacking between the two leads, maybe it was Lambert & Peebels performances or the script or the direction but I never warmed to either of them. The villain starts out as a frail Patrick Stewart in a wheelchair (practice for his role as Xavier in the X-Men films?) who is wasted in a small role before Armor decides to run the show himself, having said that Armor isn't the brightest bad guy, why did he kill Karl in the first place? Despite needing Dani & Cole alive he lets his men shoot at them constantly & why kill that woman at the end? At 90 odd minutes Gunmen moves at a decent enough pace but the action is forgettable, the character's don't click & the plot about finding hidden money while avoiding the bad guy's is nothing that original or special & Gunmen doesn't distinguish itself from any other average action thriller.

The action mainly consists of a few shoot-outs where the bad guy's can't shoot straight as usual, a few people crashing out of windows & a boat exploding at the end. Gunmen looks quite nice, set in South America the lush green jungles add a little something the close-ups of wrinkled faces & guy's with thick stubble remind me of a Spaghetti Western. There's a topless woman & a bit of blood but nothing excessive.

With a supposed budget of about $8,030,000 this had a fair bit spent on it & I can't really see where the money went besides the locations & even then Gunmen was filmed in Mexico not South America. The acting didn't impress me, as I said I thought there was little to no chemistry between Lambert & Peebles which really killed the film dead for me.

Gunmen is an average action thriller with the whole buddy buddy mismatched partner thing going on of which there are many better examples out there. Not something I would want to watch again, ever.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Spanish Fly
refinedsugar30 March 2024
I really wanted to enjoy 'Gunmen' as it looked like a fun piece of action from the 90's with a good cast. I can tolerate a predictable story, turn my brain off in pursuit of a good time as I know lots of things are likely to go boom here and a mass of firearms are gonna be shot off. The two foes who become allies I could have seen from a mile away, but what I didn't expect was just how simple the story is even for this genre.

Down in South America, drug baron Loomis (Patrick Stewart) has had his 400 million stolen and now the only man who knows where is it is the brother of the deceased thief, Dani (Christopher Lambert). Armor (Denis Leary) and his group of cut throat mercs are brought in to find the cash as DEA bounty hunter Cole (Mario Van Peebles) breaks Dani out of jail because he has a score to settle with Loomis. Dani knows where in the world the boat is and Cole just so happens to know the name of the boat.

It was a hoot to see Patrick Stewart playing a bad guy even if he doesn't have a ton of screen time. Leary isn't given much to sink his teeth into and doesn't go off on any rants unfortunately and as the "good" guy Peebles is merely sufficient. It's really Lambert that shines here the most - playing one of his 90's action slightly off kilter goofballs - with the right energy, his patented laugh. A slight deviation from the buddy cop movie with the prerequisite issue of trust and double crosses is the score here.

'Gunmen' is the type of flick you can skip and not miss much and those who give it a go will be hard pressed to rank it highly. It's as generic as generic gets ... much like the title I suppose. If you like any of the stars - Lambert, Stewart in particular - I think it's worthy of a curiosity watch but not much more. I was never bored due to some decent stunt work, but it also didn't impress.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unusual, Oddly Funny Action film.
hu67524 August 2005
Drug Baron Peter Loomis (Patrick Stewart) has his $400 million dollar drug fortune stolen. Loomis sends O'Malley (Denis Leary), a ruthless killer to find his money. Cole Parker (Mario Van Peebles), a DEA Agent is on a south American mission of justice and revenge. He is sent to find his father's killer. Cole busts an eccentric smuggler (Christopher Lambert) to help Cole to find the smuggler's brother money that he has stolen from Loomis. But O'Malley wants to find the fortune for himself. In a Cat and Mouse game, Cole and the smuggler are forced to help each other to find the missing fortune trying to avoid, O'Malley and his men.

This is an fun, action-packed thriller with an fun sense of humor. This oddball cop/buddy movie with touches of the spaghetti western is directed by Deran Sarafian (Death Warrant, The Road Killer, Terminal Velocity). The film is weird and uneven but it is a fun movie to watch. Lambert is hilarious as a whacked out smuggler. This film was a Box Office disappointment. This little seen action film might have a cult following. If you love action films with something a little different. This is for you. Screenplay by Stephen Sommers (Deep Rising, The Mummy, The Mummy Returns). Panavision. (****/*****).
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
good effort
ghostman162 April 2007
i am a Christopher Lambert fan. so when i saw this little gem at a car boot i just bought it strait away without looking at the back for the plot description.i'm glad i bought because gunmen is one of his best. it has great action funny dialogue and an all star cast including Mr Lambert, Mario van Peebles, Patrick Stewart and even Denis Leary. the plot is simple Christopher plays Dani Servigo a small time criminal who is busted out of prison by Cole parker played by Mario van Peebles and together they reluctantly team up to find a hidden loot but are pursued by Armor o Malley played by Denis Leary and Loomis played by Patrick Stewart. the plot may be simple but that is good since it doesn't drag on with developing the story and goes right to the action.Christopher's character Dani is quite funny whilst Mario's character Cole is a hard ass macho kinda guy. gunmen is certainly entertaining and never lets up i give it 8 out of 10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not a Sergio Leone rip-off
Minority_Report15 June 2002
I watched this film expecting it to be a rip off of Lethal Weapon or The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Sure, the director is influenced by Sergio Leone, but that's no bad thing and this is hardly a remake of it. Instead, it has the same laid-back approach of any Leone western and is inspired by some of his great movies moments. If anything, this is much more a clone of Lethal Weapon, and it's a good one too.

Being a fan of Christopher Lambert, it was great to see him in wise-cracking action and Mario Van Peebles was equally good. I also thought Denis Leary was a terrific bad guy and I liked Brenda Bakke as Maria too, a much better role for her than in Under Siege 2. I would go so far as to say this is just as much fun as Highlander, except it's a comedy with plenty of gags, some good, some not so good, but the film has so much pace to it that it doesn't really matter.

So if you like a good-humoured buddy flick, and you liked Heartbreak Ridge, then you should see Gunmen.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Modern remake of Sergio Leone's "The good,the bad and the ugly"
thebigmovieguy9 May 2003
"Gunmen" was loosely based upon Sergio Leone's "The good, the bad and the ugly". But it isn't that much of a rip off. It's actually pretty good. Here are the most obvious resemblances :

1. In "The good, the bad and the ugly", there are three men : the good, a lonesome cow-boy (Clint Eastwood); the bad, an gun-for-hire(Lee Van Cleef) and the ugly, a thief (Eli Wallach). In "Gunmen", Mario Van Peeples plays a bounty hunter (the good), Dennis Leary plays a cutthroat (the bad) and Christopher Lambert plays a thief (the ugly). The relationship between Van Peeples and Lambert in "Gunmen" is similar to Eastwood and Wallach's partnership in "The good, the bad and the ugly".

2. There also is what I call the "you've got the gun and I've got the bullets" situation. In "The good, the bad and the ugly", Eastwood and Wallach are forced to work together to find the treasure because Wallach knows the name of the cemetery and Eastwood knows the name of the grave in which the treasure is buried. In "Gunmen", Van Peeples and Lambert both have their own part of the secret. Lambert knows where his brother hid the boat with 400 millions dollars aboard and Van Peeples knows its name.

3. Finally, there are many scenes in "Gunmen" similar to the ones in "The good, the bad and the ugly" like the scene where Lambert is forced to reveal where the boat is to Leary (Wallach is beaten up and reveals the name of the cemetery to Van Cleef) and the scene at the end when Van Peeples makes Lambert believe he'll get rid of him to keep the treasure (Eastwood hangs Wallach but cuts him loose and shares the treasure).

With all these resemblances, it makes no doubt that "Gunmen" is a remake of "The good, the bad and the ugly". A good remake, though. Considering this movie was made with a very low budget with terrific cast, I thought "Gunmen" was a cool action/adventure flick. Mario Van Peeples and Christopher Lambert are great in their roles and Dennis Leary is excellent as the main bad guy. Patrick Steward also gives a very believable performance as the drug dealer.

Overall, "Gunmen" is a fun modern day remake of Sergio Leone's epic western. I give it a strong 7/10.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oddly entertaining, mixed action film
grimjack-212 May 1999
This film is certainly uneven, and borrows from obvious Sergio Leone westerns, but you should find it entertaining. Worth seeing, if for no other reason, to see Patrick Stewart playing a crippled south american druglord who buries alive his disloyal wife in his opening scene. Another scene that will have you shaking your head in disbelief is when two main characters shoot each other in the leg in an attempt at humor.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining
Tenacity30 June 2003
This is a very light, entertaining movie for its B budget action format. I think performances by all the big name actors are quite good and even the lesser known actress Brenda Bakke puts in a decent performance. Van Peebles and Lambert have good chemistry on the screen though it was not as easily appreciated in the Highlander movie.

I recommend it for light-hearted action fans if only to catch the segment towards the end where they "trade" First-Aid kit back and forth. :)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining
Gareth_Hacking13 December 2002
I think it's fair to say Christopher Lambert has had his fair share of duds in recent years. Started off in a great way in the 80's and then it's been one long slide into obscurity (Highlander 4 anyone?). Mario Van Peebles career path has been pretty similar since 'Heartbreak Ridge' though he seems to have done all right recently appearing in Ali. Anyway ‘Gunmen' co-stars the two the same year they appeared together in Highlander 3. The basic plot of this South American actioner is that Dani Servigo (Lambert) is the only one who knows the name of harbour where a boat with 400 million dollars of drug money onboard is moored. Cole Parker (Van Peebles) is the only one who knows the boat's name. Together they're trying to get there before Loomis (Patrick Stewart), the drug lord the money belongs to and Armor O'Malley, his right hand man (Dennis Leary) who's starting to strain at the leash.

Why am I recommending this film? Well, Sam Raimi said that the success of the Evil Dead films is dependant on how much abuse Bruce Campbell suffers. I think it's the same with this. At one point Van Peebles is tortured for information by being hung below a helicopter and flown through trees and then dunked in a lake. The more they suffer the more you want them to overcome the obstacles in their way. Mind you, Dani and Cole not the nicest of ‘heroes'. Actually they're a couple of complete jerks. They bicker constantly and don't trust each other, stooping so low as to shoot each other in leg so they other can't run off with the money (this being a early 90's action film all this does is give them slight limps, how realistic). What makes it great to watch them is Lambert and Van Peebles aren't afraid to go for it and it's obvious they're bouncing off each other. On top of this we have Leary playing exactly the nasty driven character he's so good at (don't believe me? watch Judgement Night), whether it's shooting his own men or having people buried alive. An interesting fact to note is that this is an early writing effort from Stephen Sommer, who went on to demonstrate his ability with action pictures with such films as Deep Rising and The Mummy.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed