Hostile Force (TV Movie 1997) Poster

(1997 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Bland title, bland film.
andrewbg8 August 2004
Hostile Force is a bland, generic title for a bland, generic film. You've seen the same premise and the same characters a hundred times before. It's not bad or unwatchable but it simply has nothing to distinguish it from countless other DTV movies. A robbery gone bad leaves a female cop without a husband. Two years later she is working as a coordinator for a security company. One of their sites - an armoured car base - gets hit by robbers with a simultaneous assault on the security centre.The majority of the film focuses on the ex-cop's attempts to sneak a message to the jobbing security maintenance man, who by a stunning coincidence is also an ex-cop who quit after the same robbery that her old man was offed in.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Dreary" is the best way to describe this TV made turkey.
aloep25 August 2004
I've said it before, but when Channel 5 in the UK show straight to video/TV movies, why do they always have to show absolute worst ones? I caught this on TV earlier this month and instantly recognised it as a terrible movie I'd seen many years earlier on you've guessed it, CHANNEL 5! You're probably wondering why I watched it again if it was awful. Well, it's been at least 4 years since I last saw it and I barely remembered anything about it other than it being bad. I decided to watch it again to see if it was as bad as I remembered it. Occasionally, things do improve on second viewing. Not this.

Quite possibly one of the most dreary and boring "action" movies of all time. In every angle it's cheap and tacky. Much of it is set around one dingy room where the incompetent robbers don't do much other than argue with each other, and while not doing that they're either terrorising or again arguing with one of the hostages. Everything is incompetently handled. The pacing for one, is dreadful. What relevance did Lucy James's fiance being killed in an earlier robbery have to do with the main plot? The performances are largely awful, with nobody really getting into the material except for the ever talentless Hannes Jaenicke who I recognised from Jim Wynorski's classically bad Extreme Limits, who puts in one of his usual hammy performances and at no point comes off as convincing or scary. Only positive thing I can give it is that the climax isn't as bad as it could have been, but that's hardly a compliment. This scene is mediocre at best, and comes after so much dross that even if it was great, it still couldn't make up for the rest. It includes 1 car exploding, a small gunfight and a fight on top of a moving van. This ends up providing unintentional hilarity, as the moving van is a mid 90's Ford Econoline and the van that ends up rolling over looks like a late 70's van, with circular headlamps. The difference is obvious and this is probably the only thing that made laugh in this rubbish. And the whole dreary feel is carried through to here as well, as this is set among wastegrounds under cloudy skies.

This has to be one of the shortest reviews I've ever written but everything to be said has been said. I just advise you to stay well away. It's not even "so bad it's good", it's just pitiful, dreary, forgettable rubbish that will do nothing but give you a headache and put you in a bad mood.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Avoid "The Heist" (1997) if you ever stumble across it.
tarbosh2200015 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"Some things don't go exactly as planned." In this obviously-Canadian so-called "thriller", which should have maintained its cooler original title, "Hostile Force", Lucy (Geary) is an ex-cop (after being involved in a shoot-out) now working as a 911 operator. Mike (McCarthy) believes there is money in a safe at Lucy's place of employment. Mike and some other toughs in animal masks try to intimidate the workers and find the money. Will they succeed? After a decent shoot-out opening, the movie begins to lag. Unfortunately, this lag take up the rest of the running time. That's quite an 85-minute lag. McCarthy can't save the movie, no matter how hard he tries.

Lucy's co-workers are very annoying and trite. One looks like Banya from "Seinfeld" and is ten times more irritating. The boss minces around and does his best Paul Lynde impression. Everyone except Mike and Lucy are meant to be comic relief. Sadly, the "humor" falls flat on its face and neither the movie, nor the audience, can recover.

Imagine a poorly-constructed, cheap version of Phoenix (1998).

Avoid "The Heist" (1997) if you ever stumble across it.

For more insanity, please visit: comeuppancereviews.com
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Video fodder, barely worth anyone's time
Libretio21 January 2005
HOSTILE FORCE

Aspect ratio: 1.33:1

Sound format: Ultra-Stereo

Employees of a security agency are forced to combat a gang of professional thieves who invade the premises with a view to stealing cash from the company's heavily fortified safe.

The very definition of DTV fodder, Michael Kennedy's blah programmer is an OK time-waster, nothing more. Top-billed Andrew McCarthy plays the villain, an ambiguous character who's not above killing those who get in the way of his criminal ambitions, but who keeps a tight rein on his psychopathic subordinate (popular German actor Hannes Jaenicke), whose wild behaviour threatens the entire operation. Wolf Larson (TV's "Tarzan") is a former cop who stumbles onto the heist and makes an effort to rescue the hostages, including Cynthia Geary, another ex-cop who switched careers when her boyfriend was shot and killed during a violent confrontation with armed robbers several years earlier. Unfortunately, hunky Larson is sidelined in favour of mousy-looking Geary, whose transformation into a gun-toting action hero during the film's climactic shoot-out stretches credibility to the limits.

Much of the film unfolds in the agency's control room where Geary and her co-workers are held hostage, and the banter between captors and captives isn't particularly compelling, which stifles tension and slows the pace to a crawl. When the narrative DOES move beyond these limited confines, the half-hearted action scenes are compromised by a lack of decent coverage, which further cheapens the production. There's plenty of talent on both sides of the camera (I'll refrain from making the usual comments about McCarthy's painful slide into obscurity), but the movie wears its lack of ambition like a badge of honour. Why do people waste their time making such bland, faceless tripe? Also known as ALARM FÜR SECURITY 13 and THE HEIST.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Thriller, or Comedy?
littleariel141629 March 2008
I didn't know this movie was supposed to be a comedy. Me and my dad, who were watching the show, were cracking up at the cheesy rolls and dives, the lame explosions, and the overall terrible acting! Besides the acting being bad, I also thought the setting was terribly, along with the music. Then again, it was the 90's. Maybe it was the best they could do. The only reason I watched it was because it was a Saturday afternoon, and I didn't have anything better to do. I do give it credit for having an interesting plot. . . if only they put more into it. So, if you're at home, and you have nothing to do, and this show comes on, just pop in a different movie. It's not worth it. Life's to short to waist time watching this movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Laughable, except that it isn't a comedy.
jackj18 July 2000
One of the worst screenplays ever. How's that for bad?! I guess what kept me watching it was the same reason people would watch a train crash. Too many things to specify, other than saying the whole third act was a joke. Things not making sense, in there for no reason, or a bad one, just overall terrible. Don't waste your time; even accidents this bad aren't worth it. Obviously the filmmakers have posted a lot of ratings here!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Geary was good, but ...
vchimpanzee6 April 2005
Lucy and Tony are cops that try to stop what turns out to be a very violent convenience store robbery. Two years later, Lucy is an operator for Alert Guard Security who sends service people out to check alarms or other problems. Tony, who wants to date Lucy, ends up working for the same company. Ronald, the guard at the gate, flirts with Lucy, but he's not as serious. Still, despite all this attention, Lucy feels the need to dress like a hooker and go to a bar hoping to be picked up.

'The Heist' (the title of this movie when I saw it) refers to what happens on Easter Sunday when millions of dollars are being stored by Riggs Armored Transport in a vault on the company's premises. A group of robbers includes a man with a rabbit mask, a man with a pig mask, and a former Alert Guard employee. The room where Lucy and the other operators work has a broken thermostat, and the door has to be kept open even though that's not the usual procedure.

My main incentive for watching was Cynthia Geary, who was so cute on 'Northern Exposure'. She didn't disappoint here. Lucy could be quite pleasant under normal conditions, and she handled herself very well in a crisis, even making sarcastic comments and using her feminine charm. Andrew McCarthy alternated polite and nasty as the ringleader of the gang. Peter Hanlon gave an interesting performance as Lucy's apparently gay boss. Other than Geary, though, there wasn't anything really special here. The movie was not excessively violent, but it was violent enough. The ending was quite exciting. And if you like watching things blown up, there were a few really big and unnecessary explosions.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not bad....
Graham-3822 July 2000
Don't rent this movie, and I doubt it ever came out in the theaters, but if it's 4 in the morning and you're a little drunk and it comes on, give it a chance. If only to see how far Andrew McCarthy has fallen and to see how no one's career went anywhere after this movie. Fine 4AM flick though.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
good
NYR16 September 1998
it was an excellent movie that moved at a good pace
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sheer curiosity.
akirasan6 March 2004
I caught this low budget heist-gone-awry story as I was channel surfing in the wee hours of the morning. The novelty of seeing where the careers of Cynthia Geary and Andrew McCarthy had digressed was enough to hold my attention. I think another reason I watched was it appeared to be filmed in Vancouver, B.C. It was a few years ago so I don't remember much about the movie other than the campy performance by McCarthy as the mastermind bad guy, and Geary's limited range effort as the security guard who foils the big money robbery. In a word the movie is bad, bad, bad. Oops, that's three words. But in the right state of mind, or hour of the day, it could be good bad.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed