Undue Influence (TV Movie 1996) Poster

(1996 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
a made for tv who done it that's a cut above a tv movie.
triple84 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I think there was just something about this movie that made it a bit more high quality then most tv "whodoneit"s. Maybe it was Brian Dennehe who I'm not all that familiar with but from what I have heard from people he's pretty much great in all he's in. And he was very compelling in this thriller of an attorney, representing a woman accused of killing the wife of her ex husband. He thinks she's innocent but she won't lift a finger to try to defend herslef so he delves into an investigation, trying to find out the truth.

I had not wanted to see this but was drawn into the room because-hey-it was exciting and suspencful. You really, watching this want to know what is going on and who the killer is. This movie doesn't need to rely on cheap gimmicy effects, there's both drama and a sense of intrigue. I'm not saying this is oscar caliber-far from it-but it's great tv viewing if you want good acting and an interesting mystery.

My only criticism is-spoilers-

Some questions do not get answered at the end. There are loose threads and things that are not explained as fully as they could have been. Certain things stay baffling and a bit of a puzzle. Stll a good movie though in many respects, Dennehe creates a credible and interesting attorney who steals every scene.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you are a Brian Dennehy fan -- watch this mystery
leomoviecritic25 April 2009
First off, I'm a huge fan of Brian Dennehy. Both ladies gave good performances as well as the supporting cast. And of course, Dennehy was a very interesting attorney. We are drawn into his personal life as a multi-faceted man. He is so adept at showing a honest range of emotions, personality, and character. This is a good twisty mystery. Yes, it is a longer film, but includes plenty of drama both in and our of the court room.

If you are viewing as a TV movie, I'd recommend recording if you have a recorder device to speed up your viewing pleasure (commercials). Interesting plot developments and some good ethical questions were presented. Even if you guess the guilty, you will enjoy this mystery.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining
payasoingenioso31 January 2021
The acting is great.

The plot is predictable, but it is still well executed.

Jean Smart and Patricia Richardson sharing a screen is timeless.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For the beauty of Jean Smart alone, this is worth it !!
nicholas.rhodes14 September 2003
A very beautiful lady, Jean Smart, with auburn hair is absolutely magnificent in this film and this alone is one excellent reason not to miss it ! Seriously though, This film is definitely good, as are the vast majority of films involving Brian Dennehy, whom I adore as an actor ! The plot, of the "whodunnit" type is not complicated but there is a lot of side-tracking and red herrings which have nothing to do with the truth. Some of this side-tracking, notably everything concerning the Merlo family is rather confusing and one gets the impression that it's there as padding to make the story much longer than it would have been but without any real relevance to the story itself. In spite of these plot holes and script defects, the film makes for excellent watching.

Denneyhy's daughter is really cute, and the scenes between him and here about her recently departed "Mummy" are very touching indeed, both from Dennehy and the young lady herself who acts the part very very convincingly. I had watery eyes during all these scenes.

I enjoy this sort of "courtroom-drama-made-for-tv" movie which only the USA seem capable of producing. I luckily found it issued on DVD in the UK and certainly didn't regret my purchase. I have seen the film previously on French TV under the title "Abus d'Influence".

Highly recommendable entertainnment then to be watched curled up before the fire on a cold wet and windy winter's afternoon !!
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Short and Sweet... : )
lathe-of-heaven22 April 2008
Okay, since at this time there are only 2 reviews of this film and because of the specific nature of this film I felt that I really should leave a brief comment.

First off, for what it's worth, to the fellow who is all worked up about Jean Smart... Yeah, she looks okay... HUGE breasts, scrawny legs, so you call it as you see it... : ) Personally I kind of liked Patricia Richardson better. Cuter, less gamy (Yes, I think I could tell she had had work done; it looked pretty tight around the eyes...) None the less, cute in a kind of perky almost tom-boyish kind of way.

Anyway, sorry about that... Back to the film. All right, let me state right off (well, ALMOST right off) that within the first 30 minutes or so the acting and direction were SO bloody AWFUL that I took the discs out of my player and threw them in the trash cursing all the while. Because up till NOW I had yet to see any film with Brian Dennehy that I didn't like. Especially many movies where he has played either a cop or a lawyer. But THIS one... Lame, Lame, Lame... However, after I settled down a little and did a BIT more reading here on IMDb, I thought, okay the damn thing is 240 minutes long, of COURSE there's gonna be LOTS of padding at the beginning and I was curious as to what was really going on.

So, I steeled myself, took the discs BACK out of the trash and cleaned them off and continued with the movie (BTW, I had stopped when Brian Dennehy was meeting the dubiously lovely Ms. Smart in the fancy restaurant. Man, the dialog and delivery were getting SO damn clichéd and TRULY painful, that I just couldn't take it any more!) But, I did my best to try to ignore the amateurish direction, which I feel was indeed the main culprit, and just hold on to see how the plot was gonna develop.

Okay (I guess this really ISN'T very 'Short & Sweet' after all, is it; sorry about that : ) Here is the Bottom Line:

1. You have to endure the first 30-45 minutes at least, probably due to LAME direction, some amateurish acting and padded script.

2. BUT, and it's a BIG BUT like Mariah Carey's, IF you can hold out until the LAST 30-45 minutes THEN the story itself actually does indeed get fairly involving and there are a couple of decent twists.

So, that's about it; still quite sub-par overall for a film with Brian Dennehy and in my opinion probably the poorest one out of all of his. The STORY was not bad, it is just the WAY it was told could have been a LOT better...
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow! Just wow!
costanmarga29 November 2022
I just saw this on Tubi, I'm not usually one for courtroom dramas but this movie had me on the edge of my seat the whole time. I did not find it predictable at all, lots of unexpected turns.

I have to come up with 200 more words but I'm not good at excruciating detail and like I said, others wrote a great synopsis, I don't feel the need to add to it.

I just saw this on Tubi, I'm not usually one for courtroom dramas but this movie had me on the edge of my seat the whole time. I did not find it predictable at all, lots of unexpected turns.

I have to come up with 200 more words but I'm not good at excruciating detail and like I said, others wrote a great synopsis, I don't feel the need to add to it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Watchable, SPOILERS ahead
AnnPanders13 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Well, this was LONG for a tv movie. The first half was trying to set the stage for the twists and turns at the end. But like another reviewer wrote, you really had to bear through those first two hours because Laurel was awful and you wanted to hate her. Having seen so many crime shows I figured that she was deliberately being nasty to her BIL who wasn't even charging her for his legal services because, hmm, what would motivate a woman to act like this? So I thought, she's obviously protecting her son. And the pieces quickly fell into place, especially when we found out that Melanie was pregnant. Hmm, who could possibly be the father of the baby that would REALLY piss off Laurel? You guessed it, and so I was just waiting for the big reveal that the son was the father of her unborn.

But then it got tedious, with side stories about witness protection, the ex-husband Senator caught up in corruption, and can anyone please write a review and explain to me why the hitman was still after Dennehy at the end, after blowing up a post office????? I didn't understand that at all. And for a hitman, he was a terrible shooter even with the red dot light.

It kept me watching to the end, and was interesting to figure out the twists. It is long, but I'd recommend it if you're sick on a Saturday and will be in bed all day anyway.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed