The Girl (TV Movie 1996) Poster

(1996 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Too much badness.
rebekahrox21 June 2017
I guess the Catherine Cookson model for historical dramas just do not float my boat. This was somewhat entertaining, but I just don't like all of the sorrow, suffering, and angst in my dramas. Her stories are just dark all the way through. Even when people are happy, there is some fly in the ointment. I do not mind some darkness in my dramas: I loved Little Dorrit, and Middlemarch for example. I love Elizabeth Gaskell stories. Loved Downton Abbey. These are just humorless. And boy there is a ton of them. I think I have seen enough to know I don't want to suffer through anymore of these to find the ones that I do like. I did like The Rag Nymph, and the Glass Virgin back in the day. Not sure why, but they were different in some way while still being the same basic plot. I suspect it was the actors and the characters they played.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why is it that these gorgeous men always fall for idiot women?
waterandfire13 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The Girl follows the life of Hannah Boyle, who enters the movie as a child, desperate to find help for her ailing mother. She runs into a local horseman, Ned, who is luckily kind enough to help. The movie follows her to the doorstep of the wealthy Thorntons, where Hannah's mother informs the man of the house that he has a bastard child. In front of his stiff-faced wife, mind. She then leaves little Hannah with the Thorntons, goes out to the back, and dies. So begins Hannah's tale of woe.

The first thirty minutes or so of the movie show some of the most blatant, honest cruelty that I have ever seen. Furious, hurt, and bitter at her husband's cavalier adultery, Anne Thornton takes her anger, frustration, and humiliation out on Hannah, labeling her "the girl", forcing her to work, and, eventually, thrashing her with a horsewhip so hard the child races over to the home of Ned and his grandfather, longing for comfort. Mr. Thornton puts a ready stop to this, and sends Hannah off to be "educated", and there endeth Young Hannah.

Seven years later, we meet older Hannah. Unlike the little tomboy we were first introduced to, this one is proper, "ladylike", delicate, and mild mannered. The perfect little lady. She still is hardly greeted with kindness from Anne, or from Anne's younger daughter Betsy (a kid with her head held so high she nearly trips over her shoes); but her father, half-sister Margaret, and half-brother John are all welcoming. In John, unfortunately, Hannah has a bit of a problem. She spends quite a while lusting after him, seemingly oblivious to the fact that a) they're family, and b) he doesn't seem to have any interest in her. Which causes her to bawl her heart out. And from there, the movie changes it's tone.

Hannah, is, in a sense, not an impressive character. She represents the female stereotype of that era, and it's painful to watch. The contrast to Hannah, however, is Ned (Jonathan Cake looking more broody, Irish, and bloody gorgeous than any man should have a right to.) Hard-spoken, rough, with an obvious shine for Hannah (heaven knows why), and a way of being cocky without losing his appeal, Ned creates the movie. Referring to Anne as "Lady Muck", excusing Mr. Thornton for fathering a bastard ("It's nature"), drinking, womanizing, and tending to his beloved horses, Ned is the Irish country that the Northumberland setting needs. That Hannah wastes her time fawning over her brother and pining away for a happy existence, while Ned all the while serves as her therapy, is more than a little trying. Ned too appears fed up with it; he tells her to shut up more times than anyone else does, and I love him all the more for it.

Hannah's life, of course, is bound to get worse. Her father dies (interestingly through an affair he was having), she is married off to a rather pig-like butcher, who is kind but stupid, and she realizes what the audience has known all along, namely that Ned is a) in love with her, and b) a sex god whom she should be worshiping. Unfortunately, by the time she realizes this, she's already a married woman, living a miserable existence. So she does the obvious : engage in an affair.

From here on, the movie is subject to view point. Speaking as a hardly religious person who judges each circumstance differently, I had no problem with the adultery. It had mainly to do with the times; in modern day, she could have divorced him without worry. Such things were not allowed for women back then, however; it's not as though she has much of an option. It is interesting to note, however, that both she and her father were stuck in loveless marriages; both followed their hearts elsewhere. One pays the ultimate price; the other suffers a bit (Ned more than she, and for the record, if I were him, loving a woman who got my finger chopped off in a bear trap and caused me to briefly go into a coma, really wouldn't fit into my priorities), but eventually gains happiness.

I was also struck by the slight connection to another movie; Jane Campion's The Piano. Women find love away from their husband's, and everyone's true nature is revealed. The woman discovers her freedom and sexuality; the lover reveals that he is not a hard person, but rather a loving, gentle one; and the husband reveals his dark side. In the case of of both, the woman briefly pays for the husband's anger; in the case of our movie, the lover briefly pays as well. What moral is to be learned? I suppose that everyone has a hidden quality within them.

The person who suffers most, however, is Ned. Suffering his way first through love of a woman who ignores him, then through love of a woman who is married to a man who doesn't quite treat her right, he bears a burden far more severe than hers. Perhaps Hannah has a right to be as dependent as she is, and perhaps her "trouble" is not all her fault, but one can't help but be annoyed that a rather pointless person receives undying devotion from someone who deserves better. This moral? Pretty, uneducated women always get the men. Though she does briefly redeem herself when she talks back to her husband's over-controlling mother, and takes it upon herself to manage the house.

Overall, a decent movie; the Brits tend to make them better than anyone else. And worth watching for Cake, who has a considerable amount of talent in addition to god-like looks. Flynn's good too, being as this was her first movie, and she couldn't help the script. Though you ought to take the opportunity to see it now; it's pretty rare.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth watching, but read the book, too
VTNJGirl8 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
May contain spoilers!!!!!!!

While this is a well done production, and it does follow the book word for word at times, and Jonathan Cake is absolutely gorgeous as well as a great actor, I highly recommend reading the book itself. In the book, Hannah's predicament and decisions are much more understandable, and the reader/viewer is much more sympathetic to her struggles than in the movie.

This is due to the some basic things that were not considered enough in the movie, or just left out (like the existence of the second brother, Robert, who was a great character): mood, time and seasonal factors. The background. WHEN things happened, and in WHAT season and weather were all critical to setting the mood....

BTW, Mark Benton as Fred Loam is just WONDERFUL. He generates such caring and frustration, and creates a very three-dimensional character that your heart just breaks for him. He does Fred so well that the way the writers play Hannah it gets you annoyed at her for hurting him.....while the script should not have let that happen to Hannah, it sure gives credit to Mark Benton for doing Fred so well!

Very worth watching for the period and the acting.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another Catherine Cookson classic
qljsystems15 July 2013
A good story never fades or ages, and that can be said for all of the movie-versions of Catherine Cookson's powerful novels. In spite of this movie being almost 20 years old, the power of its story and the depiction of the mean-hearted, neglectful wealthy and the struggles of the poor in Britain's North East, the hallmark setting of a Catherine Cookson story, remains timeless. Like all the movie-realizations of her novels, we're shown an almost green-and-pleasant England with its fair share of cruelty, nobility, non-starry-eyed romance, and tragedy transforming into personal triumph. All 2+ hours of this story will fly past in almost no time leaving you sorry that you reached the end.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Catherine Cookson Is fabulous
tfain-4677321 September 2018
The Girl is one of my favorites but I would gladly watch all of her movies my grandmother introduced me to the Mallen books in 1970 I read all I could then I found them on utube I watched An now we are no longer able to see these great movies.In America we are in a different region code An can't buy them to watch with out purchasing a new DVD player that's expensive to do. So please play her movies we will all be happy if u do ,we love all these the girl is excellent!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Catherine Cookson TV movies
tfain-467737 October 2018
I love all Catherine Cookson movies and would appreciate them being shown the movies on dvd wont play in USA we can't afford a 500:00 dollar vcr to play the region code these are made in . I'm trying to let my granddaughter see all her movies she's read the books YouTube use to have them to watch now they aren't playing at all. Please consider a showing of these fantastic programs Catherine Cookson fans are still out there an I can't afford 400:00 dollars for dvds that won't play in this region code
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Bit different this time!
davyd-0223719 April 2021
I say that because in this particularly well acted Cookson Dramatisation, pretty much everyone is a "church attender" - yet not one of them has an "Christian" decency. Matthew Thornton (the top dog of the area) sleeps with other women as his Missus doesnt allow him into her bed, given that the house is hers as is most of the money. Then theres the nasty mother of the butcher-greed personified! The plot revolves around a young girl who is left at the Thornton household on the basis that she is "his" child (watch to find out more). Ultimately, she is no saint either. You will need to watch to draw your own conclusions. The storyline bothered me as not all church goers are as portrayed here. The scenery is brilliant and the acting pretty good too, but in this case Im not convinced the ending was the right one!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Thornton deserved better
lizzyispink18 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Peasant woman and daughter Hannah are squatting in a shed in the woods bump into kindly neighbor Ned and his grandad. He takes them to a nearby estate where mom tells lord of the manor the girl is his. He steps up and brings her into his home. Rarely is there a protagonist as unlikable as Hannah. She's selfish and spoilt, having no appreciation for the life provided by Thornton.

When old enough she is sent away to finishing school. Having learnt no skills or manners of any type, Hannah returns home apparently with no plans to contribute in any way but continues to enjoy the family's home and money. She refuses a good marriage, bringing dishonour to the family. Thornton is set up and meets an unfortunate end so Hannah is at the mercy of wife Anne, Thornton's frigid wench of a widow. When confronted with the reality that she can't freeload forever she agrees to marry the fat doltish butcher.

Disrespectful, cold and rude to hubby and MIL,and treated appropriately for such behaviour, she whines and complains to long suffering friend Ned who is inexplicably in love with her. Why he loves her is a mystery, as she has done naught but use him to dump her problems on when her impertinence gets her into a bind. But suddenly she loves him too. Not hard to figure out where things go from here.

How Ned can want to be with her after the bear trap incident (which evidently caused paralysis) and the encounter with her her simpleton hubby is perplexing.

The costumes and sets are sufficient but nothing memorable, acting is mediocre but little could be done with such a dreadful script.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lovely, layered tale
Bean's Folks15 October 2001
Like other Catherine Cookson's stories, "The Girl" focuses on a young woman who must overcome emotional and physical obstacles to finally come into the life she deserves. This tale is no different. The performances are excellent, and the costuming and locations equally well done.

A lovely, powerful story.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed