A Real Young Girl

(1975) A Real Young Girl/ Une Vraie Jeune Fille (In French with English subtitles) ADULT DRAMA/ AUTO-BIOGRAPHY

A no- plot adaption from her own novel of the same name, directed by controversial director Catherine Breillat, starring Charlotte Alexandra as Alice Bonnard who's just coming home to visit her parents for the week from her studies she's just turned 17. She then spends the rest of the movie dwelling on finding her sexual identity or finding puberty, since she loves touching her private parts with inanimate objects such as spoons and bicycle seats. And loves teasing model-like guys who work for her extramarital dad. What more is there to say except that the director's female characters teases the men in the movie as much as the director loves to tease it's viewers. Although, I couldn't understand what to make of it, I had to semantically come to the conclusion that because it's adapted from Catherine Breillat own personal novel, that it can also be defined as an autobiography as well, since the actress is performing abnormal acts average people would not even try such as urinating without the seat down, or on the ground so that the guy she likes can see it too- this is not normal stuff, but can be expressed through into her films. Whereas, she refuses any advances made from any of the young men too. Making the assumption that the director Catherine Breillat is expressing her peculiar and rather odd acts through the actresses who star in her movies as much of her controversial films have no plot nor do they tell us anything we don't already know, for it may be another side we don't quite know about Catherine Breillat herself.

Very internalized... ...like the subject matter.

Interesting topic; possibly even unique. But one portrayed in a meandering, long, and drawn-out manner that highlights the problem of French cinema- -being that most French films wouldn't pan out and be fully fleshed if released as two-and-a-half-minute pop videos.

Objectivity is something rarely seen in films nowadays; unfortunately, rarely seen anywhere in the media nowadays. But I'm not sure if this is an ethos that should be applied to film, because an engaging movie it does not make.

This is a type of film where reading the description of the movie is more thought-provoking and interesting than actually having to sit through it. To sum up, the film should have been titled "Une Vraire Vagin Pourri".

No, I couldn't hate this movie but on the other hand it also clearly wasn't made for me. It's perhaps a movie some females can still recognize themselves in, till some extend at least. For me it was just hard to identify with the characters and all of her weird, sexual orientated, fantasies.

It's a movie about a young 14 year old girl (played by an 21 year old by the way) who has obviously started to hit puberty and is about to discover her sexuality. She starts experimenting a bit and we get to see all of her fantasies, that are being put very straight-forward to the screen. It means that the movie features plenty of full frontal female and male nudity but also some really disgusting scenes, as the little girl is really having some dirty thoughts and fantasies. Pissing, puking, worms...should I say more? But then again it's not supposed to be a movie obviously that is supposed to turn you on. It's merely a look into the thoughts and fantasies of a girl who is about to discover her sexual identity for the first time. I really don't think this movie could had been made by a male director. It takes a woman to be able to get into a young girls mind and translate and brings to the screen all of the thoughts and feelings she might be having at that certain period in her life. I admire the movie for what it does and attempts to do but as a male, it just wasn't all that appealing or throughout interesting to me.

As you wouldn't had guessed it already, this movie is being an art-house type of movie. Nothing too heavy, although some of the sequences might still be shocking to some people, since it has some explicit nudity and some gross out moments in it. But it's at least not a movie that is full of itself and tries too desperately to be an arty and creative one, by putting in lots of symbolism and sequences that run overlong.

Still you feel that the movie could had done way more with its subject. It could at least had made it a bit more interesting to watch. At times now I was really thinking 'why am I even watching this'. Not that it's boring though, the movie was also too short for that but it's also really a movie I could easily had done without.

If you are female you might still get something out of this movie and recognize yourself in some parts of the movie or its main character, though I still somewhat doubt this. Else females are way more dirty than males if this is the case.

6/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

This is Catherine Breillat's directorial debut. She also wrote the screenplay from her novel published the year before.

One may be initially confused about the fact that it was made in 1976, but not released until over 20 years later. No, it is not a video nasty, but it was banned in France and only when films like Salo or Boise Moi got released, were we able to see this film.

Breillat is not for everybody. The sex in her films is in-your-face. You have to look at them with an open mind. They have an artistic value and should be seen for that.

The film, about a 14-year-old's self discovery stars voluptuous Charlotte Alexandra, who would later appear in Emmanuelle 3. She explores her body with the boredom and recklessness of a teen, and wonders about the studs that she comes into contact with. She fantasizes at times, even about her own father. It was just too frank for the censors at the time.

This is not for the trench-coat crowd, as there is no sex, although her father (Bruno Balp) sure acts as if he would be willing. His smiles and touches are most unfatherly.

The ending was both funny and sad.

This film is rather difficult to review because it doesn't really have a plot to speak of, and it's clear that director Catherine Breillat was more keen on focusing on the art elements and detailing the sexual developments of a young girl than telling a story. This is the first film I've seen from Catherine Breillat, but given what I've read about her; it would seem that she enjoys directing films that focus on sexuality, and that would seem to be the case if this film is anything to go by. A Real Young Girl focuses on Alice Bonnard, a 'well developed' teenager who attends a boarding school and is spending the summer at her parents' house. She enjoys experimenting, and has a particular fascination with fluids, as she experiments with all sorts including urine and ear wax, as well as egg yolk and tanning cream. She becomes fixated on a man employed by her father, as well as a couple of other local men and her father, and the film basically follows her summer as things happen to her parents and she develops sexually.

Unlike most exploitation films, this one takes place from the woman's point of view, although the idea that all men are sex-obsessed perverts certainly shines through, and I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Catherine Breillat is a devout feminist, as there isn't one single decent male character in the whole film. The film rests a lot on its star Charlotte Alexandra, and she doesn't disappoint. Her performance is thoroughly realistic, and she also looks rather tasty, which is sure to delight the male viewers. I have to admit that I was expecting to be shocked going into the film, and while A Real Young Girl is liable to offend less well versed viewers; it would seem I've seen too much of this stuff as nothing in the film seemed too over the top to me. Catherine Breillat clearly isn't afraid to shock the viewers, however, as the film features plenty of nudity and other perverse scenes. The film features no suspense and the plot really just plods along, but it's well paced and while you know that the ending isn't going to provide much intrigue, it doesn't matter as anyone looking for a sexually charged film is likely to be satisfied.