User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Three brief tales of overwhelming odds changing lives...
Doylenf11 July 2008
Luck is the hidden master, according to this John Nesbitt "Passing Parade" segment from MGM.

In 1744, suffering from melancholia, Robert Clive (PETER CUSHING) of India attempts to shoot himself. The gun misfires a couple of times with the odds being 400 to 1 that it would. A timely interruption from a fellow British patriot informs him that his service in India is over and he's free to return to his normal life.

In 1895, Dr. Renkin accidentally discovers the X-ray process when some ingredients he was mixing falls off a shelf and lands on cardboard not far from a vacuum tube. Once again, sheer luck and the odds at it happening are enormous.

Then Harry Jones, down on his luck with a wife and two children to feed on his $21 a week salary, gets a phone call in the middle of the night from a drunken bar patron. After hanging up on the intruder who woke him out of a sound sleep, he discovers that a gas leak has put his wife and children into a coma and is able to get to the phone to make an emergency call before collapsing himself from the fumes. Fortunately, the operator calls the police.

The chance that the call from a man dialing a wrong number would save his life was against all odds. He can now regard himself as "the luckiest man alive".

And that's the thrust of this brief nine minute short.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dreadful anti-science
rgcustomer20 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Three cases are presented, which purport to show a "force" of "luck", and later re-interpret that as a "higher power", despite having no evidence. Anyone taking this at face value is likely to emerge with a warped idea of statistics and physics.

The first case is of Clive of India, who tried to shoot himself twice, but the gun didn't fire. The chances are stated as 1 in 20 twice, or 1 in 400, despite the likely dependence relationship between the two original shots, and less dependence with the third shot, taken by a different person at a different angle (and not at anyone).

The second case is of Roentgen, discoverer of X-Rays. A number in the millions is presented as a calculated chance of rays from a oblong tube would hit a fallen cardboard screen and the effect be noticed by Roentgen so that he'd pick it up and see his hand bones. It's unclear at all what is being measured here, but I suspect they are defining how this could have happened far too narrowly, and they aren't reporting any error range around their millions estimate, and surely there would be a wide range of possible error in that calculation.

The third case is of a man who received a drunk-dialed call that woke him up in time to save his family from natural gas poisoning. They say the chance his number would be dialed is one in 10 million, and the chance of it coming at that time is incalculable. First, it's not one in 10 million. The drunk is trying to dial a specific number and is failing. Maybe they get the digits out of order, or miss a digit, or duplicate a digit. But there are not 10 million ways to make these errors. Closer to a few hundred. Also, people are likely to be drunk at night, which is when you'd likely be asleep. Depending on the size of the leak, it could take quite some time for gas concentrations to become deadly, leaving a wide time interval when a life-saving phone call could come in. While it's still incalculable in any useful sense, it's also not too amazing. Unlikely, yes, and good too, but not too amazing.

So, after presenting us with positive events that were unlikely to happen, and perhaps misrepresenting them to seem even more unlikely, it concludes that a higher power is in charge of the force of luck. Whatever.

Bad things happen. Good things happen. Even very unlikely, seemingly impossible things happen. There are no conclusions to be drawn from that, except that our ability to predict and/or alter individual random events by any means remains zero, as it has always been, and probably always will be.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very Entertaining Passing Parade Entry
Michael_Elliott19 May 2010
Hidden Master, The (1940)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Highly entertaining entry in MGM's Passing Parade series takes a look at three different stories involving luck. The first has a man (Peter Cushing) suffering from melancholia and decides to kill himself but it doesn't work out as planned. The second story has a doctor accidentally discovering X-rays. The third story deals with a poor father who never has any luck and this continues one night when a drunk man calls the wrong number and wakes him up. He doesn't realize at first how this is going to change his life. There's nothing ground breaking here in terms of film-making, acting or directing but these stories are interesting and entertaining enough to where you'll have no problem making it through these 9-minutes. I thought the middle story was the weakest but perhaps that's because it's only given about a minutes worth of time. The first and especially the last story are extremely well done and will have you wondering about the "luck" that happened. It was fun seeing Peter Cushing playing the man who would turn out to be Robert Clive but it's also worth noting that this story was left out of the film CLIVE OF India. The final story is without question the best as it contains some great drama and a nice twist to the luck.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed