The original is based on the premise of an oral sex contest, here the sexual options are not limited to the mouth. The cast is more attractive than the original. The level of enthusiasm seems about the same. There are a few seconds of the first competition cut in.
2 Reviews
Ten years after: not so hot
lor_30 September 2020
This belated sequel to a popular 1984 theatrical porn film is a flop, despite a decent cast and production. It's uninteresting story leads to a dull, mechanical sex display in a boxing ring that is pure filler.
A token porn-parody reference is made in character names to the then-recent Tonya Harding skating scandal, but Kylie Ireland as the bad guy of the competition is a gimmick that goes nowhere.
So we're left with okay sex scenes by Kylie and Tricia Yen, as well as buxom Kim Chambers who contributes a d.p. to the cause. In the final two reels the two scenes of 3 ladies competing sexually in a who can elicit a cum shot first contest with various studs are anticlimactic.
Title word "Competition" is spelled correctly on banners at the event arena, but sloppily misspelled in the movie's title card on screen.
A token porn-parody reference is made in character names to the then-recent Tonya Harding skating scandal, but Kylie Ireland as the bad guy of the competition is a gimmick that goes nowhere.
So we're left with okay sex scenes by Kylie and Tricia Yen, as well as buxom Kim Chambers who contributes a d.p. to the cause. In the final two reels the two scenes of 3 ladies competing sexually in a who can elicit a cum shot first contest with various studs are anticlimactic.
Title word "Competition" is spelled correctly on banners at the event arena, but sloppily misspelled in the movie's title card on screen.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
