Bolo (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Impossible to summarize
ckormos11 August 2016
This movie opens with the premise that if a new sheriff is needed you select two prisoners and give them the job with a reminder not to run off. Captain Obvious says "Realism will not be necessary". They steal a blind guys wagon but in the next scene they are attacked while walking separately. Next they arrive at a brothel and meet Eric Tsang in drag. Bolo wants the ugliest woman in the brothel.

At about this point I gave up trying to summarize what was happening. The scenes were so incoherent it would take longer to describe what was happening than it would take to watch and in either case you still wouldn't understand it.

The fights were also impossible to describe. They were not fighting but what was that? I just can't explain the arms flapping around and the legs moving.

There is no story to the point where whatever is happening at any moment turns into something unrelated in the next minute. Yet still I kept watching because they were still in a brothel and girls and perhaps bare breasts. Since spoilers are forbidden I cannot say what I saw.

Since I cannot explain nor summarize this movie I also cannot review this movie nor rate it nor recommend it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is the first martial arts film I couldn't get myself to finish....I simply hated it.
planktonrules4 August 2009
I have reviewed quite a few martial arts films over the last few years, so my hating this film isn't because I don't like the genre. Also, I have a very high tolerance for "bad" martial arts films, so this one had to be really, really bad for me to give up on and and not even finish the film (something I rarely ever do). Understand that I have watched such films to its conclusion as one with guys in gorilla costumes doing kung fu and their masters using their three foot tongues as weapons--yet I just couldn't finish BOLO.

So why did I hate this film so much? Well, it was the worst of all possible worlds. First, the print from EPI/Gotham City was just terrible and the film only came in the cheesy dubbed version. Second, the film was too often played for very broad and dumb laughs. Googly eyes, silly grins, dumb cartoon-like sound effects and an annoying over-the-top gay character all were painfully unfunny. Third, even with bad dubbing and dumb comedy(?), the film could have been decent if the martial arts action had been better--which it wasn't. Instead of hitting each other or doing what looks like real martial arts, it was too choreographed and looked quite fake. Midway through the film, I was fantasizing about Sonny Chiba stomping onto the set and kicking everyone's butt--that's how much I disliked the film.

Yuck.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst. Movie. Ever.
wafartamo26 August 2018
The acting, (overacting) directing, and almost impossible to understand English dubbing, make this movie very difficult to watch.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yang Sze direct a comical kung-fu film
Serpent-518 May 2000
Two misfit convict (Yang Sze and Jason Pai Pao, who both also produced this film) gets out of prison only if they become a lawman in a town full of corruption. Several funny scene including a comical music video highlights this slightly diffrent kung-fu film. Sze, known for playing a Bruce Lee villian in ENTER THE DRAGON directs something diffrent here compare to most Kung-fu film. He also has a diffrent looks, as if he was trying to do a career change. Pao, who was last lead in THE BLACK DRAGON is also good. Recommended to Kung-fu fans.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This is not good
olajkarattila20 January 2020
Everything is wrong about this film. I was curious because of the relatively high (6,2) rating and some good user reviews. I like old school kung fu movies. This one unfortunately falls apart. Poor acting. Poor sound effects. Jokes are not even funny. The story is weak too... Don't waste your time watching this one.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A treat for fans of the inimitable Bolo
Leofwine_draca2 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
BOLO is a treat for fans of screen heavy Bolo Yeung, best known to Western viewers for his antagonist roles in Van Damme movies like BLOODSPORT and DOUBLE IMPACT. Before then he had a lengthy career in Hong Kong cinema, usually typecast as a hulking henchman, but here he gets the opportunity to play the good guy for once and boy, does he shine! BOLO is also one of just two forays behind the camera for Yeung as director.

I've always been a fan of Bolo since his days in ENTER THE DRAGON so watching this film was a real treat for me. Bolo is beefy and bearded in this one, an escaped convict who teams up with Shaw Brothers star Jason Pai Piao to tackle a village full of corruption and bad guys even worse than they are. Plenty of hijinks and action ensue, with Bolo kicking up the screen and Piao proving his mettle to boot.

What's good about this film is just how enthusiastic Yeung is when given the opportunity to play a different role to the norm. He's very funny and surprisingly athletic at times. The fight scenes aren't the best quality ever but the comedy is funny and the story interesting, which is just as important. Many of the supporting actors have unique physical qualities and you recognise them from other films, like the guy with the drooping eyelid or the cross-eyed chap. Chiang Tao, he of the imposing cheekbones, appears too.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stay in your lane, dude
lotekguy-110 August 2022
By the time this was made, Bolo already had done dozens of the 100+ acting gigs on his resume. In this debut as director, he seemingly lost his way. Incoherent plot, with transitions so wrenching at least some of the discordance must have come from edits for Western markets. Many movements (especially a lot of arms flailing in random directions, nearly a zip code away from any opponent) during the fights that were usually the main appeal of these flicks were just plain bizarre, even for chopsocky comedies of that era.

Bolo only had one more directing credit. This shows why he belonged IN FRONT of the camera (where he was an absolute Rock Star), and NOT behind it. Look elsewhere for your Bolo fix.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bolo is the David Lynch of Hong kong.
chainedspecter28 February 2006
What seems to be a light hearted comedic kung fu movie is actually a tight psychological thriller with each character reflecting a facet of the psyche of the viewer. Bolo himself represents our hulking innocence. The most innocent and simple tasks become confusing and threatening in Bolo's world. Almost as though Bolo is attempting to reveal our pitiful arrogance by showing us the world through the eyes of the severely mentally retarded and then hanging us with the realization that this is how the world actually is to all of us.

The protagonist comes under attack by increasingly ugly townsfolk thus holding a mirror up to our own culture of destruction as the suspendered representation of our cynicism mockingly sneers at him for denying the baser aspects of existence. And just as our own cynicism grows in reaction to continued exposure to blighted existence, so too does the well dressed man grow in power and influence.

The time period the movie occurs in is unclear as elements of period china, late seventies America, British controlled Hong Kong and Japanese occupation era china seamlessly coalesce giving the picture a very "Titus" sense of epic timelessness

As the movie progresses, allies suddenly attack each other for no reason and 40 seconds later they forget it thus demonstrating the Byzantine conflicts of urges within our own egos. Character development takes a backseat since each character is a timeless human archetype and the change in the movie's personality only occurs with the destruction of all other competing drives.

There is also very terse biblical symbolism throughout the maddeningly complex narrative. Bolo's love for the 7 foot tall stick woman mirroring St Peter's own struggles during the formative days of the Christian religion being only one of hundreds of examples.

Honestly though, this movie cannot be simply deconstructed in a beginner film class by a professor. Undertaking that task is a time consuming and painful spiritual journey to the very brink of oblivion as the movie doesn't shy away from inherent subconscious horrors that lurk in the viewer. To deconstruct the movie would require the entirety of the viewer's graduate study. Additionally the difficulties increase since the film actually manages to weave together an image of the viewer himself. No two people will have the same Bolo experience.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pure Kung-Fu Crack!
elgaroo8 September 2006
By far thee most hilarious, cracked-out kung-fu movie I have EVER seen!!! I am really sad so few people have ever heard of it; this is pure gold!!

Basically, this is a western gangster movie adapted to a rural Chinese kung-fu setting. VERY rural! These two misfits get out of jail by being "volunteered" to "sheriff" some middle-of nowhere podunk town. The town turns out to be completely run by local gangsters, and much back-stabbing and double-crossing ensues.

But this is a comedy! A really ballsey, absurd comedy! And not only that, but as far as I can tell, there is such a reliance on puns and obscure cultural references that didn't translate through to the English dub (and the dub acting is really bizarre/great as well!), that you'll be screaming WTF all the way through the movie!) really, there is some CRAZY stuff in this movie what makes no sense, unless maybe if you are Chinese? Don't expect to have any idea what is going on until you've seen it quite a few times, and even then, some bits are just inexplicable (the hand game? 426? the oranges!?!)

And to top it ALL off, this thing is actually CHOCK FULL OF SOME GREAT KUNG-FU! And it's kinda long, at that! Sure, much of it is totally ridiculous, but the execution and choreography of it all is really quite tight! And where else do you get to see _Yang Sze_ whooping ash with a chair? Crutches? Sandals!? A freakin wok!?!

Still, the story itself is even interesting. An archetypal, fable-like tale of the big dumb brute teaming up with the smart, witty, irreverent trickster to cause tons of mischief.)

Gloriously absurd and discordian to it's fullest.)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed