Invisible Child (TV Movie 1999) Poster

(1999 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Good movie, bad message
KRJ54815 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Although the movie itself is fairly decent, the message behind "Invisible Child" is profoundly defective.

While it attempts to garner sympathy for the mentally ill, this movie actually degrades them. For the writers to imply that psychosis is on par with cultural myths like Santa Claus is not only inane but insensitive.

The movie further degrades the mentally ill by suggesting that psychosis has benefits. The family convinced themselves that enabling the mother's illness strengthen them as a whole. But that idea in itself is a fantasy, fortifying my belief that the father and children were not only enablers of the illness, but victims of it as well.

Despite the family's proclaimed love for the mother, I felt that their reasons for evading psychiatric aid were selfish. If the issue at hand were truly the mother's wellbeing, the family would've sought help immediately. But since they did not, I suspect that their personal desires were the real motives in not seeking help.

Overall, this movie was presented sufficiently. But its message of "family before self" in regards to mental illness is highly insensitive to those who are sick but fight to get better, not worse.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Daughter of the Mind
wes-connors9 May 2014
English-accented blonde Tushka Bergen (as Gillian) gets a job as "nanny" for an affluent family. Head of the household Victor Garber (as Tim Beeman) works in their luxurious home. Attractive wife and mother Rita Wilson (as Annie) tends to her children, especially doting on "Maggie". The other two children are precocious Mae Whitman (as Rebecca, affectionately nicknamed "Doc") and youngest David Dorfman (as "Sam"). The plot concerns the five-year-old middle child "Maggie", who doesn't exist. She is the "Invisible Child". Due to some unspecified mental illness, Ms. Wilson has created Maggie, from birth, and is the only one who can see the little girl. Because she needs the job, nanny "Gillian" agrees to go along with the fantasy. The family fears Ms. Wilson would be declared unfit or committed to a mental institution, if "Maggie" is discovered to be imaginary...

This "Lifetime" TV Movie is ultimately unsatisfying because it offers too little background and never properly addresses the mother's mental health problems. We are led to believe she has handled the situation for years, without being labeled the village idiot. This seems highly unlikely, although the script advises that Mr. Garber and the other two children have helped enable the ruse. This teleplay, written by David Field and directed by Joan Micklin Silver, does have some fun scenes; these are when the characters go out in public places with the invisible "Maggie". Best is when Wilson declares "Maggie" has a fever and must be rushed to the hospital. Also noteworthy is the performance of young Whitman, especially her scene in the "Agency for Child Protection" office with suspicious Freda Foh Shen. Her manipulation is not at all believable, but it is well-played.

**** Invisible Child (3/8/99) Joan Micklin Silver ~ Rita Wilson, Tushka Bergen, Mae Whitman, Victor Garber
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What was the point?
smithannasmith33310 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is an odd movie. It is touching, yes, but what is the point or message of this storyline? I do not mind an odd movie or unusual theme, if it carries a message and if I feel that the movie-makers know what they want to say. I do not blame actors here - they are doing a good job, especially the girl who plays the nanny. Also the child welfare inspector, portraying convincingly a nasty bureaucrat. I am asking from the scriptwriter and the director - what is the point of this film? That we all should have invisible children? Or how sad it is that the invisible child dies? Also, is it possible in reality for a person interacting with a physically non-existent person for such a long time? This film was touching in many ways, I liked the nanny and the older child, Rebecca, but it did not convince me.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You Have To Not See It To Believe It!
sebast-17 March 2005
I just don't know exactly what to say about this film except that I didn't enjoy it half as much as my invisible friend Dave did. We sat together this Saturday on our invisible couch eating our invisible popcorn(which by the way, is really low in fat and cholesterol) and watched one of the stupidest movies I have ever seen in my life. You know a movie is bad when the best performance comes from the invisible child herself. Watch this if you just want a good laugh at these poor actors expense. And to think that Rita Wilson is married to two time Oscar winner Tom Hanks.(Then again, he also spent a whole movie talking to a volley ball!) Could he not have given her some advice? I have some, Read The Script Next Time Before You Sign The Contract!!!!
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Un-friggin-believable
cuckookachoo15 September 2003
I can't believe IMDB even bothered to list this!!! I saw this awhile back on Lifetime and it stands as one of the worst/best things I have ever witnessed in my life. Rita Wilson plays a demented mother who imagines she has another daughter in one of the funniest movies I have ever seen, unintentionally so naturally. TOTALLY INSANE. I've told friends about it and they don't believe me. Now I have proof with this IMDB listing! I have to track this thing down and throw my own Mystery Science Theatre party....
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Uh...come ON!
sunflowr29 January 2003
Okay, here is a Lifetime movie at its CHEESIEST! This was such a terrible concept - I can't believe that someone would write such a script.

That out of the way... okay Rita Wilson, I love ya to death. But, your husband Tom Hanks is winning Oscars and you are making movies about invisible kids?!?! Thank the Greek Gods you happened upon Nia Vardalos & her Big Fat Greek Wedding!

This movie wasn't worth the 1.5 hours I spent watching it...actually, it was on in the background while I was cleaning the house. (Not all of us are lucky to have a nanny. ;) Then again, I didn't see Gillian doing any of cleaning?!

If Lifetime had an award for worst script, this would win...! Please, don't waste your time...unless you have some housecleaning to do.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I'm sorry, but....
Electric Rat8 May 2000
This movie is ridiculous. The adult characters are unrealistic and selfish. Someone in need of this much mental help would have to had given themselves away at some point. Where are the other relatives? Where are the neighbors? It took five years for someone to step in? I don't think so. Any husband who would let his wife remain untreated for this serious of a mental disability is selfish and should be locked up himself. This film was a complete waste of my time as well as the filmmaker's. Shame on Lifetime for making such garbage. My rating? A big fat 0.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
very insightful!!!!!!!
gopsycho30 May 2005
Once in a while, comes a movie that can really be appreciated just for the story. This movie is definitely one among the category. I started to watch on a lousy Monday afternoon, when i had nothing better to do & on a channel i just discovered existed!!!! But, yeah it reminds me of beautiful mind, except that it stops with hallucinations & does not deal into schizophrenia. Being a psychology student, i have to say that its been well handled, with special mention to Rita Wilson's acting. She's made gr8 efforts to bring out the hallucinations & the normal person in her. Well..... she is normal, in the movie. Overall, a good movie with a great insight into the relationships among family members & how they always try & support each other, esp. in times of crisis. And yeah, its always not possible for family members to keep intervening in the other member's crisis or depression. Sometimes, there has to be a third person or sometimes, like in the movie, its just time that heals....
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dreadful beyond words
misterbuddwing664 March 2004
Mind-boggling! What were they thinking?? "The Invisible Child" is even WORSE than it sounds! I can't believe I watched the whole thing. I *thought* that Victor Garber was a pretty good actor--but in my mind, he will always be "tainted" for having appeared in "The Invisible Child." I feel sorry for Rita Wilson, and if I never again see the child star who played the non-invisible daughter, it'll be too soon. This is not even in the "so-bad-it's-funny" category. Watch it, if you must--but you'll be sorry you did. This is one of the dopiest scripts to ever reach the (small) screen. The Lifetime channel shows a lot of junk, but "The Invisible Child" really takes the cake.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lovely performances in an offbeat but touching story
Moviemom20 November 2007
It surprises me that so many people have such negative reactions to this movie. It isn't the usual Lifetime story with dramatic betrayals and heartbreak. It is not a documentary about mental illness. But it is a sweet almost-fantasy about love and loss and families and the the difficulty of balancing being supportive and being an enabler. Rita Wilson has dignity and grace as the delusional mother of three children, one of whom happens not to exist except in her imagination. It is not too far removed from what families do all the time on a smaller scale. Jimmy Stewart saw a big rabbit-ish pooka, for goodness' sakes.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A couple have two real child and one imaginary child, Maggie. Only the woman sees the imaginary child and all the family are acting as if the child exist.
sailoupette15 March 2006
This movie could have been better than what it is. When you get to know the reason why the woman sees an imaginary child, you know you don't want bother watching the rest of the movie. It's just stupid. I think I know the reason why the woman sees a imaginary child: she doesn't work, she doesn't know what to do with her time, she lives in a big house, she is too comfortable in her world, and so she got crazy. I liked the acting of the little girl and that's it. I wish I could have learn something from this movie, but no one won't, except maybe how to decorate your house. Also, did the woman never noticed that the kid never eats the meals? I wish I was on the movie so I could eat the dinner of Maggie. I'm sure they wouldn't mind.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Genuinely Original, Moving
jtrapp110 March 1999
From the title I was expecting some sort of crisis-of-the-week TV drama concerning child molestation or neglect, but INVISIBLE CHILD was nothing of the sort! Remarkably original, sophisticated production concerned with how people create their own private fantasies & how those fantasies sometimes come in conflict with the external world, rather like *HOUSEKEEPING*. My only complaint is that, unlike HOUSEKEEPING, the style is not idiosyncratic & moody enough to complement the content, but other than that, a fine movie!
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Noble attempt at a lacklustre script
yaspaige20 July 2008
First off, Invisible Child had the chance to be a brilliant movie, but the direction is just plain awful, and seems very amateur. But what saves this film is a flawless performance from a young Mae Whitman as Rebecca "Doc" Beeman, who shows up mediocre portrayals from leading stars Rita Wilson, Victor Garber and Tushka Bergen. I will admit that the story is a little far fetched, but it is sweet. The script is laughable at times but does offer some poignant dialogue and very sweet moments. While i liked the film i was disgusted by the way Mr Beeman makes his daughter play along with the fantasy, and how nothing feasible is done for this woman's fantasy. I would recommend to watch this film, but only for the open minded consensus.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst. British. Nanny. Movie. Ever.
kaademusic11 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
If anyone reading this plans to produce a film or, for that matter, a birthday party, please keep a list of cast and crew on hand to make sure you don't accidentally hire anyone responsible for this, in much the same way you might check potential employees for felonies.

Spoiler alert: Although you will be hoping that one of the characters will lose it and kill somebody in a bloody standoff, the only murder involved is a form of saccharine-poisoning. I'm all for imaginary friends, but this is pathetic.

Maybe this was actually a very artsy and complicated exposition on the nature of religion or absurdism that I didn't get, but I doubt it. On the other hand, I did enjoy considering how Super-Nanny would react to a family with an imaginary child.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Best! Lifetime! Movie! Ever!
coolcorn24 May 2006
First off, watch the trailer on-line somewhere, and you'll get a pretty good idea of the badness therin.

Now, the sinister edge implied in the trailer isn't there ("Driven to the edge of insanity..."), instead there's a lot of absurd God talk and touchy-feely understanding. But that's what one expects from these dark suburban Lifetime- style movies.

That said, there is no beating the scene where the have a showdown with the evil Child Protection Services woman (as they all are, you know). She questions one of the other kids about her mom's craziness: "When somebody has a fantasy that nobody else does, that's a very dangerous thing." The precocious child's reply: "Oh, like Martin Luter King. He had a dream that no one else had." Ha! Take that!

The movie's ending is not touching as it is meant to be, but rather an even more insane cure for the problem - though not in any wild knife-wielding way. It that were the case the movie would be amazing instead of just absurdly amusing.

Rita Wilson is just...just...hideous in all ways. She is just a small piece of the larger puzzle that works to make The Invisible Child a masterpiece for those who love jaw-dropping crap-tastic television.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best Lifetime Movie Ever!!!
emilyinaustin11 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It's a LIFETIME MOVIE!!!! So please - who would take it serious? Don't expect a masterpiece from lifetime! It's like the tabloid magazine of literature.

After saying that - for someone who loves Lifetime movies - this is paramount! Invisible Child is truly my all-time favorite Lifetime movie! I dare them to top this one.

I first watched this in 1999 and missed the title - had no idea what the movie was about. Nanny sleeps with husband? no. Nanny kidnaps children? No. Mom kills nanny in jealous rage? no. What? What? Mom pretends to have a middle child? Yes middle child! She already has one daughter then pretends to have Maggie, but still pulls off a third real child. This means not only is the father going along with her crazy hallucinations – he's still having sex and willing to pass along her crazy genes to another kid! Holy crap! Wait – could there be a sequel in the future? Can Sam (the youngest) grow up to have an invisible family of his own?

Wow! It's a great movie… IF you're into lifetime.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting...
gagewyn10 February 2000
From the title I thought that this movie would be some drivel about latch key children or what not. I was surprised by what I saw. The plot was original, extremely original considering that this is a Lifetime network movie.

Basically the invisible child is the middle child in a family. The mother created her, and spends as much time caring for her as for either of the other children. The treatment of Maggie, the imaginary child, is not shallow. Maggie has strong character traits and a personality. She is a dynamic character and is truly a member of the family.

Problems exist within the family because of Maggie. The nanny is understandably bothered by Maggie. The youngest child was born after Maggie, and he believes that she is real.

This movie is worth seeing. It is an interesting concept.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Gentle and Compassionate Movie
wayneoscarbry24 May 2010
First off, it should be noted that this is NOT A LIVE DOCUMENTARY! It appears that it is a story about a woman who was venturing into madness, but then recovers. Why did she recover? Possibly because she began to realize the pain she was causing her family; and possibly because an outsider (the nanny) had entered the picture and somehow this triggered Mrs. Beeman towards reality. One really does not know why or how she recovered, but she does.

The plot involves a family of four, an imaginary child, and a nanny. The story focuses on the heartbreak of mental illness. A woman (The wife and mother of the movie) believes she has three children, when in reality, she only has two. Her husband, two children, and eventually a nanny, pretend along with her. The make-believe child is called "Maggie." Mrs. Beeman (the wife and mother of this story) has a gentle and kind personality so this may be the reason why others in the family simply go along with her and act as though it is true concerning a third child.

Everyone one of the actors and and actresses gives a heartfelt performance, especially Rita Wilson (the woman with the illness) and "Doc."

If one is looking for a tender and heartfelt movie with a good ending, they may want to try watching this movie. It will bring out the compassionate side of some who feel the pain of others, and best of all, it has a good ending.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rubbish
nb_232 May 2003
Yup, it's as bad as bad can be. I agree that sometimes you need to suspend disbelief and just enjoy - I love disaster movies, for example, and hardly ever quibble about the ludicrous plots and nonsense science. But this is not bad enough to be fun. It's rubbish.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Interesting and sad family crisis
mollidew28 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I actually thought this was a very interesting movie. It delves into some sort of mental crisis on the part of the Mother. It really isn't explained in detail because she didn't lose a child or anything like that but she imagined one she didn't have. I felt it was done quite well. Mental illness can be unpredictable because often it can only affect one part of one's life. Other than imagining another child she seemed to carry on well with every other aspect of her family life. No one understands mental illness and given the bureaucracy these days, I can see why a family might be afraid of their Mother being put in an institution. It played out and when she didn't need that "inivisible child" she let it go. I thought it was acted quite well and it was an unique movie I have watched more than once.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good show, performances
MAD-3023 October 1999
We caught this TV-movie quite by accident, and not having any prior knowledge of it, and really enjoyed it. Very creative and original story. And the performances, especially that of Jane Edith Wilson as Mrs. Woods, were very good. Wilson was right on target. A real breakthrough for this newcomer. We can't wait to see her in her next outing.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Exceptional movie ,and cast.
knullbox30 July 2008
This movie supports the individualist ,not the mass medias' attempt to dictate. It also departs from the overdriven theme of man being the cause of all bad ,and women are the only family oriented being. This story treats a family as a whole. The story does reference religion ,which is something I overlook ,but it isn't fanatical. There isn't any SEX ,VIOLENCE ,TREACHERY ,POLITICS ,nor EYE SNAPPING GRAPHICS. This is a fine movie ,and all of the cast are excellent. From the previous reviews on this website ,about this movie ,it makes me wonder just what kind of people write reviews. And whether I am standing in a pile.

Thank you.

I've watched thousands of movies.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disturbing, disgusting, distressing, oh who cares anyway
smoke010 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I have to specify that this comment may contain spoilers, but in this case, any comment on this piece of dreck couldn't possibly spoil anyone's viewing of this film any more than viewing the film itself.

Here we have the premise that co-dependent, enabling husbands and delusional, schizophrenic wives make good parents to children. In fact, these particular people are just so good and kind and loving and perfect that a little thing like a psychiatric disorder, much less full-blown insanity, can't possibly affect their children (with the exception of the invisible one, who gets killed off and buried in the backyard. This is, after all, a Lifetime movie).

The entire premise of the film seems to suggest that enabling a delusion is heart-warming and uplifting. I see it as the next sensational murder case on Courttv.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Finally a film I can relate to
SusieSalmonLikeTheFish16 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film is more than just a movie to me. From the fifth grade (2007) to the present day, I've had an imaginary friend named Syd. After 2007, my family, teachers, etc. decided Syd was an illness and wanted him gone, convincing me to be rid of the only friend I've ever had. Various psychiatrists suggested everything from hypnosis to E.C.T. to medication, not one of them taking into account that I saw Syd as a sentient entity and didn't want him gone. Finally a psychiatrist told my family to check out this film, so we ordered it online and watched it together.

I won't spoil the ending, so here's the basic info: a mother of two who recently suffered a miscarriage has a third child, an imaginary being called Maggie. Various people assume she's mentally ill and that Maggie is a form of psychosis, but on the contrary Maggie is benevolent and harmless. When a new nanny is hired, Becca (Doc) and her younger brother, with the nanny's help, try to be a normal family, Maggie included.

This eye-opening TV film taught my family a lot, not just about my friend Syd but about everyone else, kids and adults alike, who have imaginary friends. The acting was great for a TV movie, the characters were all very original and it was the first film I've seen that doesn't suggest that imaginary friends are a sign of being a psycho. I recommend this film, it not only teaches more about adults with imaginary friends but also about one particular way a mother decides to deal with the loss of a child.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Probably the worst Made for TV movie in existance
westvancritic8 December 2001
This is the worst TV movie I've seen EVER! The constant repetition of the sound track, the needless camera pans of `Maggie', the awful casting, and ludicrous plot made it unbearable to watch. If you ever come across this movie in a TV guide, avoid it at all costs, better yet, do something totally unrelated to watching movies.

(0 of 5 stars)
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed