Cats (Video 1998) Poster

(1998 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
109 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Cats are finally on video!
GEM-2012 September 1999
Since I first saw the musical, "Cats", in 1987, I have always wanted to see it on video. I was thrilled when it finally arrived. I immediately bought it.

The video performance was terrific: better than I expected. Instead of seeing it from the viewpoint of being in the audience, cameras were actually on stage, moving throughout the performers! The sound is terrific, and it played on my audio system wonderfully.

Of course, there is a flaw in the video. To me, it is actually a glaring flaw: a major segment of the musical, my favorite sequence in fact, is missing. Maybe it was cut for time, but I was very disappointed. "Growltugger's Last Stand" is one of the more elaborately staged portions of "Cats". For it to be removed from this performance will certainly upset many of the true fans of "Cats".

I was prepared to score a 10 out of 10 for this show, but with the editing, I can only score it a 7. Andrew Lloyd Webber himself produced this video. He should have left that portion in.

George
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Cat's Pajamas
Ian_Jules24 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Although Jesus Christ Superstar is my favorite Andrew Lloyd Webber show (I also enjoyed Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat), Cats can be a fun show, particularly if you know and like T.S. Eliot's work, upon which all the material is based. I, like Lloyd Webber, count Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats as a childhood favorite. In the car with my parents, we used to play an audiocassette version of the poems read by Sir John Gielgud and Irene Worth. I loved the poems before I knew the name of Eliot. Nowadays, I count Prufrock amongst my favorites and it's lovely to note that all of the characters songs in this show are based on various poems of Eliot's (some of them unpublished in his lifetime). It seems to me that Cats might be a bit more confusing to one who is unfamiliar with Old Possum's Book, but the numbers are loosely bound together as it is, so it may not matter much. But I do think it will make more sense and possibly be more fun if you've read the Eliot first.

Cats is a pretty light, whimsical show not to be taken too seriously--which, to my mind, is no bad thing. We need whimsy, too! It's based on what is actually a rather interesting, cool idea of plunging into the world of the mystical Jellicle Cats, as they meet at the annual Jellicle Ball. Much of the play is spent simply meeting the cat characters at the ball. With the exception of Grizabella, each of the characters introduced comes directly from Old Possum's Book and the songs are mainly the poems set to music. And it is important to remember that this is a musical based on a series of poems--hence the vignette format it often takes. Lloyd Webber is a composer of music, not a storyteller or writer literary sense. And there's nothing wrong with that. Dating back the operas of Wagner, Puccini, and so on, there has been a rich tradition in musical theatre and of adapting and reinterpreting previous stories, legends, etc. One thing theatre offers is the opportunity for many artistic interpretations of one story or piece, but I digress.

The music and dancing here are exciting and often fabulous. The opening number, Jellicle Songs for Jellicle Cats, is simply a knockout and other highlights, for me, including the Battle of the reenactments Peaks and the Pollicles featuring the Great Rumpus Cat, as well as Mungojerrie and Rumpleteezer. Good comedy abounds in these numbers. Old Deuteronomy is one of the most gracefully translated numbers. The Gumbie Cat (Jennyanydots) and The Rum Tum Tugger are also staged well, in fresh and original ways (I especially like Jenny) and Bustopher Jones is delightful. As a side note, this video version also features Sir John Mills in a brief but apropos role as Gus the Theatre Cat (unfortunately, this version loses the Growl Tiger number that is supposed to be a tangent to Gus' song). The late Mills was always reliable and his cameo is surprisingly touching despite its brevity. In some ways, I'd have liked a more flamboyant, upbeat portrayal of Gus, but Mills' cameo is a highlight.

The dancing of the Jellicle Ball, of which there is plenty, is fantastic to watch. I dare say that these dancers, with their wonderful agility, energy, and flexibility, have to be keep in top physical condition and work at least as hard as any football player. It looks to be every bit as much a work-out, every bit as much a form of athletics, as any contact sport. And those who don't appreciate the athleticism, the endurance, and the physical excellence good dancing requires--as well as the beauty it can produce--can kiss those shiny jazz shoes. But I, again, digress. Suffice it to say there is plenty of dancing in this show. That said, filming choreography can be tricky, and I get the feeling it would more be exciting and spectacular to see it on stage, as it was intended--and making that point may have been part of the purpose of this home video edition. After all, a theatre ticket costs more than a DVD.

Although the story is loose, they've actually managed to mind some of the characters from the poems together pretty well. Old Deuteronomy, a venerated senior cat in one of Eliot's poems, because the wise leader or guru of the Jellicles here, presiding over the Ball. And Macavity, the Professor Moriarty of the Jellicle world, shows up to disrupt the ball with criminal mischief. Then Mr. Mistofolees, the conjuring cat, plays a pivotal role in the plot with his magic, which is another number that I really enjoyed. The other key character is Grizabella, whom I believe comes from one of Eliot's unpublished poems, and is portrayed mainly through the famous ballad Memory, which is lovely and poignant. The lyrics are also some of the best of the show and in the context of the show, the emotional aspect of the song is somewhat surprisingly raw and intense. It's beautifully sung and sticks in your head without doubt.

Although the story is loose, it does all come together in the end. I won't say it isn't predictable but it does end up being pretty satisfying for me. Overall, Cats is a fun show, particularly if you like T.S. Eliot's poems. Eliot's widow, Valerie, who was alive when Webber conceived the show, approved wholeheartedly. Let it be what is and let your pretensions take flight. It can be fun if you appreciate musical theatre, T.S. Eliot, and our feline fellows.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of a kind. You have to be really open minded to get Cats because it doesn't make a lot of sense. But if you are, it can be a lot of fun
mickman91-120 November 2021
What else is there to be said? Nothing, so I'll just say what I thought. It took me years to get round to Cats. I knew nothing about it until I put it on. Though of course I somehow knew the words to that infamous song when it came on, thus is its complete suffusion into popular consciousness. I didn't know what I was watching for the first hour. It made no sense. However near the end something clicked and I totally understood why it was so popular and enduring. It's because the only way to watch it is through a child's mind. You cannot try to grasp on anything, you just have to let yourself go on the wacky innocent fun ride and let your feet tap and hands clap when they want to even if they don't know why. Because there is something about it that really makes you feel safe and want to accept the invite to fall into wonder and bright lights and entertainment for simply the love and sake of it. In that regard it is very unique and I understand why it was such a phenomenon. To try to make any logical and critical review of it is just missing the point so not a lot can really be said nor should it. Though one critical note which is I think appropriate is to say that the cast and choreography is really great in how they bring cat humans to life on stage through movement. And seeing this after the existence of the 2019 version (terrible) just puts into perspective how great the staging and choreography is. And also this filmed version is a real nice production with lots of cuts and close ups for you to feel really involved in the show. My fav songs were rum tum tugger, and mr macavofy.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very nicely filmed version of the "Cats" stage musical.
TxMike29 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I am a fan of real cats, I enjoy musicals, and the musical "CATS" has been a favorite of mine for years. In the theater you are far enough away that you don't see a lot of what is going on, especially details of the make-up and expressions on the characters.

This 1998 film production was made especially to create a version on film. It is simply the stage musical masterfully performed, but with cameras set up from various points to get both full, wide shots and very intimate close-up shots. There is no audience applause at all, so it was probably filmed only with the cast and crew present.

It runs 2 hours and all the performances are outstanding. If you could say any two are featured it would be Ken Page with his wonderful, full bass voice that goes all the way up into the lower part of the tenor range, as Old Deuteronomy, who gets to choose which cat goes up to the "heaviside layer" to be reincarnated. And Elaine Paige as Grizabella the Glamour Cat, no longer young but aged and tattered. Both of them render their songs wonderfully and with the right emotion.

I found it at my public library on DVD in Widescreen and with Dolby 5.1 sound. I first saw this film version several years ago and again today.

Note: The "heaviside layer" is is a layer of ionized gas occurring between roughly 90–150 km (56–93 mi) above the ground — one of several layers in the Earth's ionosphere. The "Heaviside layer" is used as a symbol for heaven (in the afterlife sense) in the musical "Cats."
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fabulous, fun production of the popular musical
MissSimonetta8 January 2020
Who knew a spontaneous decision to see the terrible CG nightmare fuel CATS adaptation would make me watch the 1998 CATS-- and then become a fan of this weird, weird musical?

The new movie truly is bad, but the original material, much maligned over time, is actually pretty amazing. I love the variety of musical styles in all the songs, the sense of community among all the characters, even those bizarre stylized costumes and make-up. This is a fun musical, all around, and I can see why trying to make it more "cinematic" does not suit the material. The 1998 adaptation seems to essentially just shoot the stage show as it is, with a few close-ups and cinematic flourishes for good effect.

While I would recommend the 2019 movie for those who love hilariously bad films, the 1998 film is the better choice if you want to see just why CATS made billions of dollars.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best version you could watch
katharinev23 December 2019
Please watch this version instead of the 2019 film version. This version is so much better and quite frankly features the best cast of Cats yet. If you can't find the dvd all the clips are available to watch on the Cats YouTube page.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolute masterpiece!
RodrigAndrisan27 December 2019
Veteran David Mallett, who directed many music videos for great artists such as Asia, Pink Floyd, Rolling Stones, Phil Collins, David Bowie, Queen, Blondie, U2, AC/DC, The Who, Rod Stewart, Peter Gabriel, Elton John, Tina Turner, Madonna, Erasure, Rush, Roxy Music, etc., is doing a great job here, directing Andrew Lloyd Weber's wonderful music. An extraordinary distribution, excellent choreography, superlative costumes and makeup, everything superb. One of John Mills' latest films.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cats. Now and Forever or Then and Forever?
joshtill-981002 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I've been embracing my musical theatre voyage through films and to be honest, I had completely forgot about this 1998 version of Cats since word came out of the upcoming supposed nightmare that is the 2019 version. I have never seen the stage musical and probably nor will I ever. Cats is truly a tale like no other. I knew very few songs going into this film; the ever iconic "Memory" as well as parts of "Jellicle Songs For Jellicle Cats", "Mr Mistoffelees", and "Macavity: The Mystery Cat". Cats is a very odd musical, but it is nothing short of fun.

The film opens to a junkyard set, which is not changed throughout the entire show. Some cats crawl around the stage to their little nooks and crannies. The cats, led by a black and white cat, named Munkustrap, explain the attributes that correspond with being part of the Jellicle Family ("Jellicle Songs For Jellicle Cats"). As the cats tone down, a cat named Skimbleshanks notices a man inquiring on what a Jellicle Cat is and how their names come to be. The cats describe how the naming of cats works ("The Naming Of Cats").

The cats head home as the only cat with a proper English name, Victoria the white cat, showcases her unique ballet abilities as well as her extreme flexibility ("Victoria the White Cat"). Munkustrap invites all of the cats to come out of hiding and attend the Jellicle Ball that following evening, which is where their leader would choose one of them to be reborn into a new jellicle life. This event only occurs once a year ("The Invitation To The Jellicle Ball"). The cats discuss who the nominations should be and Munkustrap puts forward Jennyanydots, a tabby cat who worries too much about the other animals that roam around the junkyard ("The Old Gumbie Cat").

They are rudely interrupted by another cat, named the Rum Tum Tugger, who explains that he is indecisive and has too big of an ego for the junkyard that they live in ("The Rum Tum Tugger"). An elderly cat walks in, as the rest of the population exiles her. Bombalurina and Demeter, the two leading female cats, explain how she is Grizabella, a cat who lived life to the fullest and flirted with all of the male cats ("Grizabella: The Glamour Cat"). Bombalurina then puts forward Bustopher Jones, a cat who is rather large and the mayor of the town they live in. ("Bustopher Jones").

The cats leave to get ready for the Jellicle Ball in the upcoming evening. Two twin cats named Mungojerrie and Rumpleteazer stay onstage, explaining that they are the tricksters of the town and tend to steal items from other cats ("Mungojerrie and Rumpleteazer"). A loud crash is heard as the Jellicle reconvene, noticing that Bustopher and Jennyanydots have gone missing. However, in that moment, the cats' leader, Old Deuteronomy steps in and commences the Jellicle Ball ("Old Deuteronomy/The Jellicle Ball"). On the outskirts of the premises, Grizabella attempts to repeat the dance moves from previous balls, but fails due to her failing bones. She sits outside and attempts to remember the good times when she was welcomed by the other cats ("Grizabella The Glamour Cat Reprise/Memory 1").

Old Deuteronomy watches Grizabella from afar and notices that all of the cats are living well, and that she truly deserves a second chance ("The Moments of Happiness"). In the meantime, Jellyrolum, another cat, puts forward Gus to be reborn. Gus is a elder cat who lived outside the stage doors of theatres and went onstage for some performances ("Gus: The Theatre Cat"). Skimbleshanks puts his name forward so he can be reunited with the train station ("Skimbleshanks: The Railway Cat"). In this moment, a third crash is heard as Old Deuteronomy is mysteriously kidnapped.

The cats go in a panic as the two leading female felines explain the situation. They explain that the gang is slowly being kidnapped by Macavity, a mystery cat. His crimes and plans are unknown and he is quite seducive ("Macavity: The Mystery Cat"). The Rum Tum Tugger puts forward Mr Mistofelees, the magical cat, who successfully brings Old Deuteronomy back to the junkyard ("Mr Mistofelees"). As Old Deuteronomy is about to make his decision, Grizabella walks in and sings, once again, of being outed and not accepted by her breed, and longs for a better life ("Memory"). The cats finally accept Grizabella as Old Deuteronomy chooses Grizabella to be the cat that could be sent to the Heaviside Layer ("Journey To The Heaviside Layer"). The night ends with Mr Mistofelees explaining to the world to accept one and other and perfectly explains the definition for serendipity ("The Addressing Of The Cats").

Now, I know what you are thinking: "Cats is supposed to have little to no plot, why is this review so elongated." To me, cats has no plot, but is a metaphor for the different stages of life one goes through as well as the people you meet. You start out as a child, alike to Victoria, the youngest cat and the dreams and aspirations that children want, meanwhile rejecting the elders. Next the cats meet young adulthood, with Bustopher and the twin cats, where you can mess around. The ball is a metaphor for the worklife and Grizabella showcases her fear of going inside. Next, we enter the workforce with Skimbleshanks and Gus, while we finally grow old and reconvene of the wonderful life we lived with Memory. Cats is whatever you want it to be, a blank plot with so much symbolism to fill.

Cats gets a 7.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best musical Now and Forever!
o_levina22 October 2001
Fantastic! The best musical and the best show of all times makes a magnificent film. It has advantage of showing everything in details and details are grand. Scenery, costumes and make-up are perfect. Music is superb (especially Jellicle Ball and Macavity). The best thing about the movie is certainly the cast. Actors not only sing and dance splendidly but also imitate feline movements and manners amazingly well. And how do they act! I absolutely adore Michael Gruber as manly and handsome Munkustrap. Elaine Paige as Grizabella would leave nobody indifferent. Veerle Casteleyn with her wonderful eyes is the most touching Jemima, John Partridge is irresistibly attractive and funny Rum Tum Tagger, Phyllida Crawley-Smith is very graceful Victoria, Jacob Brent is charming Mistoffelees, Aeva May and Rosmary Ford make a beautiful pair of adult cats: reserved Demeter and sensuous Bombalurina. Sir John Mills is a little unexpected guest star, but he is perfect Gus the Theatre Cat ("the star of the highest degree"). Eliote's text is witty, and there are a lot of amusing scenes in the show. My favourite ones are The Gumbie Cat, Mangojerry and Rumpleteaser, Pekes and the Pollicles, Scimbleshanks the Railway Cat. Watching this film is an endless joy for my family and me.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well funny
gfair-1330612 November 2021
OMG this was amazing, just think I blew all the chaps out that went down the pub and played darts to decide who is Gleeson, not me, I only go London and this was well funny, I'm a construction manager as well btw.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst musical ever!
kcdl12 August 2009
Firstly I would like to say that I love musicals. I also like a lot of Andrew Lloyd Webber songs, I'm not a ALW hater. So I wasn't biased from the the start.

Cats does have its good points: great costumes, good dancing and Memories. That is it.

There is almost no plot to think of at all. Take your average action movie. Now think of something with a million times less plot than that. At this point you are still imagining something with more storyline than Cats. This wouldn't have bothered me at all except for the fact that most of the songs are really really bad and totally forgettable. So a storyline to hold the interest would have been much appreciated. Instead we have a bunch of very superficial adjective ladened songs introducing cats. Once the characters are introduced....it ends. The whole musical is introducing various cats collectively and individually and the very vaguest of story lines is resolved without any drama whatsoever. Right near the end there is the smallest glimmer of conflict, which is then resolved in the most anticlimactic way.

Memories is a good song that landed in a wasteland of musically boring lyrically bankrupt songs. Even its power is someone diminished by the fact it is reprised multiple times.

Cats is a musical version of a tourist trap. It has an illusion of great promise which is maintained by a few mad fans and probably its one good song but no substance to back it up.
20 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love it, love it, love it!
blackberrybabe19 April 2004
When I found out that my all-time favorite musical was coming to video, I flipped. I could not believe it. And when they closed, I was thrilled to have my own copy to relive the memory whenever I wanted. The video version is great. It shows the beautiful costumes and makeup and all the dancing! I always wondered how they did it. Tons of shots of my favorite cat, Munkustrap, along with the Rum Tum Tugger and Mistoffolees.

The only complaint I have is that they cut 'Growltiger's Last Stand' from the video. This is one of the funniest numbers, and it is missing. On the other hand, they do have 'The Aweful Battle of the Pekes and Pollices,' which is missing off the original cast recording. Unfortunately, there is not a complete American version of this show.

For anyone who loves the musical, get a copy. Who knows if this beloved show will return to the stage? At least the magic will live forever.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great but in 720p.
willmarth2-398-16576024 September 2021
Far better than the newer movie. Great music and costumes. It needs to be released in 4k or at least 1080p.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Much ado about nothing.
mark.waltz24 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"We liked it a lot. It was better than 'Cats'", theater audiences on a TV comedy sketch show proclaimed in a monotone voice after seeing the latest theatrical spectacular. Certainly, "Cats" has gone onto become one of the most financially successful musicals ever, but does that make it good? According to the billions who have seen it, yes, but to a small majority of those involved in the theater, it is a joke, the type of show one would sneak into like an alcoholic sneaking a drink. The music is mediocre (with the exception of one Broadway standard that everybody has probably heard, even those who hate musical theater), the story non-existent, and the premise manipulative. It's like the movies of today, all style-no substance, and after seeing the TV version and the new Broadway revival, I concur that indeed, this show has given me "Cat Scratch Fever".

T.S. Elliott's book of poems was just that, poetry, and when put into the premise of a big spectacular musical, is a two hour pretentious ball of fur. It's mesmerizing to watch, and I feel for the talented performers who get put into all sorts of twisted positions, much like Julie Taymor did with her dancers in the stage version of "The Lion King". But unlike the king of the jungle, this kitty is about as emotionally involved as commercial cat Morris and cartoon cat Garfield. At least with those two, you could count on the commercial being over in less than a minute (and usually laughed at his cynical commentary) and the comic strip had wry comments on life, pet and human relations and with a 10 second reading, much more to give to the world than this has done in the past 35+ years.

The premise of this show is simple: It's the jellicle ball for jellicle cats, and a song indicating what a jellicle cat is really gives no complete definition. Old Deuteronomy is sort of the great God like old cat who must choose which one of the jellicle cats will go on to start another life, and within the span of two hours, various cats of no varying personalities (with the exception of a few) audition for that honor. Ken Page is one of the great character performers of the theater, and makes a lovable and commanding Deuteronomy. The problem, then, is not in the performances, but within the show itself. Elaine Page repeats her London role as the aging glamour cat Grizabella who sings the poignant anthem "Memory" at the climax of act one, then repeated throughout act two, and she provides the only poignant moment for me that rendered any kind of emotion.

There's a show-stopping John Mills as the "theater cat" who claims to have performed for Queen Victoria, giving one analogist the idea that "Cats" was a metaphor for the relationship between Queen Victoria and Disraeli. Original director Harold Prince summed it up best when he replied to that inquiry, "It's about cats." So even the director knows that it's pointless entertainment, manipulating theater goers for decades and certainly packing in the tourist trade in both London and on Broadway. Of course, everybody who has seen this show or knows about it knows "Memory" and characters like Rum Tum Tugger and Jenny Any-Dots (who would name their cat that?), and after seeing this, I needed a double shot of Rum Tum Tugger.

The staging is impressive, but after a while, the dance numbers do nothing but take away the notion of any plot, and one number in particular reminded me of the 2002 disaster "Dance of the Vampires" where the living dead danced at the vampire ball in front of a mirror, with no reflection. The staging is corny, sometimes tacky, and when I saw this on Broadway, I realized that everybody around me with the exception of me had drunk the "Cats" kool-aide. I was happy to get this off my bucket list, but I certainly will laugh more every time I see a comic jab at this show, like Woody Allen did in "New York Stories" and what Marc Cherry did on the short-lived "The Five Mrs. Buchannans" when Eileen Heckart rushed her daughter-in-law Harriet Harris out of a store, claiming, "I'm not going to be late for Rum Tum Tugger just because of you." Like those two great theatrical ladies who obviously got the joke (Harris's character referred to it as technically amazing but artistically empty), I too am not taken in by over-stuffed smelly costumes and junk yard modern art when there is no point to the show in the first place.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Perhaps the most entertaining of all stage musicals, now in its filmed version.
TxMike13 January 2004
I have long enjoyed the musical 'Cats', both in several attendances at live productions and simply listening to the music on CD. 'Cats', the movie, was created in 1997, a full 16 years after its debut on stage. This isn't simply the taping of a stage performance. For the movie they assembled the best cast they could from among 'Cats' stage veterans. The set was designed especially for the movie, the makeup was toned down to look better in the closer perspective of the movie, especially the close-ups, a full orchestra was used, songs were recorded in a studio, and conventional movie techniques were used for the filming -- multiple angles, close-ups, cameras moving on tracks, etc. What we get is a movie that is does not have the realism of a stage production, and it is fairly obvious most times that singers are lip-syncing their own recordings, but a movie nonetheless that is a superb supplement to the live performances. The DVD has a very nice 'making-of' special, we see Andrew Lloyd Weber personally supervising the musical numbers, we see some of the makeup artistry at work, and a few before/after shots of actors and their characters.

Overall a fine DVD of a superb movie of perhaps the most entertaining stage musical of all.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
wonderfully...commercialised
windfox31 July 2001
firstly i admit that i'm an ALW fan. my first encounter of his work was with THE PHANTOM, after which i heard about CATS, then i bought the VCD at a sale...well it was wonderful, but one of my friends commented that the show was very commercialised, and i thought she got a point there.

i'm not saying that CATS is not art, in fact as one of the comment has said, it is 'art in every sense'. the costume and the make-up was vivid, and fusion of dancing and singing was simply too great (well i cannot possibly hit a high C if i dance like that^^). and many other little details were also carefully designed (i loved that pipe organ made from a rugby ball - brilliant idea^^). no plot - sure, but there wasn't meant to be one, after all. CATS is primarily a show for laughter and relaxation, so a lot of pop factors were added, and i think that's where makes me feel it's 'commercialised'. but if one really goes into the vague storyline he may discover something there... it all depends on the individual who watches it.

i have to mention a few actors here...(yeah everyone loves them, but i must talk about them^^) Michael Gruber is among the best Munkustrap i've seen, he's an excellent dancer and actor. John Patridge finally found his place as Rum Tum Tugger(he once played Munku...i cannot imagine that^^). Jacob Brent's the most suitable person for Misto so far, he's got an innocently 'sly' look...one other actor i've got to mention is Jason Gardiner who did an amazingly good job as Alonzo the proud and arrogant second-in-command...and in my opinion he dances better than Jacob in terms of power and stability (Jacob Brent is a very *sweet* and light-hearted dancer while Jason is a more forceful one).

well...i love CATS, and i confess that its melodies 'haunt' me and i watch it every week...you can call me a freak but i simply enjoy watching Michael Gruber's smile (he's got a very elegant, warm smile...i wonder why no one mentioned about it^^).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Awsome
JackSparrowLuver13 February 2004
This movie was amazing...purrrley amazing.

Jacob Brent as Mr. Mistoffelees blew me away. He is such a talented dancer. Jacob Brent along with some of the greatest dancers in the world make this movie one to watch over and over again. The combination of wonderful music and dancers, along with the most beautiful costumes imaginable make this movie of the Broadway production memorable. I highly recommend it. Now and Forever
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
for musical lovers
abby_cg7 July 2003
I saw this musical 11 years ago in my country and I became in love with it. I knew about the existing film 4 years after it was made. Beautiful memories came to my mind and i think it can not be better. Excellent work. Dances are full of energy, fantastic choreography, costumes and make up, every cat has a unique personality, the cast is incredible, excellent. The music infects you with joy. IT´S A BEAUTIFUL EXPERIENCE.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sub-par
k_rae_rae13 November 2020
Honestly if it wasn't for the beautiful costumes and dancing this would be a total flop. What's the plot? Is there even one? Yeah, they're going to this "jellicle ball", but nothing is explained at all, but I don't think there is anything to explain. As a musical fan, this was sub-par. The dancing however was absolutely beautiful, amazing, and graceful.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely Fantastic
comedy_claire200121 February 2004
After watching the video production of 'Cats' I can confidently say that this is the best musical EVER. If you love the book and other various productions then you just have to see this. With a beautiful mixture of super dancing and acting talent and a brilliant soundtrack this is a wonderful video for everyone to enjoy.

The songs are absolutely brilliant, all of them. From start to finish. Even if you only see this once you will be singing the songs for a lifetime to come. 'Macavity; The Mystery Cat', 'Skimbleshanks; The Railway Cat' and 'Jellicle Songs for Jellicle Cats' are my favourite songs, but the ever lasting 'Memory' is a good as ever. With a full 90 piece orchestra, the music has never sounded better.

I assure you, after watching this, you will remember it forever. And remember, you've got the Great Rumpuscat to thank for shutting those noisy Pollicle Dogs up at night!!
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
They left out Tom Jones doing "Pussycat, Pussycat, I Love You"
helpless_dancer18 June 2001
I almost didn't watch this because it started out unlike other musicals I am used to seeing, but am glad I stayed. I never even remotely figured out what was going on, but found it was immaterial anyway. The makeup was a large part of the appeal for me and the stage setting was very interesting, not to mention unusual. Great singing, nice hoofing, lithe, limber limbs with lots of energy made for a very pleasant 2 hours.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shockingly bad
tehrave2 March 2007
I found it very hard to sit through this abominable video. The choreography shifted from charming in the first five minutes to just plain embarrassing - Jennyanydots and the Rum Tum Tugger being prominent examples: musical numbers that I covered my eyes for.

The costumes and sets were also worth hiding from. The reddish-purple lighting and indigo background were sickening, especially against the orange fur of many of the cats. Surreal, and frankly, dated.

I was also confused by the haphazard plot. Their leader kidnapped by a lukewarm villain straight out of the Power Rangers - and then a lavish song-and-dance about a magician cat? Anticlimactic to say the least.

"Memory" was the only song where I didn't find myself cringing. It really stood out from all the other lame and repetitive songs as a lasting showtune. Overall, though, I want back the two hours that I spent plugging my ears in front of this ghastly production. I would love, actually, now, to see it performed - a play this popular can't be consistently that awful.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Highly Enjoyable Musical-to-Video
Gislef15 February 1999
Something for all ages; my children (3 and 5) get a huge kick out of this, and have the lyrics memorized. Unlike some movie musicals (JC Superstar, A Chorus Line), it really doesn't try to adapt to "being" a movie, but settles for being (mostly) just filming folks on stage performing in a musical. Some of the movie-style cuts are, IMO, a bit disconcerting (Rum Tug Tugger to Grisabella's entrance, Theater Cat to Shimbleskanks), and I'm not familiar enough with the musical itself to know if the cuts are part of the original or were bad edits unique to the video itself. You do get any number of close-ups to admire the costuming and make-up, and the casting is superb. Enjoyable for audiences of all ages if you like musicals.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Proves the 2019 film is not the fault of Hooper
CubsandCulture15 February 2020
I blind bought this because I wanted to compare the stage show (which I have never seen live) to the 2019 fully cinematic version. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending) this isn't merely a filmed production of the show. It's a hybrid of the show and it very being loosely adapted for video. The set is grander and they toned down the make-up. Brought in the best cast they could and sparingly used some cinematic techniques (i.e. dissolves) to polish it for video. The final product is engaging and I imagine if you like the show this is a good record of it. I *however* liked (if that is the correct word) the 2019 cinematic version better; largely because the cinematic version doubles down on the surreality of the concept.

More to the point anything negative you can say about 2019 film you can also say about this. There is no real story. The overall look is a confusing mess of oddity and misplaced horniness. (Rum Tug Tugger mimics oral sex at least 3 times!). In some ways I though the costumes were worst because at times it looked like the cat-people were ripping off their flesh. I.e. Why does Jennyanydots have a tail on her outer, I think, dress? The songs and the overall effect of the show is still just some cheap sentiment and some laughs.

I ended up enjoying (if that is the right word) this but the issue with both properties resides in the concept. There's no way for this to be anything other than a surreal piece of camp.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the Worst Films I've Ever Seen
britishboy5122 December 2002
This film is absolutely terrible. Not only is there no plot evident, the score, for the most part, is amazingly dry. As a fan of some of ALW's other works (i.e. Phantom..., Evita, etc.), and as an actor myself, I was shocked. I mean, this is a musical that ran for 18 years on the Great White Way. It did not make sense to me. I must give credit, however, to the heartbreaking number "Memory". It is a brilliant song. The choreography was quite good in some places, but became repetitive. I do not recommend this film at all.
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed