Tierra del fuego (2000) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Just a scene: the bagpiper in the marsh
chorima7517 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The film "Tierra del fuego" is exactly as the isolated Patagonia community in which it is set. On one hand, it is a wonderful kaleidoscope of ethnicities, nationalities and languages. On the other, it is messy and confusing. I thought Ornella Mutti was excellent as Armenia. I can only applaud the bravery of Tamara Acosta (she plays Indian princess Mennar), dignified and serious despite having to perform fully naked the majority of the film. I also thought that Jorge Perugorria was wasted once again. The success of "Fresa y Chocolate" proved to be a double-edged sword. It discovered a very talented actor. However, he kept being offered histrionic, larger-than-life characters in films below his talent. Julius Popper is no exception. "Tierra del Fuego" is worth watching for one scene alone: the Galician bagpiper Silveira (Nancho Novo), playing for his life in the middle of an isolated, windy marsh. "If you ever stop playing", Julius Popper threatens him, "I will kill you". When Silveira finally collapses after thirty hours, the Indians rescue him, thinking he has magic powers ("He captures the wind and transforms it in music"). I was not surprised that the image of Silveira playing the bagpipe in the marsh was the poster of the film. He is representative of so many Galicians (like myself) who once left their motherland in search of a better life. I wish that the whole film had been about him. The flashbacks about his life would have fitted better had this been the case. I hate the abrupt and unsatisfactory way in which the film solved his subplot.

I have not read the book in which this film is based, but I would certainly love to (especially if Silveira's story has a bigger arch).
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masterpiece
wjfickling24 June 2000
I hope this wonderful Chilean film finds a US distributor. I saw this at an American Cinematheque presentation in Hollywood. I had never heard of the director before. The themes are somewhat hackneyed--the corrosive and ultimately destructive influence of power and megalomania on a seemingly stable personality; the devastating effect of European colonizers on the Indians; the frontier as a repository for all kinds of misfits, adventurers, loners, and psychopaths. There are signs of the influence of such films as "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" and "Viridiana." Yet, it all works, and powerfully. This certainly deserves an audience beyond the cinematheque and art house circuit. See it if you can!
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A powerful epic drama at the south extreme of South America.
zorzalcg10 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It was a very interesting film for me. I confess that, previously, I had never heard about a character named Julius Popper. But he really was a shady historical figure, a kind of "conquistador" of the late nineteenth century, who was driven to the island of "Tierra del Fuego" in the southernmost extreme of South America, in search of gold, glory, power, lands and adventure not necessarily in this order. The movie was based in a book of tales entitled "Tierra del Fuego" written by the prestigious novelist born in Chile, Francisco Coloane and in documents like diaries. photographs and chronicles of Popper himself. The locations in the film are imposing. They show us a forbidden landscape, semiarid and very cold, slanted rays of sun that generate long shadows and a desolated beach of rocks and rubble constantly being buffeted by the gelid ocean water. The starring role is fulfilled with great power and authority by the Cuban actor Jorge Perugorría. Popper is portrayed as a man full of contradictions, sometimes a genius, an inventor, an engineer, a scientist, others a madman, a little Hernán Cortés, an impractical dreamer and sadly and finally, a responsible for a genocide. His followers are the human derelicts of various nationalities, frustrated people that have been pushed or have fled from their countries, and they have arrived at the end of the known world against all hope looking for fortune. They are easily rallied by the charismatic Popper. Novak (Nelson Villagra), the implacable military man, Silveira (Nacho Novo), the Spanish bagpipe player born and brought up in Galicia with a tragic background, Shaeffer((Álvaro Rudolphy), the drunkard and Spiro (Claudio Santamaría), the Italian fortune hunter. And there are two women in the adventure of Popper. Armenia (Ornella Muti), head of a group of prostitutes. She was very effective in the role. Like always, when is required, she delivers a strong performance, and the only catch in these case, is that she has not enough time in the screen to fully develop her character. Armenia is the financial backer and partner of Popper and constantly reminds him that he came to this forgotten of God place, to find gold and make a fortune for both. She is finally disappointed and her no- nonsense attitude is very clear in front of the grandiloquent delusions and bad decisions of Popper. She ends up joining Spiro, knowing that gold is a chimera and that the real riches are found in working the land and breeding sheep, like others landowners do in that region. Mennar (Tamara Acosta) is the other woman in the story. Ex slave of Armenia, she is freed by Popper who is fascinated for her beauty and dignity and when he knows that she is a queen of the "Onas" (Selknam), he dreams of creating an empire mixing both cultures and bringing the tribe from the barbarity to civilization. Of course, the aborigines resents the slave work that they are forced to do and the lack of a common language, further increases the frustration and they flee, seeking refuge in their natural habitat. In a fit of rage Popper incites to the genocide, offering a reward in gold for whoever kills a native and bring back a sample of his deed, meaning an ear or a genital. Unfortunately this killing was an historical fact that blackened once more the history of the conquest of America. The film was directed by Miguel Littin, an experimented Chilean director who also took part in the writing of the script. It was said that the result was not satisfactory, that the narrative was confusing and the characters were shallows. But this whole historical episode is in itself messy. I liked the professionalism of the cast and the impact of the story. Thanks to this film, I took conscience for the first time of the existence of Julius Popper, his crazy scheme for harvesting gold out of the sea water and the tragic clash of different cultures that almost wiped out the tribe of the "Onas" (Selknam).
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Civilisation running amuck into chaos at the end of the world
clanciai16 December 2022
It's an impossible story on which they have made an impossible film. It is very debatable in its outrageous bluntness going to extremes in sticking to truth and realism, and the subject is brutal and primitive. A Romanian adventurer Julius Popper goes to the end of the world, the Tierra del Fuego beyond geography in the 1890s to search and enterprise for gold, he drums up a team of drunkards, outcasts, misfits and scoundrels to support him in his engineering project, financed by Ornella Muti as the leading local prostitute, the best actor of the film, always impressive, and they set forth across the Strait of Magellan for their grandiose quest, which ends in bloodbath as the crusade derails into a genocide of the local Indians, who refuse to work for them as slaves. It is a grotesque epic of the worst characteristics of man when they bolt out of control, but the film is not disinteresting. Its main interest is that it is filmed on location, the sustained realism is convincing, all the actors are good although they have to do their worst, the imagery and cinematography is fascinating to say the least, and there are even touches of intriguing surrealism. Fellini would have liked this film, Buñuel would have loved it, while its character on the whole is rather forbidding and deterrent: it's not a film you would recommend to anyone.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed