Quarantine (TV Movie 2000) Poster

(2000 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
It's so bad it's funny
skopi5 August 2000
This is basically The Stand but with bad acting and a poorly thought out plot. A terrorist group has developed a deadly virus and it is unleashed on the world. I will give some things away here so stop reading if you don't want to know.

A number of pretty stupid plot points happen: 1. The President and key personnel are quarantined on an island off of Washington. Of course, they announce to the world where this island is. (that would probably be kept secret) 2. A flamboyant financier tries to land on this island with 12 kids (and low fuel) and is almost shotdown, but spared at the last second. They allow it land and park on the runway but indicate anyone who gets off will be shot. Um, wouldn't there be extra airplane fuel around. Gas it up and send it back out! 3. The lab where they are trying to find a cure for the disease is not quarantined until it spills. 4. They realize they made need medical help for the kids on the plane, but there are no doctors on the island except some former country club doctor. Um, wouldn't there be some doctors as part of the President's essential personnel? 5. A flight attendant (I guess) just happens to be part of the Bleeding Sword terrorist group that created the virus. He eventually takes the plane hostage and forces a face-to-face meeting with the President to tell his story (his village was hit by so-called 'smart bombs'). There is a gunfight and the President dives to catch the virus he has brought to infect him. Oh, this guy who was smart bombed had absolutely no accent.

It was just bad. The acting was horrible and melodramatic. It was a laugh riot!
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
enough ham around for lots of sandwiches
fookoo25 September 2003
It could have been worse. This movie is at the low end of expectations for a made for tv film. Fortunately, it is not available on DVD or VHS tape and had to be taped off of tv with commercials intact, but zappable. Most of the bad acting can probably be blamed on the script, because it is hard to conclude that what is up on the tv screen is nothing less than corny. The movie begins realistically enough but quickly goes downhill with lots of the dialog feeling forced and overly sentimental. At least Nastassja Kinski has the lead role as the scientist who has to find a cure for a bio-warfare, fatal virus. She and her on-screen daughter are the only ones to escape from the script alive and only because of Nastassja's screen presence that carries most of the scenes that she is in. Early on, Nastassja, dressed in a black Ninja type outfit, is a member of a destroy mission, somewhat reminiscent of Nikita of "La Femme Nikita," the tv series. Then she is plunged into a poorly thought out remake of "The Andromeda Strain," but without the aid of Michael Crichton. If the script were actually realistic, then we poor American citizens are in a world of trouble because the so-called national security is not even second rate, but probably fifth rate. If the writers are smart, they would be wise to never admit that they wrote this script because it has been very poorly researched with god-awful dialog and situations that only a real professional like Nastassja can escape, including a scene that seems to have been lifted out of "Paris, Texas." Most of the acting is hammy and some might find that amusing or something to laugh at because it is so bad.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bitter Sweet Sympathy
F1ame21 October 2001
Sweet: I have to defend the writer of the film who did manage to get a certain amount of emotional situations into the film. I found the acting to be Ok. It is always difficult to act or judge acting in fictitious films of this nature. How do we know how people would cry about dying relatives etc? I know I've never been in a situation where 50% of the world population was dying. But I have seen people distressed crying and they would be deemed unrealistic in a film.

Bitter: Most of this film is embarrassing. Despite being English I know that America has tighter security on its president than we do on the Royal family and the PM put together, so the whole island, planes, terrorist bit really made it difficult to take any of this film seriously.

Sympathy: For the people who were conned by the, "I've got a great film where a deadly virus sweeps the planet, the president is caught between his job and his family who are desperate to help the suffering. This woman is fighting for a cure but ends up quarantined from her daughter who resents her mother being away from her after her fathers death."

"Hey this has real dramatic potential... no wait, wait, who filled it out with this pile of....
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nothing good about this film
leusch-16 December 2004
This is actually the worst movie I've ever seen. There's so much to complain about that I don't really have time to list it all. Low budget doesn't normally mean bad movie, but in this case - wow! It's so bad, in the worst way possible, that it's not even worth seeing just for a laugh, one only gets irritated. I never got the feeling that the world is in trouble at all since nothing was shown. No one seems to care about anyone, not even close family, at least not more than for appearances. There's no time line. You never get a clue what the virus does, how long incubation time is, why you die from it or anything, and it seems you live for quite a while after getting the disease even though it's supposed to be the worst ever, the virus just isn't believable in any way, neither is the cure. They tell everyone about the presidents place of hiding, on national TV. The presidents only concern is his own wellbeing.

I could go on for the rest of the night, but I don't want to tell to much about the storyline. However, don't watch this crap. The makers should get arrested.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A classic!
redkiwi23 August 2002
Definitely a made for TV B-movie stereotype at its best. A disease is killing the human race, and its down to the first family to save the world. Aint America great?

Absolute cack, starring LA Law reject Harry Hamlin as Mr President.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
SAVE THESE SOULS
nogodnomasters28 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
In an attempt to prevent Eastern European terrorists from unleashing a deadly biological agent upon the world, the US accidentally does the same. This poses serious problems for President Kempers (Harry Hamlin) who is worried about re-election and the head researcher at the CDC Dr. Galen Bronty (Nastassja Kinski). Their efforts to save the world must be balanced with the only two teen girls on the planet who actually want to spend more time with their parents.

Judging from the breaks in the film, it is easy to tell this was made for TV. It also includes a low budget made for TV sound track and some extra drama, like a jet full of children, because saving the world can not possibly fill all 86 minutes. Almost laughable.

This is part of a 6 pack of films "Contagious Outbreaks" I obtained at Walmart from the $5.00 bin.

Parental Guide: No f-bombs, sex, or nudity.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I would prefer to watch Sunday morning infomercials
martin_mix22 June 2013
There were some decently entertaining moments early on, but Quarantine quickly became atrocious. Beyond the bad special effects and boring plot line we are forced to not only accept that the president of The United States of America would routinely put his family and himself in harm's way to comfort the dying, but also we're supposed to accept that it's the right thing to do. This movie starts out mildly entertaining, moves to "so bad it's funny" and winds up at beyond the funny kind of bad and ends on miserable to endure. If you want a good movie, see the Quarantine that takes place in an apartment building. It's much better. If you want a cheesy movie, see Sharktopus.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
?????????????????
kras257 October 2002
Why people vote so low ?,i cant see what i wrong on this movie ,i saw worse...,and you have to think also in the back of your head it is a TV movie so that means less money to make that film..,i think they forgot that ,so the film is about a virus that comes free on a plane cash and than you see the results if such thing can happen...,very realistic if you think of the real life now Anthrax ....and that kind of stuff...so...i think people rate it too low they underestimated the script,the crew also was good a few good actors and actresses.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheeeeeeeeese!
owenblacker5 January 2002
This film is absolutely appalling! It is so cheesy that it's almost impossible to turn over. ~I~ could provide better security than the Secret Service are depicted with. ~I~ could provide been biological analysis than the CDC are depicted with.

I admit I may not be the #1 fan of the US, but even I am offended at how incompetently and unrealistically everyone is portrayed as being.

The science is shot to hell, the reality is shot to hell. The guys who wrote this script have not a single clue -- do they even live in this reality? *GRIN*

All that said, if you enjoy 1980s-style, unrealistic, paranoid, badly-made, badly-acted B-movies, you will watch this and giggle at how much one may gather by scraping the bottom of the barrel. New depths in storytelling are plumbed in every minute. More clichés than you can shake a stick at, effects undeserving of the sobriquet "special", acting so bad that you know babies better at it and more cheese than France, Holland, Switzerland and the whole of Scandinavia.

If you want a good story, well told, look elsewhere. If you have nothing better to do than watch a film where everyone involved in it should never be employed again, then sit back and enjoy!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed