Shroud for a Nightingale (TV Mini Series 1984) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Nurses Home full of bed time secrets!
wendylaing23 August 2000
Unfortunately this show is not readily available to the public on Video! Having seen the show on television, I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed it. It is a fairly accurate adaptation of P D James's Novel"A Shroud for a Nightingale" The cast is excellent and Roy Marsden is perfectly cast as the central hero, Adam Dalgliesh. Joss Ackland, plays the egotistical Courtney-Briggs to perfection and Sheila Allen, the seemingly aloof Matron Mary Taylor, exuding vibes of attraction for Adam.

One scene stole the show! The scene where Dalgliesh interviews a slightly drunk Delia Dettinger (Margaret Whiting) The parody of 'above and beyond the call of duty' is beautifully played by Marsden and Whiting. The result, is humour underscored by underlying erotica between the two, with only a necktie being removed! Great stuff, which only such British actors can succeed in ! If it comes to your screens in a repeat, I recommend it!
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What an apt title.
Sleepin_Dragon20 November 2020
Shroud for a Nightingale is definitely one of my favourite adaptations, and possibly my all time favourite book from P.D James. It translates very well from text to screen, the only real problem, it's overlong.

The first thing that will grab your attention, the names of those appearing, some of the very best, including Sheila Allen, Liz Fraser, and of course the wonderful Joss Ackland.

I absolutely love the first two episodes, the hospital makes for a great setting, you see the hospital running well, but scratch the surface and underneath we discover hidden passions, lies, blackmail and of course murder.

It does dip in the middle a little, and part four offers you virtually nothing, it's so dull, but the final episode is a really dramatic conclusion.

Tame by modern standards, but I imagine that some of the themes they dealt with were pretty controversy for a 1984 audience.

Richard Harvey's music as always is enchanting and glorious.

I loved it, 8/10.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
an absorbing mystery; large and varied cast
zemboy21 March 2009
A very interesting, varied and believable cast including numerous student nurses, their teachers and a hospital surgeon. Wonderful acting performances by the younger actresses and by the actress playing Mary Taylor. Interesting, sometimes difficult interactions between Dalgliesh and Massingham when one or both are experiencing stress, beautifully acted by both men.

The scene with Dalgliesh and the aging widow was not erotic at all but more painful and pathetic; only Dalgliesh's wish for information kept him in the room with this drunken person whose behavior was puzzling if not downright unbelievable. The Australian woman who found it erotic must be very young; it was actually an ugly scene.

A fascinating mystery, otherwise.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Shroud for a Nightingale - Pointless Deletion of Scenes!
mcannady126 October 2014
I had reviewed this title about two years ago and still find it to be the very best mini-series from P.D. James. Tied closely with A Taste for Death in my list of favorites, the story is beautifully enacted by Roy Marsden and the rest of the cast. The nurses are beautifully portrayed as well as Mr. Courtney Briggs, the surgeon. A budding romance with Mary Taylor (Sheila Allen), the nursing school administrator, is also quite touching, as AD works through the list of suspects and the facts surrounding the murder of the two nurses at the training school. Dalgliesh can be both dominant and subtle in his quest for truth and justice. I especially like the flashbacks as AD meets the nurses and their friends and loved ones.

The denouement was beautifully and frighteningly portrayed as in the book, but there are some scenes missing. Some of these aspects are important to the story

This is how it appears on my current boxed set on DVDs I ordered from a BBC catalog about ten years ago. (About 20 years ago I experienced the same problem when I purchased the boxed set on VHS Not knowing the exact running time, I had taken a chance - both times. Though beautiful resolution and great acting, we just don't have the complete story) I would have given this one 10 out of 10 stars, but feel it is too bad that there are some pointless cuts. I had mentioned on a review board earlier about seeing this series on TV not long after it was first shown on Mystery! and taped it on VHS. When viewing it with my hubby, we found it to be an exciting, cohesive story. When I needed an extra VHS one day. I taped over it, sadly. In the 90's I ordered the set from a BBC catalog on VHS and noticed vital scenes missing. The same thing occurred about 10 or 12 years ago when I ordered the set on DVD. So I have both sets now without a few minutes of that footage. The same things are missing on the DVD boxed set.

I hope to find the real running time so I can purchase the set again on DVD. A response on a message board says I can get the series complete from Amazon in the UK. The question is, can I? Or was the series cut for good? The answer is NO.

I do wonder about the reason for the edit. (This also occurred with A Taste for Death, my other favorite mini-series.). In Shroud, I think one of them is really integral to the plot and is clearly stated in the book. It really makes all the difference when we see the inner AD.

IF anyone could help me in finding the original running time of this series, I would be so appreciative. It still remains at nearly the pinnacle of AD favorites, but was originally so much more.

Footnote: A friend purchased the Chronicles and the same unkind cuts occur there too. I noticed in her set that it says the best possible reenactment of the Series and how P.D. James was very pleased. I am surprised, but she wrote so many fine works that it must have been hard to keep track. She is my all-time favorite mystery writer. (I do think that they all look splendid if the viewers of the 80s and 90s like myself had not spotted the omissions).

I am hoping to find someone who taped the Series on VHS in reasonably good quality and can let me borrow a copy. (This would have been in the late 80s - early 90s time frame). At this stage they had a chance of being complete.

I am surprised about concerns for resolution. I have concerns for a complete story the way it was intended.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Shroud" ain't for my crowd
El Cine29 October 2010
Being 5 hrs. long, shot on "live" film stock resembling soap operas and taped plays, and having a cast of typically good British actors, a miniseries like "Shroud for a Nightingale" (SfaN) is certainly a unique and potentially very good viewing opportunity. SfaN falls far short of that potential, however.

Since adaptations of mystery novels often suffer from short running times and insufficient consideration of clues, you would think a 5-hr. miniseries format would be ideal for letting the viewer try to solve the mystery herself. Thus it's disappointing when, after investing so much time, SfaN gives up on the "fair play" solve-it-yourself aspect, choosing simply to reveal the answer in a way that no viewer could discover. (And it's not the only Dalgliesh miniseries to do this.) Strangely, SfaN goes on and on for 5 hours but never seems to think about clues any more than a 90 minute movie.

In fact, SfaN fails to maintain coherence or resolve some basic questions, even as it wastes time on redundant scenes. A character's mysterious knowledge of a victim's private financial details is treated as suspicious, then never explained. Certain innocent suspects act excessively secretive for no apparent reason. Meanwhile, events that could be conveyed in seconds are given minute upon minute of dead time. In the end, there's no reason this program should be 5 hrs. long.

One "mystery" is why sidekick Massingham, typically so accommodating to his bossy boss, suddenly spazzes out a couple of times. Goodall remarks that fellow nursing student Fallon is old compared to most students, yet Goodall looks at least 40. Weirdest of all is the scene of a drunk dancing to music from "The Godfather!" This precedes a sudden, absurd turn to bedroom farce, only enjoyable because it takes the priggish Dalgliesh down a notch.

Speaking of whom...

Lots of film fans understandably chafe at formulaic Hollywood conventions, like the insistence on making main characters "likable." However, doing the exact opposite, and having a main character who is completely unlikable, simply isn't viable for a 5-hr. miniseries. SfaN does this, and it's a serious detriment. Dalgliesh here may be the most insufferable, imperious detective protagonist I've seen. He acts like his greatest aspiration is to treat suspects as disrespectfully, even cruelly, as possible. Most of the time, my reaction was, "(insert vulgar phrase) this guy"...and to think, "Why should I spend my time with this character?"

He's associated with another series problem. Reactionary moralizing seems to surface now and then in the Dalgliesh shows I've seen. It feels just as weak and outdated as the appearance of Dalgliesh himself -- balding, mustachioed, forever in 3-piece suits and blue tie.

SfaN is not as bad as another Dalgliesh series, in which Dalgliesh went up to a sexually active bachelorette who was unconnected with the crimes, and basically blamed her promiscuity as partly responsible for what happened. Still, when one or two promiscuous people in SfaN question if Dalgliesh disapproves of their activity, he only stares at them stonily for a moment, then asks something else.

In a series that gives the soapbox to no less than three anti-abortion advocates, it would've been nice to also have at least one person stand up for a prochoice outlook. Predictably, but still annoyingly, no less than a minister persuades the pregnant woman to change her mind and not have her abortion. A holy roller proves to be a hypocritical blackmailer, but the series quickly brushes her off as an anomaly from a tiny radical sect. This time around, lesbians lose out on the sympathetic portrayal they got in "Death of an Expert Witness" -- here, they're all misandrist, crooked, and/or dirty old women.

The one challenge to this reactionary tinge is a scenario made from the blackest of irony -- a character prays for God's guidance to a good life, literally at the same time s/he unwittingly finishes his/her murderer's job with his/her own two hands. The angriest of atheists would avoid writing such a scene as too contrived!
3 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nightingale soars to great heights
gingerninjasz21 July 2023
After the slow start with the 7 episode Death of an Expert Witness, the next adaptation of a P. D. James novel - the intriguingly named Shroud For a Nightingale - is reduced to 5 episodes and proves to be a compelling watch. The title refers to the names of the student nurses who reside at Nightingale House, a training school that sits in the grounds opposite the hospital where paying patients go to be treated. The shroud is, omniously enough, for one or more of the nurses who during this mystery will fall prey to a killer. But who, and why?

The story itself is originally concerned with the arrival at the hospital of Martin Dettinger (yes, that IS Richard Marner from 'Allo 'Allo), a gun runner who Dalgliesh is sent to question regarding the death of a witness in a fraud case. Many would like to see Dettinger dead, not least high up officials in government who he (unofficially) did deals for, and Dalgliesh becomes convinced that Dettinger is being framed for convenience sake. But whilst there Dettinger recognizes one of the staff from his past, but is not entirely certain where. However, while it looks as if Dettinger will be the victim, it turns out it is not him who is the first to die. That falls to student nurse Heather Pearce (Deborah Findley), who is the night nurse assigned to look after him. She is also a petty blackmailer who has already got her hooks into fellow student Christine Dakers (Natalie Ogle) after spotting her picking up money dropped by one of the other nurses. The scene where she blackmails Dakers in her room is somewhat amusing, especially the affronted tone she puts on when Dakers baulks at paying her. "No, not to me. This money is 'dirty', Christine," she says distastefully. Pearce pretends that she is doing it for Dakers' own spiritual wellbeing, but amusingly lets the facade slip when leaving. "I pray for you," she tells her, before adding "Cash." When Dalgliesh discovers Pearce is Dettinger's nurse he wants to question her, but he has to wait as Pearce is used as the human guinea pig in nasal gastric feeding training for the other nurses - yikes!. (When one nurse suggests rectal feeding I couldn't help but smile, as all I could visualise afterwards was one of the nurses desperately trying to feed a hamburger that way to an unfortunate patient they were treating). As it is, the demonstration leads to a memorable scene where Pearce is poisoned by the feed up her nose. But as Dalgliesh begins his investigations things are further complicated when he discovers that the original person due to play the patient was not Pearce, but Jo Fallon, who pulled out sick only that morning. Fallon herself has discovered she is pregnant, but parentage is not entirely certain. Was she the intended victim or Pearce? And if it was Pearce, is it because of her blackmailing or what she may of overheard during Dettinger's drug induced sleep? Or something else as yet unknown?

The first episode sets up this mystery perfectly as it establishes the lives of the student nurses and staff living there. As well as the above mentioned, there is also Sister Mavis Gearing's relationship with a married man, surgeon Stephen Courtney-Briggs' former affair with student Jo Fallon, while lesbianism appears again in P. D. James land with Sister Rolfe's infatuation with student Julia Pardoe, plus the special relationship between Matron Mary Taylor and Sister Brumfett - though that is somewhat more ambiguous. The many plot threads make fascinating viewing as we and Dalgliesh try to establish just why Pearce died and if she was the intended target. Roy Marsden is superb in this, ranging from gentle and probing to direct and brutal, and a few times he is surprisingly rude (for Dalgliesh's standards), such as when he questions Courtney-Briggs (Joss Ackland) over his relationship with Jo Fallon. Ackland is wonderful in this, with his charismatic performance and deep fruity voice. He rises to the occasion, as do a number of the actresses in this. I particularly loved the friendship Dalgliesh forms with Matron Taylor (Sheila Allen) and their well scripted conversations they have between them, and Sheila Allen makes Matron a warm and likeable character. She is also one of the few that has a well established alibi, unlike the others at Nightingale House. I also liked Andree Evans as Sister Rolfe, her misandry and contempt for men barely concealed as she more than holds her own against Dalgliesh's questionings. But she is equally touching when displaying her infatuation with Julia Pardoe (Judi Maynard) and the gradual realisation that at her age she stands little chance of a relationship with the younger (and shallow) Pardoe. Thelma Whiteley is effectively intimidating as Brumfett, but Liz Fraser as Sister Mavis Gearing is more of a Mavis Wilton from Coronation Street and as such seems a less obvious suspect to be a killer (or is she?). Fraser would give a much better performance in Miss Marple's Nemesis in 1987.

As for the students, performances range from perfunctionary to good. Of the more notable is Eleanor David, who gives an assured and intelligent performance as Jo Fallon, who discovers she is pregnant and uncertain whether to keep the child or not. She also supplies the one surprising moment of nudity in this - something I wasn't expecting! Rosalyn Elvyn carries much of the emotional baggage as Madeline Goodall, and her interrogation scenes with Dalgliesh are surprisingly uncomfortable, with Dalgliesh remarkably hard on her. The aptly named Natalie Ogle is sweet as Christine Dakers, but apart from Lynne Pearson as Diane Harper (who departs after two episodes) the acting could be a little sharper among the students. As could some of the dialogue early on, which is a little bit clunky. There is one scene where Dakers collapses after scalding herself. As the others race in, Sarah Thomas (of Last of the Summer Wine fame) declares "She's scalded herself," while Marcia Tucker cries out "It's her leg!" Talk about stating the bleeding obvious, and Tucker must of been cursing her luck being lumbered with such dialogue. And speaking of sitcom stars, this also contains Allo Allo's Richard Marner, who is surprisingly good as Dettinger, while Only Fools & Horses stars Lennard Pearce and Buster Merryfield also appear. While Merryfield is rather too clipped and mannered as the pathologist Miles Honeyman, Pearce is much more convincing with his whisky voice as the gate keeper Mr Coles in what was his last role before he died.

As it is, it tells the strength of this production that it is able to rise above such minor irritations to become a hugely compelling mystery. It is full of memorable moments, such as the stormy night in episode 2 that leads to a 2nd murder, plus the fire in the summerhouse in the climatic final episode. Even the interrogation scenes are hypnotic, and the eventual revelation proves to have a huge emotional impact that makes Shroud for a Nightingale one of P. D. James' best adaptations. I am torn between this and Taste For Death as the best in the series, but this certain ranks as one of the most rewarding.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Inane melodrama
movieolla14 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Watched it all in one sitting...which made it easy to spot the multitude of unresolved/unexplained "motives." Lots of inconsistency, and an ending that could be spotted from afar. Among the plot challenges: Why DID Goodall conceal the inheritance issue? What was the significance of orphans? Where were the first and second year students? And the ridiculous transformation of Mrs. Dettinger from outraged, uptight grieving widow to blowzy tart.

Some elements were excellent, such as the way stress and fear stripped relationships to the bone, and Dalgliesh's conflicted emotions upon discerning the truth. Mostly though, it was terribly melodramatic and silly.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed