User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Imagine surviving 5000 years of history, and living to tell about it!
mark.waltz6 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Thornton Wilder's Pulitzer prize-winning play has never had a big screen movie version made of it, revived countless times and filmed for television, and available in this unique production starring Helen Hayes, Mary Martin and in a rare acting appearance, Broadway producer / director Legend George Abbott. This is based on a 1952 revival which starred Hayes and Martin, and from viewing it, it is obvious as to why display would be considered unfilmable. It would take someone with great imagination and foresight to figure out how to do it correctly, and even then, that would be a risk.

This three act play is an analogy of world history, focusing on one family who has survived from creation through World War II. Somehow, the patriarch George Abbott has become a man of influence, and he is speaking in Atlantic City when the great flood occurs. Later on, they deal with a World War (obviously based on the second one), and all of the problems that occurred humorously in the first two acts are dealt with any more dramatic fashion in act 3.

The regal Hayes is Abbott's wife, a hardworking, loyal woman who is stunned when her husband announces that he is leaving her for their maid, Martin. She has gone from lazy and wisecracking to glamorous and scheming, promising to take every husband away from their wife. Obviously she is representing sin, and this brings on the great flood. The more dramatic third Act deals with son Don Murray who has become as long as determined to get out from under the thumb of his father and this brings on the conflict between parents and son where the father has the desire to kill him for his betrayal.

It is not until the third act that it becomes clear why this play ended up winning a Pulitzer Prize. The light-hearted first two acts may have important messages, but they are overshadowed by the lightness of how the play is structured. The outanding cast is joined by character actress Florence Reed who emulates the original Sabina (Tallulah Bankhead) in her performance as an Atlantic City fortune teller. In the First Act, actors in costume as baby dinosaurs and woolly mammoths represent the early years of the Earth. It is very apparent that this is an analogy of man's basic immorality, and it is obviously a play that should really be seen on stage to fully appreciate it. However, this is a good way to introduce yourself to the characters, although it's changing in moods will be jarring for some.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Response to "This play is a ripoff"
kevinnscott5 May 2012
roadrunn's review of 28 May 2002 refers to the article "The Skin of Who's Teeth?" (sic) published in the Saturday Evening Post (sic) in 1945 (sic) --

"The Skin of *Whose* (emphasis in original) Teeth? or The Strange Case of Mr. Wilder's New Play and Finnegan's Wake" was serialized in two issues of the Saturday Review of Literature 25: December 19, 1942, at pp. 3-4 and February 13, 1943, at pp. 16-18.

From the Wikipedia article on Thornton Wilder, on the controversy surrounding the play: "It was claimed by Joseph Campbell and Robert (sic) Morton Robinson, authors of A Skeleton Key to Finnegan's Wake, that much of the play was the result of unacknowledged borrowing from James Joyce's last work. (Footnotes 5&6)

"5. Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson published a pair of reviews-cum-denunciations entitled 'The Skin of Whose Teeth?' in the Saturday Review immediately after the play's debut; these created a huge uproar at the time.

"6. Joseph Campbell, Mythic Worlds, Modern Words, New World Library, 2004, pp. 257-66 reprints the reviews and discusses the controversy."

From Great American Writers: Twentieth Century, edited by R. Baird Shuman (Marshall Cavendish, New York, 2002), pp. 1646-47: "Criticism of this play was, for several decades, tainted by a mean-spirited series of articles by Henry M. Robinson and Joseph Campbell essentially accusing Wilder of plagiarizing The Skin of Our Teeth from James Joyce's novel Finnegan's Wake. Subsequent critics have vindicated Wilder, whose borrowings are nothing like plagiarism. Wilder openly admired Joyce, on whom he frequently lectured . . . ."

Wilder himself wrote in the Preface to Three Plays: Our Town, The Skin of Our Teeth, The Matchmaker (Harper and Brothers, New York, 1957): "The play is deeply indebted to James Joyce's Finnegan's Wake. I should be very happy if, in the future, some author should feel similarly indebted to any work of mine. Literature has always more resembled a torch race than a furious dispute among heirs."
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Finnegan vs Antrobus
wmoore118 October 2015
So, Roadrunn doesn't like what Wilder did to "Finnegan's Wake?" He sure didn't review this broadcast nor prove to me he's read the Joyce book, which remains to me an illegible mystery. All he's said here is that he's a literary snob looking for a chance to show off.

Since I've not seen this broadcast in 60 years, I remember little about it. I'm not certain I would consider Mary Martin a good choice for Sabina, but Florence Reed recreates her role as the Fortune Teller from the original production, and Helen Hayes seems perfect casting for Mrs. Antrobus. It would be nice if VAI could release this broadcast as an alternate version of a wonderful comedy to the Old Globe production with Sada Thompson.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good example of the "Golden Age" of television.
BENNETT-125 June 2001
Warning: Spoilers
I remember seeing this on television in 1955 when I was eight years old. It was on a Sunday evening. I was stunned and totally mesmerized. It was much deeper then the usual fare shown on the video. I had to plead with my parents to let me stay up and watch the complete show after they ordered me to bed. It was a great experience. I saw the 1983 version so I was able to see it again as an adult. My hope is that some day the 1955 broadcast will be shown on cable.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rewrite of "Finnegans Wake" by James Joyce
roadrunn28 May 2002
This play is a rip-off of "Finnegans Wake" by James Joyce. There are literaly hundreds of parallels and Wilder took a four-line quote from Joyce's work verbatim, never crediting Joyce in the least.

Fortunately for Wilder, `The Skin of Our Teeth' was written in 1941, the `Wake' was published in 1939, with the war breaking out and Wilder being in the military nobody wanted to discredit a soldier.

But the facts remain. In 1945 the Saturday Evening Post published an article `The Skin of Who's Teeth, Part II' by Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson exposing the whole mess.

Cheaters never prosper.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed