Get That Girl (1932) Poster

(1932)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Silly Thriller Enlivened by Talmadge Stunts
boblipton17 April 2018
There's a plot to kidnap Shirley Grey so she won't inherit an estate and mad scientist/cocaine fiend/European Doctor Fred Malatesta will. Fortunately, Richard Talmadge is on hand to rescue her from Malatesta's secret-passage-and-men-standing-around-in-suits-of-armor-infested private sanatorium, despite the attempts of the police to arrest him.

Talmadge had started as a circus acrobat and broken into the movies as Douglas Fairbanks' stunt double. By the middle of the 1920s, he was starring in light-hearted adventure romps that featured his acrobatic hijinks. He continued starring throughout the early 1930s in state-right distribution vehicles (this one had 26 distributors according to the IMDb), but the production values were quite obviously cheap and the details often ludicrous, as here; only Talmadge's stonework, shot wild, remained top-notch.

Talmadge retreated to supporting work, stunt work, and stunt direction and prospered in the last field; his last credit was supervising stunts for HOW THE WEST WAS WON -- a fine career.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not real bad, but could have been a whole lot better with minimum work!
JohnHowardReid18 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Producer: Richard Talmadge. Not copyrighted 1932 by Richard Talmadge Productions, Inc. No New York opening. U.S. release through Mercury Pictures: 15 May 1932. 67 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: A tractor salesman rescues an heiress from the clutches of kidnappers, who were holding her prisoner at a sinister sanatorium run by sadistic Dr. Sandro.

COMMENT: Producer Dick Talmadge gives himself plenty of opportunities to demonstrate his acrobatic and stunting skills in this nonsensical story, set almost wholly on a speeding train and in a mad asylum. Whilst the plot is full of action, neither director nor writer do much to give it any atmosphere. The characters are underdeveloped, and the story comes to an abrupt conclusion.

With a little ingenuity, the asylum could have been turned into a more menacing house of horrors. The blue-tinted photography is certainly most pleasing, but it seems too warm and sunny for the set-piece old mansion full of hidden corridors, laboratory victims and torture chambers.

Nonetheless, Shirley Grey makes an attractively vulnerable heroine, though lacking the glamour and charisma that sensuous Geneva Mitchell brings to her reluctant villainess. Talmadge himself is naively personable. His voice, an American-accented light tenor, is said to be dubbed. Maybe, maybe not?
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent Ideas, but Lacking Elements
Reviews_of_the_Dead13 July 2022
This is a movie that I didn't know about until going through Letterboxd for horror from 1932. From the looks of it, this is another one that seemed light on the elements aside from the time it was made. I was able to find this streaming on YouTube to check out. Aside from this information, I came in blind.

Synopsis: a young girl, who is about to receive a large inheritance, is abducted to an isolated sanitarium where a crazed doctor is performing strange experiments.

We jump right in with a car chase. Ruth Dale (Shirley Grey) is trying to get to the train station. After her is a group led by a character played by Carl Stockdale. With him are henchman Schultz (Victor Metzetti) and Mike (Billy Jones). One of them is pretending to be a woman. With fancy driving from the taxi, she makes it to the station ahead of the gate locking. The guys after her aren't so lucky. Also arriving late is Dick Bartlett (Richard Talmadge). He jumps the fence to get on the train before it leaves.

On board, he takes a liking to Ruth. She got a telegram saying that a bodyguard will be waiting for her at the end of the line. She is slated to inherit money as the synopsis said. Due to this information, she believes Dick is part of the crew trying to kidnap her. She does warm to him as they go on.

The problem is that the trio also get on the next stop. Men working on the train notice Dick bothering her. This group of criminals accuse him and he's taken off the train in custody. He knows there's something wrong and gives the police the slip. He steals one of their cars to get to the next stop before it is too late.

This trio wants the money that Ruth is slated to inherit. They take her to a sanitarium where Dr. Sandro Tito (Fred Malatesta) works. The leader says he will keep Dr. Tito away from her if she will sign the money over to him. She refuses. There is only so long that this guy can keep Dr. Tito at bay. Dick also is limited on the time to rescue her with the police hot on his trail.

That is where I'll leave my recap for this movie as there isn't a lot to the story. When I was making sure I had the right one, I noticed that this was produced by Talmadge who also starred here. This feels like a movie is showcasing him. It looked like back in the day, he played in movies as the character of Dick. They would just change the last name. He also looked to do stunt coordinating in movies. I would imagine that all the stunts he did himself. This is impressive as there are multiple sequences of that. I'll give him credit for his performance as he is fine as an actor and his comedic timing was solid.

With that out of the way, even though there isn't a lot to the story, what we get works. We have Ruth who is inheriting a money and this gang wants it. This is a premise we got in wild west or gangster movies. What I found interesting is what puts this into the horror category for me. The leader of the gang's plan is to take her to this sanitarium where Dr. Tito works. This movie is pre-code to my knowledge and this doctor is ruthless. What is interesting is that this is the second movie from this year I've watched where a doctor is the villain. Dr. Tito isn't in on the plan that the leader is doing. There is only so much that can keep this doctor from hurting Ruth and the leader is using this to his advantage. I don't fully remember what the experiment he is doing and what the implications are, but he is still diabolic. I like this movie exploring this idea early into cinema. We have scientists like Dr. Frankenstein who are mad to succeed. Dr. Tito might be doing something for the good of humanity, but it feels more like he is torturing patients.

That's not much more I can delve into there, so I'll go to the acting. I've already said that Talmadge was good. Grey has a bit earlier in this movie when she is on the run. She gets taken though around the end of the first act. What I like she is that she has a good scream which helps Dick at different times. Malatesta is good as this mad scientist. He is quite creepy to be honest. Stockdale and his crew are good. There is also this plumber, played by James Guilfoyle. He is funny, because he forces his way in to complete the job he is hired for and ends up getting drunk on wine in the cellar. The acting is fine for what the movie needed in my opinion.

Last things to go into would be the filmmaking. I'd say that the cinematography is fine. It is fairly static, but we do get a few locations. There are some car chases that I wasn't necessarily expecting. We have a couple of train stations. There are ones in cars as well. The last would be the sanitarium that ends up being our third act. It is a creepy setting that works. There aren't a lot in the way of effects, but it also didn't need it. They do speed up the footage when Dick is being chased. That does add comedy. Other than that, the soundtrack didn't stand out to me. The version I watched on YouTube wasn't great, but it is hard for me to hold against the movie.

In conclusion, this movie is basic in its story. That's not to say that it is bad though. We have Ruth who is trying to get away from a group of villains. The idea of being held in a sanitarium against your will is terrifying. Add in a mad doctor, which makes it even worse. I thought that Talmadge was fine as our lead. The rest of the cast was solid. I'd say that the filmmaking here was decent. None of it stands out aside from things that Talmadge did there as well. This movie just had issues keeping my attention if I'm honest. I had to consult what notes I took to write this. That isn't a good thing with a runtime of just over an hour. This movie is just over average for me. There are solid aspects here that made it watchable, especially for the era.

My Rating: 5.5 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Super-low budgeted silent action pic made during the sound era.
planktonrules13 January 2016
The story in "Get the Girl" is simple. Dick (Talmadge) gets on a train where he meets an heiress heading to collect her fortune. However, if she doesn't arrive on time, Ruth (Shirley Grey) will forfeit her money--and a gang of hired thugs will do anything to stop her. Naturally, Dick comes to the rescue and spends almost the entire movie trying to save her from these crooks...as well as a mad doctor.

According to IMDb, while Richard Talmadge wasn't a famous movie star in the US, he was popular abroad (particularly in the USSR). When you see this film, it's easy to see why. Although he didn't have good looks, Talmadge was an acrobat...and he is VERY acrobatic in the film. And, since it was intended for international release, the film has a super-simple plot and is action-oriented. They didn't even bother adding any music to the movie--but relied almost exclusively on Tadmadge's physical stunts to carry the film. While Americans wouldn't think much of "Get That Girl", I could see how it would do better abroad...especially in countries where they hadn't yet switched to sound. In many ways, the film is like a silent action movie and simply adding a few intertitle cards could make it a silent. Overall, I'd say it's not a very good sound film but would make a dandy silent--particularly since the sound quality is rather poor.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sultry Geneva Mitchell Is the Reason to Watch!!
kidboots29 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Talmadge had started off as a stuntman and made a big splash in the Thanhauser serial "The Million Dollar Mystery" where his daredevil stunts got him noticed. By the end of the silents he had a high reputation as a stuntman and producer of solid action films but his soft, high pitched, slightly accented voice (he was from Munich) made him yet another talkie casualty. He kept up his stunt work and production company but now it was strictly small time and his films were released on a state's rights basis. In fact the death defying stunts are the best part of "Get That Girl" which also starred Shirley Grey, a pretty, sensitive actress whose career just didn't take off - she in turn had to compete with sultry Geneva Mitchell as Nedra, nymphomaniac wife of mad scientist Dr. Tito.

Grey plays Ruth Dale who is pursued onto the train by three men (one dressed as a woman!!) and she seems to think one of them is

tractor salesman Dick (Talmadge) who has persistently tried to be friendly with her but is tricked into making a disturbance and then thrown off the train. It's the old story, Ruth is an heiress and the three men are after her inheritance.

She is taken to an old sanitarium (followed closely by Dick) that is being run as a cover for oddball experiments. Drug addicted Doctor Tito ("you know what that stuff does to you") is experimenting with trying to turn women into mannequins - there are a few "unfortunate mistakes" lying around. There is one unexplained plot line. The old gardener brings forth a scream of recognition in Nedra, it is obvious that they know each other but that is not explained and later on the same elderly gentleman seems fascinated with Ruth and tries to help her escape but, again, that plot line is dropped and never explained!!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed