Ripley Under Ground (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Dead painters society
jotix10029 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The theory that a dead painter's work will increase the value of his pictures, is at the center of the story. Contrary to what we might have thought, young star Derwatt, a man who seems to have arrived in the world of art in London, does not quite rate as having the clout to push prices up if he is not around anymore. Derwatt, who loves to drive at high speeds suffers a fatal accident right after his adoring fans have bought all his paintings.

Tom Ripley, who is now living in London, shows no means of earning an income and faces eviction from his apartment. He runs with an arty crowd, that includes Derwatt, Bernard, an undiscovered, but talented painter on his own, gallery owner, Jeff Constant, and Cinthia, who seems to be a groupie into that scene. All of them have witnessed the accident and decide to have Bernard produce canvas as though they were Derwatt's ; after all, the guy can certainly imitate his friend's style to almost perfection.

Enter Neil Murchisson, a collector of Derwatt's paintings. He has come to buy more for the museum in Ohio he represents. Since all the production is sold, Ripley and his friends decide to press Bernard into creating a few pictures imitating Derwatt. Murchisson, who insists in buying the next batch of pictures, pushes a check into Jeff's hands, who in turn is convinced by Tom Ripley to continue the charade, knowing no one will find out the deceit.

Ripley, who has met the gorgeous Heloise Plisson at the opening, decides to follow her to France. Ripley, who comes into some money after the phony Derwatt's come into the market, decides he wants Heloise for himself. He is amazed by what he finds when he gets to France. Heloise, not only is gorgeous, but also she is immensely rich. Her father, who sees right through his daughter's friend, is powerless because the young woman is smitten from the start with Ripley, the gold digger.

"Ripley Under Ground", adapted from a Patricia Highsmith's novel, and directed by Roger Spottisgoode, doesn't quite have the punch that other, more successful films based on this character had achieved, most notably, in Rene Clement's "Purple Noon", and in Liliana Cavani's "Ripley's Game". Those earlier films have powerful and charismatic actors, Alain Delon, and John Malkovich, in the central role. Barry Pepper, an otherwise excellent actor, does what he can with his Tom Ripley, but doesn't quite pull it. "Ripley Under Ground" is by no means horrible, but it could have been better.

The basic problem with the screenplay by W. Blake Herron and Donald Westlake, is that it never settles into either a crime story, or an Euro-thriller. The best thing in the film is the ensemble cast that was gathered for it. Alan Cumming does quite well with the straight part, of the ambitious art dealer. Jacinta Barrett plays Heloise with charm. Claire Forlini, Douglas Henshall, Tom Wilkinson, and Ian Hart do good work for the director. Willem Dafoe appears as the American art lover who falls prey to the ambitions of these assorted group under the guidance of Tom Ripley.

There is an ironic twist at the conclusion of the film, which comes quite unexpectedly, but we had already sensed was a possibility.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Released at long last...
vhsiv21 September 2007
Filmed back in 2004, but left on the shelf for 3 years, 'Ripley Under Ground' aka 'White On White' has been released on DVD in Europe.

Barry Pepper plays Ripley as something of a low-key rock-star - long hair, a close shave and charisma to burn – and the tone of the thing is far lighter than any of the previous incarnations - 'Purple Noon' ,'The American Friend', 'The Talented Mr. Ripley', 'Ripley's Game', etc.

Some early reviewers have referred to it as a 'comedy', but it's not, really. Unfortunately, the lighter tone actually hurts the film a bit, because this outing paints Mr. Ripley as less of a menace and sociopath than any of the Ripley films that have preceded it.

This interpretation apparently sprang from a comment that Ms. Highsmith made about the films adapted of her novels: She apparently felt that the films missed the humor of her character and the droll wit of her dark plots. But the humor in this effort tends to undermines the suspense.

Beside having freed Mr. Pepper from the short-haired grunt roles that he usually plays, the film really allows Alan Cumming and Claire Forlani to shine in ways that they usually aren't allowed to when they are shoe-horned into American accents. She is officially excused from having participated in 'Meet Joe Black'.

It's a good, but not great film. The delight was seeing Barry Pepper stretch-out in the kind of role he's seldom given.

I typically enjoy the Ripley films and novels for their psychopathy, but this was different enough to be enjoyable. If you come across it on cable or the Shanghai bootleg carrels try not to overlook it.

*** out of *****
47 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Accidental, Not Purposely Ripley
j-penkair11 December 2015
This film is entertaining. Just imagine the character of Barry Pepper as someone else and not Ms. Patricia Highsmith's Thomas Ripley, you will be engrossed and not so disappointed. For me, I can't do that. I have already been impressed by both Matt Damon's and John Malkovich's Ripley, whose performances are so right one can't help feeling that they really play the same person at different ages, despite two completely different look and totally separate productions. I am not so sure who gets it wrong between Barry Pepper who plays him or Roger Spottiswoode the director. Thomas Ripley is not an accidental psychopath. He is a professional one who is completely conscious of all his actions and perfectly comfortable with them. He has excellent taste equipped with the vast knowledge of everything beyond his means, so he cheats, steals, and kills for such yearning. Tom Ripley never protests or acts against the mainstream. He simply has his own ways and means, and executes them rather effectively. Pepper's Ripley is not even close. His Ripley is boringly human, ordinary, and commonplace. He is supposed to be a genuinely evil spirit who lives well and excels among the sophistication of all kinds. Being an American does not stop him from being well-cultivated and subtle. Ripley's creator, Ms. Highsmith, was a big fan of him. She protested against people who made so much fuss about "a little murder" around them. See, Ripley is not a criminal but an artist of the most devious kind. This film does not get it. Furthermore, it is a poor choice of either the director or the script writer, or both, to apply comedic tone to this story. Ripley can be fun, but never comedic. Relief moments in Ripley's stories usually come with arts, good life, and stylishness. If your wish is to penetrate Mr. Ripley's mind, one of the most unique characters in the literary world, watch "The Talented Mr. Ripley" and "Ripley's Game" instead.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining But Lacks Depth
adamcarter-633724 March 2017
This movie has all the ingredients to be a compelling movie. It has a great cast, good director, and the co-writer of The Bourne Identity. However, the movie doesn't explore it's themes and characters enough. It doesn't make full use of its interesting premise. The whole thing wasn't utilized. The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999) was a fascinating thriller/drama with a fascinating performance from Matt Damon and many compelling themes. Tom Ripley is a complex character and his books/films need depth. However, if you are able to get over that, this film is entertaining. Just don't expect anything great.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Film takes a totally different direction from the first film, but is still good!
rogersrj29 January 2004
I was able to see a screening of White on White (which was called Ripley's Art) and was greatly surprised. Going into the film, I was thinking that it would be a very dark, serious film. However, the film is nothing like the first. This is much more of a dark comedy with some mystery aspects. If you liked the first film because it was so dark, then you probably will not like this film. Good performances from all the actors, but some of the lines were a little corny.

Overall, I enjoyed the film, but many of the people at the screening said they did not enjoy it.
41 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fair
giorgos-grigoriou5 November 2012
I randomly watched the movie in the TV,having no idea what i was going to see. Not bad but pretty fake at some point but even with the the cliché' of trying to be unpredictable,i enjoyed it.Tom Ripley with his friends are trying to hide the death of their talented painter-artist friend and make money out of his name pretending that he is alive but this isn't an easy job to do,Tom Ripley in his try to not be revealed is willing to do anything.....It is an average movie but it keeps your interest to watch it till the end,Barry Pepper's (Tom Ripley)acting was good and Claire Forlani(Cynthia) was the hottest in the movie,i enjoyed her sexy scenes and dialogs the most.So just fine to watch it but yet there is anything great to remember from the movie
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ripley buried
janjira-3127714 August 2017
RIPLEY UNDER GROUND (2005)

Tom Wilkinson. Simon Callow. Clare Forlani… The casting is fine with the unfortunate exception of Barry Pepper (excellent in The 25th Hour) who is miscast as Patricia Highsmith's Tom Ripley. Then again, this movie is only nominally a Ripley film. Why, because the misfiring slapstick of the screenplay taken with the frenetic "action" orientation of the pedestrian direction are wrong-headed. And that's a shame. Actors, however competent, cannot save films lacking intelligence, wit, subtlety, and style. Highsmith requires these four things, plus atmosphere. Postcard shots of a French château, jump cuts, and wooden dialogue just don't meet the mark. Nor is mere attitude (for example, an arty archness) any substitute for substance (in this case, the mental machinations of Mr. Ripley). And yet, there are worse movies on offer. Far worse.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unengaging average thriller
Enchorde12 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Recap: Tom Ripley is struggling to get by as a actor in London. However, as his credentials are discovered as fake and he is kicked out. But his friend, Derwatt, a painter, has just made it big. But Derwatt's proposal goes wrong and Derwatt kills himself. His friends, all in need of money, decides that it would be best if Derwatt was still alive and sold his paintings. Or better yet, still produced new paintings. So they hide the body and starts an elaborate plot to keep Derwatt hidden, but alive. But a lie needs a lie to cover it up. And soon events spin out of control.

Comments: It is unfortunately too clear that this is a (second) sequel that has lost budget and quality. The few effects are simply not good enough, but what is worse is that the story is not really believable or engaging. It's a little over the top, too many accidents or random events are just too convenient to Ripley and his games. And what might be the worst, Tom Ripley is hard to sympathize with. He lacks finesse and ingenuity, instead his answer are violence and murder to keep his lies covered up. It is not about false identities or a psychological game of hide and seek. It's a murder story gone wrong.

And when you lose interest in the lead characters, the movie is normally in deep trouble. This is, which is unfortunate because I like the cast. Barry Pepper, Alan Cumming, Claire Forlani, Tom Wilkinson and Willem Defoe is all good and talented actors. Most of them normally do much better productions than this.

5/10
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Forgeries and fake Ripley
ulicknormanowen28 April 2023
Highsmith 's excellent thriller -which is the follow-up to "the talented Mr Ripley" -has undergone some changes:in the book ,Tom was the owner of the desirable Belle Ombre château (he bought with Dickie Greenleaf's money ,;his victim's cousin appears in this episode ) and the happy husband of rich French heiress Héloise who has not got a single clue about her criminal husband's activities .

The screenwriters kept the proper nouns and a vague screenplay ,added some hot sex scenes, and produced a movie too hurried for comfort ; besides ,Barry Pepper is the worst Ripley I've ever seen (he's got top-notch competition :Alain Delon, Dennis Hopper ,Matt Damon and John Malkovich,and he 's not up to scratch) ,lacking charisma and giving a johnny-one-note performance ,displaying nothing of Highsmith's complex hero .When Willem Dafoe,easily the best actor of the cast ,appears ,one cannot help but wonder what this cerebral thespian could have made with the part of Ripley .Highsmith 's story was slow-moving,but inexorably building the suspense ; the movie multiplies the coincidences,the implausibilities at such a speed it's difficult to follow the plot if you don't know the novel ; it's no longer a psychological drama, it's an action-packed flick ,like so many others , sometimes verging on horror ....entertaining at best ,but Highsmith's buffs will fatally be disappointed .

French François Marthouret appears as Héloise 's daddy ,perhaps only to justify the would be cynical ending.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's not Highsmith's Ripley, but it's worthwhile anyway!
johannes2000-17 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a big fan of the novels of Patricia Highsmith. In the Ripley-series (5 novels) Tom Ripley is as charming as Highsmith's other (anti-)heroes, but he's also a psychopath in the "best" sense of the word: highly intelligent and totally void of any conscience. Another important feature is the unobtrusive way in which Ripley manages all his schemes: he's the quintessential boy-next-door whom no-one suspects of anything bad.

Now when you want a scrupulous rendering of Highsmith's novel to the screen, this movie fails. The script did use Highsmith's premise (the forgery of an already dead painter's work and how master-mind Ripley and his accomplices get away with it) but then gave it all kinds of twists and turns of its own. Here Tom can hardly be called an unobtrusive boy-next-door, he's actually a very sexy stunner (at many times he walks around shirtless to show-off his chiseled torso!), an active and sensual lady's man, which the original Ripley is very much NOT, in fact there are countless gay innuendo's in all of the Ripley-novels.

Anyway, as a movie in its own right it's fine enough. This Ripley is a very self-confident, ruthless and charming con-man who sets up a smart scheme of fraud and murder and wriggles his way into the bed and the wealth of a beautiful woman. The pace is fast, and besides action and suspense there's also lots of humor (which is definitely NOT Highsmithian by the way). Maybe that could have used some better editing, at times it's almost too much of a comedy (like the scene where Tom has to clean the blood of two giant white poodles after a killing).

The acting is overall very good, I especially liked Allan Cumming as the exasperated priggish gallery-owner. WIlliam Dafoe's name is prominently on the cover of the DVD, but he only has very limited screen-time. Tom Wilkinson as the intelligent adversary of Tom Ripley did a fine job, as well as Ian Hart as the misguided and abused Bernard, although I was a bit distracted by the idiotic hair-do they made him wear (a wig, I hope!). This leaves Barry Pepper as Tom Ripley. Now you wouldn't call him really handsome, but he has these remarkable features that are classical and rugged at the same time (an exciting combination!), he's charismatic, very physical, and plays the intelligent con-man with much flair and obvious fun.

All in all: I liked it, not as a Highsmith, but as a fine and entertaining movie in its own right.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very positive surprise !!!
kjartan-760-5682899 June 2010
I bought this, cheap on second hand DVD - and I didn't expect much. I had seen: "The talented Mr Ripley" and "Ripleys game" before - so I was a bit curious as to how this one would go down, because I haven't heard anything about it and that is usually a bad sign. - But.... I absolutely LOVED it. The plot was intriguing, and I loved the actors - and the ending - just perfect ! This is a movie I,m gonna watch again in a years time. At the end of this movie I actually raised my arms up and shouted: "Bloody hell!!! GREAT movie !!! There is also a bit of music in the middle of the movie when Tom goes to France I think for the first time - anyone know what music that is? Its beautiful.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A hidden Ripley gem!
fzane3 July 2019
I highly recommend it. It kept me in suspense until the last second, beautifully done!!! Ripley was on fire in this movie, and definitely 100% heterosexual, hahaha. After over 10 years of thinking it'd seen all the Ripley movies, this week i got to see one more!! What a treat!!! :-D The movie is almost a dark comedy, and i love that about it, even though it still has many serious moments as well. Definitely watch this one before "Ripley's Game" as it ties in perfectly with how that movie begins. Wow, what a ride!!! :-D
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great thriller
hellvair8717 July 2015
This is very good thriller.

I like very much black humor what make film in second level.

I'm always like Patricia Highsmith novel, but it's very hard make movie because filmmaker not always understand the humor what Patricia make in characters

But this films understand that very well.

CAST is PERFECT!

Barry Pepper is a good Tom Ripley!

Claire Forlani and Alan Cumming acting travesty in art people. it's very funny
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fun to watch :)
christinejoycruz8 May 2021
I was pleasantly surprised by the comedy and the ending actually made me smile. Barry Pepper as always delivered a great performance and is hot is in this movie. I felt bad rooting for Tom Ripley even though I know he's very naughty. He had a nice chemistry with Jacinda Barrett. Their tender scenes made me giddy. Alan Cumming and Claire Forlani were so amusing, Tom Wilkinson and Wilhelm Dafoe were very effective in their roles. This movie should have been given better publicity and distribution. Such a shame that it did not get the attention it deserved.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why no DVD release in the US?
ewassonphotography23 April 2019
I was able to watch this movie while on holiday in Thailand. I thought it was a great film with great acting and interesting scenes and scenarios. Although Dafoe's character was played, perhaps by the desired outcome of the director, a bit melodramatic. At any rate, it has always befuddled me as to how this film has literally no foot print in the US.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed