(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Nudity is all that matters
lor_2 October 2022
Despite the misleading capsule description and ridiculour Vinegar Syndrome hype, this is merely a late entry in porn's Softcore era, with snippets of explicit sex thrown in to keep up with the changing marketplace of 1970.

It's tedious, though busty full-frontal nudes are appealing to stare at when first shown. Nothing happens to sustain interest for a full hour, however.

Guys show up at a house where 5 beauties live in sort of a commune, and they are open to hiring studs from their newspaper ad, who can service them sexually. John Holmes, his long, limp dick a novelty to also stare at (at that time) is already on their payroll.

The simulated sex is very boring, with the usual hand over penis (to hide penetration, or at several times reveal it either intentionally or accidentally) style of fellatio and 69-sex-position providing those camera angles fans of Skinemax and Showtime After Dark decades later have suffered with watching cable.

So views of Uschi Digard and Maria Arnold, among others, provide minimal titillation. It would clearly suffice at a storefront theater when released, but revival five decades later is a waste of time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed